{ "schemaVersion": "iceqc.research-report.reader.v1", "document": { "id": "doc-iceqc-r-2008-02", "slug": "education-for-all-midpoint-progress-distance-data-uncertainty", "documentNumber": "ICEQC-R-2008-02", "title": "Education for All at Midpoint: Progress, Distance and Data Uncertainty", "subtitle": "A global policy and indicator assessment of progress since Dakar, the distance remaining to 2015 and the limits of available evidence", "family": "RESEARCH", "reportType": "THEMATIC_RESEARCH_REPORT", "researchCategory": "DATA_AND_INDICATOR_RESEARCH", "reportArchetype": "COMPARATIVE_INDICATOR_STUDY", "geographicScope": "Global", "ownerBody": "ICEQC Research and Policy Directorate", "publisher": "International Council for Education Quality Certification (ICEQC)", "publicIdentity": "ICEQC_ONLY" }, "version": { "id": "ver-iceqc-r-2008-02-en-2008-05-05", "edition": "2008", "versionLabel": "Published 2008-05-05", "language": "en", "authoritativeLanguage": "en", "status": "PUBLISHED", "publicationDate": "2008-05-05", "evidenceCutoffDate": "2008-05-05", "statusNotice": "This is the controlled English edition. Evidence and institutional status are stated as at the evidence cut-off date.", "summary": "Eight years have passed since governments and international institutions adopted the Dakar Framework for Action, and fewer than eight years remain before the 2015 horizon. The midpoint does not divide implementation into two equal tasks. Progress already achieved may have reached populations that were easier to serve, while the remaining distance is concentrated among children, young people and adults facing poverty, rural isolation, disability, conflict, discrimination or weak public provision. The final margin may therefore require greater institutional effort than the first." }, "publicationControl": { "matrixRecordId": "ICEQC-R-2008-02", "temporalBasis": "CONTEMPORANEOUS_AS_AT_PUBLICATION_DATE", "originalAuthorship": "ICEQC", "suggestedMainTextWords": 33000, "suggestedTechnicalAnnexWords": 6500, "suggestedTotalWords": 39500, "actualMainTextWords": 40744, "actualTechnicalAnnexWords": 0, "actualTotalWords": 40744 }, "frontMatter": { "executiveSummary": [ "Eight years have passed since governments and international institutions adopted the Dakar Framework for Action, and fewer than eight years remain before the 2015 horizon. The midpoint does not divide implementation into two equal tasks. Progress already achieved may have reached populations that were easier to serve, while the remaining distance is concentrated among children, young people and adults facing poverty, rural isolation, disability, conflict, discrimination or weak public provision. The final margin may therefore require greater institutional effort than the first.", "The available global evidence shows important movement in access and gender parity, but the pace and distribution are uneven, and several goals remain difficult to measure directly. Enrolment does not establish attendance, completion or learning. Adult literacy estimates draw on methods of unequal strength. Youth learning needs do not have one agreed global indicator. Early childhood policy extends beyond the boundary of pre-primary education captured in ordinary statistics.", "This report assesses progress, the distance remaining and the uncertainty surrounding both. It does not issue a new global estimate. It establishes the conditions under which reported change can inform policy: comparable definitions, aligned populations and reference dates, disclosure of revisions, distributional analysis and a clear distinction between observed values and projections. It further examines the institutional and financial conditions that determine whether acceleration is plausible.", "The central conclusion is that global and regional improvement must be read with the absolute number still underserved and with inequalities within countries. A favourable average can coexist with persistent exclusion. Conversely, improved administrative coverage may initially worsen a reported indicator by revealing learners previously absent from the data. Neither result can be interpreted responsibly without the underlying source record." ], "keyFindings": [ "The midpoint is a policy checkpoint, not evidence that half of the required institutional effort has been completed. 2. Progress should be reported through both rates and the absolute populations still excluded or underserved. 3. Primary enrolment gains do not by themselves establish timely entry, attendance, completion or learning. 4. The six Education for All goals have unequal measurement maturity; comparison should not manufacture common precision. 5. National averages conceal large differences associated with wealth, residence, disability, gender, language and conflict. 6. Trend analysis must mark changes in population estimates, programme classification, provider coverage and collection methods. 7. Projections to 2015 are conditional scenarios. Their assumptions and sensitivity to the period selected should be public. 8. Education quality requires evidence on learning opportunity, teachers, materials and time as well as participation. 9. Finance and institutional capacity determine whether accelerated progress is operationally credible. 10. Missing and weak data are distributed unequally; the least visible populations are often those at greatest risk of exclusion." ], "scopeAndMethod": [ "The report covers the six Education for All goals and the principal cross-cutting conditions that determine access, continuity, learning and equity. It uses global and regional evidence available by 5 May 2008 and adopts the Dakar commitments as the primary policy frame. The Millennium Development Goals provide a related but narrower basis for examining universal primary education and gender.", "The method separates three questions. *Progress* concerns comparable change since a stated baseline. *Distance* concerns the gap between the latest observation and the defined goal, including the number of people affected. *Uncertainty* concerns sampling, coverage, classification, population estimates, model assumptions and evidence gaps that materially limit the conclusion. None should be inferred solely from the other two.", "Sources include global monitoring reports, international classifications, survey guidance, rights instruments and policy evidence on equity and inclusion. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities entered into force on 3 May 2008, two days before the report cutoff; its status is stated only as at that date.", "No later estimate, revision, policy decision or evaluative finding is used. Where evidence cannot support a direct conclusion, the report states the interpretive requirement rather than filling the gap with an assumed value." ] }, "parts": [ { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "number": "I", "title": "Early childhood care and education", "anchor": "part-i-early-childhood-care-and-education", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-1", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-2", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-3", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-4", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-5", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-6", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-7", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-8", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-9", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-10" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "number": "II", "title": "Universal primary access", "anchor": "part-ii-universal-primary-access", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-11", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-12", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-13", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-14", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-15", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-16", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-17", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-18", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-19", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-20" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "number": "III", "title": "Primary attendance", "anchor": "part-iii-primary-attendance", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-21", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-22", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-23", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-24", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-25", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-26", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-27", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-28", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-29", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-30" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "number": "IV", "title": "Primary completion", "anchor": "part-iv-primary-completion", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-31", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-32", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-33", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-34", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-35", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-36", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-37", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-38", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-39", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-40" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "number": "V", "title": "Youth learning needs", "anchor": "part-v-youth-learning-needs", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-41", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-42", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-43", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-44", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-45", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-46", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-47", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-48", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-49", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-50" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "number": "VI", "title": "Adult literacy", "anchor": "part-vi-adult-literacy", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-51", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-52", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-53", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-54", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-55", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-56", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-57", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-58", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-59", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-60" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "number": "VII", "title": "Gender parity and equality", "anchor": "part-vii-gender-parity-and-equality", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-61", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-62", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-63", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-64", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-65", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-66", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-67", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-68", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-69", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-70" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "number": "VIII", "title": "Learning quality", "anchor": "part-viii-learning-quality", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-71", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-72", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-73", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-74", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-75", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-76", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-77", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-78", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-79", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-80" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "number": "IX", "title": "Teacher availability", "anchor": "part-ix-teacher-availability", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-81", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-82", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-83", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-84", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-85", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-86", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-87", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-88", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-89", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-90" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "number": "X", "title": "Education finance", "anchor": "part-x-education-finance", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-91", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-92", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-93", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-94", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-95", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-96", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-97", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-98", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-99", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-100" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "number": "XI", "title": "Household cost and poverty", "anchor": "part-xi-household-cost-and-poverty", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-101", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-102", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-103", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-104", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-105", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-106", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-107", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-108", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-109", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-110" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "number": "XII", "title": "Rural and remote provision", "anchor": "part-xii-rural-and-remote-provision", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-111", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-112", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-113", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-114", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-115", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-116", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-117", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-118", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-119", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-120" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "number": "XIII", "title": "Language and minority status", "anchor": "part-xiii-language-and-minority-status", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-121", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-122", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-123", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-124", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-125", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-126", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-127", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-128", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-129", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-130" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "number": "XIV", "title": "Disability and inclusion", "anchor": "part-xiv-disability-and-inclusion", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-131", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-132", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-133", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-134", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-135", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-136", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-137", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-138", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-139", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-140" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "number": "XV", "title": "Conflict, displacement and emergency", "anchor": "part-xv-conflict-displacement-and-emergency", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-141", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-142", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-143", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-144", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-145", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-146", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-147", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-148", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-149", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-150" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "number": "XVI", "title": "Child labour and protection", "anchor": "part-xvi-child-labour-and-protection", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-151", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-152", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-153", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-154", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-155", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-156", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-157", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-158", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-159", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-160" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "number": "XVII", "title": "Governance and institutional capacity", "anchor": "part-xvii-governance-and-institutional-capacity", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-161", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-162", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-163", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-164", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-165", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-166", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-167", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-168", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-169", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-170" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "number": "XVIII", "title": "International assistance", "anchor": "part-xviii-international-assistance", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-171", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-172", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-173", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-174", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-175", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-176", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-177", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-178", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-179", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-180" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "number": "XIX", "title": "Population and demographic change", "anchor": "part-xix-population-and-demographic-change", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-181", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-182", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-183", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-184", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-185", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-186", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-187", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-188", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-189", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-190" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "number": "XX", "title": "Distance to 2015", "anchor": "part-xx-distance-to-2015", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-191", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-192", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-193", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-194", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-195", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-196", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-197", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-198", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-199", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-200" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "number": "XXI", "title": "Conclusions and priorities to 2015", "anchor": "part-xxi-conclusions-and-priorities-to-2015", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-201", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-202", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-203", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-204", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-205", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-206", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-207", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-208", "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-209" ] } ], "sections": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-1", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "parentId": null, "number": "1", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "1-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-1-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is the expansion and equitable quality of comprehensive services before primary school. A defensible account draws on participation by age, duration, provider coverage and the circumstances of vulnerable children. Because programme boundaries and incomplete non-state reporting can make nominal coverage non-comparable, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that age-specific access, intensity, quality conditions and transition should be interpreted together.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-2", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "parentId": null, "number": "2", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "2-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-2-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For early childhood care and education, the midpoint inquiry concerns the expansion and equitable quality of comprehensive services before primary school. The evidence should encompass participation by age, duration, provider coverage and the circumstances of vulnerable children. The material measurement risk is that programme boundaries and incomplete non-state reporting can make nominal coverage non-comparable. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-2-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The goal definition test asks for the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies. Authorities should separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. In this domain, age-specific access, intensity, quality conditions and transition should be interpreted together. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-2-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The interpretive rule is that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-3", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "parentId": null, "number": "3", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "3-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-3-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Baseline and latest observation is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is the expansion and equitable quality of comprehensive services before primary school. A sufficient evidence base includes participation by age, duration, provider coverage and the circumstances of vulnerable children, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-3-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that programme boundaries and incomplete non-state reporting can make nominal coverage non-comparable. It should therefore retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage and should apply the following domain safeguard: age-specific access, intensity, quality conditions and transition should be interpreted together. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-3-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing limitation is that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-4", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "parentId": null, "number": "4", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "4-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-4-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is the expansion and equitable quality of comprehensive services before primary school. Midpoint reporting should begin with participation by age, duration, provider coverage and the circumstances of vulnerable children and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, programme boundaries and incomplete non-state reporting can make nominal coverage non-comparable.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-4-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under level and absolute population, the required proposition is the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition. Statistical and policy authorities should publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. They should also ensure that age-specific access, intensity, quality conditions and transition should be interpreted together. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-4-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For interpretation, rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-5", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "parentId": null, "number": "5", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "5-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-5-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish the expansion and equitable quality of comprehensive services before primary school without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes participation by age, duration, provider coverage and the circumstances of vulnerable children. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-5-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that programme boundaries and incomplete non-state reporting can make nominal coverage non-comparable. The distribution and equity review therefore determines how the national result is shared across groups and places and requires authorities to disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. The domain-specific response is clear: age-specific access, intensity, quality conditions and transition should be interpreted together.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-5-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The conclusion should follow the standard that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-6", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "parentId": null, "number": "6", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "6-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-6-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Early childhood care and education illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is the expansion and equitable quality of comprehensive services before primary school, while the empirical account is built from participation by age, duration, provider coverage and the circumstances of vulnerable children.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-6-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because programme boundaries and incomplete non-state reporting can make nominal coverage non-comparable, attention to service and learning quality is necessary. The authority should establish whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended and should connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. Its final account should reflect that age-specific access, intensity, quality conditions and transition should be interpreted together. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-6-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The relevant interpretive boundary is that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-7", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "parentId": null, "number": "7", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "7-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-7-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of early childhood care and education asks the expansion and equitable quality of comprehensive services before primary school. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with participation by age, duration, provider coverage and the circumstances of vulnerable children and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-7-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that programme boundaries and incomplete non-state reporting can make nominal coverage non-comparable. In considering trend and pace, authorities should identify the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period and compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. The operational principle is that age-specific access, intensity, quality conditions and transition should be interpreted together.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-7-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The resulting conclusion must observe that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-8", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "parentId": null, "number": "8", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "8-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-8-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in early childhood care and education is assessed against the expansion and equitable quality of comprehensive services before primary school. The record should contain participation by age, duration, provider coverage and the circumstances of vulnerable children, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-8-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that programme boundaries and incomplete non-state reporting can make nominal coverage non-comparable. The projection and scenario test accordingly requires what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued; implementation should state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that age-specific access, intensity, quality conditions and transition should be interpreted together.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-8-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-9", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "parentId": null, "number": "9", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "9-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-9-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in early childhood care and education cannot be understood without defining the expansion and equitable quality of comprehensive services before primary school. The appropriate measurement account combines participation by age, duration, provider coverage and the circumstances of vulnerable children. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-9-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If programme boundaries and incomplete non-state reporting can make nominal coverage non-comparable, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under data quality and uncertainty should establish which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding, and the responsible bodies should compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. In substantive terms, age-specific access, intensity, quality conditions and transition should be interpreted together.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-9-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The reporting standard is that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-10", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "parentId": null, "number": "10", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "10-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-10-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Early childhood care and education must be traced through developmentally appropriate provision, language, continuity and early identification of barriers. For early childhood care and education, the midpoint inquiry concerns the expansion and equitable quality of comprehensive services before primary school. The evidence should encompass participation by age, duration, provider coverage and the circumstances of vulnerable children. The material measurement risk is that programme boundaries and incomplete non-state reporting can make nominal coverage non-comparable. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-10-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy response test asks for which public action is supported by the combined evidence. Authorities should identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. In this domain, age-specific access, intensity, quality conditions and transition should be interpreted together. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-10-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The interpretive rule is that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-11", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "11", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "11-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-11-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether all children of primary-school age enter school. A defensible account draws on age-specific enrolment, entry history and the number never enrolled. Because gross enrolment can rise while late entry and permanent exclusion remain substantial, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that access analysis should distinguish timely entry, delayed entry and children unlikely ever to enrol.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-12", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "12", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "12-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-12-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether all children of primary-school age enter school without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes age-specific enrolment, entry history and the number never enrolled. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-12-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that gross enrolment can rise while late entry and permanent exclusion remain substantial. The goal definition review therefore determines the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies and requires authorities to separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. The domain-specific response is clear: access analysis should distinguish timely entry, delayed entry and children unlikely ever to enrol.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-12-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The conclusion should follow the standard that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-13", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "13", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "13-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-13-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Universal primary access illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether all children of primary-school age enter school, while the empirical account is built from age-specific enrolment, entry history and the number never enrolled.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-13-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because gross enrolment can rise while late entry and permanent exclusion remain substantial, attention to baseline and latest observation is necessary. The authority should establish the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar and should retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. Its final account should reflect that access analysis should distinguish timely entry, delayed entry and children unlikely ever to enrol. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-13-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The relevant interpretive boundary is that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-14", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "14", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "14-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-14-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of universal primary access asks whether all children of primary-school age enter school. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with age-specific enrolment, entry history and the number never enrolled and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-14-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that gross enrolment can rise while late entry and permanent exclusion remain substantial. In considering level and absolute population, authorities should identify the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition and publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. The operational principle is that access analysis should distinguish timely entry, delayed entry and children unlikely ever to enrol.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-14-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The resulting conclusion must observe that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-15", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "15", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "15-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-15-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in universal primary access is assessed against whether all children of primary-school age enter school. The record should contain age-specific enrolment, entry history and the number never enrolled, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-15-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that gross enrolment can rise while late entry and permanent exclusion remain substantial. The distribution and equity test accordingly requires how the national result is shared across groups and places; implementation should disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that access analysis should distinguish timely entry, delayed entry and children unlikely ever to enrol.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-15-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-16", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "16", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "16-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-16-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in universal primary access cannot be understood without defining whether all children of primary-school age enter school. The appropriate measurement account combines age-specific enrolment, entry history and the number never enrolled. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-16-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If gross enrolment can rise while late entry and permanent exclusion remain substantial, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under service and learning quality should establish whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended, and the responsible bodies should connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. In substantive terms, access analysis should distinguish timely entry, delayed entry and children unlikely ever to enrol.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-16-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The reporting standard is that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-17", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "17", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "17-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-17-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For universal primary access, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether all children of primary-school age enter school. The evidence should encompass age-specific enrolment, entry history and the number never enrolled. The material measurement risk is that gross enrolment can rise while late entry and permanent exclusion remain substantial. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-17-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The trend and pace test asks for the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period. Authorities should compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. In this domain, access analysis should distinguish timely entry, delayed entry and children unlikely ever to enrol. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-17-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The interpretive rule is that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-18", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "18", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "18-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-18-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Projection and scenario is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether all children of primary-school age enter school. A sufficient evidence base includes age-specific enrolment, entry history and the number never enrolled, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-18-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that gross enrolment can rise while late entry and permanent exclusion remain substantial. It should therefore state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range and should apply the following domain safeguard: access analysis should distinguish timely entry, delayed entry and children unlikely ever to enrol. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-18-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing limitation is that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-19", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "19", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "19-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-19-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether all children of primary-school age enter school. Midpoint reporting should begin with age-specific enrolment, entry history and the number never enrolled and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, gross enrolment can rise while late entry and permanent exclusion remain substantial.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-19-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under data quality and uncertainty, the required proposition is which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding. Statistical and policy authorities should compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. They should also ensure that access analysis should distinguish timely entry, delayed entry and children unlikely ever to enrol. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-19-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For interpretation, uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-20", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "20", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "20-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-20-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Universal primary access must be traced through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether all children of primary-school age enter school without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes age-specific enrolment, entry history and the number never enrolled. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-20-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that gross enrolment can rise while late entry and permanent exclusion remain substantial. The policy response review therefore determines which public action is supported by the combined evidence and requires authorities to identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. The domain-specific response is clear: access analysis should distinguish timely entry, delayed entry and children unlikely ever to enrol.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-20-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The conclusion should follow the standard that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-21", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "21", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "21-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-21-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether registered pupils participate regularly in instruction. A defensible account draws on administrative enrolment, household attendance and absence during a defined reference period. Because registration may not become presence where cost, work, illness, distance or insecurity interrupts participation, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that attendance evidence should complement enrolment and should be disaggregated by location and household circumstances.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-22", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "22", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "22-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-22-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in primary attendance is assessed against whether registered pupils participate regularly in instruction. The record should contain administrative enrolment, household attendance and absence during a defined reference period, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-22-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that registration may not become presence where cost, work, illness, distance or insecurity interrupts participation. The goal definition test accordingly requires the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies; implementation should separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that attendance evidence should complement enrolment and should be disaggregated by location and household circumstances.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-22-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-23", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "23", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "23-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-23-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in primary attendance cannot be understood without defining whether registered pupils participate regularly in instruction. The appropriate measurement account combines administrative enrolment, household attendance and absence during a defined reference period. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-23-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If registration may not become presence where cost, work, illness, distance or insecurity interrupts participation, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under baseline and latest observation should establish the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar, and the responsible bodies should retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. In substantive terms, attendance evidence should complement enrolment and should be disaggregated by location and household circumstances.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-23-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The reporting standard is that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-24", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "24", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "24-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-24-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For primary attendance, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether registered pupils participate regularly in instruction. The evidence should encompass administrative enrolment, household attendance and absence during a defined reference period. The material measurement risk is that registration may not become presence where cost, work, illness, distance or insecurity interrupts participation. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-24-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The level and absolute population test asks for the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition. Authorities should publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. In this domain, attendance evidence should complement enrolment and should be disaggregated by location and household circumstances. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-24-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The interpretive rule is that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-25", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "25", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "25-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-25-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distribution and equity is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether registered pupils participate regularly in instruction. A sufficient evidence base includes administrative enrolment, household attendance and absence during a defined reference period, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-25-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that registration may not become presence where cost, work, illness, distance or insecurity interrupts participation. It should therefore disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy and should apply the following domain safeguard: attendance evidence should complement enrolment and should be disaggregated by location and household circumstances. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-25-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing limitation is that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-26", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "26", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "26-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-26-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether registered pupils participate regularly in instruction. Midpoint reporting should begin with administrative enrolment, household attendance and absence during a defined reference period and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, registration may not become presence where cost, work, illness, distance or insecurity interrupts participation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-26-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under service and learning quality, the required proposition is whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended. Statistical and policy authorities should connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. They should also ensure that attendance evidence should complement enrolment and should be disaggregated by location and household circumstances. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-26-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For interpretation, quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-27", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "27", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "27-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-27-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether registered pupils participate regularly in instruction without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes administrative enrolment, household attendance and absence during a defined reference period. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-27-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that registration may not become presence where cost, work, illness, distance or insecurity interrupts participation. The trend and pace review therefore determines the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period and requires authorities to compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. The domain-specific response is clear: attendance evidence should complement enrolment and should be disaggregated by location and household circumstances.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-27-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The conclusion should follow the standard that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-28", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "28", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "28-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-28-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Primary attendance illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether registered pupils participate regularly in instruction, while the empirical account is built from administrative enrolment, household attendance and absence during a defined reference period.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-28-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because registration may not become presence where cost, work, illness, distance or insecurity interrupts participation, attention to projection and scenario is necessary. The authority should establish what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued and should state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. Its final account should reflect that attendance evidence should complement enrolment and should be disaggregated by location and household circumstances. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-28-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The relevant interpretive boundary is that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-29", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "29", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "29-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-29-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of primary attendance asks whether registered pupils participate regularly in instruction. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with administrative enrolment, household attendance and absence during a defined reference period and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-29-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that registration may not become presence where cost, work, illness, distance or insecurity interrupts participation. In considering data quality and uncertainty, authorities should identify which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding and compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. The operational principle is that attendance evidence should complement enrolment and should be disaggregated by location and household circumstances.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-29-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The resulting conclusion must observe that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-30", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "30", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "30-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-30-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Primary attendance must be traced through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. Progress in primary attendance is assessed against whether registered pupils participate regularly in instruction. The record should contain administrative enrolment, household attendance and absence during a defined reference period, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-30-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that registration may not become presence where cost, work, illness, distance or insecurity interrupts participation. The policy response test accordingly requires which public action is supported by the combined evidence; implementation should identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that attendance evidence should complement enrolment and should be disaggregated by location and household circumstances.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-30-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-31", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "31", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "31-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-31-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether entrants progress through the full primary cycle. A defensible account draws on grade progression, repetition, dropout, last-grade participation and completion. Because cross-sectional survival measures can confuse cohort experience with changing enrolment patterns, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that completion should be read with age, repetition and learning rather than treated as a single terminal event.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-32", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "32", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "32-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-32-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Goal definition is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether entrants progress through the full primary cycle. A sufficient evidence base includes grade progression, repetition, dropout, last-grade participation and completion, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-32-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that cross-sectional survival measures can confuse cohort experience with changing enrolment patterns. It should therefore separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it and should apply the following domain safeguard: completion should be read with age, repetition and learning rather than treated as a single terminal event. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-32-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing limitation is that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-33", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "33", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "33-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-33-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether entrants progress through the full primary cycle. Midpoint reporting should begin with grade progression, repetition, dropout, last-grade participation and completion and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, cross-sectional survival measures can confuse cohort experience with changing enrolment patterns.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-33-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under baseline and latest observation, the required proposition is the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar. Statistical and policy authorities should retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. They should also ensure that completion should be read with age, repetition and learning rather than treated as a single terminal event. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-33-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For interpretation, apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-34", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "34", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "34-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-34-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether entrants progress through the full primary cycle without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes grade progression, repetition, dropout, last-grade participation and completion. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-34-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that cross-sectional survival measures can confuse cohort experience with changing enrolment patterns. The level and absolute population review therefore determines the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition and requires authorities to publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. The domain-specific response is clear: completion should be read with age, repetition and learning rather than treated as a single terminal event.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-34-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The conclusion should follow the standard that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-35", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "35", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "35-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-35-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Primary completion illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether entrants progress through the full primary cycle, while the empirical account is built from grade progression, repetition, dropout, last-grade participation and completion.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-35-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because cross-sectional survival measures can confuse cohort experience with changing enrolment patterns, attention to distribution and equity is necessary. The authority should establish how the national result is shared across groups and places and should disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. Its final account should reflect that completion should be read with age, repetition and learning rather than treated as a single terminal event. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-35-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The relevant interpretive boundary is that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-36", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "36", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "36-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-36-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of primary completion asks whether entrants progress through the full primary cycle. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with grade progression, repetition, dropout, last-grade participation and completion and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-36-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that cross-sectional survival measures can confuse cohort experience with changing enrolment patterns. In considering service and learning quality, authorities should identify whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended and connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. The operational principle is that completion should be read with age, repetition and learning rather than treated as a single terminal event.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-36-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The resulting conclusion must observe that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-37", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "37", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "37-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-37-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in primary completion is assessed against whether entrants progress through the full primary cycle. The record should contain grade progression, repetition, dropout, last-grade participation and completion, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-37-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that cross-sectional survival measures can confuse cohort experience with changing enrolment patterns. The trend and pace test accordingly requires the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period; implementation should compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that completion should be read with age, repetition and learning rather than treated as a single terminal event.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-37-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-38", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "38", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "38-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-38-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in primary completion cannot be understood without defining whether entrants progress through the full primary cycle. The appropriate measurement account combines grade progression, repetition, dropout, last-grade participation and completion. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-38-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If cross-sectional survival measures can confuse cohort experience with changing enrolment patterns, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under projection and scenario should establish what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued, and the responsible bodies should state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. In substantive terms, completion should be read with age, repetition and learning rather than treated as a single terminal event.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-38-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The reporting standard is that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-39", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "39", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "39-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-39-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For primary completion, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether entrants progress through the full primary cycle. The evidence should encompass grade progression, repetition, dropout, last-grade participation and completion. The material measurement risk is that cross-sectional survival measures can confuse cohort experience with changing enrolment patterns. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-39-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The data quality and uncertainty test asks for which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding. Authorities should compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. In this domain, completion should be read with age, repetition and learning rather than treated as a single terminal event. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-39-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The interpretive rule is that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-40", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "40", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "40-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-40-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Policy response is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether entrants progress through the full primary cycle. A sufficient evidence base includes grade progression, repetition, dropout, last-grade participation and completion, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-40-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that cross-sectional survival measures can confuse cohort experience with changing enrolment patterns. It should therefore identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation and should apply the following domain safeguard: completion should be read with age, repetition and learning rather than treated as a single terminal event. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-40-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing limitation is that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-41", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "parentId": null, "number": "41", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "41-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-41-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether young people gain relevant knowledge and skills for work, further learning and civic life. A defensible account draws on participation across secondary, vocational and non-formal routes and evidence of acquired competence. Because the goal lacks one universally accepted measure and can disappear behind narrow enrolment proxies, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that countries should define the relevant opportunity and report both reach and learning without creating false global equivalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-42", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "parentId": null, "number": "42", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "42-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-42-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Youth learning needs illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether young people gain relevant knowledge and skills for work, further learning and civic life, while the empirical account is built from participation across secondary, vocational and non-formal routes and evidence of acquired competence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-42-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because the goal lacks one universally accepted measure and can disappear behind narrow enrolment proxies, attention to goal definition is necessary. The authority should establish the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies and should separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. Its final account should reflect that countries should define the relevant opportunity and report both reach and learning without creating false global equivalence. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-42-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The relevant interpretive boundary is that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-43", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "parentId": null, "number": "43", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "43-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-43-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of youth learning needs asks whether young people gain relevant knowledge and skills for work, further learning and civic life. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with participation across secondary, vocational and non-formal routes and evidence of acquired competence and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-43-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that the goal lacks one universally accepted measure and can disappear behind narrow enrolment proxies. In considering baseline and latest observation, authorities should identify the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar and retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. The operational principle is that countries should define the relevant opportunity and report both reach and learning without creating false global equivalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-43-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The resulting conclusion must observe that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-44", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "parentId": null, "number": "44", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "44-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-44-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in youth learning needs is assessed against whether young people gain relevant knowledge and skills for work, further learning and civic life. The record should contain participation across secondary, vocational and non-formal routes and evidence of acquired competence, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-44-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that the goal lacks one universally accepted measure and can disappear behind narrow enrolment proxies. The level and absolute population test accordingly requires the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition; implementation should publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that countries should define the relevant opportunity and report both reach and learning without creating false global equivalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-44-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-45", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "parentId": null, "number": "45", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "45-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-45-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in youth learning needs cannot be understood without defining whether young people gain relevant knowledge and skills for work, further learning and civic life. The appropriate measurement account combines participation across secondary, vocational and non-formal routes and evidence of acquired competence. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-45-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If the goal lacks one universally accepted measure and can disappear behind narrow enrolment proxies, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under distribution and equity should establish how the national result is shared across groups and places, and the responsible bodies should disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. In substantive terms, countries should define the relevant opportunity and report both reach and learning without creating false global equivalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-45-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The reporting standard is that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-46", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "parentId": null, "number": "46", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "46-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-46-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For youth learning needs, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether young people gain relevant knowledge and skills for work, further learning and civic life. The evidence should encompass participation across secondary, vocational and non-formal routes and evidence of acquired competence. The material measurement risk is that the goal lacks one universally accepted measure and can disappear behind narrow enrolment proxies. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-46-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The service and learning quality test asks for whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended. Authorities should connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. In this domain, countries should define the relevant opportunity and report both reach and learning without creating false global equivalence. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-46-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The interpretive rule is that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-47", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "parentId": null, "number": "47", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "47-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-47-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Trend and pace is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether young people gain relevant knowledge and skills for work, further learning and civic life. A sufficient evidence base includes participation across secondary, vocational and non-formal routes and evidence of acquired competence, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-47-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that the goal lacks one universally accepted measure and can disappear behind narrow enrolment proxies. It should therefore compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision and should apply the following domain safeguard: countries should define the relevant opportunity and report both reach and learning without creating false global equivalence. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-47-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing limitation is that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-48", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "parentId": null, "number": "48", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "48-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-48-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether young people gain relevant knowledge and skills for work, further learning and civic life. Midpoint reporting should begin with participation across secondary, vocational and non-formal routes and evidence of acquired competence and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, the goal lacks one universally accepted measure and can disappear behind narrow enrolment proxies.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-48-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under projection and scenario, the required proposition is what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued. Statistical and policy authorities should state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. They should also ensure that countries should define the relevant opportunity and report both reach and learning without creating false global equivalence. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-48-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For interpretation, distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-49", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "parentId": null, "number": "49", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "49-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-49-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether young people gain relevant knowledge and skills for work, further learning and civic life without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes participation across secondary, vocational and non-formal routes and evidence of acquired competence. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-49-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that the goal lacks one universally accepted measure and can disappear behind narrow enrolment proxies. The data quality and uncertainty review therefore determines which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding and requires authorities to compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. The domain-specific response is clear: countries should define the relevant opportunity and report both reach and learning without creating false global equivalence.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-49-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The conclusion should follow the standard that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-50", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "parentId": null, "number": "50", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "50-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-50-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Youth learning needs must be traced through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. Youth learning needs illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether young people gain relevant knowledge and skills for work, further learning and civic life, while the empirical account is built from participation across secondary, vocational and non-formal routes and evidence of acquired competence. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-50-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because the goal lacks one universally accepted measure and can disappear behind narrow enrolment proxies, attention to policy response is necessary. The authority should establish which public action is supported by the combined evidence and should identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. Its final account should reflect that countries should define the relevant opportunity and report both reach and learning without creating false global equivalence. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-50-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The relevant interpretive boundary is that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-51", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "51", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "51-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-51-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether adults can use literacy in the contexts relevant to their lives. A defensible account draws on direct assessment, self-report, educational attainment and programme participation. Because self-reported literacy and schooling proxies can overstate functional competence and conceal degrees of skill, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that estimates should identify the method used and avoid precise comparison across unlike measures.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-52", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "52", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "52-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-52-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in adult literacy cannot be understood without defining whether adults can use literacy in the contexts relevant to their lives. The appropriate measurement account combines direct assessment, self-report, educational attainment and programme participation. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-52-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If self-reported literacy and schooling proxies can overstate functional competence and conceal degrees of skill, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under goal definition should establish the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies, and the responsible bodies should separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. In substantive terms, estimates should identify the method used and avoid precise comparison across unlike measures.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-52-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The reporting standard is that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-53", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "53", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "53-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-53-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For adult literacy, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether adults can use literacy in the contexts relevant to their lives. The evidence should encompass direct assessment, self-report, educational attainment and programme participation. The material measurement risk is that self-reported literacy and schooling proxies can overstate functional competence and conceal degrees of skill. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-53-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The baseline and latest observation test asks for the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar. Authorities should retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. In this domain, estimates should identify the method used and avoid precise comparison across unlike measures. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-53-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The interpretive rule is that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-54", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "54", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "54-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-54-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Level and absolute population is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether adults can use literacy in the contexts relevant to their lives. A sufficient evidence base includes direct assessment, self-report, educational attainment and programme participation, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-54-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that self-reported literacy and schooling proxies can overstate functional competence and conceal degrees of skill. It should therefore publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits and should apply the following domain safeguard: estimates should identify the method used and avoid precise comparison across unlike measures. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-54-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing limitation is that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-55", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "55", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "55-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-55-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether adults can use literacy in the contexts relevant to their lives. Midpoint reporting should begin with direct assessment, self-report, educational attainment and programme participation and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, self-reported literacy and schooling proxies can overstate functional competence and conceal degrees of skill.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-55-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under distribution and equity, the required proposition is how the national result is shared across groups and places. Statistical and policy authorities should disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. They should also ensure that estimates should identify the method used and avoid precise comparison across unlike measures. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-55-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For interpretation, progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-56", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "56", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "56-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-56-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether adults can use literacy in the contexts relevant to their lives without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes direct assessment, self-report, educational attainment and programme participation. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-56-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that self-reported literacy and schooling proxies can overstate functional competence and conceal degrees of skill. The service and learning quality review therefore determines whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended and requires authorities to connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. The domain-specific response is clear: estimates should identify the method used and avoid precise comparison across unlike measures.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-56-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The conclusion should follow the standard that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-57", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "57", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "57-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-57-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Adult literacy illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether adults can use literacy in the contexts relevant to their lives, while the empirical account is built from direct assessment, self-report, educational attainment and programme participation.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-57-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because self-reported literacy and schooling proxies can overstate functional competence and conceal degrees of skill, attention to trend and pace is necessary. The authority should establish the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period and should compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. Its final account should reflect that estimates should identify the method used and avoid precise comparison across unlike measures. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-57-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The relevant interpretive boundary is that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-58", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "58", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "58-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-58-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of adult literacy asks whether adults can use literacy in the contexts relevant to their lives. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with direct assessment, self-report, educational attainment and programme participation and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-58-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that self-reported literacy and schooling proxies can overstate functional competence and conceal degrees of skill. In considering projection and scenario, authorities should identify what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued and state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. The operational principle is that estimates should identify the method used and avoid precise comparison across unlike measures.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-58-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The resulting conclusion must observe that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-59", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "59", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "59-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-59-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in adult literacy is assessed against whether adults can use literacy in the contexts relevant to their lives. The record should contain direct assessment, self-report, educational attainment and programme participation, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-59-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that self-reported literacy and schooling proxies can overstate functional competence and conceal degrees of skill. The data quality and uncertainty test accordingly requires which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding; implementation should compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that estimates should identify the method used and avoid precise comparison across unlike measures.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-59-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-60", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "60", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "60-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-60-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Adult literacy must be traced through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The distance remaining in adult literacy cannot be understood without defining whether adults can use literacy in the contexts relevant to their lives. The appropriate measurement account combines direct assessment, self-report, educational attainment and programme participation. It should preserve both national and distributional results. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-60-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If self-reported literacy and schooling proxies can overstate functional competence and conceal degrees of skill, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under policy response should establish which public action is supported by the combined evidence, and the responsible bodies should identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. In substantive terms, estimates should identify the method used and avoid precise comparison across unlike measures.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-60-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The reporting standard is that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-61", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "61", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "61-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-61-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether girls and boys have equal substantive opportunities across participation, progression and learning. A defensible account draws on sex-disaggregated rates, household position, location, safety and institutional practice. Because national parity can coexist with deep disadvantage among poor, rural or marginalised groups, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that parity indices should be accompanied by absolute levels and intersecting distributions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-62", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "62", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "62-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-62-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether girls and boys have equal substantive opportunities across participation, progression and learning. Midpoint reporting should begin with sex-disaggregated rates, household position, location, safety and institutional practice and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, national parity can coexist with deep disadvantage among poor, rural or marginalised groups.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-62-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under goal definition, the required proposition is the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies. Statistical and policy authorities should separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. They should also ensure that parity indices should be accompanied by absolute levels and intersecting distributions. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-62-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For interpretation, a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-63", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "63", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "63-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-63-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether girls and boys have equal substantive opportunities across participation, progression and learning without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes sex-disaggregated rates, household position, location, safety and institutional practice. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-63-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that national parity can coexist with deep disadvantage among poor, rural or marginalised groups. The baseline and latest observation review therefore determines the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar and requires authorities to retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. The domain-specific response is clear: parity indices should be accompanied by absolute levels and intersecting distributions.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-63-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The conclusion should follow the standard that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-64", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "64", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "64-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-64-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Gender parity and equality illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether girls and boys have equal substantive opportunities across participation, progression and learning, while the empirical account is built from sex-disaggregated rates, household position, location, safety and institutional practice.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-64-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because national parity can coexist with deep disadvantage among poor, rural or marginalised groups, attention to level and absolute population is necessary. The authority should establish the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition and should publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. Its final account should reflect that parity indices should be accompanied by absolute levels and intersecting distributions. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-64-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The relevant interpretive boundary is that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-65", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "65", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "65-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-65-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of gender parity and equality asks whether girls and boys have equal substantive opportunities across participation, progression and learning. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with sex-disaggregated rates, household position, location, safety and institutional practice and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-65-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that national parity can coexist with deep disadvantage among poor, rural or marginalised groups. In considering distribution and equity, authorities should identify how the national result is shared across groups and places and disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. The operational principle is that parity indices should be accompanied by absolute levels and intersecting distributions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-65-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The resulting conclusion must observe that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-66", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "66", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "66-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-66-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in gender parity and equality is assessed against whether girls and boys have equal substantive opportunities across participation, progression and learning. The record should contain sex-disaggregated rates, household position, location, safety and institutional practice, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-66-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that national parity can coexist with deep disadvantage among poor, rural or marginalised groups. The service and learning quality test accordingly requires whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended; implementation should connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that parity indices should be accompanied by absolute levels and intersecting distributions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-66-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-67", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "67", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "67-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-67-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in gender parity and equality cannot be understood without defining whether girls and boys have equal substantive opportunities across participation, progression and learning. The appropriate measurement account combines sex-disaggregated rates, household position, location, safety and institutional practice. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-67-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If national parity can coexist with deep disadvantage among poor, rural or marginalised groups, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under trend and pace should establish the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period, and the responsible bodies should compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. In substantive terms, parity indices should be accompanied by absolute levels and intersecting distributions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-67-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The reporting standard is that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-68", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "68", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "68-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-68-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For gender parity and equality, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether girls and boys have equal substantive opportunities across participation, progression and learning. The evidence should encompass sex-disaggregated rates, household position, location, safety and institutional practice. The material measurement risk is that national parity can coexist with deep disadvantage among poor, rural or marginalised groups. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-68-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The projection and scenario test asks for what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued. Authorities should state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. In this domain, parity indices should be accompanied by absolute levels and intersecting distributions. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-68-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The interpretive rule is that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-69", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "69", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "69-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-69-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Data quality and uncertainty is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether girls and boys have equal substantive opportunities across participation, progression and learning. A sufficient evidence base includes sex-disaggregated rates, household position, location, safety and institutional practice, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-69-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that national parity can coexist with deep disadvantage among poor, rural or marginalised groups. It should therefore compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial and should apply the following domain safeguard: parity indices should be accompanied by absolute levels and intersecting distributions. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-69-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing limitation is that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-70", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "70", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "70-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-70-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Gender parity and equality must be traced through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The policy objective in this field is whether girls and boys have equal substantive opportunities across participation, progression and learning. Midpoint reporting should begin with sex-disaggregated rates, household position, location, safety and institutional practice and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, national parity can coexist with deep disadvantage among poor, rural or marginalised groups. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-70-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under policy response, the required proposition is which public action is supported by the combined evidence. Statistical and policy authorities should identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. They should also ensure that parity indices should be accompanied by absolute levels and intersecting distributions. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-70-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For interpretation, monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-71", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "71", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "71-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-71-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether participation results in relevant foundational knowledge, skills and dispositions. A defensible account draws on assessment results, curriculum opportunity, completion and classroom conditions. Because test coverage, language, sampling and grade survival affect who is assessed and what the mean represents, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that learning evidence should describe the assessed population and the content opportunity available to it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-72", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "72", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "72-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-72-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of learning quality asks whether participation results in relevant foundational knowledge, skills and dispositions. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with assessment results, curriculum opportunity, completion and classroom conditions and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-72-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that test coverage, language, sampling and grade survival affect who is assessed and what the mean represents. In considering goal definition, authorities should identify the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies and separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. The operational principle is that learning evidence should describe the assessed population and the content opportunity available to it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-72-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The resulting conclusion must observe that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-73", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "73", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "73-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-73-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in learning quality is assessed against whether participation results in relevant foundational knowledge, skills and dispositions. The record should contain assessment results, curriculum opportunity, completion and classroom conditions, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-73-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that test coverage, language, sampling and grade survival affect who is assessed and what the mean represents. The baseline and latest observation test accordingly requires the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar; implementation should retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that learning evidence should describe the assessed population and the content opportunity available to it.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-73-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-74", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "74", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "74-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-74-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in learning quality cannot be understood without defining whether participation results in relevant foundational knowledge, skills and dispositions. The appropriate measurement account combines assessment results, curriculum opportunity, completion and classroom conditions. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-74-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If test coverage, language, sampling and grade survival affect who is assessed and what the mean represents, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under level and absolute population should establish the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition, and the responsible bodies should publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. In substantive terms, learning evidence should describe the assessed population and the content opportunity available to it.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-74-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The reporting standard is that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-75", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "75", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "75-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-75-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For learning quality, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether participation results in relevant foundational knowledge, skills and dispositions. The evidence should encompass assessment results, curriculum opportunity, completion and classroom conditions. The material measurement risk is that test coverage, language, sampling and grade survival affect who is assessed and what the mean represents. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-75-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distribution and equity test asks for how the national result is shared across groups and places. Authorities should disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. In this domain, learning evidence should describe the assessed population and the content opportunity available to it. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-75-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The interpretive rule is that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-76", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "76", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "76-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-76-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Service and learning quality is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether participation results in relevant foundational knowledge, skills and dispositions. A sufficient evidence base includes assessment results, curriculum opportunity, completion and classroom conditions, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-76-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that test coverage, language, sampling and grade survival affect who is assessed and what the mean represents. It should therefore connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence and should apply the following domain safeguard: learning evidence should describe the assessed population and the content opportunity available to it. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-76-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing limitation is that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-77", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "77", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "77-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-77-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether participation results in relevant foundational knowledge, skills and dispositions. Midpoint reporting should begin with assessment results, curriculum opportunity, completion and classroom conditions and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, test coverage, language, sampling and grade survival affect who is assessed and what the mean represents.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-77-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under trend and pace, the required proposition is the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period. Statistical and policy authorities should compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. They should also ensure that learning evidence should describe the assessed population and the content opportunity available to it. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-77-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For interpretation, a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-78", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "78", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "78-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-78-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether participation results in relevant foundational knowledge, skills and dispositions without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes assessment results, curriculum opportunity, completion and classroom conditions. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-78-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that test coverage, language, sampling and grade survival affect who is assessed and what the mean represents. The projection and scenario review therefore determines what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued and requires authorities to state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. The domain-specific response is clear: learning evidence should describe the assessed population and the content opportunity available to it.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-78-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The conclusion should follow the standard that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-79", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "79", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "79-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-79-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Learning quality illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether participation results in relevant foundational knowledge, skills and dispositions, while the empirical account is built from assessment results, curriculum opportunity, completion and classroom conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-79-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because test coverage, language, sampling and grade survival affect who is assessed and what the mean represents, attention to data quality and uncertainty is necessary. The authority should establish which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding and should compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. Its final account should reflect that learning evidence should describe the assessed population and the content opportunity available to it. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-79-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The relevant interpretive boundary is that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-80", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "80", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "80-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-80-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Learning quality must be traced through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. A responsible account of learning quality asks whether participation results in relevant foundational knowledge, skills and dispositions. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with assessment results, curriculum opportunity, completion and classroom conditions and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-80-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that test coverage, language, sampling and grade survival affect who is assessed and what the mean represents. In considering policy response, authorities should identify which public action is supported by the combined evidence and identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. The operational principle is that learning evidence should describe the assessed population and the content opportunity available to it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-80-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The resulting conclusion must observe that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-81", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "81", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "81-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-81-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether systems have enough teachers in the places, grades and subjects where expansion requires them. A defensible account draws on pupil-teacher ratios, vacancies, qualifications, absence, deployment and attrition. Because a national ratio can conceal overcrowding, unfilled posts and unequal assignment, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that workforce monitoring should combine numbers with distribution, preparation, presence and workload.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-82", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "82", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "82-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-82-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For teacher availability, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether systems have enough teachers in the places, grades and subjects where expansion requires them. The evidence should encompass pupil-teacher ratios, vacancies, qualifications, absence, deployment and attrition. The material measurement risk is that a national ratio can conceal overcrowding, unfilled posts and unequal assignment. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-82-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The goal definition test asks for the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies. Authorities should separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. In this domain, workforce monitoring should combine numbers with distribution, preparation, presence and workload. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-82-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teacher availability should be judged through staffing, presence, workload, qualification and the instructional time actually available. The interpretive rule is that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-83", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "83", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "83-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-83-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Baseline and latest observation is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether systems have enough teachers in the places, grades and subjects where expansion requires them. A sufficient evidence base includes pupil-teacher ratios, vacancies, qualifications, absence, deployment and attrition, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-83-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that a national ratio can conceal overcrowding, unfilled posts and unequal assignment. It should therefore retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage and should apply the following domain safeguard: workforce monitoring should combine numbers with distribution, preparation, presence and workload. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-83-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teacher availability requires evidence on staffing, presence, workload, qualification and the instructional time actually available. The governing limitation is that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-84", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "84", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "84-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-84-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether systems have enough teachers in the places, grades and subjects where expansion requires them. Midpoint reporting should begin with pupil-teacher ratios, vacancies, qualifications, absence, deployment and attrition and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, a national ratio can conceal overcrowding, unfilled posts and unequal assignment.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-84-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under level and absolute population, the required proposition is the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition. Statistical and policy authorities should publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. They should also ensure that workforce monitoring should combine numbers with distribution, preparation, presence and workload. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-84-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teacher availability must be traced through staffing, presence, workload, qualification and the instructional time actually available. For interpretation, rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-85", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "85", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "85-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-85-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether systems have enough teachers in the places, grades and subjects where expansion requires them without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes pupil-teacher ratios, vacancies, qualifications, absence, deployment and attrition. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-85-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that a national ratio can conceal overcrowding, unfilled posts and unequal assignment. The distribution and equity review therefore determines how the national result is shared across groups and places and requires authorities to disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. The domain-specific response is clear: workforce monitoring should combine numbers with distribution, preparation, presence and workload.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-85-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teacher availability places the evidential emphasis on staffing, presence, workload, qualification and the instructional time actually available. The conclusion should follow the standard that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-86", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "86", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "86-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-86-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teacher availability illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether systems have enough teachers in the places, grades and subjects where expansion requires them, while the empirical account is built from pupil-teacher ratios, vacancies, qualifications, absence, deployment and attrition.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-86-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because a national ratio can conceal overcrowding, unfilled posts and unequal assignment, attention to service and learning quality is necessary. The authority should establish whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended and should connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. Its final account should reflect that workforce monitoring should combine numbers with distribution, preparation, presence and workload. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-86-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teacher availability should be judged through staffing, presence, workload, qualification and the instructional time actually available. The relevant interpretive boundary is that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-87", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "87", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "87-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-87-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of teacher availability asks whether systems have enough teachers in the places, grades and subjects where expansion requires them. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with pupil-teacher ratios, vacancies, qualifications, absence, deployment and attrition and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-87-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that a national ratio can conceal overcrowding, unfilled posts and unequal assignment. In considering trend and pace, authorities should identify the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period and compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. The operational principle is that workforce monitoring should combine numbers with distribution, preparation, presence and workload.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-87-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teacher availability requires evidence on staffing, presence, workload, qualification and the instructional time actually available. The resulting conclusion must observe that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-88", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "88", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "88-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-88-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in teacher availability is assessed against whether systems have enough teachers in the places, grades and subjects where expansion requires them. The record should contain pupil-teacher ratios, vacancies, qualifications, absence, deployment and attrition, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-88-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that a national ratio can conceal overcrowding, unfilled posts and unequal assignment. The projection and scenario test accordingly requires what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued; implementation should state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that workforce monitoring should combine numbers with distribution, preparation, presence and workload.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-88-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teacher availability must be traced through staffing, presence, workload, qualification and the instructional time actually available. The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-89", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "89", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "89-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-89-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in teacher availability cannot be understood without defining whether systems have enough teachers in the places, grades and subjects where expansion requires them. The appropriate measurement account combines pupil-teacher ratios, vacancies, qualifications, absence, deployment and attrition. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-89-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If a national ratio can conceal overcrowding, unfilled posts and unequal assignment, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under data quality and uncertainty should establish which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding, and the responsible bodies should compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. In substantive terms, workforce monitoring should combine numbers with distribution, preparation, presence and workload.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-89-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teacher availability places the evidential emphasis on staffing, presence, workload, qualification and the instructional time actually available. The reporting standard is that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-90", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "90", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "90-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-90-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teacher availability must be traced through staffing, presence, workload, qualification and the instructional time actually available. For teacher availability, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether systems have enough teachers in the places, grades and subjects where expansion requires them. The evidence should encompass pupil-teacher ratios, vacancies, qualifications, absence, deployment and attrition. The material measurement risk is that a national ratio can conceal overcrowding, unfilled posts and unequal assignment. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-90-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy response test asks for which public action is supported by the combined evidence. Authorities should identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. In this domain, workforce monitoring should combine numbers with distribution, preparation, presence and workload. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-90-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teacher availability should be judged through staffing, presence, workload, qualification and the instructional time actually available. The interpretive rule is that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-91", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "parentId": null, "number": "91", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "91-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-91-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether resources are sufficient, predictable and directed to the goals with greatest unmet need. A defensible account draws on public expenditure, unit cost, household contribution and the allocation across levels and regions. Because nominal spending can rise without preserving purchasing power or reaching disadvantaged schools, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that financial trends should be expressed in real terms and linked to service and equity outcomes.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-92", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "parentId": null, "number": "92", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "92-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-92-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether resources are sufficient, predictable and directed to the goals with greatest unmet need without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes public expenditure, unit cost, household contribution and the allocation across levels and regions. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-92-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that nominal spending can rise without preserving purchasing power or reaching disadvantaged schools. The goal definition review therefore determines the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies and requires authorities to separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. The domain-specific response is clear: financial trends should be expressed in real terms and linked to service and equity outcomes.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-92-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Education finance should be judged through authorised resources, timely release, actual receipt and the service protected. The conclusion should follow the standard that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-93", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "parentId": null, "number": "93", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "93-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-93-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Education finance illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether resources are sufficient, predictable and directed to the goals with greatest unmet need, while the empirical account is built from public expenditure, unit cost, household contribution and the allocation across levels and regions.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-93-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because nominal spending can rise without preserving purchasing power or reaching disadvantaged schools, attention to baseline and latest observation is necessary. The authority should establish the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar and should retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. Its final account should reflect that financial trends should be expressed in real terms and linked to service and equity outcomes. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-93-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Education finance requires evidence on authorised resources, timely release, actual receipt and the service protected. The relevant interpretive boundary is that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-94", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "parentId": null, "number": "94", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "94-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-94-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of education finance asks whether resources are sufficient, predictable and directed to the goals with greatest unmet need. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with public expenditure, unit cost, household contribution and the allocation across levels and regions and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-94-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that nominal spending can rise without preserving purchasing power or reaching disadvantaged schools. In considering level and absolute population, authorities should identify the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition and publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. The operational principle is that financial trends should be expressed in real terms and linked to service and equity outcomes.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-94-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Education finance must be traced through authorised resources, timely release, actual receipt and the service protected. The resulting conclusion must observe that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-95", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "parentId": null, "number": "95", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "95-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-95-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in education finance is assessed against whether resources are sufficient, predictable and directed to the goals with greatest unmet need. The record should contain public expenditure, unit cost, household contribution and the allocation across levels and regions, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-95-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that nominal spending can rise without preserving purchasing power or reaching disadvantaged schools. The distribution and equity test accordingly requires how the national result is shared across groups and places; implementation should disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that financial trends should be expressed in real terms and linked to service and equity outcomes.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-95-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Education finance places the evidential emphasis on authorised resources, timely release, actual receipt and the service protected. The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-96", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "parentId": null, "number": "96", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "96-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-96-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in education finance cannot be understood without defining whether resources are sufficient, predictable and directed to the goals with greatest unmet need. The appropriate measurement account combines public expenditure, unit cost, household contribution and the allocation across levels and regions. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-96-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If nominal spending can rise without preserving purchasing power or reaching disadvantaged schools, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under service and learning quality should establish whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended, and the responsible bodies should connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. In substantive terms, financial trends should be expressed in real terms and linked to service and equity outcomes.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-96-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Education finance should be judged through authorised resources, timely release, actual receipt and the service protected. The reporting standard is that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-97", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "parentId": null, "number": "97", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "97-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-97-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For education finance, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether resources are sufficient, predictable and directed to the goals with greatest unmet need. The evidence should encompass public expenditure, unit cost, household contribution and the allocation across levels and regions. The material measurement risk is that nominal spending can rise without preserving purchasing power or reaching disadvantaged schools. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-97-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The trend and pace test asks for the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period. Authorities should compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. In this domain, financial trends should be expressed in real terms and linked to service and equity outcomes. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-97-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Education finance requires evidence on authorised resources, timely release, actual receipt and the service protected. The interpretive rule is that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-98", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "parentId": null, "number": "98", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "98-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-98-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Projection and scenario is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether resources are sufficient, predictable and directed to the goals with greatest unmet need. A sufficient evidence base includes public expenditure, unit cost, household contribution and the allocation across levels and regions, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-98-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that nominal spending can rise without preserving purchasing power or reaching disadvantaged schools. It should therefore state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range and should apply the following domain safeguard: financial trends should be expressed in real terms and linked to service and equity outcomes. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-98-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Education finance must be traced through authorised resources, timely release, actual receipt and the service protected. The governing limitation is that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-99", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "parentId": null, "number": "99", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "99-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-99-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether resources are sufficient, predictable and directed to the goals with greatest unmet need. Midpoint reporting should begin with public expenditure, unit cost, household contribution and the allocation across levels and regions and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, nominal spending can rise without preserving purchasing power or reaching disadvantaged schools.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-99-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under data quality and uncertainty, the required proposition is which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding. Statistical and policy authorities should compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. They should also ensure that financial trends should be expressed in real terms and linked to service and equity outcomes. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-99-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Education finance places the evidential emphasis on authorised resources, timely release, actual receipt and the service protected. For interpretation, uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-100", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "parentId": null, "number": "100", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "100-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-100-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Education finance must be traced through authorised resources, timely release, actual receipt and the service protected. Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether resources are sufficient, predictable and directed to the goals with greatest unmet need without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes public expenditure, unit cost, household contribution and the allocation across levels and regions. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-100-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that nominal spending can rise without preserving purchasing power or reaching disadvantaged schools. The policy response review therefore determines which public action is supported by the combined evidence and requires authorities to identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. The domain-specific response is clear: financial trends should be expressed in real terms and linked to service and equity outcomes.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-100-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Education finance should be judged through authorised resources, timely release, actual receipt and the service protected. The conclusion should follow the standard that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-101", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "101", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "101-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-101-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether direct and indirect costs prevent entry, attendance or completion. A defensible account draws on fees, uniforms, transport, learning materials, foregone work and household consumption position. Because fee abolition alone may leave substantial non-fee burdens and supply constraints, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that cost measures should identify who pays, what is excluded and how relief affects regular participation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-102", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "102", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "102-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-102-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in household cost and poverty is assessed against whether direct and indirect costs prevent entry, attendance or completion. The record should contain fees, uniforms, transport, learning materials, foregone work and household consumption position, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-102-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that fee abolition alone may leave substantial non-fee burdens and supply constraints. The goal definition test accordingly requires the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies; implementation should separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that cost measures should identify who pays, what is excluded and how relief affects regular participation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-102-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Household cost and poverty should be judged through the full cost borne by households, the timing of payment and the participation consequence. The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-103", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "103", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "103-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-103-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in household cost and poverty cannot be understood without defining whether direct and indirect costs prevent entry, attendance or completion. The appropriate measurement account combines fees, uniforms, transport, learning materials, foregone work and household consumption position. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-103-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If fee abolition alone may leave substantial non-fee burdens and supply constraints, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under baseline and latest observation should establish the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar, and the responsible bodies should retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. In substantive terms, cost measures should identify who pays, what is excluded and how relief affects regular participation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-103-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Household cost and poverty requires evidence on the full cost borne by households, the timing of payment and the participation consequence. The reporting standard is that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-104", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "104", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "104-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-104-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For household cost and poverty, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether direct and indirect costs prevent entry, attendance or completion. The evidence should encompass fees, uniforms, transport, learning materials, foregone work and household consumption position. The material measurement risk is that fee abolition alone may leave substantial non-fee burdens and supply constraints. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-104-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The level and absolute population test asks for the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition. Authorities should publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. In this domain, cost measures should identify who pays, what is excluded and how relief affects regular participation. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-104-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Household cost and poverty must be traced through the full cost borne by households, the timing of payment and the participation consequence. The interpretive rule is that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-105", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "105", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "105-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-105-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distribution and equity is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether direct and indirect costs prevent entry, attendance or completion. A sufficient evidence base includes fees, uniforms, transport, learning materials, foregone work and household consumption position, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-105-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that fee abolition alone may leave substantial non-fee burdens and supply constraints. It should therefore disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy and should apply the following domain safeguard: cost measures should identify who pays, what is excluded and how relief affects regular participation. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-105-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Household cost and poverty places the evidential emphasis on the full cost borne by households, the timing of payment and the participation consequence. The governing limitation is that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-106", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "106", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "106-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-106-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether direct and indirect costs prevent entry, attendance or completion. Midpoint reporting should begin with fees, uniforms, transport, learning materials, foregone work and household consumption position and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, fee abolition alone may leave substantial non-fee burdens and supply constraints.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-106-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under service and learning quality, the required proposition is whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended. Statistical and policy authorities should connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. They should also ensure that cost measures should identify who pays, what is excluded and how relief affects regular participation. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-106-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Household cost and poverty should be judged through the full cost borne by households, the timing of payment and the participation consequence. For interpretation, quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-107", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "107", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "107-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-107-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether direct and indirect costs prevent entry, attendance or completion without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes fees, uniforms, transport, learning materials, foregone work and household consumption position. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-107-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that fee abolition alone may leave substantial non-fee burdens and supply constraints. The trend and pace review therefore determines the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period and requires authorities to compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. The domain-specific response is clear: cost measures should identify who pays, what is excluded and how relief affects regular participation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-107-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Household cost and poverty requires evidence on the full cost borne by households, the timing of payment and the participation consequence. The conclusion should follow the standard that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-108", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "108", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "108-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-108-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Household cost and poverty illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether direct and indirect costs prevent entry, attendance or completion, while the empirical account is built from fees, uniforms, transport, learning materials, foregone work and household consumption position.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-108-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because fee abolition alone may leave substantial non-fee burdens and supply constraints, attention to projection and scenario is necessary. The authority should establish what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued and should state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. Its final account should reflect that cost measures should identify who pays, what is excluded and how relief affects regular participation. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-108-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Household cost and poverty must be traced through the full cost borne by households, the timing of payment and the participation consequence. The relevant interpretive boundary is that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-109", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "109", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "109-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-109-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of household cost and poverty asks whether direct and indirect costs prevent entry, attendance or completion. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with fees, uniforms, transport, learning materials, foregone work and household consumption position and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-109-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that fee abolition alone may leave substantial non-fee burdens and supply constraints. In considering data quality and uncertainty, authorities should identify which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding and compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. The operational principle is that cost measures should identify who pays, what is excluded and how relief affects regular participation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-109-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Household cost and poverty places the evidential emphasis on the full cost borne by households, the timing of payment and the participation consequence. The resulting conclusion must observe that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-110", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "110", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "110-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-110-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Household cost and poverty must be traced through the full cost borne by households, the timing of payment and the participation consequence. Progress in household cost and poverty is assessed against whether direct and indirect costs prevent entry, attendance or completion. The record should contain fees, uniforms, transport, learning materials, foregone work and household consumption position, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-110-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that fee abolition alone may leave substantial non-fee burdens and supply constraints. The policy response test accordingly requires which public action is supported by the combined evidence; implementation should identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that cost measures should identify who pays, what is excluded and how relief affects regular participation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-110-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Household cost and poverty should be judged through the full cost borne by households, the timing of payment and the participation consequence. The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-111", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "111", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "111-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-111-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether geographic distribution permits children to reach complete cycles of acceptable education. A defensible account draws on school location, travel time, population density, staffing and grade range. Because urban-rural classifications differ and can conceal remote settlements within broad administrative categories, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that mapping should connect learner residence with available provision and the cost of distance.", "citationIds": [ "REF-12" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-112", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "112", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "112-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-112-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Goal definition is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether geographic distribution permits children to reach complete cycles of acceptable education. A sufficient evidence base includes school location, travel time, population density, staffing and grade range, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-112-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that urban-rural classifications differ and can conceal remote settlements within broad administrative categories. It should therefore separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it and should apply the following domain safeguard: mapping should connect learner residence with available provision and the cost of distance. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-112-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Rural and remote provision should be judged through distance, sparse provision, transport, staffing and the absence of a feasible alternative. The governing limitation is that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-113", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "113", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "113-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-113-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether geographic distribution permits children to reach complete cycles of acceptable education. Midpoint reporting should begin with school location, travel time, population density, staffing and grade range and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, urban-rural classifications differ and can conceal remote settlements within broad administrative categories.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-113-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under baseline and latest observation, the required proposition is the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar. Statistical and policy authorities should retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. They should also ensure that mapping should connect learner residence with available provision and the cost of distance. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-113-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Rural and remote provision requires evidence on distance, sparse provision, transport, staffing and the absence of a feasible alternative. For interpretation, apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-114", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "114", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "114-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-114-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether geographic distribution permits children to reach complete cycles of acceptable education without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes school location, travel time, population density, staffing and grade range. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-114-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that urban-rural classifications differ and can conceal remote settlements within broad administrative categories. The level and absolute population review therefore determines the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition and requires authorities to publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. The domain-specific response is clear: mapping should connect learner residence with available provision and the cost of distance.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-114-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Rural and remote provision must be traced through distance, sparse provision, transport, staffing and the absence of a feasible alternative. The conclusion should follow the standard that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-115", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "115", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "115-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-115-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Rural and remote provision illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether geographic distribution permits children to reach complete cycles of acceptable education, while the empirical account is built from school location, travel time, population density, staffing and grade range.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-115-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because urban-rural classifications differ and can conceal remote settlements within broad administrative categories, attention to distribution and equity is necessary. The authority should establish how the national result is shared across groups and places and should disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. Its final account should reflect that mapping should connect learner residence with available provision and the cost of distance. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-115-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Rural and remote provision places the evidential emphasis on distance, sparse provision, transport, staffing and the absence of a feasible alternative. The relevant interpretive boundary is that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-116", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "116", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "116-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-116-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of rural and remote provision asks whether geographic distribution permits children to reach complete cycles of acceptable education. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with school location, travel time, population density, staffing and grade range and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-116-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that urban-rural classifications differ and can conceal remote settlements within broad administrative categories. In considering service and learning quality, authorities should identify whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended and connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. The operational principle is that mapping should connect learner residence with available provision and the cost of distance.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-116-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Rural and remote provision should be judged through distance, sparse provision, transport, staffing and the absence of a feasible alternative. The resulting conclusion must observe that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-117", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "117", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "117-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-117-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in rural and remote provision is assessed against whether geographic distribution permits children to reach complete cycles of acceptable education. The record should contain school location, travel time, population density, staffing and grade range, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-117-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that urban-rural classifications differ and can conceal remote settlements within broad administrative categories. The trend and pace test accordingly requires the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period; implementation should compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that mapping should connect learner residence with available provision and the cost of distance.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-117-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Rural and remote provision requires evidence on distance, sparse provision, transport, staffing and the absence of a feasible alternative. The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-118", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "118", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "118-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-118-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in rural and remote provision cannot be understood without defining whether geographic distribution permits children to reach complete cycles of acceptable education. The appropriate measurement account combines school location, travel time, population density, staffing and grade range. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-118-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If urban-rural classifications differ and can conceal remote settlements within broad administrative categories, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under projection and scenario should establish what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued, and the responsible bodies should state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. In substantive terms, mapping should connect learner residence with available provision and the cost of distance.", "citationIds": [ "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-118-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Rural and remote provision must be traced through distance, sparse provision, transport, staffing and the absence of a feasible alternative. The reporting standard is that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-119", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "119", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "119-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-119-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For rural and remote provision, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether geographic distribution permits children to reach complete cycles of acceptable education. The evidence should encompass school location, travel time, population density, staffing and grade range. The material measurement risk is that urban-rural classifications differ and can conceal remote settlements within broad administrative categories. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-119-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The data quality and uncertainty test asks for which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding. Authorities should compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. In this domain, mapping should connect learner residence with available provision and the cost of distance. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-119-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Rural and remote provision places the evidential emphasis on distance, sparse provision, transport, staffing and the absence of a feasible alternative. The interpretive rule is that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-120", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "120", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "120-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-120-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Policy response is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether geographic distribution permits children to reach complete cycles of acceptable education. A sufficient evidence base includes school location, travel time, population density, staffing and grade range, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-120-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that urban-rural classifications differ and can conceal remote settlements within broad administrative categories. It should therefore identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation and should apply the following domain safeguard: mapping should connect learner residence with available provision and the cost of distance. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-120-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Rural and remote provision should be judged through distance, sparse provision, transport, staffing and the absence of a feasible alternative. The governing limitation is that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-121", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "121", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "121-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-121-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether language and identity create barriers to comprehension, participation or acceptable provision. A defensible account draws on home language, language of instruction, teacher capacity, materials and community evidence. Because identity categories can be unavailable or misused as causal explanations, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that language-related patterns should initiate examination of delivery while protecting self-identification and community participation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-122", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "122", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "122-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-122-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Language and minority status illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether language and identity create barriers to comprehension, participation or acceptable provision, while the empirical account is built from home language, language of instruction, teacher capacity, materials and community evidence.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-122-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because identity categories can be unavailable or misused as causal explanations, attention to goal definition is necessary. The authority should establish the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies and should separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. Its final account should reflect that language-related patterns should initiate examination of delivery while protecting self-identification and community participation. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-122-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Language and minority status should be judged through language of information, instruction, assessment and meaningful participation. The relevant interpretive boundary is that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-123", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "123", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "123-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-123-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of language and minority status asks whether language and identity create barriers to comprehension, participation or acceptable provision. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with home language, language of instruction, teacher capacity, materials and community evidence and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-123-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that identity categories can be unavailable or misused as causal explanations. In considering baseline and latest observation, authorities should identify the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar and retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. The operational principle is that language-related patterns should initiate examination of delivery while protecting self-identification and community participation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-123-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Language and minority status requires evidence on language of information, instruction, assessment and meaningful participation. The resulting conclusion must observe that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-124", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "124", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "124-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-124-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in language and minority status is assessed against whether language and identity create barriers to comprehension, participation or acceptable provision. The record should contain home language, language of instruction, teacher capacity, materials and community evidence, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-124-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that identity categories can be unavailable or misused as causal explanations. The level and absolute population test accordingly requires the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition; implementation should publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that language-related patterns should initiate examination of delivery while protecting self-identification and community participation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-124-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Language and minority status must be traced through language of information, instruction, assessment and meaningful participation. The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-125", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "125", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "125-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-125-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in language and minority status cannot be understood without defining whether language and identity create barriers to comprehension, participation or acceptable provision. The appropriate measurement account combines home language, language of instruction, teacher capacity, materials and community evidence. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-125-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If identity categories can be unavailable or misused as causal explanations, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under distribution and equity should establish how the national result is shared across groups and places, and the responsible bodies should disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. In substantive terms, language-related patterns should initiate examination of delivery while protecting self-identification and community participation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-125-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Language and minority status places the evidential emphasis on language of information, instruction, assessment and meaningful participation. The reporting standard is that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-126", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "126", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "126-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-126-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For language and minority status, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether language and identity create barriers to comprehension, participation or acceptable provision. The evidence should encompass home language, language of instruction, teacher capacity, materials and community evidence. The material measurement risk is that identity categories can be unavailable or misused as causal explanations. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-126-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The service and learning quality test asks for whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended. Authorities should connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. In this domain, language-related patterns should initiate examination of delivery while protecting self-identification and community participation. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-126-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Language and minority status should be judged through language of information, instruction, assessment and meaningful participation. The interpretive rule is that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-127", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "127", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "127-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-127-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Trend and pace is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether language and identity create barriers to comprehension, participation or acceptable provision. A sufficient evidence base includes home language, language of instruction, teacher capacity, materials and community evidence, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-127-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that identity categories can be unavailable or misused as causal explanations. It should therefore compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision and should apply the following domain safeguard: language-related patterns should initiate examination of delivery while protecting self-identification and community participation. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-127-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Language and minority status requires evidence on language of information, instruction, assessment and meaningful participation. The governing limitation is that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-128", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "128", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "128-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-128-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether language and identity create barriers to comprehension, participation or acceptable provision. Midpoint reporting should begin with home language, language of instruction, teacher capacity, materials and community evidence and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, identity categories can be unavailable or misused as causal explanations.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-128-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under projection and scenario, the required proposition is what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued. Statistical and policy authorities should state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. They should also ensure that language-related patterns should initiate examination of delivery while protecting self-identification and community participation. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [ "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-128-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Language and minority status must be traced through language of information, instruction, assessment and meaningful participation. For interpretation, distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-129", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "129", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "129-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-129-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether language and identity create barriers to comprehension, participation or acceptable provision without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes home language, language of instruction, teacher capacity, materials and community evidence. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-129-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that identity categories can be unavailable or misused as causal explanations. The data quality and uncertainty review therefore determines which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding and requires authorities to compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. The domain-specific response is clear: language-related patterns should initiate examination of delivery while protecting self-identification and community participation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-129-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Language and minority status places the evidential emphasis on language of information, instruction, assessment and meaningful participation. The conclusion should follow the standard that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-130", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "130", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "130-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-130-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Language and minority status must be traced through language of information, instruction, assessment and meaningful participation. Language and minority status illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether language and identity create barriers to comprehension, participation or acceptable provision, while the empirical account is built from home language, language of instruction, teacher capacity, materials and community evidence. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-130-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because identity categories can be unavailable or misused as causal explanations, attention to policy response is necessary. The authority should establish which public action is supported by the combined evidence and should identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. Its final account should reflect that language-related patterns should initiate examination of delivery while protecting self-identification and community participation. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-130-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Language and minority status should be judged through language of information, instruction, assessment and meaningful participation. The relevant interpretive boundary is that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-131", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "131", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "131-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-131-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether children with disabilities participate in ordinary education with the support required. A defensible account draws on functional difficulty, accessibility, placement, attendance, support and progression. Because diagnosis-based administrative counts omit children without assessment or services, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that systems should improve inclusive data without delaying removal of known environmental and institutional barriers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-14" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-132", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "132", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "132-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-132-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in disability and inclusion cannot be understood without defining whether children with disabilities participate in ordinary education with the support required. The appropriate measurement account combines functional difficulty, accessibility, placement, attendance, support and progression. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-132-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If diagnosis-based administrative counts omit children without assessment or services, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under goal definition should establish the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies, and the responsible bodies should separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. In substantive terms, systems should improve inclusive data without delaying removal of known environmental and institutional barriers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-132-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Disability and inclusion should be judged through accessibility, reasonable support, ordinary participation and remedy when provision fails. The reporting standard is that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-133", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "133", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "133-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-133-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For disability and inclusion, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether children with disabilities participate in ordinary education with the support required. The evidence should encompass functional difficulty, accessibility, placement, attendance, support and progression. The material measurement risk is that diagnosis-based administrative counts omit children without assessment or services. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-133-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The baseline and latest observation test asks for the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar. Authorities should retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. In this domain, systems should improve inclusive data without delaying removal of known environmental and institutional barriers. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-133-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Disability and inclusion requires evidence on accessibility, reasonable support, ordinary participation and remedy when provision fails. The interpretive rule is that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-134", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "134", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "134-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-134-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Level and absolute population is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether children with disabilities participate in ordinary education with the support required. A sufficient evidence base includes functional difficulty, accessibility, placement, attendance, support and progression, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-134-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that diagnosis-based administrative counts omit children without assessment or services. It should therefore publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits and should apply the following domain safeguard: systems should improve inclusive data without delaying removal of known environmental and institutional barriers. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-134-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Disability and inclusion must be traced through accessibility, reasonable support, ordinary participation and remedy when provision fails. The governing limitation is that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-135", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "135", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "135-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-135-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether children with disabilities participate in ordinary education with the support required. Midpoint reporting should begin with functional difficulty, accessibility, placement, attendance, support and progression and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, diagnosis-based administrative counts omit children without assessment or services.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-135-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under distribution and equity, the required proposition is how the national result is shared across groups and places. Statistical and policy authorities should disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. They should also ensure that systems should improve inclusive data without delaying removal of known environmental and institutional barriers. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-135-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Disability and inclusion places the evidential emphasis on accessibility, reasonable support, ordinary participation and remedy when provision fails. For interpretation, progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-136", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "136", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "136-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-136-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether children with disabilities participate in ordinary education with the support required without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes functional difficulty, accessibility, placement, attendance, support and progression. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-136-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that diagnosis-based administrative counts omit children without assessment or services. The service and learning quality review therefore determines whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended and requires authorities to connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. The domain-specific response is clear: systems should improve inclusive data without delaying removal of known environmental and institutional barriers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-136-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Disability and inclusion should be judged through accessibility, reasonable support, ordinary participation and remedy when provision fails. The conclusion should follow the standard that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-137", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "137", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "137-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-137-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Disability and inclusion illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether children with disabilities participate in ordinary education with the support required, while the empirical account is built from functional difficulty, accessibility, placement, attendance, support and progression.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-137-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because diagnosis-based administrative counts omit children without assessment or services, attention to trend and pace is necessary. The authority should establish the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period and should compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. Its final account should reflect that systems should improve inclusive data without delaying removal of known environmental and institutional barriers. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-137-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Disability and inclusion requires evidence on accessibility, reasonable support, ordinary participation and remedy when provision fails. The relevant interpretive boundary is that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-138", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "138", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "138-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-138-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of disability and inclusion asks whether children with disabilities participate in ordinary education with the support required. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with functional difficulty, accessibility, placement, attendance, support and progression and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-138-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that diagnosis-based administrative counts omit children without assessment or services. In considering projection and scenario, authorities should identify what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued and state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. The operational principle is that systems should improve inclusive data without delaying removal of known environmental and institutional barriers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-138-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Disability and inclusion must be traced through accessibility, reasonable support, ordinary participation and remedy when provision fails. The resulting conclusion must observe that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-139", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "139", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "139-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-139-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in disability and inclusion is assessed against whether children with disabilities participate in ordinary education with the support required. The record should contain functional difficulty, accessibility, placement, attendance, support and progression, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-139-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that diagnosis-based administrative counts omit children without assessment or services. The data quality and uncertainty test accordingly requires which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding; implementation should compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that systems should improve inclusive data without delaying removal of known environmental and institutional barriers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-139-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Disability and inclusion places the evidential emphasis on accessibility, reasonable support, ordinary participation and remedy when provision fails. The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-140", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "140", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "140-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-140-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Disability and inclusion must be traced through accessibility, reasonable support, ordinary participation and remedy when provision fails. The distance remaining in disability and inclusion cannot be understood without defining whether children with disabilities participate in ordinary education with the support required. The appropriate measurement account combines functional difficulty, accessibility, placement, attendance, support and progression. It should preserve both national and distributional results. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-140-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If diagnosis-based administrative counts omit children without assessment or services, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under policy response should establish which public action is supported by the combined evidence, and the responsible bodies should identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. In substantive terms, systems should improve inclusive data without delaying removal of known environmental and institutional barriers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-140-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Disability and inclusion should be judged through accessibility, reasonable support, ordinary participation and remedy when provision fails. The reporting standard is that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-141", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "141", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "141-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-141-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether education remains available and continuous amid violence, displacement or disaster. A defensible account draws on school operation, population movement, learning time, safety and temporary provision. Because ordinary denominators and institution lists may cease to represent the affected population, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that monitoring should preserve a minimum account of learners, provision, interruption and restoration without creating unsafe data practices.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-142", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "142", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "142-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-142-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether education remains available and continuous amid violence, displacement or disaster. Midpoint reporting should begin with school operation, population movement, learning time, safety and temporary provision and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, ordinary denominators and institution lists may cease to represent the affected population.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-142-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under goal definition, the required proposition is the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies. Statistical and policy authorities should separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. They should also ensure that monitoring should preserve a minimum account of learners, provision, interruption and restoration without creating unsafe data practices. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-142-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For interpretation, a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes. The report should state how it affected the assessment of progress and the distance remaining.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-143", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "143", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "143-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-143-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether education remains available and continuous amid violence, displacement or disaster without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes school operation, population movement, learning time, safety and temporary provision. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-143-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that ordinary denominators and institution lists may cease to represent the affected population. The baseline and latest observation review therefore determines the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar and requires authorities to retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. The domain-specific response is clear: monitoring should preserve a minimum account of learners, provision, interruption and restoration without creating unsafe data practices.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-143-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The conclusion should follow the standard that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value. The report should state how it affected the assessment of progress and the distance remaining.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-144", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "144", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "144-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-144-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Conflict, displacement and emergency illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether education remains available and continuous amid violence, displacement or disaster, while the empirical account is built from school operation, population movement, learning time, safety and temporary provision.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-144-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because ordinary denominators and institution lists may cease to represent the affected population, attention to level and absolute population is necessary. The authority should establish the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition and should publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. Its final account should reflect that monitoring should preserve a minimum account of learners, provision, interruption and restoration without creating unsafe data practices. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-144-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The relevant interpretive boundary is that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required. The report should state how it affected the assessment of progress and the distance remaining.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-145", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "145", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "145-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-145-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of conflict, displacement and emergency asks whether education remains available and continuous amid violence, displacement or disaster. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with school operation, population movement, learning time, safety and temporary provision and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-145-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that ordinary denominators and institution lists may cease to represent the affected population. In considering distribution and equity, authorities should identify how the national result is shared across groups and places and disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. The operational principle is that monitoring should preserve a minimum account of learners, provision, interruption and restoration without creating unsafe data practices.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-145-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The resulting conclusion must observe that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems. The report should state how it affected the assessment of progress and the distance remaining.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-146", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "146", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "146-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-146-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in conflict, displacement and emergency is assessed against whether education remains available and continuous amid violence, displacement or disaster. The record should contain school operation, population movement, learning time, safety and temporary provision, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-146-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that ordinary denominators and institution lists may cease to represent the affected population. The service and learning quality test accordingly requires whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended; implementation should connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that monitoring should preserve a minimum account of learners, provision, interruption and restoration without creating unsafe data practices.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-146-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established. The report should state how it affected the assessment of progress and the distance remaining.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-147", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "147", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "147-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-147-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in conflict, displacement and emergency cannot be understood without defining whether education remains available and continuous amid violence, displacement or disaster. The appropriate measurement account combines school operation, population movement, learning time, safety and temporary provision. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-147-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If ordinary denominators and institution lists may cease to represent the affected population, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under trend and pace should establish the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period, and the responsible bodies should compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. In substantive terms, monitoring should preserve a minimum account of learners, provision, interruption and restoration without creating unsafe data practices.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-147-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The reporting standard is that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress. The report should state how it affected the assessment of progress and the distance remaining.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-148", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "148", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "148-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-148-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For conflict, displacement and emergency, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether education remains available and continuous amid violence, displacement or disaster. The evidence should encompass school operation, population movement, learning time, safety and temporary provision. The material measurement risk is that ordinary denominators and institution lists may cease to represent the affected population. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-148-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The projection and scenario test asks for what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued. Authorities should state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. In this domain, monitoring should preserve a minimum account of learners, provision, interruption and restoration without creating unsafe data practices. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-148-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The interpretive rule is that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself. The report should state how it affected the assessment of progress and the distance remaining.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-149", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "149", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "149-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-149-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Data quality and uncertainty is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether education remains available and continuous amid violence, displacement or disaster. A sufficient evidence base includes school operation, population movement, learning time, safety and temporary provision, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-149-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that ordinary denominators and institution lists may cease to represent the affected population. It should therefore compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial and should apply the following domain safeguard: monitoring should preserve a minimum account of learners, provision, interruption and restoration without creating unsafe data practices. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-149-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing limitation is that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive. The report should state how it affected the assessment of progress and the distance remaining.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-150", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "150", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "150-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-150-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether education remains available and continuous amid violence, displacement or disaster. Midpoint reporting should begin with school operation, population movement, learning time, safety and temporary provision and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, ordinary denominators and institution lists may cease to represent the affected population. The report should state how it affected the assessment of progress and the distance remaining.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-150-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under policy response, the required proposition is which public action is supported by the combined evidence. Statistical and policy authorities should identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. They should also ensure that monitoring should preserve a minimum account of learners, provision, interruption and restoration without creating unsafe data practices. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-150-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For interpretation, monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes. The report should state how it affected the assessment of progress and the distance remaining.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-151", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "151", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "151-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-151-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether work, exploitation or unsafe conditions prevent sustained education. A defensible account draws on attendance, hours and type of work, household conditions and protection records. Because school participation and labour may overlap, so a simple binary can miss harmful intensity or seasonal withdrawal, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that education and protection evidence should be interpreted jointly with particular attention to the worst forms of labour.", "citationIds": [ "REF-16" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-152", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "152", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "152-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-152-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of child labour and protection asks whether work, exploitation or unsafe conditions prevent sustained education. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with attendance, hours and type of work, household conditions and protection records and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-152-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that school participation and labour may overlap, so a simple binary can miss harmful intensity or seasonal withdrawal. In considering goal definition, authorities should identify the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies and separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. The operational principle is that education and protection evidence should be interpreted jointly with particular attention to the worst forms of labour.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-152-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Child labour and protection should be judged through safety, excessive work, care responsibilities, attendance and referral to competent protection services. The resulting conclusion must observe that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-153", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "153", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "153-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-153-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in child labour and protection is assessed against whether work, exploitation or unsafe conditions prevent sustained education. The record should contain attendance, hours and type of work, household conditions and protection records, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-153-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that school participation and labour may overlap, so a simple binary can miss harmful intensity or seasonal withdrawal. The baseline and latest observation test accordingly requires the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar; implementation should retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that education and protection evidence should be interpreted jointly with particular attention to the worst forms of labour.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-153-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Child labour and protection requires evidence on safety, excessive work, care responsibilities, attendance and referral to competent protection services. The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-154", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "154", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "154-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-154-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in child labour and protection cannot be understood without defining whether work, exploitation or unsafe conditions prevent sustained education. The appropriate measurement account combines attendance, hours and type of work, household conditions and protection records. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-154-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If school participation and labour may overlap, so a simple binary can miss harmful intensity or seasonal withdrawal, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under level and absolute population should establish the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition, and the responsible bodies should publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. In substantive terms, education and protection evidence should be interpreted jointly with particular attention to the worst forms of labour.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-154-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Child labour and protection must be traced through safety, excessive work, care responsibilities, attendance and referral to competent protection services. The reporting standard is that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-155", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "155", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "155-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-155-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For child labour and protection, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether work, exploitation or unsafe conditions prevent sustained education. The evidence should encompass attendance, hours and type of work, household conditions and protection records. The material measurement risk is that school participation and labour may overlap, so a simple binary can miss harmful intensity or seasonal withdrawal. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-155-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distribution and equity test asks for how the national result is shared across groups and places. Authorities should disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. In this domain, education and protection evidence should be interpreted jointly with particular attention to the worst forms of labour. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-155-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Child labour and protection places the evidential emphasis on safety, excessive work, care responsibilities, attendance and referral to competent protection services. The interpretive rule is that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-156", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "156", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "156-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-156-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Service and learning quality is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether work, exploitation or unsafe conditions prevent sustained education. A sufficient evidence base includes attendance, hours and type of work, household conditions and protection records, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-156-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that school participation and labour may overlap, so a simple binary can miss harmful intensity or seasonal withdrawal. It should therefore connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence and should apply the following domain safeguard: education and protection evidence should be interpreted jointly with particular attention to the worst forms of labour. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-156-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Child labour and protection should be judged through safety, excessive work, care responsibilities, attendance and referral to competent protection services. The governing limitation is that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-157", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "157", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "157-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-157-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether work, exploitation or unsafe conditions prevent sustained education. Midpoint reporting should begin with attendance, hours and type of work, household conditions and protection records and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, school participation and labour may overlap, so a simple binary can miss harmful intensity or seasonal withdrawal.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-157-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under trend and pace, the required proposition is the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period. Statistical and policy authorities should compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. They should also ensure that education and protection evidence should be interpreted jointly with particular attention to the worst forms of labour. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-157-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Child labour and protection requires evidence on safety, excessive work, care responsibilities, attendance and referral to competent protection services. For interpretation, a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-158", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "158", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "158-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-158-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether work, exploitation or unsafe conditions prevent sustained education without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes attendance, hours and type of work, household conditions and protection records. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-158-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that school participation and labour may overlap, so a simple binary can miss harmful intensity or seasonal withdrawal. The projection and scenario review therefore determines what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued and requires authorities to state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. The domain-specific response is clear: education and protection evidence should be interpreted jointly with particular attention to the worst forms of labour.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-158-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Child labour and protection must be traced through safety, excessive work, care responsibilities, attendance and referral to competent protection services. The conclusion should follow the standard that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-159", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "159", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "159-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-159-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Child labour and protection illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether work, exploitation or unsafe conditions prevent sustained education, while the empirical account is built from attendance, hours and type of work, household conditions and protection records.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-159-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because school participation and labour may overlap, so a simple binary can miss harmful intensity or seasonal withdrawal, attention to data quality and uncertainty is necessary. The authority should establish which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding and should compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. Its final account should reflect that education and protection evidence should be interpreted jointly with particular attention to the worst forms of labour. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-159-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Child labour and protection places the evidential emphasis on safety, excessive work, care responsibilities, attendance and referral to competent protection services. The relevant interpretive boundary is that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-160", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "160", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "160-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-160-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Child labour and protection must be traced through safety, excessive work, care responsibilities, attendance and referral to competent protection services. A responsible account of child labour and protection asks whether work, exploitation or unsafe conditions prevent sustained education. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with attendance, hours and type of work, household conditions and protection records and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-160-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that school participation and labour may overlap, so a simple binary can miss harmful intensity or seasonal withdrawal. In considering policy response, authorities should identify which public action is supported by the combined evidence and identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. The operational principle is that education and protection evidence should be interpreted jointly with particular attention to the worst forms of labour.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-160-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Child labour and protection should be judged through safety, excessive work, care responsibilities, attendance and referral to competent protection services. The resulting conclusion must observe that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-161", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "161", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "161-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-161-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether public bodies can plan, finance, deliver and correct the measures required. A defensible account draws on responsibility, budget execution, information systems, inspection and local implementation. Because policy adoption may be reported as progress even where operational authority and resources are absent, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that monitoring should distinguish commitment, capacity, delivery and result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-162", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "162", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "162-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-162-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For governance and institutional capacity, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether public bodies can plan, finance, deliver and correct the measures required. The evidence should encompass responsibility, budget execution, information systems, inspection and local implementation. The material measurement risk is that policy adoption may be reported as progress even where operational authority and resources are absent. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-162-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The goal definition test asks for the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies. Authorities should separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. In this domain, monitoring should distinguish commitment, capacity, delivery and result. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-162-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Governance and institutional capacity should be judged through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The interpretive rule is that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-163", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "163", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "163-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-163-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Baseline and latest observation is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether public bodies can plan, finance, deliver and correct the measures required. A sufficient evidence base includes responsibility, budget execution, information systems, inspection and local implementation, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-163-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that policy adoption may be reported as progress even where operational authority and resources are absent. It should therefore retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage and should apply the following domain safeguard: monitoring should distinguish commitment, capacity, delivery and result. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-163-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Governance and institutional capacity requires evidence on the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The governing limitation is that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-164", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "164", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "164-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-164-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether public bodies can plan, finance, deliver and correct the measures required. Midpoint reporting should begin with responsibility, budget execution, information systems, inspection and local implementation and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, policy adoption may be reported as progress even where operational authority and resources are absent.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-164-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under level and absolute population, the required proposition is the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition. Statistical and policy authorities should publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. They should also ensure that monitoring should distinguish commitment, capacity, delivery and result. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-164-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Governance and institutional capacity must be traced through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. For interpretation, rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-165", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "165", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "165-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-165-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether public bodies can plan, finance, deliver and correct the measures required without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes responsibility, budget execution, information systems, inspection and local implementation. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-165-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that policy adoption may be reported as progress even where operational authority and resources are absent. The distribution and equity review therefore determines how the national result is shared across groups and places and requires authorities to disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. The domain-specific response is clear: monitoring should distinguish commitment, capacity, delivery and result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-165-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Governance and institutional capacity places the evidential emphasis on the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The conclusion should follow the standard that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-166", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "166", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "166-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-166-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Governance and institutional capacity illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether public bodies can plan, finance, deliver and correct the measures required, while the empirical account is built from responsibility, budget execution, information systems, inspection and local implementation.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-166-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because policy adoption may be reported as progress even where operational authority and resources are absent, attention to service and learning quality is necessary. The authority should establish whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended and should connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. Its final account should reflect that monitoring should distinguish commitment, capacity, delivery and result. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-166-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Governance and institutional capacity should be judged through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The relevant interpretive boundary is that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-167", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "167", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "167-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-167-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of governance and institutional capacity asks whether public bodies can plan, finance, deliver and correct the measures required. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with responsibility, budget execution, information systems, inspection and local implementation and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-167-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that policy adoption may be reported as progress even where operational authority and resources are absent. In considering trend and pace, authorities should identify the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period and compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. The operational principle is that monitoring should distinguish commitment, capacity, delivery and result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-167-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Governance and institutional capacity requires evidence on the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The resulting conclusion must observe that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-168", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "168", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "168-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-168-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in governance and institutional capacity is assessed against whether public bodies can plan, finance, deliver and correct the measures required. The record should contain responsibility, budget execution, information systems, inspection and local implementation, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-168-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that policy adoption may be reported as progress even where operational authority and resources are absent. The projection and scenario test accordingly requires what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued; implementation should state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that monitoring should distinguish commitment, capacity, delivery and result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-168-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Governance and institutional capacity must be traced through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-169", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "169", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "169-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-169-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in governance and institutional capacity cannot be understood without defining whether public bodies can plan, finance, deliver and correct the measures required. The appropriate measurement account combines responsibility, budget execution, information systems, inspection and local implementation. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-169-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If policy adoption may be reported as progress even where operational authority and resources are absent, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under data quality and uncertainty should establish which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding, and the responsible bodies should compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. In substantive terms, monitoring should distinguish commitment, capacity, delivery and result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-169-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Governance and institutional capacity places the evidential emphasis on the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The reporting standard is that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-170", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "170", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "170-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-170-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Governance and institutional capacity must be traced through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. For governance and institutional capacity, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether public bodies can plan, finance, deliver and correct the measures required. The evidence should encompass responsibility, budget execution, information systems, inspection and local implementation. The material measurement risk is that policy adoption may be reported as progress even where operational authority and resources are absent. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-170-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy response test asks for which public action is supported by the combined evidence. Authorities should identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. In this domain, monitoring should distinguish commitment, capacity, delivery and result. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-170-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Governance and institutional capacity should be judged through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The interpretive rule is that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-171", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "171", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "171-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-171-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether external finance and technical cooperation support sustained national priorities. A defensible account draws on commitment, disbursement, predictability, sector allocation and alignment with national plans. Because announced aid may not arrive on time or may create fragmented reporting and recurrent costs, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that assistance should be assessed by usable, predictable support and its contribution to national capacity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-18" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-172", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "172", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "172-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-172-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether external finance and technical cooperation support sustained national priorities without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes commitment, disbursement, predictability, sector allocation and alignment with national plans. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-172-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that announced aid may not arrive on time or may create fragmented reporting and recurrent costs. The goal definition review therefore determines the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies and requires authorities to separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. The domain-specific response is clear: assistance should be assessed by usable, predictable support and its contribution to national capacity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-172-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "International assistance should be judged through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The conclusion should follow the standard that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-173", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "173", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "173-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-173-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "International assistance illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether external finance and technical cooperation support sustained national priorities, while the empirical account is built from commitment, disbursement, predictability, sector allocation and alignment with national plans.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-173-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because announced aid may not arrive on time or may create fragmented reporting and recurrent costs, attention to baseline and latest observation is necessary. The authority should establish the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar and should retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. Its final account should reflect that assistance should be assessed by usable, predictable support and its contribution to national capacity. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-173-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "International assistance requires evidence on the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The relevant interpretive boundary is that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-174", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "174", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "174-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-174-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of international assistance asks whether external finance and technical cooperation support sustained national priorities. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with commitment, disbursement, predictability, sector allocation and alignment with national plans and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-174-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that announced aid may not arrive on time or may create fragmented reporting and recurrent costs. In considering level and absolute population, authorities should identify the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition and publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. The operational principle is that assistance should be assessed by usable, predictable support and its contribution to national capacity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-174-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "International assistance must be traced through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The resulting conclusion must observe that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-175", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "175", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "175-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-175-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in international assistance is assessed against whether external finance and technical cooperation support sustained national priorities. The record should contain commitment, disbursement, predictability, sector allocation and alignment with national plans, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-175-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that announced aid may not arrive on time or may create fragmented reporting and recurrent costs. The distribution and equity test accordingly requires how the national result is shared across groups and places; implementation should disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that assistance should be assessed by usable, predictable support and its contribution to national capacity.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-175-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "International assistance places the evidential emphasis on the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-176", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "176", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "176-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-176-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in international assistance cannot be understood without defining whether external finance and technical cooperation support sustained national priorities. The appropriate measurement account combines commitment, disbursement, predictability, sector allocation and alignment with national plans. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-176-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If announced aid may not arrive on time or may create fragmented reporting and recurrent costs, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under service and learning quality should establish whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended, and the responsible bodies should connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. In substantive terms, assistance should be assessed by usable, predictable support and its contribution to national capacity.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-176-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "International assistance should be judged through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The reporting standard is that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-177", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "177", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "177-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-177-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For international assistance, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether external finance and technical cooperation support sustained national priorities. The evidence should encompass commitment, disbursement, predictability, sector allocation and alignment with national plans. The material measurement risk is that announced aid may not arrive on time or may create fragmented reporting and recurrent costs. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-177-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The trend and pace test asks for the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period. Authorities should compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. In this domain, assistance should be assessed by usable, predictable support and its contribution to national capacity. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-177-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "International assistance requires evidence on the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The interpretive rule is that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-178", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "178", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "178-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-178-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Projection and scenario is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether external finance and technical cooperation support sustained national priorities. A sufficient evidence base includes commitment, disbursement, predictability, sector allocation and alignment with national plans, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-178-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that announced aid may not arrive on time or may create fragmented reporting and recurrent costs. It should therefore state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range and should apply the following domain safeguard: assistance should be assessed by usable, predictable support and its contribution to national capacity. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-178-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "International assistance must be traced through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The governing limitation is that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-179", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "179", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "179-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-179-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether external finance and technical cooperation support sustained national priorities. Midpoint reporting should begin with commitment, disbursement, predictability, sector allocation and alignment with national plans and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, announced aid may not arrive on time or may create fragmented reporting and recurrent costs.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-179-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under data quality and uncertainty, the required proposition is which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding. Statistical and policy authorities should compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. They should also ensure that assistance should be assessed by usable, predictable support and its contribution to national capacity. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-179-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "International assistance places the evidential emphasis on the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. For interpretation, uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-180", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "180", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "180-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-180-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "International assistance must be traced through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether external finance and technical cooperation support sustained national priorities without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes commitment, disbursement, predictability, sector allocation and alignment with national plans. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-180-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that announced aid may not arrive on time or may create fragmented reporting and recurrent costs. The policy response review therefore determines which public action is supported by the combined evidence and requires authorities to identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. The domain-specific response is clear: assistance should be assessed by usable, predictable support and its contribution to national capacity.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-180-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "International assistance should be judged through the educational function, affected population, delivery condition and evidence required for correction. The conclusion should follow the standard that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-181", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "181", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "181-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-181-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether education expansion keeps pace with the number and distribution of learners. A defensible account draws on age cohorts, fertility, migration, urbanisation and population projections. Because outdated projections can create apparent progress or deterioration unrelated to actual provision, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that indicator series should state population revisions and planning should examine absolute numbers alongside rates.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-182", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "182", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "182-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-182-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in population and demographic change is assessed against whether education expansion keeps pace with the number and distribution of learners. The record should contain age cohorts, fertility, migration, urbanisation and population projections, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-182-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that outdated projections can create apparent progress or deterioration unrelated to actual provision. The goal definition test accordingly requires the exact result promised and the population to whom it applies; implementation should separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that indicator series should state population revisions and planning should examine absolute numbers alongside rates.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-182-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Population and demographic change should be judged through population coverage, age structure, migration, denominator change and service demand. The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-183", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "183", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "183-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-183-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in population and demographic change cannot be understood without defining whether education expansion keeps pace with the number and distribution of learners. The appropriate measurement account combines age cohorts, fertility, migration, urbanisation and population projections. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-183-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If outdated projections can create apparent progress or deterioration unrelated to actual provision, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under baseline and latest observation should establish the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar, and the responsible bodies should retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. In substantive terms, indicator series should state population revisions and planning should examine absolute numbers alongside rates.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-183-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Population and demographic change requires evidence on population coverage, age structure, migration, denominator change and service demand. The reporting standard is that apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-184", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "184", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "184-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-184-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For population and demographic change, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether education expansion keeps pace with the number and distribution of learners. The evidence should encompass age cohorts, fertility, migration, urbanisation and population projections. The material measurement risk is that outdated projections can create apparent progress or deterioration unrelated to actual provision. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-184-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The level and absolute population test asks for the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition. Authorities should publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. In this domain, indicator series should state population revisions and planning should examine absolute numbers alongside rates. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-184-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Population and demographic change must be traced through population coverage, age structure, migration, denominator change and service demand. The interpretive rule is that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-185", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "185", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "185-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-185-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distribution and equity is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether education expansion keeps pace with the number and distribution of learners. A sufficient evidence base includes age cohorts, fertility, migration, urbanisation and population projections, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-185-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that outdated projections can create apparent progress or deterioration unrelated to actual provision. It should therefore disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy and should apply the following domain safeguard: indicator series should state population revisions and planning should examine absolute numbers alongside rates. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-185-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Population and demographic change places the evidential emphasis on population coverage, age structure, migration, denominator change and service demand. The governing limitation is that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-186", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "186", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "186-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-186-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether education expansion keeps pace with the number and distribution of learners. Midpoint reporting should begin with age cohorts, fertility, migration, urbanisation and population projections and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, outdated projections can create apparent progress or deterioration unrelated to actual provision.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-186-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under service and learning quality, the required proposition is whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended. Statistical and policy authorities should connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. They should also ensure that indicator series should state population revisions and planning should examine absolute numbers alongside rates. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-186-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Population and demographic change should be judged through population coverage, age structure, migration, denominator change and service demand. For interpretation, quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-187", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "187", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "187-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-187-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether education expansion keeps pace with the number and distribution of learners without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes age cohorts, fertility, migration, urbanisation and population projections. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-187-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that outdated projections can create apparent progress or deterioration unrelated to actual provision. The trend and pace review therefore determines the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period and requires authorities to compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. The domain-specific response is clear: indicator series should state population revisions and planning should examine absolute numbers alongside rates.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-187-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Population and demographic change requires evidence on population coverage, age structure, migration, denominator change and service demand. The conclusion should follow the standard that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-188", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "188", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "188-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-188-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Population and demographic change illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether education expansion keeps pace with the number and distribution of learners, while the empirical account is built from age cohorts, fertility, migration, urbanisation and population projections.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-188-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because outdated projections can create apparent progress or deterioration unrelated to actual provision, attention to projection and scenario is necessary. The authority should establish what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued and should state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. Its final account should reflect that indicator series should state population revisions and planning should examine absolute numbers alongside rates. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-188-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Population and demographic change must be traced through population coverage, age structure, migration, denominator change and service demand. The relevant interpretive boundary is that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-189", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "189", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "189-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-189-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of population and demographic change asks whether education expansion keeps pace with the number and distribution of learners. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with age cohorts, fertility, migration, urbanisation and population projections and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-189-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that outdated projections can create apparent progress or deterioration unrelated to actual provision. In considering data quality and uncertainty, authorities should identify which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding and compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. The operational principle is that indicator series should state population revisions and planning should examine absolute numbers alongside rates.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-189-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Population and demographic change places the evidential emphasis on population coverage, age structure, migration, denominator change and service demand. The resulting conclusion must observe that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-190", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "190", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "190-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-190-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Population and demographic change must be traced through population coverage, age structure, migration, denominator change and service demand. Progress in population and demographic change is assessed against whether education expansion keeps pace with the number and distribution of learners. The record should contain age cohorts, fertility, migration, urbanisation and population projections, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-190-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that outdated projections can create apparent progress or deterioration unrelated to actual provision. The policy response test accordingly requires which public action is supported by the combined evidence; implementation should identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that indicator series should state population revisions and planning should examine absolute numbers alongside rates.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-190-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Population and demographic change should be judged through population coverage, age structure, migration, denominator change and service demand. The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-191", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "191", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "191-midpoint-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-191-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The substantive objective is whether present levels and rates of change are sufficient to achieve the stated goals. A defensible account draws on baseline, latest observation, historical trajectory, target definition and time remaining. Because linear projections can conceal ceilings, shocks, inequality and the institutional effort required for the final margin, the report must explain definitions and evidence before judging the rate of progress. The controlling proposition is that prospective statements should be scenarios with assumptions, not predictions expressed as certainty.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-192", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "192", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "192-goal-definition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-192-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Goal definition is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether present levels and rates of change are sufficient to achieve the stated goals. A sufficient evidence base includes baseline, latest observation, historical trajectory, target definition and time remaining, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-192-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that linear projections can conceal ceilings, shocks, inequality and the institutional effort required for the final margin. It should therefore separate the political commitment from the particular indicator selected to represent it and should apply the following domain safeguard: prospective statements should be scenarios with assumptions, not predictions expressed as certainty. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-192-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distance to 2015 should be judged through the baseline, remaining population, pace of change and credibility of the proposed response. The governing limitation is that a measurable proxy should not narrow the substantive goal without explicit acknowledgement. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-193", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "193", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "193-baseline-and-latest-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-193-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy objective in this field is whether present levels and rates of change are sufficient to achieve the stated goals. Midpoint reporting should begin with baseline, latest observation, historical trajectory, target definition and time remaining and should state the relationship of each measure to the Dakar commitment. Otherwise, linear projections can conceal ceilings, shocks, inequality and the institutional effort required for the final margin.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-193-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Under baseline and latest observation, the required proposition is the dates, sources and definitions used to describe change since Dakar. Statistical and policy authorities should retain comparable observations and mark any break in classification, population or coverage. They should also ensure that prospective statements should be scenarios with assumptions, not predictions expressed as certainty. Any revision to an earlier observation should be retained in the series record and its effect on the apparent trend should be explained.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-193-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distance to 2015 requires evidence on the baseline, remaining population, pace of change and credibility of the proposed response. For interpretation, apparent distance travelled is unreliable where the beginning and latest values are not constructed alike. The result should support a decision about priority, resource or implementation; it should not become a summary judgement on a population whose circumstances and educational opportunity the indicator only partly describes. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-194", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "194", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "194-level-and-absolute-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-194-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment at the midpoint must establish whether present levels and rates of change are sufficient to achieve the stated goals without assuming that the most readily available indicator is a complete representation. Relevant evidence includes baseline, latest observation, historical trajectory, target definition and time remaining. Its scope and limitations should accompany the result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-194-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A recurrent source of error is that linear projections can conceal ceilings, shocks, inequality and the institutional effort required for the final margin. The level and absolute population review therefore determines the current rate together with the number of people experiencing the condition and requires authorities to publish population counts, denominators and relevant confidence or coverage limits. The domain-specific response is clear: prospective statements should be scenarios with assumptions, not predictions expressed as certainty.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-194-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distance to 2015 must be traced through the baseline, remaining population, pace of change and credibility of the proposed response. The conclusion should follow the standard that rates identify proportion while counts identify the scale of provision and resources required. Where evidence differs among sources, reconciliation should examine concepts, dates, populations and coverage before one estimate is preferred. Unresolved difference should be reported rather than concealed in a single value. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-195", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "195", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "195-distribution-and-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-195-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distance to 2015 illustrates the distinction between movement in an indicator and progress in the underlying goal. The substantive concern is whether present levels and rates of change are sufficient to achieve the stated goals, while the empirical account is built from baseline, latest observation, historical trajectory, target definition and time remaining.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-195-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Because linear projections can conceal ceilings, shocks, inequality and the institutional effort required for the final margin, attention to distribution and equity is necessary. The authority should establish how the national result is shared across groups and places and should disaggregate policy-relevant characteristics and preserve adequate sample size and privacy. Its final account should reflect that prospective statements should be scenarios with assumptions, not predictions expressed as certainty. Evidence of unequal progress should lead to further analysis of institutions and resources, not to an assumption that group identity explains the result.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-195-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distance to 2015 places the evidential emphasis on the baseline, remaining population, pace of change and credibility of the proposed response. The relevant interpretive boundary is that progress that bypasses the least served cannot be described fully by an improving national average. This boundary protects the credibility of the monitoring framework and gives decision-makers a more accurate basis for deciding where acceleration or correction is required. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-196", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "196", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "196-service-and-learning-quality", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-196-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsible account of distance to 2015 asks whether present levels and rates of change are sufficient to achieve the stated goals. It does not begin by selecting the largest available national total. It begins with baseline, latest observation, historical trajectory, target definition and time remaining and the definitions required to make those elements comparable through time.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-196-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The known risk is that linear projections can conceal ceilings, shocks, inequality and the institutional effort required for the final margin. In considering service and learning quality, authorities should identify whether expanded participation provides the conditions and outcomes intended and connect access data with learning opportunity, workforce, materials, time and credible outcome evidence. The operational principle is that prospective statements should be scenarios with assumptions, not predictions expressed as certainty.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-196-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distance to 2015 should be judged through the baseline, remaining population, pace of change and credibility of the proposed response. The resulting conclusion must observe that quantity and quality should be monitored together without using one as an unmeasured assumption about the other. Where data support only a broad regional statement, the report should not imply country-level or group-level precision. Where administrative capacity is itself weak, that limitation is also a policy finding and should inform investment in information systems. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-197", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "197", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "197-trend-and-pace", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-197-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress in distance to 2015 is assessed against whether present levels and rates of change are sufficient to achieve the stated goals. The record should contain baseline, latest observation, historical trajectory, target definition and time remaining, with enough metadata to separate real change from changes in source or coverage.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-197-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal threat is that linear projections can conceal ceilings, shocks, inequality and the institutional effort required for the final margin. The trend and pace test accordingly requires the direction, stability and rate of change over an appropriate period; implementation should compare multiple observations and distinguish sustained change from volatility or data revision. For this domain, decision-makers should apply the proposition that prospective statements should be scenarios with assumptions, not predictions expressed as certainty.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-197-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distance to 2015 requires evidence on the baseline, remaining population, pace of change and credibility of the proposed response. The evidence should be interpreted on the basis that a short recent interval should not determine a long-range conclusion without sensitivity analysis. Midpoint monitoring is most useful when it identifies the remaining population, the likely mechanism of exclusion and the public institution able to act, while stating where those elements have not yet been established. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-198", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "198", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "198-projection-and-scenario", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-198-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distance remaining in distance to 2015 cannot be understood without defining whether present levels and rates of change are sufficient to achieve the stated goals. The appropriate measurement account combines baseline, latest observation, historical trajectory, target definition and time remaining. It should preserve both national and distributional results.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-198-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "If linear projections can conceal ceilings, shocks, inequality and the institutional effort required for the final margin, a favourable aggregate may provide false assurance. Review under projection and scenario should establish what would follow if specified trends and policy conditions continued, and the responsible bodies should state assumptions, show alternative paths and avoid extrapolation beyond the useful range. In substantive terms, prospective statements should be scenarios with assumptions, not predictions expressed as certainty.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-198-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distance to 2015 must be traced through the baseline, remaining population, pace of change and credibility of the proposed response. The reporting standard is that distance to target is a planning measure, not a claim that social and institutional change follows a fixed line. A statement about 2015 should therefore identify its assumptions, show sensitivity to recent pace and avoid suggesting that unchanged policy effort will necessarily produce unchanged rates of progress. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. Public reporting should connect this evidence to a dated action rather than to an undifferentiated claim of compliance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-199", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "199", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "199-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-199-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For distance to 2015, the midpoint inquiry concerns whether present levels and rates of change are sufficient to achieve the stated goals. The evidence should encompass baseline, latest observation, historical trajectory, target definition and time remaining. The material measurement risk is that linear projections can conceal ceilings, shocks, inequality and the institutional effort required for the final margin. This risk affects both the reported level and the inference drawn about progress since 2000.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-199-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The data quality and uncertainty test asks for which errors, omissions and model choices can materially affect the finding. Authorities should compare sources, investigate missingness and reduce published precision where uncertainty is substantial. In this domain, prospective statements should be scenarios with assumptions, not predictions expressed as certainty. Publication should identify which data are directly observed, which are estimated and which depend on a classification or model.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-199-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distance to 2015 places the evidential emphasis on the baseline, remaining population, pace of change and credibility of the proposed response. The interpretive rule is that uncertainty should qualify the conclusion and direct data improvement rather than disappear from presentation. A finding of progress remains important when its uncertainty is visible. It becomes misleading when the absence of data, a revised denominator or a wider reporting system is treated as though it were a change in the educational condition itself. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. The review should state which learners experienced the condition and whether the response reached them.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-200", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "200", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "200-policy-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-200-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Policy response is central to the assessment because the Education for All question is whether present levels and rates of change are sufficient to achieve the stated goals. A sufficient evidence base includes baseline, latest observation, historical trajectory, target definition and time remaining, organised around a consistent population and reference period.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-200-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analysis must allow for the possibility that linear projections can conceal ceilings, shocks, inequality and the institutional effort required for the final margin. It should therefore identify the responsible institution, affected population, resource requirement and measure of implementation and should apply the following domain safeguard: prospective statements should be scenarios with assumptions, not predictions expressed as certainty. Differences among regions or groups should be examined before a national result is presented as broadly shared.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-200-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distance to 2015 should be judged through the baseline, remaining population, pace of change and credibility of the proposed response. The governing limitation is that monitoring has public value when it informs correction while preserving the limits of causal inference. This does not prevent a reasoned judgement. It requires the judgement to distinguish established direction, plausible explanation and matters on which the available evidence remains inconclusive. Any departure should be explained by reference to the source, population and policy purpose. A limitation is material when it prevents the authority from deciding whether this service condition was preserved.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-201", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "201", "title": "Reading progress and distance together", "anchor": "201-reading-progress-and-distance-together", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-201-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Progress and distance answer different questions. A system may have advanced rapidly from a very low baseline and still remain far from universal provision. Another may show slower recent change because it is approaching a ceiling, while a disadvantaged minority remains entirely outside the average. Both require an account of the absolute population affected and of the institutions responsible for the remaining gap.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-201-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Midpoint reporting should therefore avoid dividing countries into simple success and failure categories. It should identify the level, direction, distribution and credibility of change. It should further explain whether current finance, workforce and delivery capacity are consistent with the pace required. Where those conditions are absent, an optimistic projection cannot substitute for a plan.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-202", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "202", "title": "A common hierarchy of evidence", "anchor": "202-a-common-hierarchy-of-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-202-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Observed administrative and survey values should be distinguished from adjusted estimates, modelled values and projections. Each can be useful, but each answers a different question. Source values require documented coverage; survey values require sampling and questionnaire information; estimates require assumptions; projections require a scenario. Public presentation should preserve those distinctions.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-202-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Conflicting values should trigger reconciliation of population, period, definition and source. Selecting one value because it aligns with an expected trend weakens monitoring. Where reconciliation remains incomplete, the range or discrepancy should be published with an account of its likely policy significance.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-203", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "203", "title": "Equity at the centre of the midpoint assessment", "anchor": "203-equity-at-the-centre-of-the-midpoint-assessment", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-203-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The remaining distance to Education for All is increasingly a question of distribution. National averages should be accompanied by measures for populations facing poverty, remoteness, disability, conflict, linguistic barriers or discrimination. Data should be collected lawfully, respectfully and with sufficient involvement of affected communities to ensure that categories reflect rather than distort lived conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-203-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Disaggregation is not an end in itself. It should connect an observed disparity to further inquiry into service availability, cost, institutional practice and learning conditions. Group identity must not be used as a convenient cause. Public bodies remain responsible for identifying and correcting avoidable barriers.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-204", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "204", "title": "Quality and learning", "anchor": "204-quality-and-learning", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-204-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Expansion without adequate teachers, time, materials and usable curriculum can increase enrolment without securing learning. Yet a narrow test score cannot stand alone as a measure of educational quality. It reflects the assessed content, language, sample, participation and prior opportunity. Quality monitoring should combine learning evidence with the conditions through which learning is provided.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-204-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Systems should disclose who was assessed and who was absent. Where dropout is high, results for enrolled pupils can present an unduly favourable account of the cohort. Where assessments are not comparable through time, trend claims should be withheld or carefully qualified.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-205", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "205", "title": "Financing acceleration", "anchor": "205-financing-acceleration", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-205-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The resources required for the remaining distance should be estimated in terms of real teachers, classrooms, learning materials, support and recurrent operating capacity. Nominal expenditure growth is insufficient where prices, population and system responsibilities change. Budget allocation and execution should be examined together.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-205-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "External assistance can support acceleration when it is predictable and aligned with national plans. Short or fragmented projects may increase reported activity without creating sustained capacity. Financing claims should therefore connect commitments, disbursement and actual educational provision.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-206", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "206", "title": "Institutional capacity and implementation", "anchor": "206-institutional-capacity-and-implementation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-206-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A commitment becomes educational provision through assigned responsibility, lawful authority, competent personnel, finance, information and correction. Monitoring should distinguish adoption of a plan from implementation and implementation from learner outcome. Each stage may fail for different reasons and requires a different response.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-206-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Local variation should be visible. National systems often contain districts progressing at different rates because of population, geography, administration or unequal resources. Aggregate improvement should not shield persistent local failure, while local difficulty should not be attributed to communities where institutional conditions provide a better explanation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-207", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "207", "title": "The responsible use of projections", "anchor": "207-the-responsible-use-of-projections", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-207-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Projection to 2015 should be framed as a conditional scenario. At minimum, the baseline, latest observation, trend period, functional form and target definition should be stated. Alternative assumptions should be shown where the conclusion changes materially. A linear trend may be informative over a limited range but cannot represent shocks, capacity limits or the additional effort required to serve a marginalised final population.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-207-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The purpose of projection is to identify the scale and urgency of corrective action. It should not be used to claim inevitability. When no reliable series exists, a qualitative risk assessment may be more honest than a precise year of achievement.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-208", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "208", "title": "Priorities for the remaining period", "anchor": "208-priorities-for-the-remaining-period", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-208-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authorities should protect gains already achieved while directing additional effort to the least served. Immediate priorities are to identify populations absent from both services and data; maintain teacher supply and learning conditions during expansion; remove financial and administrative barriers; and improve the reliability of attendance, completion, literacy and learning measures.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-208-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The remaining period requires disciplined selection. Measures should be judged by their likely effect on access, continuity and learning and by the capacity to deliver them at scale. Public reporting should state what was implemented, who received it and what changed, rather than equating policy announcement or expenditure with result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-12" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-209", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "209", "title": "Final conclusion", "anchor": "209-final-conclusion", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-209-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "At the midpoint, Education for All remains a current public obligation and an unfinished institutional task. The evidence supports neither complacency based on global improvement nor despair based on the scale of the remaining gap. It supports differentiated action grounded in comparable trends, absolute populations, distribution and the conditions of implementation.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-209-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Data uncertainty does not remove accountability. It changes the precision of the claim and identifies where information systems must improve. The most credible monitoring framework shows what is known, what is estimated, who remains least visible and which assumptions shape the view of 2015. That framework serves the public interest because it directs attention from headline rates to the children, young people and adults whom the goals were adopted to reach.", "citationIds": [] } ] } ], "technicalAppendices": [], "notes": [], "references": [ { "id": "REF-01", "authoringBody": "Education for All Global Monitoring Report Team", "title": "Education for All by 2015: Will We Make It? — EFA Global Monitoring Report 2008", "year": 2007, "publicationDate": "2007-11-29", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000154743", "evidenceRole": "The principal global assessment of progress towards the six Education for All goals and the prospects for 2015." }, { "id": "REF-02", "authoringBody": "World Education Forum", "title": "The Dakar Framework for Action: Education for All — Meeting Our Collective Commitments", "year": 2000, "publicationDate": "2000-04-28", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_ACTION_FRAMEWORK", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000121147", "evidenceRole": "The six Education for All goals, collective commitments and 2015 horizon." }, { "id": "REF-03", "authoringBody": "United Nations", "title": "The Millennium Development Goals Report 2007", "year": 2007, "publicationDate": "2007-07-02", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://static.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/mdg2007.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Global and regional monitoring of primary education, gender and related development goals." }, { "id": "REF-04", "authoringBody": "Education for All Global Monitoring Report Team", "title": "Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2007: Strong Foundations — Early Childhood Care and Education", "year": 2006, "publicationDate": "2006-10-26", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000147794", "evidenceRole": "Evidence on early childhood policy, participation, disadvantage and the foundations of later learning." }, { "id": "REF-05", "authoringBody": "Education for All Global Monitoring Report Team", "title": "Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2006: Literacy for Life", "year": 2005, "publicationDate": "2005-11-09", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000141639", "evidenceRole": "Global analysis of youth and adult literacy, measurement and policy." }, { "id": "REF-06", "authoringBody": "Education for All Global Monitoring Report Team", "title": "Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2005: Education for All — The Quality Imperative", "year": 2004, "publicationDate": "2004-11-08", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000137333", "evidenceRole": "Global analysis of education quality, learning, teachers and system conditions." }, { "id": "REF-07", "authoringBody": "UNESCO Institute for Statistics", "title": "Guide to the Analysis and Use of Household Survey and Census Education Data", "year": 2004, "publicationDate": "2004-01-01", "sourceType": "STATISTICAL_METHOD_GUIDE", "url": "https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/guide-to-the-analysis-and-use-of-household-survey-and-census-education-data-en_0.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Methods and limitations for household and census education indicators." }, { "id": "REF-08", "authoringBody": "UNESCO Institute for Statistics and UNICEF", "title": "Children Out of School: Measuring Exclusion from Primary Education", "year": 2005, "publicationDate": "2005-01-01", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_STATISTICAL_REPORT", "url": "https://uis.unesco.org/en/topic/out-school-children-and-youth", "evidenceRole": "Concepts and measurement of access, participation and exclusion." }, { "id": "REF-09", "authoringBody": "UNESCO Institute for Statistics", "title": "International Standard Classification of Education: ISCED 1997", "year": 1997, "publicationDate": "1997-01-01", "sourceType": "INTERNATIONAL_STATISTICAL_CLASSIFICATION", "url": "https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-1997-en_0.pdf", "evidenceRole": "International classification of education levels and programmes." }, { "id": "REF-10", "authoringBody": "United Nations Statistics Division", "title": "Household Sample Surveys in Developing and Transition Countries", "year": 2005, "publicationDate": "2005-01-01", "sourceType": "STATISTICAL_METHOD_HANDBOOK", "url": "https://unstats.un.org/unsd/hhsurveys/sectiona_new.htm", "evidenceRole": "Survey design, sampling, error and analysis principles." }, { "id": "REF-11", "authoringBody": "World Bank", "title": "World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development", "year": 2005, "publicationDate": "2005-09-01", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_DEVELOPMENT_REPORT", "url": "https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/435331468127174418/pdf/322040World0Development0Report02006.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Inequality of opportunity, institutions and public action." }, { "id": "REF-12", "authoringBody": "UNICEF", "title": "The State of the World’s Children 2006: Excluded and Invisible", "year": 2005, "publicationDate": "2005-12-01", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_FLAGSHIP_REPORT", "url": "https://www.unicef.org/media/84806/file/SOWC-2006.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Evidence concerning children missed by services, protection and statistics." }, { "id": "REF-13", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Convention on the Rights of the Child", "year": 1989, "publicationDate": "1989-11-20", "sourceType": "INTERNATIONAL_CONVENTION", "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child", "evidenceRole": "Rights concerning education, development, equality and the interests of the child." }, { "id": "REF-14", "authoringBody": "United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights", "title": "General Comment No. 13: The Right to Education", "year": 1999, "publicationDate": "1999-12-08", "sourceType": "TREATY_BODY_GENERAL_COMMENT", "url": "https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/cescr/1999/en/37937", "evidenceRole": "Availability, accessibility, acceptability and adaptability of education." }, { "id": "REF-15", "authoringBody": "UNESCO", "title": "Guidelines for Inclusion: Ensuring Access to Education for All", "year": 2005, "publicationDate": "2005-01-01", "sourceType": "POLICY_GUIDELINES", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000140224", "evidenceRole": "Inclusive-system responsibilities and the removal of barriers." }, { "id": "REF-16", "authoringBody": "UNESCO and UNICEF", "title": "A Human Rights-Based Approach to Education for All", "year": 2007, "publicationDate": "2007-01-01", "sourceType": "INTERAGENCY_POLICY_FRAMEWORK", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000154861", "evidenceRole": "Rights-based planning, participation, equality, accountability and quality." }, { "id": "REF-17", "authoringBody": "International Labour Organization", "title": "Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182)", "year": 1999, "publicationDate": "1999-06-17", "sourceType": "INTERNATIONAL_LABOUR_CONVENTION", "url": "https://www.ilo.org/resource/c182-worst-forms-child-labour-convention-1999-no-182", "evidenceRole": "International obligations concerning urgent elimination of the worst forms of child labour." }, { "id": "REF-18", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "United Nations Millennium Declaration", "year": 2000, "publicationDate": "2000-09-08", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_DECLARATION", "url": "https://undocs.org/A/RES/55/2", "evidenceRole": "International commitments on development, equality and universal primary education." }, { "id": "REF-19", "authoringBody": "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development", "title": "Education at a Glance 2007: OECD Indicators", "year": 2007, "publicationDate": "2007-09-18", "sourceType": "COMPARATIVE_INDICATOR_REPORT", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2007-en", "evidenceRole": "Comparative definitions and indicators concerning participation, attainment, resources and education systems." }, { "id": "REF-20", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities", "year": 2006, "publicationDate": "2006-12-13", "sourceType": "INTERNATIONAL_CONVENTION", "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities", "evidenceRole": "The disability-rights framework, including inclusive education; adopted before the cutoff and in force from 3 May 2008." } ], "readerNodes": [ { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "I", "title": "Early childhood care and education", "anchor": "part-i-early-childhood-care-and-education", "sortOrder": 1 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-1", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "number": "1", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "1-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 2 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-2", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "number": "2", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "2-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 3 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-3", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "number": "3", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "3-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 4 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-4", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "number": "4", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "4-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 5 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-5", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "number": "5", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "5-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 6 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-6", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "number": "6", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "6-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 7 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-7", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "number": "7", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "7-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 8 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-8", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "number": "8", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "8-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 9 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-9", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "number": "9", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "9-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 10 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-10", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-i", "number": "10", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "10-policy-response", "sortOrder": 11 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "II", "title": "Universal primary access", "anchor": "part-ii-universal-primary-access", "sortOrder": 12 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-11", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "number": "11", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "11-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 13 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-12", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "number": "12", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "12-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 14 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-13", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "number": "13", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "13-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 15 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-14", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "number": "14", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "14-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 16 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-15", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "number": "15", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "15-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 17 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-16", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "number": "16", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "16-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 18 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-17", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "number": "17", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "17-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 19 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-18", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "number": "18", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "18-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 20 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-19", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "number": "19", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "19-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 21 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-20", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ii", "number": "20", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "20-policy-response", "sortOrder": 22 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "III", "title": "Primary attendance", "anchor": "part-iii-primary-attendance", "sortOrder": 23 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-21", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "number": "21", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "21-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 24 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-22", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "number": "22", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "22-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 25 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-23", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "number": "23", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "23-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 26 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-24", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "number": "24", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "24-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 27 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-25", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "number": "25", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "25-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 28 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-26", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "number": "26", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "26-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 29 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-27", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "number": "27", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "27-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 30 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-28", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "number": "28", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "28-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 31 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-29", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "number": "29", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "29-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 32 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-30", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iii", "number": "30", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "30-policy-response", "sortOrder": 33 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "IV", "title": "Primary completion", "anchor": "part-iv-primary-completion", "sortOrder": 34 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-31", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "number": "31", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "31-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 35 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-32", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "number": "32", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "32-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 36 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-33", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "number": "33", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "33-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 37 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-34", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "number": "34", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "34-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 38 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-35", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "number": "35", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "35-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 39 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-36", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "number": "36", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "36-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 40 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-37", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "number": "37", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "37-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 41 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-38", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "number": "38", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "38-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 42 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-39", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "number": "39", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "39-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 43 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-40", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-iv", "number": "40", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "40-policy-response", "sortOrder": 44 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "V", "title": "Youth learning needs", "anchor": "part-v-youth-learning-needs", "sortOrder": 45 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-41", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "number": "41", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "41-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 46 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-42", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "number": "42", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "42-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 47 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-43", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "number": "43", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "43-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 48 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-44", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "number": "44", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "44-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 49 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-45", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "number": "45", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "45-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 50 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-46", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "number": "46", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "46-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 51 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-47", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "number": "47", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "47-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 52 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-48", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "number": "48", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "48-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 53 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-49", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "number": "49", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "49-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 54 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-50", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-v", "number": "50", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "50-policy-response", "sortOrder": 55 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "VI", "title": "Adult literacy", "anchor": "part-vi-adult-literacy", "sortOrder": 56 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-51", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "number": "51", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "51-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 57 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-52", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "number": "52", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "52-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 58 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-53", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "number": "53", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "53-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 59 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-54", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "number": "54", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "54-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 60 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-55", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "number": "55", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "55-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 61 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-56", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "number": "56", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "56-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 62 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-57", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "number": "57", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "57-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 63 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-58", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "number": "58", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "58-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 64 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-59", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "number": "59", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "59-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 65 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-60", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vi", "number": "60", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "60-policy-response", "sortOrder": 66 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "VII", "title": "Gender parity and equality", "anchor": "part-vii-gender-parity-and-equality", "sortOrder": 67 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-61", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "number": "61", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "61-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 68 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-62", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "number": "62", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "62-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 69 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-63", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "number": "63", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "63-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 70 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-64", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "number": "64", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "64-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 71 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-65", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "number": "65", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "65-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 72 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-66", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "number": "66", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "66-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 73 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-67", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "number": "67", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "67-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 74 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-68", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "number": "68", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "68-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 75 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-69", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "number": "69", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "69-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 76 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-70", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-vii", "number": "70", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "70-policy-response", "sortOrder": 77 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "VIII", "title": "Learning quality", "anchor": "part-viii-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 78 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-71", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "number": "71", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "71-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 79 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-72", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "number": "72", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "72-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 80 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-73", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "number": "73", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "73-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 81 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-74", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "number": "74", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "74-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 82 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-75", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "number": "75", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "75-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 83 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-76", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "number": "76", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "76-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 84 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-77", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "number": "77", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "77-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 85 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-78", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "number": "78", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "78-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 86 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-79", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "number": "79", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "79-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 87 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-80", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-viii", "number": "80", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "80-policy-response", "sortOrder": 88 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "IX", "title": "Teacher availability", "anchor": "part-ix-teacher-availability", "sortOrder": 89 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-81", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "number": "81", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "81-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 90 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-82", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "number": "82", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "82-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 91 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-83", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "number": "83", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "83-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 92 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-84", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "number": "84", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "84-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 93 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-85", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "number": "85", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "85-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 94 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-86", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "number": "86", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "86-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 95 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-87", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "number": "87", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "87-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 96 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-88", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "number": "88", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "88-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 97 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-89", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "number": "89", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "89-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 98 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-90", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-ix", "number": "90", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "90-policy-response", "sortOrder": 99 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "X", "title": "Education finance", "anchor": "part-x-education-finance", "sortOrder": 100 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-91", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "number": "91", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "91-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 101 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-92", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "number": "92", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "92-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 102 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-93", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "number": "93", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "93-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 103 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-94", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "number": "94", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "94-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 104 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-95", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "number": "95", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "95-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 105 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-96", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "number": "96", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "96-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 106 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-97", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "number": "97", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "97-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 107 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-98", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "number": "98", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "98-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 108 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-99", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "number": "99", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "99-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 109 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-100", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-x", "number": "100", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "100-policy-response", "sortOrder": 110 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XI", "title": "Household cost and poverty", "anchor": "part-xi-household-cost-and-poverty", "sortOrder": 111 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-101", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "number": "101", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "101-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 112 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-102", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "number": "102", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "102-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 113 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-103", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "number": "103", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "103-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 114 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-104", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "number": "104", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "104-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 115 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-105", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "number": "105", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "105-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 116 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-106", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "number": "106", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "106-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 117 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-107", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "number": "107", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "107-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 118 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-108", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "number": "108", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "108-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 119 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-109", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "number": "109", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "109-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 120 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-110", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xi", "number": "110", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "110-policy-response", "sortOrder": 121 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XII", "title": "Rural and remote provision", "anchor": "part-xii-rural-and-remote-provision", "sortOrder": 122 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-111", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "number": "111", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "111-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 123 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-112", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "number": "112", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "112-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 124 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-113", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "number": "113", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "113-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 125 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-114", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "number": "114", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "114-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 126 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-115", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "number": "115", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "115-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 127 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-116", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "number": "116", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "116-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 128 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-117", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "number": "117", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "117-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 129 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-118", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "number": "118", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "118-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 130 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-119", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "number": "119", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "119-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 131 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-120", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xii", "number": "120", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "120-policy-response", "sortOrder": 132 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XIII", "title": "Language and minority status", "anchor": "part-xiii-language-and-minority-status", "sortOrder": 133 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-121", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "number": "121", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "121-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 134 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-122", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "number": "122", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "122-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 135 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-123", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "number": "123", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "123-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 136 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-124", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "number": "124", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "124-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 137 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-125", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "number": "125", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "125-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 138 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-126", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "number": "126", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "126-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 139 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-127", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "number": "127", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "127-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 140 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-128", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "number": "128", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "128-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 141 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-129", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "number": "129", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "129-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 142 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-130", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiii", "number": "130", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "130-policy-response", "sortOrder": 143 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XIV", "title": "Disability and inclusion", "anchor": "part-xiv-disability-and-inclusion", "sortOrder": 144 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-131", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "number": "131", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "131-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 145 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-132", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "number": "132", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "132-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 146 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-133", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "number": "133", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "133-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 147 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-134", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "number": "134", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "134-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 148 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-135", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "number": "135", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "135-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 149 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-136", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "number": "136", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "136-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 150 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-137", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "number": "137", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "137-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 151 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-138", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "number": "138", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "138-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 152 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-139", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "number": "139", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "139-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 153 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-140", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xiv", "number": "140", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "140-policy-response", "sortOrder": 154 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XV", "title": "Conflict, displacement and emergency", "anchor": "part-xv-conflict-displacement-and-emergency", "sortOrder": 155 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-141", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "number": "141", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "141-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 156 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-142", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "number": "142", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "142-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 157 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-143", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "number": "143", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "143-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 158 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-144", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "number": "144", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "144-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 159 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-145", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "number": "145", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "145-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 160 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-146", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "number": "146", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "146-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 161 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-147", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "number": "147", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "147-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 162 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-148", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "number": "148", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "148-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 163 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-149", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "number": "149", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "149-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 164 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-150", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xv", "number": "150", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "150-policy-response", "sortOrder": 165 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XVI", "title": "Child labour and protection", "anchor": "part-xvi-child-labour-and-protection", "sortOrder": 166 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-151", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "number": "151", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "151-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 167 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-152", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "number": "152", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "152-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 168 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-153", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "number": "153", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "153-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 169 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-154", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "number": "154", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "154-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 170 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-155", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "number": "155", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "155-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 171 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-156", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "number": "156", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "156-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 172 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-157", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "number": "157", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "157-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 173 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-158", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "number": "158", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "158-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 174 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-159", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "number": "159", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "159-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 175 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-160", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvi", "number": "160", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "160-policy-response", "sortOrder": 176 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XVII", "title": "Governance and institutional capacity", "anchor": "part-xvii-governance-and-institutional-capacity", "sortOrder": 177 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-161", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "number": "161", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "161-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 178 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-162", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "number": "162", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "162-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 179 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-163", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "number": "163", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "163-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 180 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-164", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "number": "164", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "164-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 181 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-165", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "number": "165", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "165-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 182 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-166", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "number": "166", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "166-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 183 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-167", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "number": "167", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "167-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 184 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-168", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "number": "168", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "168-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 185 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-169", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "number": "169", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "169-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 186 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-170", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xvii", "number": "170", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "170-policy-response", "sortOrder": 187 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XVIII", "title": "International assistance", "anchor": "part-xviii-international-assistance", "sortOrder": 188 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-171", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "number": "171", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "171-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 189 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-172", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "number": "172", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "172-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 190 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-173", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "number": "173", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "173-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 191 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-174", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "number": "174", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "174-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 192 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-175", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "number": "175", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "175-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 193 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-176", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "number": "176", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "176-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 194 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-177", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "number": "177", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "177-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 195 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-178", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "number": "178", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "178-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 196 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-179", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "number": "179", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "179-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 197 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-180", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xviii", "number": "180", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "180-policy-response", "sortOrder": 198 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XIX", "title": "Population and demographic change", "anchor": "part-xix-population-and-demographic-change", "sortOrder": 199 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-181", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "number": "181", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "181-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 200 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-182", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "number": "182", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "182-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 201 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-183", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "number": "183", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "183-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 202 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-184", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "number": "184", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "184-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 203 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-185", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "number": "185", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "185-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 204 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-186", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "number": "186", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "186-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 205 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-187", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "number": "187", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "187-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 206 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-188", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "number": "188", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "188-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 207 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-189", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "number": "189", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "189-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 208 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-190", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xix", "number": "190", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "190-policy-response", "sortOrder": 209 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XX", "title": "Distance to 2015", "anchor": "part-xx-distance-to-2015", "sortOrder": 210 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-191", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "number": "191", "title": "Midpoint proposition", "anchor": "191-midpoint-proposition", "sortOrder": 211 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-192", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "number": "192", "title": "Goal definition", "anchor": "192-goal-definition", "sortOrder": 212 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-193", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "number": "193", "title": "Baseline and latest observation", "anchor": "193-baseline-and-latest-observation", "sortOrder": 213 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-194", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "number": "194", "title": "Level and absolute population", "anchor": "194-level-and-absolute-population", "sortOrder": 214 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-195", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "number": "195", "title": "Distribution and equity", "anchor": "195-distribution-and-equity", "sortOrder": 215 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-196", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "number": "196", "title": "Service and learning quality", "anchor": "196-service-and-learning-quality", "sortOrder": 216 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-197", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "number": "197", "title": "Trend and pace", "anchor": "197-trend-and-pace", "sortOrder": 217 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-198", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "number": "198", "title": "Projection and scenario", "anchor": "198-projection-and-scenario", "sortOrder": 218 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-199", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "number": "199", "title": "Data quality and uncertainty", "anchor": "199-data-quality-and-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 219 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-200", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xx", "number": "200", "title": "Policy response", "anchor": "200-policy-response", "sortOrder": 220 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XXI", "title": "Conclusions and priorities to 2015", "anchor": "part-xxi-conclusions-and-priorities-to-2015", "sortOrder": 221 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-201", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "number": "201", "title": "Reading progress and distance together", "anchor": "201-reading-progress-and-distance-together", "sortOrder": 222 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-202", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "number": "202", "title": "A common hierarchy of evidence", "anchor": "202-a-common-hierarchy-of-evidence", "sortOrder": 223 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-203", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "number": "203", "title": "Equity at the centre of the midpoint assessment", "anchor": "203-equity-at-the-centre-of-the-midpoint-assessment", "sortOrder": 224 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-204", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "number": "204", "title": "Quality and learning", "anchor": "204-quality-and-learning", "sortOrder": 225 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-205", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "number": "205", "title": "Financing acceleration", "anchor": "205-financing-acceleration", "sortOrder": 226 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-206", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "number": "206", "title": "Institutional capacity and implementation", "anchor": "206-institutional-capacity-and-implementation", "sortOrder": 227 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-207", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "number": "207", "title": "The responsible use of projections", "anchor": "207-the-responsible-use-of-projections", "sortOrder": 228 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-208", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "number": "208", "title": "Priorities for the remaining period", "anchor": "208-priorities-for-the-remaining-period", "sortOrder": 229 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2008-02-209", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2008-02-xxi", "number": "209", "title": "Final conclusion", "anchor": "209-final-conclusion", "sortOrder": 230 } ], "statistics": { "partCount": 21, "sectionCount": 209, "appendixCount": 0, "paragraphCount": 578, "tableCount": 0, "referenceCount": 20, "mainTextWords": 40744, "technicalAppendixWords": 0, "totalWords": 40744 }, "contentHash": "sha256-698f03780e953f60a1957a6d2abb185e3631cde4701de8e23c227cb80623bde5" }