{
  "schemaVersion": "iceqc.research-report.reader.v1",
  "document": {
    "id": "doc-iceqc-r-2009-02",
    "slug": "out-of-school-populations-economic-contraction-risk-profile",
    "documentNumber": "ICEQC-R-2009-02",
    "title": "Out-of-School Populations during Economic Contraction: A Risk Profile",
    "subtitle": "A global comparative indicator study of exclusion, household and public-finance transmission, distributional risk and protective monitoring",
    "family": "RESEARCH",
    "reportType": "THEMATIC_RESEARCH_REPORT",
    "researchCategory": "DATA_AND_INDICATOR_RESEARCH",
    "reportArchetype": "COMPARATIVE_INDICATOR_STUDY",
    "geographicScope": "Global",
    "ownerBody": "ICEQC Research and Policy Directorate",
    "publisher": "International Council for Education Quality Certification (ICEQC)",
    "publicIdentity": "ICEQC_ONLY"
  },
  "version": {
    "id": "ver-iceqc-r-2009-02-en-2009-03-13",
    "edition": "2009",
    "versionLabel": "Published 2009-03-13",
    "language": "en",
    "authoritativeLanguage": "en",
    "status": "PUBLISHED",
    "publicationDate": "2009-03-13",
    "evidenceCutoffDate": "2009-03-13",
    "statusNotice": "This is the controlled English edition. Evidence and institutional status are stated as at the evidence cut-off date.",
    "summary": "The global contraction has created a serious but not yet fully measured risk to educational participation. By the evidence cut-off, international assessments recorded a rapid weakening of output, trade, employment, credit and fiscal prospects. Education data, however, arrive on school-year and annual cycles and cannot yet show a complete, harmonised post-shock result. This report therefore presents a risk profile rather than an estimate of children made out of school by the crisis. It links the best available baseline on exclusion to observable household, labour-market, public-finance and service-continuity channels."
  },
  "publicationControl": {
    "matrixRecordId": "ICEQC-R-2009-02",
    "temporalBasis": "CONTEMPORANEOUS_AS_AT_PUBLICATION_DATE",
    "originalAuthorship": "ICEQC",
    "suggestedMainTextWords": 30000,
    "suggestedTechnicalAnnexWords": 0,
    "suggestedTotalWords": 30000,
    "actualMainTextWords": 30059,
    "actualTechnicalAnnexWords": 0,
    "actualTotalWords": 30059
  },
  "frontMatter": {
    "executiveSummary": [
      "The global contraction has created a serious but not yet fully measured risk to educational participation. By the evidence cut-off, international assessments recorded a rapid weakening of output, trade, employment, credit and fiscal prospects. Education data, however, arrive on school-year and annual cycles and cannot yet show a complete, harmonised post-shock result. This report therefore presents a risk profile rather than an estimate of children made out of school by the crisis. It links the best available baseline on exclusion to observable household, labour-market, public-finance and service-continuity channels.",
      "The baseline is already severe and unequal. The 2009 Education for All assessment places the global primary-age out-of-school population at about 75 million for 2006 and reports that girls constituted approximately 55 per cent. These values are not a March 2009 crisis count; they describe the most recent comparable global position available for assessing exposure. Regional totals conceal pronounced differences by household wealth, sex, residence, disability, conflict and administrative reach.",
      "Economic contraction can affect schooling without an immediate change in registered enrolment. A household may keep a child on the roll while attendance becomes irregular because transport, food, materials or foregone earnings are no longer affordable. A ministry may protect the education budget in nominal terms while cash releases, grants, recruitment, maintenance or school meals deteriorate. Early warning must therefore connect participation with household constraints, school operations and fiscal execution.",
      "The report distinguishes children who never enter, children who withdraw, temporary and repeated absence, unsuccessful transition and mobile or displaced learners. It rejects the use of a single undifferentiated out-of-school total where definitions and denominators differ. Administrative records, household surveys, population estimates and qualitative enquiry have complementary functions; each also has characteristic blind spots.",
      "The appropriate public response is protective and evidence-led. Authorities should preserve essential learner-facing functions, reduce binding household costs, identify concentrated disadvantage, allow prompt re-entry and publish limitations with every crisis claim. Rights and non-discrimination remain applicable during fiscal adjustment. Where evidence cannot distinguish a true participation change from migration, seasonality or a break in series, the uncertainty should remain visible."
    ],
    "keyFindings": [
      "The evidence available by 13 March 2009 establishes heightened risk, not a defensible global count of crisis-attributable exclusion.",
      "The pre-crisis out-of-school population is the exposure baseline and must not be presented as an effect of the contraction.",
      "Enrolment, attendance, entry, dropout, transition and completion answer different questions and should remain separate.",
      "Household liquidity, food security, work, migration and schooling costs can transmit contraction before annual statistics change.",
      "Budget approval does not establish service protection; release, receipt, staffing and usable inputs require observation.",
      "Poverty, sex, disability, residence, conflict and mobility interact, so one-dimensional averages can conceal concentrated harm.",
      "Regional evidence is useful for orientation but not for assigning uniform country risk.",
      "Administrative and household sources should be triangulated, with definitions, dates, denominators and missingness disclosed.",
      "Protective measures should address the evidenced barrier and be assessed by receipt, sustained participation and progression.",
      "Re-entry and recovery require explicit monitoring because temporary withdrawal can become permanent exclusion."
    ],
    "scopeAndMethod": [
      "This comparative indicator study covers children of primary and secondary school age, with primary-age measures retained where that is the population supported by the source. It considers global and regional patterns while requiring national and subnational interpretation. It does not measure learning loss, forecast a single global total or rank governments. The principal question is which populations and systems face a material risk of increased or prolonged exclusion during contraction, through which channels, and with what observable evidence.",
      "The evidence base consists of official international monitoring, statistical guidance, rights instruments and contemporaneous economic and labour assessments issued no later than 13 March 2009. Quantitative statements are limited to values supported by those sources. Recorded fact, analytical inference and policy consideration are kept distinct. No comparative table is presented because source years, populations and definitions are too heterogeneous for a single tabular synthesis without creating false equivalence.",
      "The analytical sequence begins with the education baseline, defines the relevant populations and indicators, traces household and public-finance transmission, differentiates distributional and regional exposure, and sets out an early-warning and protective-response framework. A risk is treated as higher where a plausible contraction channel meets a large exposed population, weak household or institutional buffering, and evidence of service or participation stress. The absence of timely data reduces confidence; it does not convert the risk to zero.",
      "All institutional status, evidence and conclusions are stated as at 13 March 2009. Later recession outcomes, later estimates and subsequent policy frameworks are outside scope.",
      "The term economic contraction denotes the abrupt weakening described in contemporaneous global economic and employment assessments; it is not assigned through a single national threshold. Countries entered the period at different points in their business, fiscal and school cycles. The report therefore treats macroeconomic deterioration as context and tests the education channel separately. A country may face severe household or revenue exposure without a contemporaneous measured rise in its out-of-school rate, and another may record worsening participation for reasons only partly connected with the global event.",
      "The risk profile does not combine unlike measures into a composite index. Weighting poverty, fiscal exposure, baseline exclusion and administrative capacity would require judgements that the available evidence cannot make universal. Instead, each domain supplies a question for national examination: how many children were already excluded; which households and services are exposed; what buffer exists; which early signal is observable; and which authority can act. This preserves differences in meaning and allows an adverse exception to remain visible instead of being offset by a favourable score elsewhere.",
      "Regional references serve to locate broad concentrations and common transmission channels. They do not imply that every country within a region shares the same educational structure, economic exposure or policy capacity. Country evidence should be used at the finest reliable level, particularly where national averages conceal provinces, districts, remote communities, informal settlements or displaced populations. Cross-national comparison is retained only where programme level, official age, reference year, numerator and denominator support a common interpretation.",
      "The study gives particular weight to timing because preventable exclusion can occur between statistical rounds. A leading observation such as delayed school grants or sharply increased repeated absence is less complete than a verified annual rate, but it may be more useful for protection if its limitations are stated and it triggers proportionate verification. Early-warning evidence should later be reconciled with complete records. Revision is a normal part of responsible measurement, provided the earlier value, reason for change and effect on the conclusion remain available.",
      "Policy considerations are presented as tests rather than universal prescriptions. A measure suitable where transport cost is the binding barrier may be irrelevant where insecurity, disability exclusion or absent secondary capacity is decisive. Protection should start from the affected population and the mechanism supported by evidence. It should then be examined for coverage, timeliness, sustained participation and unintended exclusion. Public reporting should make clear whether a statement concerns a legal entitlement, a planned allocation, actual receipt, an observed result or a forecast risk."
    ]
  },
  "parts": [
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-i",
      "number": "I",
      "title": "Purpose, baseline and analytical boundaries",
      "anchor": "part-i-purpose-baseline-and-analytical-boundaries",
      "sectionIds": [
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-1",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-2",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-3",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-4",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-5"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-ii",
      "number": "II",
      "title": "Population concepts and indicator construction",
      "anchor": "part-ii-population-concepts-and-indicator-construction",
      "sectionIds": [
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-6",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-7",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-8",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-9",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-10"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iii",
      "number": "III",
      "title": "Transmission through households and livelihoods",
      "anchor": "part-iii-transmission-through-households-and-livelihoods",
      "sectionIds": [
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-11",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-12",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-13",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-14",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-15"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iv",
      "number": "IV",
      "title": "Transmission through public finance and education supply",
      "anchor": "part-iv-transmission-through-public-finance-and-education-supply",
      "sectionIds": [
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-16",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-17",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-18",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-19",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-20"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-v",
      "number": "V",
      "title": "Distributional risk profiles",
      "anchor": "part-v-distributional-risk-profiles",
      "sectionIds": [
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-21",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-22",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-23",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-24",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-25"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vi",
      "number": "VI",
      "title": "Regional and system differentiation",
      "anchor": "part-vi-regional-and-system-differentiation",
      "sectionIds": [
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-26",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-27",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-28",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-29",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-30"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vii",
      "number": "VII",
      "title": "Early warning, monitoring and interpretation",
      "anchor": "part-vii-early-warning-monitoring-and-interpretation",
      "sectionIds": [
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-31",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-32",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-33",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-34",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-35"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-viii",
      "number": "VIII",
      "title": "Protective response and conclusions",
      "anchor": "part-viii-protective-response-and-conclusions",
      "sectionIds": [
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-36",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-37",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-38",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-39",
        "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-40"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "sections": [
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-1",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-i",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "1",
      "title": "The decision problem",
      "anchor": "1-the-decision-problem",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-1-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for the decision problem bears directly on the risk assessment. The 2009 baseline shows large pre-existing exclusion concentrated in poorer countries and within-country groups; a common macroeconomic shock therefore meets sharply unequal starting conditions. The source year and population for the decision problem must be preserved because comparable observations on the decision problem often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for the decision problem: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-1-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach the decision problem through several routes, but routes affecting the decision problem should not be collapsed. The relevant population is not a single stock. It includes children who have never entered, entrants who leave before completion, pupils absent for sustained periods, displaced learners and those enrolled in provision too irregular to secure participation. Household income and public revenue relevant to the decision problem can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on the decision problem should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about the decision problem and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-1-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of the decision problem requires a denominator and a time boundary. Separate recorded participation from prospective exposure, and report each forecast as a conditional risk statement rather than as a count of children already excluded. Every observation on the decision problem should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for the decision problem should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects the decision problem, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-1-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of the decision problem. A small average movement in the decision problem can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of the decision problem is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for the decision problem is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-1-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on the decision problem requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning the decision problem should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning the decision problem is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-1-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A crisis risk profile must identify where a contraction can enlarge or prolong educational exclusion without mistaking a forecast for an observed enrolment change. In the analysis of the decision problem, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning the decision problem should remain at its collection level: a national association about the decision problem cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning the decision problem cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-1-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The first interpretive check for the decision problem is temporal. The likely path without contraction cannot be assumed to equal the preceding year's path, because demography, earlier reforms, conflict, prices and local events may already have altered participation. The second check concerns observation: The relevant population is not a single stock. It includes children who have never entered, entrants who leave before completion, pupils absent for sustained periods, displaced learners and those enrolled in provision too irregular to secure participation. Where these conditions are only partly measured, the finding should be expressed as exposure or warning, not realised effect. The third check concerns actionability. Separate recorded participation from prospective exposure, and report each forecast as a conditional risk statement rather than as a count of children already excluded. Evidence collected after the relevant school decision may still support accountability, but it cannot substitute for an early signal capable of preventing exclusion.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-1-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Monitoring the decision problem should also record adverse exceptions. The relevant population is not a single stock. It includes children who have never entered, entrants who leave before completion, pupils absent for sustained periods, displaced learners and those enrolled in provision too irregular to secure participation. Averages and medians can obscure a school closure, a district payment interruption or a group unable to use a nominal entitlement. Exception evidence does not establish the national rate, yet it can reveal a failed safeguard and justify focused verification. The resulting action should remain proportionate to the reach, duration and reversibility of the observed problem.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-2",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-i",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "2",
      "title": "A contemporaneous risk frame",
      "anchor": "2-a-contemporaneous-risk-frame",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-2-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach a contemporaneous risk frame through several routes, but routes affecting a contemporaneous risk frame should not be collapsed. The analytical task is consequently one of disciplined early warning: assemble transmission evidence, baseline exclusion and institutional buffers while preserving uncertainty about timing and magnitude. Household income and public revenue relevant to a contemporaneous risk frame can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on a contemporaneous risk frame should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about a contemporaneous risk frame and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-2-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of a contemporaneous risk frame requires a denominator and a time boundary. A defensible profile ranks vulnerabilities and observation needs; it does not attribute every absence or budget variance to the global contraction. Every observation on a contemporaneous risk frame should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for a contemporaneous risk frame should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects a contemporaneous risk frame, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-2-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of a contemporaneous risk frame. A small average movement in a contemporaneous risk frame can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of a contemporaneous risk frame is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for a contemporaneous risk frame is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-2-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on a contemporaneous risk frame requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning a contemporaneous risk frame should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning a contemporaneous risk frame is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-2-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "By 13 March 2009, output, trade, remittances, employment and public revenue had deteriorated rapidly, but education administrative systems had not yet produced harmonised post-crisis participation series. In the analysis of a contemporaneous risk frame, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning a contemporaneous risk frame should remain at its collection level: a national association about a contemporaneous risk frame cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning a contemporaneous risk frame cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-2-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for a contemporaneous risk frame bears directly on the risk assessment. Comparisons must distinguish countries directly exposed through finance and trade from poorer economies exposed through commodities, aid, remittances, employment and fiscal response. The source year and population for a contemporaneous risk frame must be preserved because comparable observations on a contemporaneous risk frame often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for a contemporaneous risk frame: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-2-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Missing information has a particular meaning for a contemporaneous risk frame. Children outside formal provision, schools with weak staffing and households in motion are also less likely to appear promptly in regular returns. Completeness should therefore be examined across places and groups, not reported only as a national percentage. Comparisons must distinguish countries directly exposed through finance and trade from poorer economies exposed through commodities, aid, remittances, employment and fiscal response. If non-response or late reporting is concentrated in the exposed population, a stable aggregate for a contemporaneous risk frame may understate deterioration. A responsible conclusion should preserve that possibility, seek corroboration and avoid treating absence from the record as attendance in school.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-2-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Interpretation of a contemporaneous risk frame benefits from a source map. Administrative returns describe institutional contact, household enquiries describe children and constraints, fiscal records describe authorised and released resources, and local accounts illuminate mechanisms. No source should silently substitute for another. A defensible profile ranks vulnerabilities and observation needs; it does not attribute every absence or budget variance to the global contraction. Agreement among independent sources strengthens the warning; disagreement should lead to reconciliation of dates, populations and definitions before a combined conclusion is issued.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-3",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-i",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "3",
      "title": "Rights and minimum protection",
      "anchor": "3-rights-and-minimum-protection",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-3-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of rights and minimum protection requires a denominator and a time boundary. Monitoring should therefore identify both the average service change and whether the response transfers cost or risk to children least able to absorb it. Every observation on rights and minimum protection should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for rights and minimum protection should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects rights and minimum protection, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-3-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of rights and minimum protection. A small average movement in rights and minimum protection can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of rights and minimum protection is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for rights and minimum protection is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-3-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on rights and minimum protection requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning rights and minimum protection should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning rights and minimum protection is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-3-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction does not alter the status of education as a right or make discrimination an acceptable instrument of adjustment. In the analysis of rights and minimum protection, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning rights and minimum protection should remain at its collection level: a national association about rights and minimum protection cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning rights and minimum protection cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-3-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for rights and minimum protection bears directly on the risk assessment. Measures that appear neutral in aggregate can burden groups differently when household liquidity, unpaid care, distance or prior exclusion varies. The source year and population for rights and minimum protection must be preserved because comparable observations on rights and minimum protection often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for rights and minimum protection: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-3-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach rights and minimum protection through several routes, but routes affecting rights and minimum protection should not be collapsed. Availability, accessibility, acceptability and adaptability provide distinct tests: a school may remain formally open while transport, charges, disability access, language or safety makes attendance impracticable. Household income and public revenue relevant to rights and minimum protection can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on rights and minimum protection should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about rights and minimum protection and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-3-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A public measure directed at rights and minimum protection can achieve high aggregate coverage and still miss the children facing the binding barrier. Eligibility, take-up and sustained receipt are separate observations, as are receipt and educational effect. Monitoring should therefore identify both the average service change and whether the response transfers cost or risk to children least able to absorb it. Investigation of non-receipt should consider documents, travel, language, disability access, payment timing and discretion at the point of delivery. The distributional question is whether the measure changes the constraint described in this section, rather than whether expenditure or beneficiary numbers increased in the abstract.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-3-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The public communication of rights and minimum protection should keep scale and uncertainty together. Measures that appear neutral in aggregate can burden groups differently when household liquidity, unpaid care, distance or prior exclusion varies. A rate without its population can hide a large absolute burden, while a count without a denominator can reflect demographic size rather than elevated risk. Where confidence intervals are unavailable, known coverage and definitional limits should still be stated in plain language. This allows urgent attention without encouraging false comparison or unsupported precision.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-4",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-i",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "4",
      "title": "Unit of analysis and time",
      "anchor": "4-unit-of-analysis-and-time",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-4-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of unit of analysis and time. A small average movement in unit of analysis and time can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of unit of analysis and time is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for unit of analysis and time is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-4-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on unit of analysis and time requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning unit of analysis and time should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning unit of analysis and time is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-4-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The child is the principal unit for participation, but households, schools, districts and public budgets are necessary units for understanding exposure and response. In the analysis of unit of analysis and time, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning unit of analysis and time should remain at its collection level: a national association about unit of analysis and time cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning unit of analysis and time cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-4-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for unit of analysis and time bears directly on the risk assessment. Annual enrolment is a weak early-warning measure where withdrawal occurs after registration, attendance becomes intermittent or late entry is deferred to the following school year. The source year and population for unit of analysis and time must be preserved because comparable observations on unit of analysis and time often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for unit of analysis and time: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-4-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach unit of analysis and time through several routes, but routes affecting unit of analysis and time should not be collapsed. School-year calendars, survey reference weeks, fiscal years and recession quarters do not coincide; a cross-section can therefore combine decisions made under different economic conditions. Household income and public revenue relevant to unit of analysis and time can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on unit of analysis and time should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about unit of analysis and time and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-4-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of unit of analysis and time requires a denominator and a time boundary. Report dates, age rules and observation windows alongside each indicator, and retain the lag between an economic event and a measured educational consequence. Every observation on unit of analysis and time should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for unit of analysis and time should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects unit of analysis and time, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-4-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Fiscal evidence relevant to unit of analysis and time should be read in real and operational terms. Nominal protection can buy fewer inputs, while a fully executed central vote can coexist with late or incomplete receipt at school level. School-year calendars, survey reference weeks, fiscal years and recession quarters do not coincide; a cross-section can therefore combine decisions made under different economic conditions. The appropriate chain is allocation, release, receipt, usable service and participation consequence. Breaks in that chain should be located before responsibility is assigned. Where finance and participation move together, the association warrants investigation; attribution still requires timing, a plausible mechanism and consideration of competing explanations.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-4-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Responsibility for unit of analysis and time follows authority over the relevant constraint. Households can report cost or absence, and schools can identify interruption, but neither should be expected to remedy a revenue, entitlement or system-capacity failure beyond its control. The child is the principal unit for participation, but households, schools, districts and public budgets are necessary units for understanding exposure and response. The responsible public body should connect the signal to finance, staffing, admission or support authority and report whether the corrective measure reached the affected learner.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-5",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-i",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "5",
      "title": "Causal discipline",
      "anchor": "5-causal-discipline",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-5-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on causal discipline requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning causal discipline should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning causal discipline is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-5-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Household income loss, public expenditure restraint, labour-market change, migration and service deterioration are plausible channels, but their presence does not prove that a named child left school because of the crisis. In the analysis of causal discipline, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning causal discipline should remain at its collection level: a national association about causal discipline cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning causal discipline cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-5-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for causal discipline bears directly on the risk assessment. Causal claims require a credible counterfactual, temporal ordering and evidence that competing explanations do not account for the observed difference. The source year and population for causal discipline must be preserved because comparable observations on causal discipline often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for causal discipline: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-5-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach causal discipline through several routes, but routes affecting causal discipline should not be collapsed. Pre-existing poverty, conflict, disability exclusion, poor quality and demographic pressure may move simultaneously and may also influence exposure to contraction. Household income and public revenue relevant to causal discipline can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on causal discipline should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about causal discipline and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-5-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of causal discipline requires a denominator and a time boundary. For current surveillance, triangulation and explicit uncertainty are preferable to an apparently precise estimate assembled from incompatible series. Every observation on causal discipline should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for causal discipline should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects causal discipline, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-5-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of causal discipline. A small average movement in causal discipline can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of causal discipline is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for causal discipline is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-5-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Comparison of causal discipline should stop when definitions cease to sustain a common meaning. Causal claims require a credible counterfactual, temporal ordering and evidence that competing explanations do not account for the observed difference. An unresolved observation is better retained outside an average than forced into a rank that conceals a population or reference-period difference. For a valid comparison, numerator, denominator, age range, programme boundary, collection method and treatment of missing cases must be sufficiently aligned. Any remaining qualification should accompany the comparative statement and limit the decision made from it.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-5-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A final sensitivity check for causal discipline should ask whether the conclusion changes when uncertain denominators, late reports or alternative reference periods are used. Pre-existing poverty, conflict, disability exclusion, poor quality and demographic pressure may move simultaneously and may also influence exposure to contraction. A result that reverses under plausible assumptions is not useless, but it should not be presented as settled comparative evidence. It can still identify the observation most worth improving and the population for whom a temporary protective presumption is justified while verification continues.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-6",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-ii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "6",
      "title": "Children never enrolled",
      "anchor": "6-children-never-enrolled",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-6-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Never-entry reflects accumulated barriers before the crisis and is not interchangeable with current dropout. It is especially sensitive to household poverty, distance, disability, language, gender norms and the perceived value and quality of schooling. In the analysis of children never enrolled, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning children never enrolled should remain at its collection level: a national association about children never enrolled cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning children never enrolled cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-6-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for children never enrolled bears directly on the risk assessment. Household surveys are essential for identifying such children, yet survey timing and age misreporting can blur the boundary between late entry and permanent exclusion. The source year and population for children never enrolled must be preserved because comparable observations on children never enrolled often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for children never enrolled: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-6-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach children never enrolled through several routes, but routes affecting children never enrolled should not be collapsed. An economic shock may postpone entry without producing an immediate administrative record, because the child has no prior school identifier. Household income and public revenue relevant to children never enrolled can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on children never enrolled should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about children never enrolled and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-6-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of children never enrolled requires a denominator and a time boundary. Track entry by single year of age and household characteristics, and interpret a rising share of over-age new entrants as possible evidence of deferred access rather than successful on-time inclusion. Every observation on children never enrolled should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for children never enrolled should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects children never enrolled, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-6-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of children never enrolled. A small average movement in children never enrolled can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of children never enrolled is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for children never enrolled is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-6-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on children never enrolled requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning children never enrolled should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning children never enrolled is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-6-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Recovery in relation to children never enrolled requires a demanding test. Return to a register can occur without regular presence, appropriate placement or progression, particularly after a child becomes over-age, assumes work or moves residence. Never-entry reflects accumulated barriers before the crisis and is not interchangeable with current dropout. It is especially sensitive to household poverty, distance, disability, language, gender norms and the perceived value and quality of schooling. Follow-up should identify who returns, how long participation is sustained and whether support reaches those who do not return. This prevents an improving total from concealing a cohort for whom a temporary interruption has become durable exclusion.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-6-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "For children never enrolled, the decision record should show the baseline date, the signal date and the date on which a protective measure could alter the result. It should identify which children were observable, which were outside coverage and which assumptions connect the economic event to educational participation. Track entry by single year of age and household characteristics, and interpret a rising share of over-age new entrants as possible evidence of deferred access rather than successful on-time inclusion. Subsequent revision should preserve the earlier judgement and explain whether new information changed the underlying condition, the population estimate or the interpretation. That record permits correction without pretending that later knowledge was available on 13 March 2009.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-7",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-ii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "7",
      "title": "Dropout and non-completion",
      "anchor": "7-dropout-and-non-completion",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-7-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for dropout and non-completion bears directly on the risk assessment. A fall in enrolment between grades combines dropout, repetition, transfer, migration and data error unless children are followed longitudinally. The source year and population for dropout and non-completion must be preserved because comparable observations on dropout and non-completion often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for dropout and non-completion: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-7-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach dropout and non-completion through several routes, but routes affecting dropout and non-completion should not be collapsed. Contraction can raise dropout risk through direct costs, foregone earnings, family mobility, hunger, reduced school quality or the loss of a supporting adult. Household income and public revenue relevant to dropout and non-completion can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on dropout and non-completion should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about dropout and non-completion and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-7-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of dropout and non-completion requires a denominator and a time boundary. Use cohort flow evidence where available, reconcile transfers, and present non-completion as a separate outcome from never-entry and temporary absence. Every observation on dropout and non-completion should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for dropout and non-completion should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects dropout and non-completion, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-7-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of dropout and non-completion. A small average movement in dropout and non-completion can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of dropout and non-completion is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for dropout and non-completion is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-7-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on dropout and non-completion requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning dropout and non-completion should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning dropout and non-completion is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-7-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Dropout denotes departure after entry, but definitions vary according to whether a child fails to return, is absent for a specified period or is not observed in a subsequent grade. In the analysis of dropout and non-completion, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning dropout and non-completion should remain at its collection level: a national association about dropout and non-completion cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning dropout and non-completion cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-7-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The warning value of evidence on dropout and non-completion depends on whether an authorised body can act within the educational period concerned. Use cohort flow evidence where available, reconcile transfers, and present non-completion as a separate outcome from never-entry and temporary absence. A precise annual estimate delivered after withdrawal may be less protective than a qualified monthly or termly signal supported by several sources. Timeliness does not excuse weak method: the source, coverage, question and uncertainty should remain explicit. It does require a planned route from signal to verification, protective action and later correction of the public record.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-7-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "An equity review of dropout and non-completion should compare the distribution of exposure with the distribution of protection. A fall in enrolment between grades combines dropout, repetition, transfer, migration and data error unless children are followed longitudinally. If the group facing the greatest barrier receives the smallest or latest share of support, an improving national mean cannot close the concern. The review should ask whether programme rules, documentation, geographic reach or local discretion produced the mismatch and should identify the authority able to amend it during the school term.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-8",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-ii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "8",
      "title": "Attendance and effective participation",
      "anchor": "8-attendance-and-effective-participation",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-8-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach attendance and effective participation through several routes, but routes affecting attendance and effective participation should not be collapsed. Families under strain may preserve enrolment while reducing attendance on market days, during seasonal work, after migration or when transport and meals become unaffordable. Household income and public revenue relevant to attendance and effective participation can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on attendance and effective participation should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about attendance and effective participation and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-8-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of attendance and effective participation requires a denominator and a time boundary. A crisis-sensitive system should examine attendance distributions, repeated spells and return after absence, disaggregated by sex, age, disability, residence and household circumstances. Every observation on attendance and effective participation should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for attendance and effective participation should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects attendance and effective participation, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-8-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of attendance and effective participation. A small average movement in attendance and effective participation can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of attendance and effective participation is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for attendance and effective participation is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-8-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on attendance and effective participation requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning attendance and effective participation should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning attendance and effective participation is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-8-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Registration records a formal relationship with a school; attendance records presence during an observation period; neither alone establishes sustained participation or learning. In the analysis of attendance and effective participation, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning attendance and effective participation should remain at its collection level: a national association about attendance and effective participation cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning attendance and effective participation cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-8-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for attendance and effective participation bears directly on the risk assessment. Short survey reference periods can miss episodic absence, while school registers may be completed inconsistently where staff capacity is weak. The source year and population for attendance and effective participation must be preserved because comparable observations on attendance and effective participation often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for attendance and effective participation: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-8-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Assessment of attendance and effective participation should conclude with an explicit counter-test. If seasonality, migration, a revised population estimate or a reporting change can explain the movement, the crisis interpretation should be narrowed. If those alternatives do not suffice, Families under strain may preserve enrolment while reducing attendance on market days, during seasonal work, after migration or when transport and meals become unaffordable. The inquiry can then test household cost, work, school continuity and fiscal evidence in the sequence most relevant to the affected population. This approach neither delays urgent protection nor converts a plausible channel into a quantitative claim stronger than the evidence permits.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-8-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The evidentiary threshold for a public claim about attendance and effective participation rises with the consequence attached to it. A broad warning can rest on converging directional evidence if uncertainty is explicit; reallocating resources away from a place or group requires representative and comparable information. Registration records a formal relationship with a school; attendance records presence during an observation period; neither alone establishes sustained participation or learning. Both decisions should be revisited when stronger attendance, household or fiscal evidence becomes available, but the earlier basis should remain visible.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-9",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-ii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "9",
      "title": "Primary-age and adolescent exclusion",
      "anchor": "9-primary-age-and-adolescent-exclusion",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-9-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of primary-age and adolescent exclusion requires a denominator and a time boundary. Publish age- and level-specific measures, identify the official entrance and completion ages, and avoid extending conclusions beyond the population actually observed. Every observation on primary-age and adolescent exclusion should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for primary-age and adolescent exclusion should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects primary-age and adolescent exclusion, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-17"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-9-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of primary-age and adolescent exclusion. A small average movement in primary-age and adolescent exclusion can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of primary-age and adolescent exclusion is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for primary-age and adolescent exclusion is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-17"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-9-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on primary-age and adolescent exclusion requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning primary-age and adolescent exclusion should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning primary-age and adolescent exclusion is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-17"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-9-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Primary-age out-of-school estimates support the universal primary education commitment, but they do not capture the different economic and social pressures affecting adolescents. In the analysis of primary-age and adolescent exclusion, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning primary-age and adolescent exclusion should remain at its collection level: a national association about primary-age and adolescent exclusion cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning primary-age and adolescent exclusion cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-17"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-9-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for primary-age and adolescent exclusion bears directly on the risk assessment. Combining age groups can conceal opposite movements, such as protected primary participation alongside accelerated secondary withdrawal. The source year and population for primary-age and adolescent exclusion must be preserved because comparable observations on primary-age and adolescent exclusion often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for primary-age and adolescent exclusion: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-17"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-9-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach primary-age and adolescent exclusion through several routes, but routes affecting primary-age and adolescent exclusion should not be collapsed. Older children face stronger labour demand, domestic responsibility, marriage risk, examination costs and the transition from primary to secondary provision. Household income and public revenue relevant to primary-age and adolescent exclusion can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on primary-age and adolescent exclusion should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about primary-age and adolescent exclusion and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-17"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-9-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The first interpretive check for primary-age and adolescent exclusion is temporal. The likely path without contraction cannot be assumed to equal the preceding year's path, because demography, earlier reforms, conflict, prices and local events may already have altered participation. The second check concerns observation: Older children face stronger labour demand, domestic responsibility, marriage risk, examination costs and the transition from primary to secondary provision. Where these conditions are only partly measured, the finding should be expressed as exposure or warning, not realised effect. The third check concerns actionability. Publish age- and level-specific measures, identify the official entrance and completion ages, and avoid extending conclusions beyond the population actually observed. Evidence collected after the relevant school decision may still support accountability, but it cannot substitute for an early signal capable of preventing exclusion.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-17"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-9-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Monitoring primary-age and adolescent exclusion should also record adverse exceptions. Older children face stronger labour demand, domestic responsibility, marriage risk, examination costs and the transition from primary to secondary provision. Averages and medians can obscure a school closure, a district payment interruption or a group unable to use a nominal entitlement. Exception evidence does not establish the national rate, yet it can reveal a failed safeguard and justify focused verification. The resulting action should remain proportionate to the reach, duration and reversibility of the observed problem.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-17"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-10",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-ii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "10",
      "title": "Denominators and population estimates",
      "anchor": "10-denominators-and-population-estimates",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-10-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of denominators and population estimates. A small average movement in denominators and population estimates can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of denominators and population estimates is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for denominators and population estimates is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-10-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on denominators and population estimates requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning denominators and population estimates should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning denominators and population estimates is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-10-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The out-of-school rate depends as much on the school-age population denominator as on the count of enrolled pupils. In the analysis of denominators and population estimates, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning denominators and population estimates should remain at its collection level: a national association about denominators and population estimates cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning denominators and population estimates cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-10-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for denominators and population estimates bears directly on the risk assessment. Economic contraction can increase movement between urban and rural areas or across borders, making stale denominators especially misleading. The source year and population for denominators and population estimates must be preserved because comparable observations on denominators and population estimates often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for denominators and population estimates: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-10-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach denominators and population estimates through several routes, but routes affecting denominators and population estimates should not be collapsed. Census projections may be uncertain where migration, displacement, mortality or rapid demographic change has altered local populations; administrative totals may also include pupils outside the official age range. Household income and public revenue relevant to denominators and population estimates can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on denominators and population estimates should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about denominators and population estimates and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-10-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of denominators and population estimates requires a denominator and a time boundary. Reconcile school records with population estimates, show the source and vintage of each denominator, and flag rates whose apparent change may reflect revised population projections. Every observation on denominators and population estimates should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for denominators and population estimates should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects denominators and population estimates, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-10-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Missing information has a particular meaning for denominators and population estimates. Children outside formal provision, schools with weak staffing and households in motion are also less likely to appear promptly in regular returns. Completeness should therefore be examined across places and groups, not reported only as a national percentage. Economic contraction can increase movement between urban and rural areas or across borders, making stale denominators especially misleading. If non-response or late reporting is concentrated in the exposed population, a stable aggregate for denominators and population estimates may understate deterioration. A responsible conclusion should preserve that possibility, seek corroboration and avoid treating absence from the record as attendance in school.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-10-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Interpretation of denominators and population estimates benefits from a source map. Administrative returns describe institutional contact, household enquiries describe children and constraints, fiscal records describe authorised and released resources, and local accounts illuminate mechanisms. No source should silently substitute for another. Reconcile school records with population estimates, show the source and vintage of each denominator, and flag rates whose apparent change may reflect revised population projections. Agreement among independent sources strengthens the warning; disagreement should lead to reconciliation of dates, populations and definitions before a combined conclusion is issued.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-11",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "11",
      "title": "Income and liquidity loss",
      "anchor": "11-income-and-liquidity-loss",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-11-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on income and liquidity loss requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning income and liquidity loss should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning income and liquidity loss is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-14",
            "REF-15"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-11-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Loss of wages, casual earnings, farm receipts, remittances or credit can make modest school expenses immediately binding even where tuition is formally free. In the analysis of income and liquidity loss, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning income and liquidity loss should remain at its collection level: a national association about income and liquidity loss cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning income and liquidity loss cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-14",
            "REF-15"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-11-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for income and liquidity loss bears directly on the risk assessment. Poor households have fewer assets and less access to formal borrowing, and repeated shocks can exhaust informal support. The source year and population for income and liquidity loss must be preserved because comparable observations on income and liquidity loss often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for income and liquidity loss: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-14",
            "REF-15"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-11-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach income and liquidity loss through several routes, but routes affecting income and liquidity loss should not be collapsed. The sequence matters: households may first reduce food quality, transport, uniforms, books or tutoring before withdrawing a child, so educational risk appears before recorded dropout. Household income and public revenue relevant to income and liquidity loss can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on income and liquidity loss should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about income and liquidity loss and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-14",
            "REF-15"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-11-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of income and liquidity loss requires a denominator and a time boundary. Monitor education-related spending, arrears, travel, meals, attendance and reported reasons for absence together; no single item adequately represents the household constraint. Every observation on income and liquidity loss should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for income and liquidity loss should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects income and liquidity loss, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-14",
            "REF-15"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-11-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of income and liquidity loss. A small average movement in income and liquidity loss can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of income and liquidity loss is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for income and liquidity loss is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-14",
            "REF-15"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-11-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A public measure directed at income and liquidity loss can achieve high aggregate coverage and still miss the children facing the binding barrier. Eligibility, take-up and sustained receipt are separate observations, as are receipt and educational effect. Monitor education-related spending, arrears, travel, meals, attendance and reported reasons for absence together; no single item adequately represents the household constraint. Investigation of non-receipt should consider documents, travel, language, disability access, payment timing and discretion at the point of delivery. The distributional question is whether the measure changes the constraint described in this section, rather than whether expenditure or beneficiary numbers increased in the abstract.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-14",
            "REF-15"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-11-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The public communication of income and liquidity loss should keep scale and uncertainty together. Poor households have fewer assets and less access to formal borrowing, and repeated shocks can exhaust informal support. A rate without its population can hide a large absolute burden, while a count without a denominator can reflect demographic size rather than elevated risk. Where confidence intervals are unavailable, known coverage and definitional limits should still be stated in plain language. This allows urgent attention without encouraging false comparison or unsupported precision.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-14",
            "REF-15"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-12",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "12",
      "title": "Direct and indirect schooling costs",
      "anchor": "12-direct-and-indirect-schooling-costs",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-12-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Fees are only one component of the private cost of participation. Uniforms, books, contributions, examinations, transport and meals can determine whether a nominally free place is usable. In the analysis of direct and indirect schooling costs, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning direct and indirect schooling costs should remain at its collection level: a national association about direct and indirect schooling costs cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning direct and indirect schooling costs cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-12-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for direct and indirect schooling costs bears directly on the risk assessment. Average household spending can fall because poor children leave while better-off pupils remain, producing a misleading appearance of reduced cost. The source year and population for direct and indirect schooling costs must be preserved because comparable observations on direct and indirect schooling costs often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for direct and indirect schooling costs: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-12-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach direct and indirect schooling costs through several routes, but routes affecting direct and indirect schooling costs should not be collapsed. During contraction, institutions facing reduced transfers may seek larger household contributions, shifting a public-finance shortfall into private expenditure. Household income and public revenue relevant to direct and indirect schooling costs can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on direct and indirect schooling costs should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about direct and indirect schooling costs and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-12-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of direct and indirect schooling costs requires a denominator and a time boundary. Record required and informal payments, waivers, arrears and exclusionary consequences by household group, and relate the evidence to attendance rather than expenditure alone. Every observation on direct and indirect schooling costs should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for direct and indirect schooling costs should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects direct and indirect schooling costs, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-12-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of direct and indirect schooling costs. A small average movement in direct and indirect schooling costs can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of direct and indirect schooling costs is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for direct and indirect schooling costs is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-12-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on direct and indirect schooling costs requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning direct and indirect schooling costs should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning direct and indirect schooling costs is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-12-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Fiscal evidence relevant to direct and indirect schooling costs should be read in real and operational terms. Nominal protection can buy fewer inputs, while a fully executed central vote can coexist with late or incomplete receipt at school level. During contraction, institutions facing reduced transfers may seek larger household contributions, shifting a public-finance shortfall into private expenditure. The appropriate chain is allocation, release, receipt, usable service and participation consequence. Breaks in that chain should be located before responsibility is assigned. Where finance and participation move together, the association warrants investigation; attribution still requires timing, a plausible mechanism and consideration of competing explanations.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-12-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Responsibility for direct and indirect schooling costs follows authority over the relevant constraint. Households can report cost or absence, and schools can identify interruption, but neither should be expected to remedy a revenue, entitlement or system-capacity failure beyond its control. Fees are only one component of the private cost of participation. Uniforms, books, contributions, examinations, transport and meals can determine whether a nominally free place is usable. The responsible public body should connect the signal to finance, staffing, admission or support authority and report whether the corrective measure reached the affected learner.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-13",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "13",
      "title": "Child labour and work intensity",
      "anchor": "13-child-labour-and-work-intensity",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-13-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for child labour and work intensity bears directly on the risk assessment. Girls’ domestic and care work is frequently less visible than paid activity; boys may face heightened exposure in agriculture, street work or other casual occupations. The source year and population for child labour and work intensity must be preserved because comparable observations on child labour and work intensity often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for child labour and work intensity: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-14",
            "REF-17",
            "REF-06"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-13-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach child labour and work intensity through several routes, but routes affecting child labour and work intensity should not be collapsed. The relevant margin is not simply whether a child works, but hours, timing, conditions and interference with attendance, study and rest. Household income and public revenue relevant to child labour and work intensity can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on child labour and work intensity should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about child labour and work intensity and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-14",
            "REF-17",
            "REF-06"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-13-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of child labour and work intensity requires a denominator and a time boundary. Link labour questions to schooling status and time use, and treat a change in work intensity as an early-warning signal rather than automatic proof of withdrawal. Every observation on child labour and work intensity should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for child labour and work intensity should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects child labour and work intensity, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-14",
            "REF-17",
            "REF-06"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-13-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of child labour and work intensity. A small average movement in child labour and work intensity can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of child labour and work intensity is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for child labour and work intensity is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-14",
            "REF-17",
            "REF-06"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-13-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on child labour and work intensity requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning child labour and work intensity should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning child labour and work intensity is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-14",
            "REF-17",
            "REF-06"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-13-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A weaker adult labour market can reduce demand for some forms of child work, yet household income loss can simultaneously increase the need for children’s unpaid, informal or hazardous labour. In the analysis of child labour and work intensity, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning child labour and work intensity should remain at its collection level: a national association about child labour and work intensity cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning child labour and work intensity cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-14",
            "REF-17",
            "REF-06"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-13-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Comparison of child labour and work intensity should stop when definitions cease to sustain a common meaning. Girls’ domestic and care work is frequently less visible than paid activity; boys may face heightened exposure in agriculture, street work or other casual occupations. An unresolved observation is better retained outside an average than forced into a rank that conceals a population or reference-period difference. For a valid comparison, numerator, denominator, age range, programme boundary, collection method and treatment of missing cases must be sufficiently aligned. Any remaining qualification should accompany the comparative statement and limit the decision made from it.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-14",
            "REF-17",
            "REF-06"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-13-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A final sensitivity check for child labour and work intensity should ask whether the conclusion changes when uncertain denominators, late reports or alternative reference periods are used. The relevant margin is not simply whether a child works, but hours, timing, conditions and interference with attendance, study and rest. A result that reverses under plausible assumptions is not useless, but it should not be presented as settled comparative evidence. It can still identify the observation most worth improving and the population for whom a temporary protective presumption is justified while verification continues.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-14",
            "REF-17",
            "REF-06"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-14",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "14",
      "title": "Food security and nutrition",
      "anchor": "14-food-security-and-nutrition",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-14-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach food security and nutrition through several routes, but routes affecting food security and nutrition should not be collapsed. Hunger may reduce attendance and concentration even when enrolment persists; loss of school meals can remove both a nutrition intervention and an incentive for regular participation. Household income and public revenue relevant to food security and nutrition can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on food security and nutrition should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about food security and nutrition and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-15",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-14-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of food security and nutrition requires a denominator and a time boundary. Track meal provision, household food stress, attendance and health-related absence, with attention to places affected by both price and employment shocks. Every observation on food security and nutrition should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for food security and nutrition should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects food security and nutrition, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-15",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-14-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of food security and nutrition. A small average movement in food security and nutrition can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of food security and nutrition is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for food security and nutrition is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-15",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-14-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on food security and nutrition requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning food security and nutrition should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning food security and nutrition is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-15",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-14-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "High food prices preceding the financial crisis had already compressed household budgets, and income contraction can deepen the trade-off between food and schooling costs. In the analysis of food security and nutrition, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning food security and nutrition should remain at its collection level: a national association about food security and nutrition cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning food security and nutrition cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-15",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-14-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for food security and nutrition bears directly on the risk assessment. Food insecurity measures and education measures operate on different reference periods and should not be merged into a single index without justification. The source year and population for food security and nutrition must be preserved because comparable observations on food security and nutrition often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for food security and nutrition: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-15",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-14-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Recovery in relation to food security and nutrition requires a demanding test. Return to a register can occur without regular presence, appropriate placement or progression, particularly after a child becomes over-age, assumes work or moves residence. High food prices preceding the financial crisis had already compressed household budgets, and income contraction can deepen the trade-off between food and schooling costs. Follow-up should identify who returns, how long participation is sustained and whether support reaches those who do not return. This prevents an improving total from concealing a cohort for whom a temporary interruption has become durable exclusion.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-15",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-14-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "For food security and nutrition, the decision record should show the baseline date, the signal date and the date on which a protective measure could alter the result. It should identify which children were observable, which were outside coverage and which assumptions connect the economic event to educational participation. Track meal provision, household food stress, attendance and health-related absence, with attention to places affected by both price and employment shocks. Subsequent revision should preserve the earlier judgement and explain whether new information changed the underlying condition, the population estimate or the interpretation. That record permits correction without pretending that later knowledge was available on 13 March 2009.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-15",
            "REF-16",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-15",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "15",
      "title": "Remittances, migration and family separation",
      "anchor": "15-remittances-migration-and-family-separation",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-15-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of remittances, migration and family separation requires a denominator and a time boundary. Cross-check transfer, migration and household data, provide rapid admission without punitive documentation barriers, and report mobility separately from confirmed dropout. Every observation on remittances, migration and family separation should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for remittances, migration and family separation should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects remittances, migration and family separation, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-15-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of remittances, migration and family separation. A small average movement in remittances, migration and family separation can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of remittances, migration and family separation is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for remittances, migration and family separation is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-15-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on remittances, migration and family separation requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning remittances, migration and family separation should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning remittances, migration and family separation is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-15-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Remittance declines can transmit labour-market contraction across borders to households whose local economic conditions appear unchanged. In the analysis of remittances, migration and family separation, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning remittances, migration and family separation should remain at its collection level: a national association about remittances, migration and family separation cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning remittances, migration and family separation cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-15-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for remittances, migration and family separation bears directly on the risk assessment. Children who move repeatedly can be counted as enrolled in one place and absent in another, or disappear from both administrative systems. The source year and population for remittances, migration and family separation must be preserved because comparable observations on remittances, migration and family separation often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for remittances, migration and family separation: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-15-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach remittances, migration and family separation through several routes, but routes affecting remittances, migration and family separation should not be collapsed. Return migration may enlarge school demand in origin areas, while destination schools can lose pupils or funding tied to headcounts; documentation and language may hinder re-entry. Household income and public revenue relevant to remittances, migration and family separation can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on remittances, migration and family separation should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about remittances, migration and family separation and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-15-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The warning value of evidence on remittances, migration and family separation depends on whether an authorised body can act within the educational period concerned. Cross-check transfer, migration and household data, provide rapid admission without punitive documentation barriers, and report mobility separately from confirmed dropout. A precise annual estimate delivered after withdrawal may be less protective than a qualified monthly or termly signal supported by several sources. Timeliness does not excuse weak method: the source, coverage, question and uncertainty should remain explicit. It does require a planned route from signal to verification, protective action and later correction of the public record.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-15-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "An equity review of remittances, migration and family separation should compare the distribution of exposure with the distribution of protection. Children who move repeatedly can be counted as enrolled in one place and absent in another, or disappear from both administrative systems. If the group facing the greatest barrier receives the smallest or latest share of support, an improving national mean cannot close the concern. The review should ask whether programme rules, documentation, geographic reach or local discretion produced the mismatch and should identify the authority able to amend it during the school term.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-18",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-16",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iv",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "16",
      "title": "Revenue contraction and budget execution",
      "anchor": "16-revenue-contraction-and-budget-execution",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-16-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of revenue contraction and budget execution. A small average movement in revenue contraction and budget execution can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of revenue contraction and budget execution is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for revenue contraction and budget execution is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-16-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on revenue contraction and budget execution requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning revenue contraction and budget execution should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning revenue contraction and budget execution is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-16-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A voted education budget is not the same as cash released or service delivered. Revenue shortfalls may appear first as delayed transfers, arrears, frozen recruitment or curtailed maintenance rather than an explicit budget cut. In the analysis of revenue contraction and budget execution, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning revenue contraction and budget execution should remain at its collection level: a national association about revenue contraction and budget execution cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning revenue contraction and budget execution cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-16-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for revenue contraction and budget execution bears directly on the risk assessment. Comparisons should distinguish original appropriation, revised allocation, release, commitment and expenditure, using consistent price treatment. The source year and population for revenue contraction and budget execution must be preserved because comparable observations on revenue contraction and budget execution often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for revenue contraction and budget execution: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-16-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach revenue contraction and budget execution through several routes, but routes affecting revenue contraction and budget execution should not be collapsed. Nominal allocations also conceal inflation and exchange-rate effects on imported materials, construction and externally financed programmes. Household income and public revenue relevant to revenue contraction and budget execution can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on revenue contraction and budget execution should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about revenue contraction and budget execution and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-16-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of revenue contraction and budget execution requires a denominator and a time boundary. Connect fiscal records to school-level receipt and service indicators so that execution weakness can be identified before it becomes an enrolment or attendance loss. Every observation on revenue contraction and budget execution should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for revenue contraction and budget execution should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects revenue contraction and budget execution, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-16-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Assessment of revenue contraction and budget execution should conclude with an explicit counter-test. If seasonality, migration, a revised population estimate or a reporting change can explain the movement, the crisis interpretation should be narrowed. If those alternatives do not suffice, Nominal allocations also conceal inflation and exchange-rate effects on imported materials, construction and externally financed programmes. The inquiry can then test household cost, work, school continuity and fiscal evidence in the sequence most relevant to the affected population. This approach neither delays urgent protection nor converts a plausible channel into a quantitative claim stronger than the evidence permits.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-16-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The evidentiary threshold for a public claim about revenue contraction and budget execution rises with the consequence attached to it. A broad warning can rest on converging directional evidence if uncertainty is explicit; reallocating resources away from a place or group requires representative and comparable information. A voted education budget is not the same as cash released or service delivered. Revenue shortfalls may appear first as delayed transfers, arrears, frozen recruitment or curtailed maintenance rather than an explicit budget cut. Both decisions should be revisited when stronger attendance, household or fiscal evidence becomes available, but the earlier basis should remain visible.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-17",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iv",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "17",
      "title": "Teacher employment and deployment",
      "anchor": "17-teacher-employment-and-deployment",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-17-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on teacher employment and deployment requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning teacher employment and deployment should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning teacher employment and deployment is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-05"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-17-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Protecting an aggregate wage bill does not ensure that teachers remain present where exclusion risk is greatest. In the analysis of teacher employment and deployment, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning teacher employment and deployment should remain at its collection level: a national association about teacher employment and deployment cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning teacher employment and deployment cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-05"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-17-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for teacher employment and deployment bears directly on the risk assessment. Remote schools may be more exposed where vacancies are difficult to fill and local households can no longer supplement staff support. The source year and population for teacher employment and deployment must be preserved because comparable observations on teacher employment and deployment often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for teacher employment and deployment: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-05"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-17-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach teacher employment and deployment through several routes, but routes affecting teacher employment and deployment should not be collapsed. Hiring freezes, delayed pay, attrition, transfers and reliance on untrained or community-paid staff can alter class size, subject coverage and instructional time. Household income and public revenue relevant to teacher employment and deployment can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on teacher employment and deployment should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about teacher employment and deployment and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-05"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-17-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of teacher employment and deployment requires a denominator and a time boundary. Monitor filled posts, attendance, payment delays, deployment and pupil–teacher conditions by location, while avoiding the inference that staffing quantity alone establishes acceptable learning conditions. Every observation on teacher employment and deployment should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for teacher employment and deployment should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects teacher employment and deployment, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-05"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-17-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of teacher employment and deployment. A small average movement in teacher employment and deployment can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of teacher employment and deployment is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for teacher employment and deployment is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-05"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-17-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The first interpretive check for teacher employment and deployment is temporal. The likely path without contraction cannot be assumed to equal the preceding year's path, because demography, earlier reforms, conflict, prices and local events may already have altered participation. The second check concerns observation: Hiring freezes, delayed pay, attrition, transfers and reliance on untrained or community-paid staff can alter class size, subject coverage and instructional time. Where these conditions are only partly measured, the finding should be expressed as exposure or warning, not realised effect. The third check concerns actionability. Monitor filled posts, attendance, payment delays, deployment and pupil–teacher conditions by location, while avoiding the inference that staffing quantity alone establishes acceptable learning conditions. Evidence collected after the relevant school decision may still support accountability, but it cannot substitute for an early signal capable of preventing exclusion.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-05"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-17-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Monitoring teacher employment and deployment should also record adverse exceptions. Hiring freezes, delayed pay, attrition, transfers and reliance on untrained or community-paid staff can alter class size, subject coverage and instructional time. Averages and medians can obscure a school closure, a district payment interruption or a group unable to use a nominal entitlement. Exception evidence does not establish the national rate, yet it can reveal a failed safeguard and justify focused verification. The resulting action should remain proportionate to the reach, duration and reversibility of the observed problem.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-05"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-18",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iv",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "18",
      "title": "School operating resources",
      "anchor": "18-school-operating-resources",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-18-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Small recurrent inputs—water, sanitation, fuel, lighting, textbooks, repairs and communication—can determine whether a school remains safe and usable. In the analysis of school operating resources, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning school operating resources should remain at its collection level: a national association about school operating resources cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning school operating resources cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-18-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for school operating resources bears directly on the risk assessment. A school may remain administratively open while shortening hours, combining classes or requiring families to provide essential materials. The source year and population for school operating resources must be preserved because comparable observations on school operating resources often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for school operating resources: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-18-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach school operating resources through several routes, but routes affecting school operating resources should not be collapsed. These items are vulnerable when systems protect salaries but compress non-salary expenditure, or when local grants arrive late. Household income and public revenue relevant to school operating resources can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on school operating resources should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about school operating resources and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-18-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of school operating resources requires a denominator and a time boundary. Report actual receipt and availability during the school term, not annual expenditure alone, and give priority to inputs whose absence creates a direct barrier for disadvantaged learners. Every observation on school operating resources should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for school operating resources should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects school operating resources, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-18-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of school operating resources. A small average movement in school operating resources can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of school operating resources is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for school operating resources is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-18-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on school operating resources requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning school operating resources should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning school operating resources is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-18-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Missing information has a particular meaning for school operating resources. Children outside formal provision, schools with weak staffing and households in motion are also less likely to appear promptly in regular returns. Completeness should therefore be examined across places and groups, not reported only as a national percentage. A school may remain administratively open while shortening hours, combining classes or requiring families to provide essential materials. If non-response or late reporting is concentrated in the exposed population, a stable aggregate for school operating resources may understate deterioration. A responsible conclusion should preserve that possibility, seek corroboration and avoid treating absence from the record as attendance in school.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-18-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Interpretation of school operating resources benefits from a source map. Administrative returns describe institutional contact, household enquiries describe children and constraints, fiscal records describe authorised and released resources, and local accounts illuminate mechanisms. No source should silently substitute for another. Report actual receipt and availability during the school term, not annual expenditure alone, and give priority to inputs whose absence creates a direct barrier for disadvantaged learners. Agreement among independent sources strengthens the warning; disagreement should lead to reconciliation of dates, populations and definitions before a combined conclusion is issued.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-19",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iv",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "19",
      "title": "Infrastructure and distance",
      "anchor": "19-infrastructure-and-distance",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-19-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for infrastructure and distance bears directly on the risk assessment. National capital totals cannot reveal whether contraction freezes expansion precisely where population growth and exclusion are highest. The source year and population for infrastructure and distance must be preserved because comparable observations on infrastructure and distance often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for infrastructure and distance: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-19-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach infrastructure and distance through several routes, but routes affecting infrastructure and distance should not be collapsed. Capital expenditure is often easier to defer than salaries, but the distributional consequence depends on which communities were waiting for new capacity. Household income and public revenue relevant to infrastructure and distance can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on infrastructure and distance should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about infrastructure and distance and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-19-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of infrastructure and distance requires a denominator and a time boundary. Map projects, service areas, condition and expected beneficiaries; distinguish prudent rescheduling from abandonment that materially reduces educational availability. Every observation on infrastructure and distance should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for infrastructure and distance should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects infrastructure and distance, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-19-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of infrastructure and distance. A small average movement in infrastructure and distance can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of infrastructure and distance is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for infrastructure and distance is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-19-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on infrastructure and distance requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning infrastructure and distance should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning infrastructure and distance is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-19-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Postponed construction or maintenance can affect participation where classrooms are overcrowded, routes unsafe, sanitation inadequate or secondary schools distant. In the analysis of infrastructure and distance, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning infrastructure and distance should remain at its collection level: a national association about infrastructure and distance cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning infrastructure and distance cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-19-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A public measure directed at infrastructure and distance can achieve high aggregate coverage and still miss the children facing the binding barrier. Eligibility, take-up and sustained receipt are separate observations, as are receipt and educational effect. Map projects, service areas, condition and expected beneficiaries; distinguish prudent rescheduling from abandonment that materially reduces educational availability. Investigation of non-receipt should consider documents, travel, language, disability access, payment timing and discretion at the point of delivery. The distributional question is whether the measure changes the constraint described in this section, rather than whether expenditure or beneficiary numbers increased in the abstract.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-19-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The public communication of infrastructure and distance should keep scale and uncertainty together. National capital totals cannot reveal whether contraction freezes expansion precisely where population growth and exclusion are highest. A rate without its population can hide a large absolute burden, while a count without a denominator can reflect demographic size rather than elevated risk. Where confidence intervals are unavailable, known coverage and definitional limits should still be stated in plain language. This allows urgent attention without encouraging false comparison or unsupported precision.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-20",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iv",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "20",
      "title": "External finance and aid volatility",
      "anchor": "20-external-finance-and-aid-volatility",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-20-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach external finance and aid volatility through several routes, but routes affecting external finance and aid volatility should not be collapsed. Projects dependent on foreign exchange or separate implementation arrangements may face different risks from budget support. Household income and public revenue relevant to external finance and aid volatility can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on external finance and aid volatility should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about external finance and aid volatility and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-20-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of external finance and aid volatility requires a denominator and a time boundary. Report commitment, disbursement, domestic counterpart finance and learner-facing use separately, and assess whether emergency support sustains recurrent functions that cannot be stopped without exclusionary effects. Every observation on external finance and aid volatility should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for external finance and aid volatility should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects external finance and aid volatility, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-20-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of external finance and aid volatility. A small average movement in external finance and aid volatility can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of external finance and aid volatility is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for external finance and aid volatility is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-20-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on external finance and aid volatility requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning external finance and aid volatility should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning external finance and aid volatility is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-20-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Aid can protect education when domestic revenue falls, yet commitments, disbursements and sector use differ, and volatile support can complicate recurrent planning. In the analysis of external finance and aid volatility, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning external finance and aid volatility should remain at its collection level: a national association about external finance and aid volatility cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning external finance and aid volatility cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-20-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for external finance and aid volatility bears directly on the risk assessment. Counting a pledge as available education finance overstates protection if timing, conditions or absorption prevent delivery during the school year. The source year and population for external finance and aid volatility must be preserved because comparable observations on external finance and aid volatility often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for external finance and aid volatility: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-20-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Fiscal evidence relevant to external finance and aid volatility should be read in real and operational terms. Nominal protection can buy fewer inputs, while a fully executed central vote can coexist with late or incomplete receipt at school level. Projects dependent on foreign exchange or separate implementation arrangements may face different risks from budget support. The appropriate chain is allocation, release, receipt, usable service and participation consequence. Breaks in that chain should be located before responsibility is assigned. Where finance and participation move together, the association warrants investigation; attribution still requires timing, a plausible mechanism and consideration of competing explanations.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-20-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Responsibility for external finance and aid volatility follows authority over the relevant constraint. Households can report cost or absence, and schools can identify interruption, but neither should be expected to remedy a revenue, entitlement or system-capacity failure beyond its control. Aid can protect education when domestic revenue falls, yet commitments, disbursements and sector use differ, and volatile support can complicate recurrent planning. The responsible public body should connect the signal to finance, staffing, admission or support authority and report whether the corrective measure reached the affected learner.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-21",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-v",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "21",
      "title": "Poverty and wealth",
      "anchor": "21-poverty-and-wealth",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-21-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of poverty and wealth requires a denominator and a time boundary. Use more than one welfare measure where possible and examine transitions in participation across the distribution rather than comparing only the poorest and richest groups. Every observation on poverty and wealth should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for poverty and wealth should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects poverty and wealth, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-21-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of poverty and wealth. A small average movement in poverty and wealth can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of poverty and wealth is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for poverty and wealth is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-21-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on poverty and wealth requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning poverty and wealth should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning poverty and wealth is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-21-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Baseline evidence consistently associates household poverty with lower entry, attendance and completion, but national averages can hide the steepness of the gradient. In the analysis of poverty and wealth, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning poverty and wealth should remain at its collection level: a national association about poverty and wealth cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning poverty and wealth cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-21-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for poverty and wealth bears directly on the risk assessment. Asset indices identify relative position imperfectly during a rapid shock, since assets change more slowly than current income and liquidity. The source year and population for poverty and wealth must be preserved because comparable observations on poverty and wealth often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for poverty and wealth: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-21-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach poverty and wealth through several routes, but routes affecting poverty and wealth should not be collapsed. Contraction threatens children near as well as below a poverty threshold because a modest income loss may remove the margin that financed transport, meals or materials. Household income and public revenue relevant to poverty and wealth can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on poverty and wealth should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about poverty and wealth and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-21-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Comparison of poverty and wealth should stop when definitions cease to sustain a common meaning. Asset indices identify relative position imperfectly during a rapid shock, since assets change more slowly than current income and liquidity. An unresolved observation is better retained outside an average than forced into a rank that conceals a population or reference-period difference. For a valid comparison, numerator, denominator, age range, programme boundary, collection method and treatment of missing cases must be sufficiently aligned. Any remaining qualification should accompany the comparative statement and limit the decision made from it.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-21-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A final sensitivity check for poverty and wealth should ask whether the conclusion changes when uncertain denominators, late reports or alternative reference periods are used. Contraction threatens children near as well as below a poverty threshold because a modest income loss may remove the margin that financed transport, meals or materials. A result that reverses under plausible assumptions is not useless, but it should not be presented as settled comparative evidence. It can still identify the observation most worth improving and the population for whom a temporary protective presumption is justified while verification continues.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-05",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-22",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-v",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "22",
      "title": "Gendered pathways",
      "anchor": "22-gendered-pathways",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-22-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of gendered pathways. A small average movement in gendered pathways can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of gendered pathways is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for gendered pathways is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-22-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on gendered pathways requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning gendered pathways should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning gendered pathways is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-22-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Girls and boys encounter different combinations of direct cost, work, care, safety, marriage and expected returns; the sign of a gender gap therefore cannot be assumed from the aggregate. In the analysis of gendered pathways, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning gendered pathways should remain at its collection level: a national association about gendered pathways cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning gendered pathways cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-22-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for gendered pathways bears directly on the risk assessment. Parity at national primary level can coexist with acute disadvantage among poor rural girls or with boys’ withdrawal in particular labour markets. The source year and population for gendered pathways must be preserved because comparable observations on gendered pathways often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for gendered pathways: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-22-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach gendered pathways through several routes, but routes affecting gendered pathways should not be collapsed. A household may protect the education of one child while reallocating another child’s time, and this choice can vary by age, birth order and local labour demand. Household income and public revenue relevant to gendered pathways can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on gendered pathways should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about gendered pathways and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-22-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of gendered pathways requires a denominator and a time boundary. Analyse sex jointly with wealth, residence, age and level, and investigate the mechanism behind any divergence before selecting a response. Every observation on gendered pathways should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for gendered pathways should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects gendered pathways, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-22-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Recovery in relation to gendered pathways requires a demanding test. Return to a register can occur without regular presence, appropriate placement or progression, particularly after a child becomes over-age, assumes work or moves residence. Girls and boys encounter different combinations of direct cost, work, care, safety, marriage and expected returns; the sign of a gender gap therefore cannot be assumed from the aggregate. Follow-up should identify who returns, how long participation is sustained and whether support reaches those who do not return. This prevents an improving total from concealing a cohort for whom a temporary interruption has become durable exclusion.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-22-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "For gendered pathways, the decision record should show the baseline date, the signal date and the date on which a protective measure could alter the result. It should identify which children were observable, which were outside coverage and which assumptions connect the economic event to educational participation. Analyse sex jointly with wealth, residence, age and level, and investigate the mechanism behind any divergence before selecting a response. Subsequent revision should preserve the earlier judgement and explain whether new information changed the underlying condition, the population estimate or the interpretation. That record permits correction without pretending that later knowledge was available on 13 March 2009.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-23",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-v",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "23",
      "title": "Disability",
      "anchor": "23-disability",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-23-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on disability requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning disability should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning disability is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-23-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Children with disabilities often face additional transport, assistive, communication and support costs that become more difficult to meet during contraction. In the analysis of disability, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning disability should remain at its collection level: a national association about disability cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning disability cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-23-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for disability bears directly on the risk assessment. Across-the-board expenditure restraint can have unequal effect where participation depends on a small but essential accommodation. The source year and population for disability must be preserved because comparable observations on disability often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for disability: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-23-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach disability through several routes, but routes affecting disability should not be collapsed. Administrative systems may omit disability status or record only children already in special provision, leaving those never enrolled invisible. Household income and public revenue relevant to disability can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on disability should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about disability and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-23-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of disability requires a denominator and a time boundary. Protect reasonable supports, improve voluntary and respectful identification, and interpret disability-disaggregated rates cautiously where definitions, stigma and survey instruments differ. Every observation on disability should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for disability should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects disability, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-23-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of disability. A small average movement in disability can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of disability is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for disability is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-23-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The warning value of evidence on disability depends on whether an authorised body can act within the educational period concerned. Protect reasonable supports, improve voluntary and respectful identification, and interpret disability-disaggregated rates cautiously where definitions, stigma and survey instruments differ. A precise annual estimate delivered after withdrawal may be less protective than a qualified monthly or termly signal supported by several sources. Timeliness does not excuse weak method: the source, coverage, question and uncertainty should remain explicit. It does require a planned route from signal to verification, protective action and later correction of the public record.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-23-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "An equity review of disability should compare the distribution of exposure with the distribution of protection. Across-the-board expenditure restraint can have unequal effect where participation depends on a small but essential accommodation. If the group facing the greatest barrier receives the smallest or latest share of support, an improving national mean cannot close the concern. The review should ask whether programme rules, documentation, geographic reach or local discretion produced the mismatch and should identify the authority able to amend it during the school term.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-08",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-24",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-v",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "24",
      "title": "Rural, remote and urban-poor locations",
      "anchor": "24-rural-remote-and-urban-poor-locations",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-24-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Rural distance and sparse provision raise transport and delivery costs, while urban poor settlements may combine proximity with fees, insecure tenure, mobility and overcrowding. In the analysis of rural, remote and urban-poor locations, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning rural, remote and urban-poor locations should remain at its collection level: a national association about rural, remote and urban-poor locations cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning rural, remote and urban-poor locations cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-24-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for rural, remote and urban-poor locations bears directly on the risk assessment. A national urban–rural split is too coarse to identify remote communities, informal settlements or districts dependent on a single employer. The source year and population for rural, remote and urban-poor locations must be preserved because comparable observations on rural, remote and urban-poor locations often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for rural, remote and urban-poor locations: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-24-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach rural, remote and urban-poor locations through several routes, but routes affecting rural, remote and urban-poor locations should not be collapsed. Commodity and agricultural shocks affect rural livelihoods differently from manufacturing, construction or service contraction in towns. Household income and public revenue relevant to rural, remote and urban-poor locations can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on rural, remote and urban-poor locations should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about rural, remote and urban-poor locations and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-24-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of rural, remote and urban-poor locations requires a denominator and a time boundary. Combine geographic access, livelihood exposure, school capacity and household indicators at the smallest reliable level, taking care not to disclose individual children. Every observation on rural, remote and urban-poor locations should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for rural, remote and urban-poor locations should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects rural, remote and urban-poor locations, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-24-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of rural, remote and urban-poor locations. A small average movement in rural, remote and urban-poor locations can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of rural, remote and urban-poor locations is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for rural, remote and urban-poor locations is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-24-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on rural, remote and urban-poor locations requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning rural, remote and urban-poor locations should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning rural, remote and urban-poor locations is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-24-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Assessment of rural, remote and urban-poor locations should conclude with an explicit counter-test. If seasonality, migration, a revised population estimate or a reporting change can explain the movement, the crisis interpretation should be narrowed. If those alternatives do not suffice, Commodity and agricultural shocks affect rural livelihoods differently from manufacturing, construction or service contraction in towns. The inquiry can then test household cost, work, school continuity and fiscal evidence in the sequence most relevant to the affected population. This approach neither delays urgent protection nor converts a plausible channel into a quantitative claim stronger than the evidence permits.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-24-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The evidentiary threshold for a public claim about rural, remote and urban-poor locations rises with the consequence attached to it. A broad warning can rest on converging directional evidence if uncertainty is explicit; reallocating resources away from a place or group requires representative and comparable information. Rural distance and sparse provision raise transport and delivery costs, while urban poor settlements may combine proximity with fees, insecure tenure, mobility and overcrowding. Both decisions should be revisited when stronger attendance, household or fiscal evidence becomes available, but the earlier basis should remain visible.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-25",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-v",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "25",
      "title": "Conflict, displacement and fragile administration",
      "anchor": "25-conflict-displacement-and-fragile-administration",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-25-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for conflict, displacement and fragile administration bears directly on the risk assessment. A decline in reported out-of-school numbers can reflect population movement or statistical loss rather than improved access. The source year and population for conflict, displacement and fragile administration must be preserved because comparable observations on conflict, displacement and fragile administration often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for conflict, displacement and fragile administration: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-18",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-25-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach conflict, displacement and fragile administration through several routes, but routes affecting conflict, displacement and fragile administration should not be collapsed. Displaced children may lack documentation, reside outside planning estimates or move between formal and community provision. Household income and public revenue relevant to conflict, displacement and fragile administration can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on conflict, displacement and fragile administration should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about conflict, displacement and fragile administration and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-18",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-25-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of conflict, displacement and fragile administration requires a denominator and a time boundary. Maintain flexible admission, portable records and separate estimates of population coverage, and state clearly where insecurity prevents complete observation. Every observation on conflict, displacement and fragile administration should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for conflict, displacement and fragile administration should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects conflict, displacement and fragile administration, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-18",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-25-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of conflict, displacement and fragile administration. A small average movement in conflict, displacement and fragile administration can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of conflict, displacement and fragile administration is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for conflict, displacement and fragile administration is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-18",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-25-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on conflict, displacement and fragile administration requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning conflict, displacement and fragile administration should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning conflict, displacement and fragile administration is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-18",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-25-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Conflict and displacement already disrupt records, finance, teacher deployment, safety and continuity; economic contraction can reduce the resources available for an already difficult response. In the analysis of conflict, displacement and fragile administration, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning conflict, displacement and fragile administration should remain at its collection level: a national association about conflict, displacement and fragile administration cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning conflict, displacement and fragile administration cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-18",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-25-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The first interpretive check for conflict, displacement and fragile administration is temporal. The likely path without contraction cannot be assumed to equal the preceding year's path, because demography, earlier reforms, conflict, prices and local events may already have altered participation. The second check concerns observation: Displaced children may lack documentation, reside outside planning estimates or move between formal and community provision. Where these conditions are only partly measured, the finding should be expressed as exposure or warning, not realised effect. The third check concerns actionability. Maintain flexible admission, portable records and separate estimates of population coverage, and state clearly where insecurity prevents complete observation. Evidence collected after the relevant school decision may still support accountability, but it cannot substitute for an early signal capable of preventing exclusion.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-18",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-25-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Monitoring conflict, displacement and fragile administration should also record adverse exceptions. Displaced children may lack documentation, reside outside planning estimates or move between formal and community provision. Averages and medians can obscure a school closure, a district payment interruption or a group unable to use a nominal entitlement. Exception evidence does not establish the national rate, yet it can reveal a failed safeguard and justify focused verification. The resulting action should remain proportionate to the reach, duration and reversibility of the observed problem.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-18",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-26",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vi",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "26",
      "title": "Sub-Saharan Africa",
      "anchor": "26-sub-saharan-africa",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-26-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach sub-saharan africa through several routes, but routes affecting sub-saharan africa should not be collapsed. Exposure differs among commodity exporters, aid-dependent economies, remittance recipients and countries with conflict or fiscal fragility. Household income and public revenue relevant to sub-saharan africa can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on sub-saharan africa should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about sub-saharan africa and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-26-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of sub-saharan africa requires a denominator and a time boundary. Country profiles should therefore combine baseline exclusion, revenue and aid exposure, household costs, teacher capacity and the reach of protective programmes rather than assign a single regional risk score. Every observation on sub-saharan africa should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for sub-saharan africa should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects sub-saharan africa, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-26-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of sub-saharan africa. A small average movement in sub-saharan africa can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of sub-saharan africa is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for sub-saharan africa is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-26-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on sub-saharan africa requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning sub-saharan africa should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning sub-saharan africa is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-26-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The region entered the contraction with rapid enrolment gains in many countries but large remaining out-of-school populations, demographic pressure, teacher shortages and severe within-country inequality. In the analysis of sub-saharan africa, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning sub-saharan africa should remain at its collection level: a national association about sub-saharan africa cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning sub-saharan africa cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-26-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for sub-saharan africa bears directly on the risk assessment. Regional aggregation can conceal both strong progress and systems where capacity expansion has not kept pace with the school-age population. The source year and population for sub-saharan africa must be preserved because comparable observations on sub-saharan africa often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for sub-saharan africa: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-26-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Missing information has a particular meaning for sub-saharan africa. Children outside formal provision, schools with weak staffing and households in motion are also less likely to appear promptly in regular returns. Completeness should therefore be examined across places and groups, not reported only as a national percentage. Regional aggregation can conceal both strong progress and systems where capacity expansion has not kept pace with the school-age population. If non-response or late reporting is concentrated in the exposed population, a stable aggregate for sub-saharan africa may understate deterioration. A responsible conclusion should preserve that possibility, seek corroboration and avoid treating absence from the record as attendance in school.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-26-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Interpretation of sub-saharan africa benefits from a source map. Administrative returns describe institutional contact, household enquiries describe children and constraints, fiscal records describe authorised and released resources, and local accounts illuminate mechanisms. No source should silently substitute for another. Country profiles should therefore combine baseline exclusion, revenue and aid exposure, household costs, teacher capacity and the reach of protective programmes rather than assign a single regional risk score. Agreement among independent sources strengthens the warning; disagreement should lead to reconciliation of dates, populations and definitions before a combined conclusion is issued.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-04",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-27",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vi",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "27",
      "title": "South and West Asia",
      "anchor": "27-south-and-west-asia",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-27-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of south and west asia requires a denominator and a time boundary. Monitoring should retain state or province variation and examine transition, attendance and never-entry alongside the headline primary-age rate. Every observation on south and west asia should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for south and west asia should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects south and west asia, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-27-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of south and west asia. A small average movement in south and west asia can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of south and west asia is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for south and west asia is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-27-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on south and west asia requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning south and west asia should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning south and west asia is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-27-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Large absolute out-of-school populations coexist with wide differences in income, governance, gender relations, conflict exposure and subnational capacity. In the analysis of south and west asia, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning south and west asia should remain at its collection level: a national association about south and west asia cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning south and west asia cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-27-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for south and west asia bears directly on the risk assessment. Macroeconomic indicators at national level may not describe households linked to migration, informal work or specific export sectors. The source year and population for south and west asia must be preserved because comparable observations on south and west asia often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for south and west asia: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-27-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach south and west asia through several routes, but routes affecting south and west asia should not be collapsed. Household cost, child work, female mobility and unequal public provision can reinforce one another, particularly for poor rural girls and marginalised communities. Household income and public revenue relevant to south and west asia can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on south and west asia should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about south and west asia and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-27-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A public measure directed at south and west asia can achieve high aggregate coverage and still miss the children facing the binding barrier. Eligibility, take-up and sustained receipt are separate observations, as are receipt and educational effect. Monitoring should retain state or province variation and examine transition, attendance and never-entry alongside the headline primary-age rate. Investigation of non-receipt should consider documents, travel, language, disability access, payment timing and discretion at the point of delivery. The distributional question is whether the measure changes the constraint described in this section, rather than whether expenditure or beneficiary numbers increased in the abstract.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-27-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The public communication of south and west asia should keep scale and uncertainty together. Macroeconomic indicators at national level may not describe households linked to migration, informal work or specific export sectors. A rate without its population can hide a large absolute burden, while a count without a denominator can reflect demographic size rather than elevated risk. Where confidence intervals are unavailable, known coverage and definitional limits should still be stated in plain language. This allows urgent attention without encouraging false comparison or unsupported precision.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-28",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vi",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "28",
      "title": "East Asia and the Pacific",
      "anchor": "28-east-asia-and-the-pacific",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-28-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of east asia and the pacific. A small average movement in east asia and the pacific can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of east asia and the pacific is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for east asia and the pacific is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-28-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on east asia and the pacific requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning east asia and the pacific should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning east asia and the pacific is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-28-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "High aggregate participation in several systems should not obscure pockets of exclusion among remote, migrant, minority, disabled and poor urban children. In the analysis of east asia and the pacific, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning east asia and the pacific should remain at its collection level: a national association about east asia and the pacific cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning east asia and the pacific cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-28-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for east asia and the pacific bears directly on the risk assessment. Administrative enrolment can remain high even as irregular attendance or return migration increases. The source year and population for east asia and the pacific must be preserved because comparable observations on east asia and the pacific often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for east asia and the pacific: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-28-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach east asia and the pacific through several routes, but routes affecting east asia and the pacific should not be collapsed. Export and manufacturing contraction may affect household employment quickly, while internal migration can alter both origin and destination school demand. Household income and public revenue relevant to east asia and the pacific can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on east asia and the pacific should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about east asia and the pacific and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-28-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of east asia and the pacific requires a denominator and a time boundary. Use local attendance, mobility and household-cost evidence, and protect the right of migrant and returning children to enrol without avoidable documentation barriers. Every observation on east asia and the pacific should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for east asia and the pacific should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects east asia and the pacific, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-28-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Fiscal evidence relevant to east asia and the pacific should be read in real and operational terms. Nominal protection can buy fewer inputs, while a fully executed central vote can coexist with late or incomplete receipt at school level. Export and manufacturing contraction may affect household employment quickly, while internal migration can alter both origin and destination school demand. The appropriate chain is allocation, release, receipt, usable service and participation consequence. Breaks in that chain should be located before responsibility is assigned. Where finance and participation move together, the association warrants investigation; attribution still requires timing, a plausible mechanism and consideration of competing explanations.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-28-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Responsibility for east asia and the pacific follows authority over the relevant constraint. Households can report cost or absence, and schools can identify interruption, but neither should be expected to remedy a revenue, entitlement or system-capacity failure beyond its control. High aggregate participation in several systems should not obscure pockets of exclusion among remote, migrant, minority, disabled and poor urban children. The responsible public body should connect the signal to finance, staffing, admission or support authority and report whether the corrective measure reached the affected learner.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-29",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vi",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "29",
      "title": "Latin America and the Caribbean",
      "anchor": "29-latin-america-and-the-caribbean",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-29-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on latin america and the caribbean requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning latin america and the caribbean should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning latin america and the caribbean is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-29-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Relatively high primary participation shifts attention towards persistence, grade progression, secondary transition and inequality among income groups, rural populations and ethnic communities. In the analysis of latin america and the caribbean, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning latin america and the caribbean should remain at its collection level: a national association about latin america and the caribbean cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning latin america and the caribbean cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-29-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for latin america and the caribbean bears directly on the risk assessment. An unchanged net enrolment rate may coexist with increased absence, repetition or delayed completion. The source year and population for latin america and the caribbean must be preserved because comparable observations on latin america and the caribbean often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for latin america and the caribbean: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-29-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach latin america and the caribbean through several routes, but routes affecting latin america and the caribbean should not be collapsed. Employment and remittance shocks can affect adolescents’ work–school choices, while fiscal constraints may weaken targeted transfers or local services. Household income and public revenue relevant to latin america and the caribbean can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on latin america and the caribbean should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about latin america and the caribbean and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-29-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of latin america and the caribbean requires a denominator and a time boundary. Monitor school trajectories and household support coverage, and separate cyclical deterioration from longer-standing quality and progression problems. Every observation on latin america and the caribbean should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for latin america and the caribbean should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects latin america and the caribbean, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-29-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of latin america and the caribbean. A small average movement in latin america and the caribbean can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of latin america and the caribbean is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for latin america and the caribbean is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-29-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Comparison of latin america and the caribbean should stop when definitions cease to sustain a common meaning. An unchanged net enrolment rate may coexist with increased absence, repetition or delayed completion. An unresolved observation is better retained outside an average than forced into a rank that conceals a population or reference-period difference. For a valid comparison, numerator, denominator, age range, programme boundary, collection method and treatment of missing cases must be sufficiently aligned. Any remaining qualification should accompany the comparative statement and limit the decision made from it.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-29-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A final sensitivity check for latin america and the caribbean should ask whether the conclusion changes when uncertain denominators, late reports or alternative reference periods are used. Employment and remittance shocks can affect adolescents’ work–school choices, while fiscal constraints may weaken targeted transfers or local services. A result that reverses under plausible assumptions is not useless, but it should not be presented as settled comparative evidence. It can still identify the observation most worth improving and the population for whom a temporary protective presumption is justified while verification continues.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-30",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vi",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "30",
      "title": "Arab States, Central and Eastern Europe, and Central Asia",
      "anchor": "30-arab-states-central-and-eastern-europe-and-central-asia",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-30-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "These diverse systems combine different baseline enrolment patterns, demographic trends, public-finance structures and exposures to commodity prices, migration and conflict. In the analysis of arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia should remain at its collection level: a national association about arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-30-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia bears directly on the risk assessment. Broad regional labels are analytically insufficient and can encourage comparison of unlike education structures. The source year and population for arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia must be preserved because comparable observations on arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-30-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia through several routes, but routes affecting arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia should not be collapsed. In some settings, contraction risk is concentrated in secondary and vocational transitions; in others, displacement, rural access or household poverty remains central. Household income and public revenue relevant to arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-30-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia requires a denominator and a time boundary. Profiles should use national level definitions first, then compare only harmonised indicators with explicit notes on programme structure and reference year. Every observation on arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-30-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia. A small average movement in arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-30-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-30-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Recovery in relation to arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia requires a demanding test. Return to a register can occur without regular presence, appropriate placement or progression, particularly after a child becomes over-age, assumes work or moves residence. These diverse systems combine different baseline enrolment patterns, demographic trends, public-finance structures and exposures to commodity prices, migration and conflict. Follow-up should identify who returns, how long participation is sustained and whether support reaches those who do not return. This prevents an improving total from concealing a cohort for whom a temporary interruption has become durable exclusion.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-30-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "For arab states, central and eastern europe, and central asia, the decision record should show the baseline date, the signal date and the date on which a protective measure could alter the result. It should identify which children were observable, which were outside coverage and which assumptions connect the economic event to educational participation. Profiles should use national level definitions first, then compare only harmonised indicators with explicit notes on programme structure and reference year. Subsequent revision should preserve the earlier judgement and explain whether new information changed the underlying condition, the population estimate or the interpretation. That record permits correction without pretending that later knowledge was available on 13 March 2009.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-31",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "31",
      "title": "A minimum crisis dashboard",
      "anchor": "31-a-minimum-crisis-dashboard",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-31-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for a minimum crisis dashboard bears directly on the risk assessment. Each measure needs a named source, reference period, population, disaggregation and revision rule. The source year and population for a minimum crisis dashboard must be preserved because comparable observations on a minimum crisis dashboard often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for a minimum crisis dashboard: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-31-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach a minimum crisis dashboard through several routes, but routes affecting a minimum crisis dashboard should not be collapsed. It should include entry, attendance, withdrawal and return; household costs and reasons; teacher and grant continuity; meal and transport support; and fiscal release. Household income and public revenue relevant to a minimum crisis dashboard can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on a minimum crisis dashboard should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about a minimum crisis dashboard and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-31-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of a minimum crisis dashboard requires a denominator and a time boundary. Signals should trigger investigation rather than automatic classification, because a change may arise from seasonality, migration, data cleaning or policy reform. Every observation on a minimum crisis dashboard should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for a minimum crisis dashboard should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects a minimum crisis dashboard, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-31-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of a minimum crisis dashboard. A small average movement in a minimum crisis dashboard can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of a minimum crisis dashboard is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for a minimum crisis dashboard is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-31-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on a minimum crisis dashboard requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning a minimum crisis dashboard should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning a minimum crisis dashboard is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-31-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A useful dashboard is small enough to be maintained yet broad enough to detect household, school and fiscal transmission before annual completion data arrive. In the analysis of a minimum crisis dashboard, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning a minimum crisis dashboard should remain at its collection level: a national association about a minimum crisis dashboard cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning a minimum crisis dashboard cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-31-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The warning value of evidence on a minimum crisis dashboard depends on whether an authorised body can act within the educational period concerned. Signals should trigger investigation rather than automatic classification, because a change may arise from seasonality, migration, data cleaning or policy reform. A precise annual estimate delivered after withdrawal may be less protective than a qualified monthly or termly signal supported by several sources. Timeliness does not excuse weak method: the source, coverage, question and uncertainty should remain explicit. It does require a planned route from signal to verification, protective action and later correction of the public record.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-31-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "An equity review of a minimum crisis dashboard should compare the distribution of exposure with the distribution of protection. Each measure needs a named source, reference period, population, disaggregation and revision rule. If the group facing the greatest barrier receives the smallest or latest share of support, an improving national mean cannot close the concern. The review should ask whether programme rules, documentation, geographic reach or local discretion produced the mismatch and should identify the authority able to amend it during the school term.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-11"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-32",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "32",
      "title": "Administrative data",
      "anchor": "32-administrative-data",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-32-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach administrative data through several routes, but routes affecting administrative data should not be collapsed. Incentives linked to enrolment or funding can affect reporting, and crisis-related staff shortages may reduce completeness precisely where risk is high. Household income and public revenue relevant to administrative data can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on administrative data should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about administrative data and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-32-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of administrative data requires a denominator and a time boundary. Validate unusual changes, retain revisions, reconcile transfers and compare aggregate administrative counts with independent population and household evidence. Every observation on administrative data should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for administrative data should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects administrative data, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-32-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of administrative data. A small average movement in administrative data can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of administrative data is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for administrative data is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-32-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on administrative data requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning administrative data should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning administrative data is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-32-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "School censuses and registers can provide wide coverage and local detail, but they generally describe users of the system better than children who never enter. In the analysis of administrative data, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning administrative data should remain at its collection level: a national association about administrative data cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning administrative data cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-32-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for administrative data bears directly on the risk assessment. Monthly attendance and withdrawal records are useful only if definitions and follow-up are consistent. The source year and population for administrative data must be preserved because comparable observations on administrative data often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for administrative data: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-32-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Assessment of administrative data should conclude with an explicit counter-test. If seasonality, migration, a revised population estimate or a reporting change can explain the movement, the crisis interpretation should be narrowed. If those alternatives do not suffice, Incentives linked to enrolment or funding can affect reporting, and crisis-related staff shortages may reduce completeness precisely where risk is high. The inquiry can then test household cost, work, school continuity and fiscal evidence in the sequence most relevant to the affected population. This approach neither delays urgent protection nor converts a plausible channel into a quantitative claim stronger than the evidence permits.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-32-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The evidentiary threshold for a public claim about administrative data rises with the consequence attached to it. A broad warning can rest on converging directional evidence if uncertainty is explicit; reallocating resources away from a place or group requires representative and comparable information. School censuses and registers can provide wide coverage and local detail, but they generally describe users of the system better than children who never enter. Both decisions should be revisited when stronger attendance, household or fiscal evidence becomes available, but the earlier basis should remain visible.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-33",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "33",
      "title": "Household surveys and rapid enquiries",
      "anchor": "33-household-surveys-and-rapid-enquiries",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-33-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of household surveys and rapid enquiries requires a denominator and a time boundary. Publish the sample, field dates, question wording and uncertainty, and use qualitative accounts to explain mechanisms rather than estimate prevalence without a valid design. Every observation on household surveys and rapid enquiries should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for household surveys and rapid enquiries should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects household surveys and rapid enquiries, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-33-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of household surveys and rapid enquiries. A small average movement in household surveys and rapid enquiries can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of household surveys and rapid enquiries is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for household surveys and rapid enquiries is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-33-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on household surveys and rapid enquiries requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning household surveys and rapid enquiries should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning household surveys and rapid enquiries is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-33-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Household surveys reveal non-participants, costs, work and reported reasons, and allow multiple dimensions of disadvantage to be examined together. In the analysis of household surveys and rapid enquiries, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning household surveys and rapid enquiries should remain at its collection level: a national association about household surveys and rapid enquiries cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning household surveys and rapid enquiries cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-33-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for household surveys and rapid enquiries bears directly on the risk assessment. Rapid enquiries can provide timely directional evidence but should not inherit the authority of a representative survey when selection is purposive or coverage narrow. The source year and population for household surveys and rapid enquiries must be preserved because comparable observations on household surveys and rapid enquiries often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for household surveys and rapid enquiries: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-33-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach household surveys and rapid enquiries through several routes, but routes affecting household surveys and rapid enquiries should not be collapsed. Their limitations include sampling error, infrequency, non-response, recall and incomplete coverage of institutional, displaced or mobile populations. Household income and public revenue relevant to household surveys and rapid enquiries can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on household surveys and rapid enquiries should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about household surveys and rapid enquiries and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-33-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The first interpretive check for household surveys and rapid enquiries is temporal. The likely path without contraction cannot be assumed to equal the preceding year's path, because demography, earlier reforms, conflict, prices and local events may already have altered participation. The second check concerns observation: Their limitations include sampling error, infrequency, non-response, recall and incomplete coverage of institutional, displaced or mobile populations. Where these conditions are only partly measured, the finding should be expressed as exposure or warning, not realised effect. The third check concerns actionability. Publish the sample, field dates, question wording and uncertainty, and use qualitative accounts to explain mechanisms rather than estimate prevalence without a valid design. Evidence collected after the relevant school decision may still support accountability, but it cannot substitute for an early signal capable of preventing exclusion.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-33-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Monitoring household surveys and rapid enquiries should also record adverse exceptions. Their limitations include sampling error, infrequency, non-response, recall and incomplete coverage of institutional, displaced or mobile populations. Averages and medians can obscure a school closure, a district payment interruption or a group unable to use a nominal entitlement. Exception evidence does not establish the national rate, yet it can reveal a failed safeguard and justify focused verification. The resulting action should remain proportionate to the reach, duration and reversibility of the observed problem.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-02",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-18"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-34",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "34",
      "title": "Comparability and breaks in series",
      "anchor": "34-comparability-and-breaks-in-series",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-34-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of comparability and breaks in series. A small average movement in comparability and breaks in series can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of comparability and breaks in series is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for comparability and breaks in series is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-34-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on comparability and breaks in series requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning comparability and breaks in series should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning comparability and breaks in series is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-34-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Indicator names can remain constant while school-age definitions, programme classifications, census projections or data collection change. In the analysis of comparability and breaks in series, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning comparability and breaks in series should remain at its collection level: a national association about comparability and breaks in series cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning comparability and breaks in series cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-34-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for comparability and breaks in series bears directly on the risk assessment. A regional rank assembled without checking these breaks rewards apparent precision over meaning. The source year and population for comparability and breaks in series must be preserved because comparable observations on comparability and breaks in series often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for comparability and breaks in series: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-34-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach comparability and breaks in series through several routes, but routes affecting comparability and breaks in series should not be collapsed. During a crisis, exceptional enrolment campaigns, fee reforms, migration and late reporting can create genuine and statistical discontinuities at the same time. Household income and public revenue relevant to comparability and breaks in series can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on comparability and breaks in series should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about comparability and breaks in series and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-34-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of comparability and breaks in series requires a denominator and a time boundary. Maintain a comparability record for each series, annotate revisions, and withhold trend or rank conclusions where the direction of bias is material and unresolved. Every observation on comparability and breaks in series should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for comparability and breaks in series should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects comparability and breaks in series, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-34-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Missing information has a particular meaning for comparability and breaks in series. Children outside formal provision, schools with weak staffing and households in motion are also less likely to appear promptly in regular returns. Completeness should therefore be examined across places and groups, not reported only as a national percentage. A regional rank assembled without checking these breaks rewards apparent precision over meaning. If non-response or late reporting is concentrated in the exposed population, a stable aggregate for comparability and breaks in series may understate deterioration. A responsible conclusion should preserve that possibility, seek corroboration and avoid treating absence from the record as attendance in school.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-34-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Interpretation of comparability and breaks in series benefits from a source map. Administrative returns describe institutional contact, household enquiries describe children and constraints, fiscal records describe authorised and released resources, and local accounts illuminate mechanisms. No source should silently substitute for another. Maintain a comparability record for each series, annotate revisions, and withhold trend or rank conclusions where the direction of bias is material and unresolved. Agreement among independent sources strengthens the warning; disagreement should lead to reconciliation of dates, populations and definitions before a combined conclusion is issued.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-03",
            "REF-20",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-35",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "35",
      "title": "Thresholds and escalation",
      "anchor": "35-thresholds-and-escalation",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-35-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on thresholds and escalation requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning thresholds and escalation should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning thresholds and escalation is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-35-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A single universal threshold cannot represent the same concern in a high-participation system and a system with severe baseline exclusion. In the analysis of thresholds and escalation, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning thresholds and escalation should remain at its collection level: a national association about thresholds and escalation cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning thresholds and escalation cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-35-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for thresholds and escalation bears directly on the risk assessment. Small national movement may be serious if concentrated among a marginalised group, while a large administrative change may reflect corrected denominators. The source year and population for thresholds and escalation must be preserved because comparable observations on thresholds and escalation often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for thresholds and escalation: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-35-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach thresholds and escalation through several routes, but routes affecting thresholds and escalation should not be collapsed. Escalation should consider level, change, concentration, duration and the capacity of affected institutions to respond. Household income and public revenue relevant to thresholds and escalation can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on thresholds and escalation should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about thresholds and escalation and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-35-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of thresholds and escalation requires a denominator and a time boundary. Set contextual thresholds before reviewing results, require corroboration for consequential decisions, and document why a signal was closed, monitored or escalated. Every observation on thresholds and escalation should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for thresholds and escalation should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects thresholds and escalation, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-35-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of thresholds and escalation. A small average movement in thresholds and escalation can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of thresholds and escalation is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for thresholds and escalation is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-35-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A public measure directed at thresholds and escalation can achieve high aggregate coverage and still miss the children facing the binding barrier. Eligibility, take-up and sustained receipt are separate observations, as are receipt and educational effect. Set contextual thresholds before reviewing results, require corroboration for consequential decisions, and document why a signal was closed, monitored or escalated. Investigation of non-receipt should consider documents, travel, language, disability access, payment timing and discretion at the point of delivery. The distributional question is whether the measure changes the constraint described in this section, rather than whether expenditure or beneficiary numbers increased in the abstract.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-35-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The public communication of thresholds and escalation should keep scale and uncertainty together. Small national movement may be serious if concentrated among a marginalised group, while a large administrative change may reflect corrected denominators. A rate without its population can hide a large absolute burden, while a count without a denominator can reflect demographic size rather than elevated risk. Where confidence intervals are unavailable, known coverage and definitional limits should still be stated in plain language. This allows urgent attention without encouraging false comparison or unsupported precision.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-20"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-36",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-viii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "36",
      "title": "Protecting access and reducing household cost",
      "anchor": "36-protecting-access-and-reducing-household-cost",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-36-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Fee waivers, grants, meals, transport, materials and cash or in-kind support can protect participation when they reach the right child at the right time. In the analysis of protecting access and reducing household cost, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning protecting access and reducing household cost should remain at its collection level: a national association about protecting access and reducing household cost cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning protecting access and reducing household cost cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-36-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for protecting access and reducing household cost bears directly on the risk assessment. Universal and targeted measures have different fiscal and distributional properties; neither is automatically preferable in every setting. The source year and population for protecting access and reducing household cost must be preserved because comparable observations on protecting access and reducing household cost often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for protecting access and reducing household cost: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-36-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach protecting access and reducing household cost through several routes, but routes affecting protecting access and reducing household cost should not be collapsed. Design should consider administrative burden, stigma, exclusion error, payment delay and whether an intervention inadvertently conditions a right on documentation families cannot provide. Household income and public revenue relevant to protecting access and reducing household cost can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on protecting access and reducing household cost should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about protecting access and reducing household cost and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-36-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of protecting access and reducing household cost requires a denominator and a time boundary. Select the mechanism from evidence on the binding barrier, monitor receipt and attendance, and preserve access for children missed by the initial targeting rule. Every observation on protecting access and reducing household cost should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for protecting access and reducing household cost should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects protecting access and reducing household cost, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-36-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of protecting access and reducing household cost. A small average movement in protecting access and reducing household cost can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of protecting access and reducing household cost is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for protecting access and reducing household cost is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-36-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on protecting access and reducing household cost requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning protecting access and reducing household cost should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning protecting access and reducing household cost is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-36-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Fiscal evidence relevant to protecting access and reducing household cost should be read in real and operational terms. Nominal protection can buy fewer inputs, while a fully executed central vote can coexist with late or incomplete receipt at school level. Design should consider administrative burden, stigma, exclusion error, payment delay and whether an intervention inadvertently conditions a right on documentation families cannot provide. The appropriate chain is allocation, release, receipt, usable service and participation consequence. Breaks in that chain should be located before responsibility is assigned. Where finance and participation move together, the association warrants investigation; attribution still requires timing, a plausible mechanism and consideration of competing explanations.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-36-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Responsibility for protecting access and reducing household cost follows authority over the relevant constraint. Households can report cost or absence, and schools can identify interruption, but neither should be expected to remedy a revenue, entitlement or system-capacity failure beyond its control. Fee waivers, grants, meals, transport, materials and cash or in-kind support can protect participation when they reach the right child at the right time. The responsible public body should connect the signal to finance, staffing, admission or support authority and report whether the corrective measure reached the affected learner.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-06",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-09"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-37",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-viii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "37",
      "title": "Protecting core public provision",
      "anchor": "37-protecting-core-public-provision",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-37-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for protecting core public provision bears directly on the risk assessment. Across-the-board reductions ignore unequal starting capacity and may cause a larger service loss in small or remote schools. The source year and population for protecting core public provision must be preserved because comparable observations on protecting core public provision often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for protecting core public provision: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-37-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach protecting core public provision through several routes, but routes affecting protecting core public provision should not be collapsed. Teacher pay, school grants, water, sanitation, learning materials, meals and transport may each be essential in a particular setting. Household income and public revenue relevant to protecting core public provision can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on protecting core public provision should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about protecting core public provision and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-37-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of protecting core public provision requires a denominator and a time boundary. Budget protection should follow a documented service floor, with execution monitored through school receipt and learner participation rather than central allocation alone. Every observation on protecting core public provision should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for protecting core public provision should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects protecting core public provision, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-37-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of protecting core public provision. A small average movement in protecting core public provision can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of protecting core public provision is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for protecting core public provision is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-37-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on protecting core public provision requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning protecting core public provision should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning protecting core public provision is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-37-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Fiscal adjustment should distinguish deferrable expenditure from functions whose interruption closes access or makes schooling unsafe and unacceptable. In the analysis of protecting core public provision, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning protecting core public provision should remain at its collection level: a national association about protecting core public provision cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning protecting core public provision cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-37-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Comparison of protecting core public provision should stop when definitions cease to sustain a common meaning. Across-the-board reductions ignore unequal starting capacity and may cause a larger service loss in small or remote schools. An unresolved observation is better retained outside an average than forced into a rank that conceals a population or reference-period difference. For a valid comparison, numerator, denominator, age range, programme boundary, collection method and treatment of missing cases must be sufficiently aligned. Any remaining qualification should accompany the comparative statement and limit the decision made from it.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-37-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "A final sensitivity check for protecting core public provision should ask whether the conclusion changes when uncertain denominators, late reports or alternative reference periods are used. Teacher pay, school grants, water, sanitation, learning materials, meals and transport may each be essential in a particular setting. A result that reverses under plausible assumptions is not useless, but it should not be presented as settled comparative evidence. It can still identify the observation most worth improving and the population for whom a temporary protective presumption is justified while verification continues.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-07",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-01"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-38",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-viii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "38",
      "title": "Re-entry and recovery",
      "anchor": "38-re-entry-and-recovery",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-38-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach re-entry and recovery through several routes, but routes affecting re-entry and recovery should not be collapsed. Age-grade mismatch, missed learning, examination rules, stigma, work commitments and changed residence can make exclusion persistent. Household income and public revenue relevant to re-entry and recovery can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on re-entry and recovery should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about re-entry and recovery and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-38-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of re-entry and recovery requires a denominator and a time boundary. Track return, sustained attendance and progression, and avoid declaring recovery from aggregate enrolment if the children most affected remain outside. Every observation on re-entry and recovery should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for re-entry and recovery should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects re-entry and recovery, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-38-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of re-entry and recovery. A small average movement in re-entry and recovery can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of re-entry and recovery is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for re-entry and recovery is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-38-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on re-entry and recovery requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning re-entry and recovery should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning re-entry and recovery is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-38-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Children who withdraw during contraction may not return automatically when income or public revenue improves. In the analysis of re-entry and recovery, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning re-entry and recovery should remain at its collection level: a national association about re-entry and recovery cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning re-entry and recovery cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-38-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for re-entry and recovery bears directly on the risk assessment. Re-entry policy should provide flexible admission, accelerated or remedial support and recognition of prior learning without lowering the entitlement to quality. The source year and population for re-entry and recovery must be preserved because comparable observations on re-entry and recovery often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for re-entry and recovery: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-38-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Recovery in relation to re-entry and recovery requires a demanding test. Return to a register can occur without regular presence, appropriate placement or progression, particularly after a child becomes over-age, assumes work or moves residence. Children who withdraw during contraction may not return automatically when income or public revenue improves. Follow-up should identify who returns, how long participation is sustained and whether support reaches those who do not return. This prevents an improving total from concealing a cohort for whom a temporary interruption has become durable exclusion.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-38-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "For re-entry and recovery, the decision record should show the baseline date, the signal date and the date on which a protective measure could alter the result. It should identify which children were observable, which were outside coverage and which assumptions connect the economic event to educational participation. Track return, sustained attendance and progression, and avoid declaring recovery from aggregate enrolment if the children most affected remain outside. Subsequent revision should preserve the earlier judgement and explain whether new information changed the underlying condition, the population estimate or the interpretation. That record permits correction without pretending that later knowledge was available on 13 March 2009.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-06",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-10",
            "REF-02"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-39",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-viii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "39",
      "title": "Responsibilities and public reporting",
      "anchor": "39-responsibilities-and-public-reporting",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-39-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of responsibilities and public reporting requires a denominator and a time boundary. The objective is timely correction and equitable continuity, not the construction of a composite ranking detached from decision responsibility. Every observation on responsibilities and public reporting should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for responsibilities and public reporting should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects responsibilities and public reporting, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-19"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-39-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of responsibilities and public reporting. A small average movement in responsibilities and public reporting can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of responsibilities and public reporting is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for responsibilities and public reporting is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-19"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-39-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on responsibilities and public reporting requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning responsibilities and public reporting should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning responsibilities and public reporting is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-19"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-39-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Central authorities control national finance, norms and data; local authorities and schools control important aspects of delivery; households and communities provide evidence but should not bear responsibility for remedying public failure. In the analysis of responsibilities and public reporting, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning responsibilities and public reporting should remain at its collection level: a national association about responsibilities and public reporting cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning responsibilities and public reporting cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-19"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-39-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for responsibilities and public reporting bears directly on the risk assessment. Public reporting should distinguish observed conditions, analytical risk and planned response, state limitations and identify the authority able to act. The source year and population for responsibilities and public reporting must be preserved because comparable observations on responsibilities and public reporting often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for responsibilities and public reporting: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-19"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-39-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach responsibilities and public reporting through several routes, but routes affecting responsibilities and public reporting should not be collapsed. External partners can support continuity without displacing domestic accountability or creating parallel information demands. Household income and public revenue relevant to responsibilities and public reporting can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on responsibilities and public reporting should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about responsibilities and public reporting and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-19"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-39-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The warning value of evidence on responsibilities and public reporting depends on whether an authorised body can act within the educational period concerned. The objective is timely correction and equitable continuity, not the construction of a composite ranking detached from decision responsibility. A precise annual estimate delivered after withdrawal may be less protective than a qualified monthly or termly signal supported by several sources. Timeliness does not excuse weak method: the source, coverage, question and uncertainty should remain explicit. It does require a planned route from signal to verification, protective action and later correction of the public record.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-19"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-39-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "An equity review of responsibilities and public reporting should compare the distribution of exposure with the distribution of protection. Public reporting should distinguish observed conditions, analytical risk and planned response, state limitations and identify the authority able to act. If the group facing the greatest barrier receives the smallest or latest share of support, an improving national mean cannot close the concern. The review should ask whether programme rules, documentation, geographic reach or local discretion produced the mismatch and should identify the authority able to amend it during the school term.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-05",
            "REF-09",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-19"
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-40",
      "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-viii",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "40",
      "title": "Concluding assessment",
      "anchor": "40-concluding-assessment",
      "level": 1,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-40-b001",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Distribution is integral to the assessment of concluding assessment. A small average movement in concluding assessment can coexist with substantial loss among poor, remote, disabled, displaced or otherwise marginalised children. Joint disaggregation of concluding assessment is warranted when sample size permits. Where the sample for concluding assessment is insufficient, the limitation belongs with the finding; qualitative evidence can explain its mechanism but cannot supply prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-40-b002",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Public action on concluding assessment requires proportionate protection and verifiable follow-through. A response concerning concluding assessment should name its responsible authority, intended population, timing and evidence of receipt. Administrative completion concerning concluding assessment is not decisive: access, attendance, return or progression must be sustained without shifting unreasonable cost or risk to the child.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-40-b003",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "As at 13 March 2009, the contraction presents a credible threat to participation through household livelihoods, public revenue, external finance and migration, superimposed on large and unequal baseline exclusion. In the analysis of concluding assessment, the distinction determines whether an observation describes a child, a household constraint, an institutional condition or an inferred crisis channel. Evidence concerning concluding assessment should remain at its collection level: a national association about concluding assessment cannot establish an individual cause, while one case concerning concluding assessment cannot establish population prevalence.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-40-b004",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The available baseline for concluding assessment bears directly on the risk assessment. The strongest risk profile combines child-level participation, household constraints, school continuity and budget execution, interpreted against national institutions and pre-crisis trends. The source year and population for concluding assessment must be preserved because comparable observations on concluding assessment often predate the contraction. Earlier disparities still identify exposure for concluding assessment: fragile access can turn limited losses of income, staffing or continuity into disproportionate educational consequences.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-40-b005",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Economic contraction may reach concluding assessment through several routes, but routes affecting concluding assessment should not be collapsed. The available evidence supports heightened surveillance and protection; it does not yet support a harmonised estimate of crisis-attributable out-of-school children. Household income and public revenue relevant to concluding assessment can move differently from prices, employment and migration. The analytical record on concluding assessment should name its proposed channel, identify an intermediate observation about concluding assessment and specify the educational result that would confirm or weaken the interpretation.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-40-b006",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Measurement of concluding assessment requires a denominator and a time boundary. Policy should protect essential provision, lower binding household costs, enable re-entry and publish evidence early enough for unequal effects to be corrected. Every observation on concluding assessment should state its exclusions, missing cases and revisions. School and fiscal years for concluding assessment should not be aligned only by calendar label. Where mobility affects concluding assessment, origin and destination coverage require examination before its rate is interpreted as improvement or deterioration.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-40-b007",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "Assessment of concluding assessment should conclude with an explicit counter-test. If seasonality, migration, a revised population estimate or a reporting change can explain the movement, the crisis interpretation should be narrowed. If those alternatives do not suffice, The available evidence supports heightened surveillance and protection; it does not yet support a harmonised estimate of crisis-attributable out-of-school children. The inquiry can then test household cost, work, school continuity and fiscal evidence in the sequence most relevant to the affected population. This approach neither delays urgent protection nor converts a plausible channel into a quantitative claim stronger than the evidence permits.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-40-b008",
          "type": "PARAGRAPH",
          "text": "The evidentiary threshold for a public claim about concluding assessment rises with the consequence attached to it. A broad warning can rest on converging directional evidence if uncertainty is explicit; reallocating resources away from a place or group requires representative and comparable information. As at 13 March 2009, the contraction presents a credible threat to participation through household livelihoods, public revenue, external finance and migration, superimposed on large and unequal baseline exclusion. Both decisions should be revisited when stronger attendance, household or fiscal evidence becomes available, but the earlier basis should remain visible.",
          "citationIds": [
            "REF-01",
            "REF-11",
            "REF-12",
            "REF-13",
            "REF-14"
          ]
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "technicalAppendices": [],
  "notes": [],
  "references": [
    {
      "id": "REF-01",
      "authoringBody": "Education for All Global Monitoring Report Team",
      "title": "Overcoming Inequality: Why Governance Matters — EFA Global Monitoring Report 2009",
      "year": 2008,
      "publicationDate": "2008-11-25",
      "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_REPORT",
      "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000177683",
      "evidenceRole": "Baseline global and distributional evidence on out-of-school children, inequality, governance and education finance."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-02",
      "authoringBody": "UNESCO Institute for Statistics and UNICEF",
      "title": "Children Out of School: Measuring Exclusion from Primary Education",
      "year": 2005,
      "publicationDate": "2005-01-01",
      "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_REPORT",
      "url": "https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/children-out-of-school-measuring-exclusion-from-primary-education-en_0.pdf",
      "evidenceRole": "Conceptual and empirical framework for administrative and household measurement of exclusion from primary education."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-03",
      "authoringBody": "UNESCO Institute for Statistics",
      "title": "Global Education Digest 2008: Comparing Education Statistics Across the World",
      "year": 2008,
      "publicationDate": "2008-06-01",
      "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_REPORT",
      "url": "https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/global-education-digest-2008-comparing-education-statistics-across-the-world-en_0.pdf",
      "evidenceRole": "Cross-national definitions, enrolment, participation, progression, finance and comparability metadata."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-04",
      "authoringBody": "United Nations",
      "title": "The Millennium Development Goals Report 2008",
      "year": 2008,
      "publicationDate": "2008-09-11",
      "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_REPORT",
      "url": "https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/The%20Millennium%20Development%20Goals%20Report%202008.pdf",
      "evidenceRole": "Regional progress and remaining inequality in universal primary education and poverty reduction."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-05",
      "authoringBody": "World Education Forum",
      "title": "The Dakar Framework for Action: Education for All — Meeting Our Collective Commitments",
      "year": 2000,
      "publicationDate": "2000-04-28",
      "sourceType": "POLICY_DOCUMENT",
      "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000121147",
      "evidenceRole": "Commitments on access, equity, quality, national planning, finance and monitoring."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-06",
      "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly",
      "title": "Convention on the Rights of the Child",
      "year": 1989,
      "publicationDate": "1989-11-20",
      "sourceType": "TREATY",
      "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child",
      "evidenceRole": "Rights to education, non-discrimination, development, protection and the best interests of the child."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-07",
      "authoringBody": "United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights",
      "title": "General Comment No. 13: The Right to Education",
      "year": 1999,
      "publicationDate": "1999-12-08",
      "sourceType": "LEGAL_INSTRUMENT",
      "url": "https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/cescr/1999/en/37937",
      "evidenceRole": "Framework of availability, accessibility, acceptability and adaptability, including non-discrimination and progressive realisation."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-08",
      "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly",
      "title": "Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities",
      "year": 2006,
      "publicationDate": "2006-12-13",
      "sourceType": "TREATY",
      "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities",
      "evidenceRole": "Inclusive education and disability-related equality obligations."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-09",
      "authoringBody": "UNESCO and UNICEF",
      "title": "A Human Rights-Based Approach to Education for All",
      "year": 2007,
      "publicationDate": "2007-01-01",
      "sourceType": "POLICY_DOCUMENT",
      "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000154861",
      "evidenceRole": "Rights-based planning, participation, accountability and inclusion in education."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-10",
      "authoringBody": "UNESCO",
      "title": "Guidelines for Inclusion: Ensuring Access to Education for All",
      "year": 2005,
      "publicationDate": "2005-01-01",
      "sourceType": "TECHNICAL_GUIDANCE",
      "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000140224",
      "evidenceRole": "Policy guidance on identifying and removing barriers to participation and learning."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-11",
      "authoringBody": "World Bank",
      "title": "The Global Economic Crisis: Assessing Vulnerability with a Poverty Lens",
      "year": 2009,
      "publicationDate": "2009-02-12",
      "sourceType": "POLICY_DOCUMENT",
      "url": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/211761468191968451/pdf/521490WP0Educa10Box345553B01PUBLIC1.pdf",
      "evidenceRole": "Contemporaneous fiscal and service-continuity analysis used as the matrix evidence anchor."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-12",
      "authoringBody": "World Bank",
      "title": "Global Economic Prospects 2009: Commodities at the Crossroads",
      "year": 2008,
      "publicationDate": "2008-12-09",
      "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_REPORT",
      "url": "https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/887971468339211734/global-economic-prospects-2009-commodities-at-the-crossroads",
      "evidenceRole": "Contemporaneous global outlook for contraction, trade, commodity prices, capital flows and developing-country vulnerability."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-13",
      "authoringBody": "International Monetary Fund",
      "title": "World Economic Outlook Update: Global Economic Slump Challenges Policies",
      "year": 2009,
      "publicationDate": "2009-01-28",
      "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_REPORT",
      "url": "https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2009/update/01/",
      "evidenceRole": "Contemporaneous assessment of the rapid deterioration in global output, trade and financial conditions."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-14",
      "authoringBody": "International Labour Organization",
      "title": "Global Employment Trends: January 2009",
      "year": 2009,
      "publicationDate": "2009-01-28",
      "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_REPORT",
      "url": "https://www.ilo.org/publications/global-employment-trends-january-2009",
      "evidenceRole": "Employment, unemployment, working poverty and vulnerable-employment scenarios at the onset of contraction."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-15",
      "authoringBody": "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations",
      "title": "The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2008: High Food Prices and Food Security — Threats and Opportunities",
      "year": 2008,
      "publicationDate": "2008-12-09",
      "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_REPORT",
      "url": "https://www.fao.org/4/i0291e/i0291e00.htm",
      "evidenceRole": "Food-price pressure, household food insecurity and vulnerability preceding the financial contraction."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-16",
      "authoringBody": "United Nations Children’s Fund",
      "title": "The State of the World’s Children 2009: Maternal and Newborn Health",
      "year": 2008,
      "publicationDate": "2008-12-11",
      "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_REPORT",
      "url": "https://www.unicef.org/reports/state-worlds-children-2009",
      "evidenceRole": "Child and maternal deprivation context and the interdependence of health, nutrition and education."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-17",
      "authoringBody": "International Labour Organization",
      "title": "Global Report under the Follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work: The End of Child Labour — Within Reach",
      "year": 2006,
      "publicationDate": "2006-05-04",
      "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_REPORT",
      "url": "https://www.ilo.org/publications/end-child-labour-within-reach",
      "evidenceRole": "Evidence on child labour, hazardous work and the relation between schooling, poverty and labour demand."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-18",
      "authoringBody": "Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees",
      "title": "2007 Global Trends: Refugees, Asylum-seekers, Returnees, Internally Displaced and Stateless Persons",
      "year": 2008,
      "publicationDate": "2008-06-17",
      "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_REPORT",
      "url": "https://www.unhcr.org/statistics/unhcrstats/4852366f2/2007-global-trends-refugees-asylum-seekers-returnees-internally-displaced.html",
      "evidenceRole": "Displacement populations and protection conditions relevant to educational exclusion."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-19",
      "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly",
      "title": "United Nations Millennium Declaration",
      "year": 2000,
      "publicationDate": "2000-09-08",
      "sourceType": "RESOLUTION",
      "url": "https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_55_2.pdf",
      "evidenceRole": "International development, equality and shared-responsibility commitments."
    },
    {
      "id": "REF-20",
      "authoringBody": "UNESCO Institute for Statistics",
      "title": "Guide to the Analysis and Use of Household Survey and Census Education Data",
      "year": 2004,
      "publicationDate": "2004-01-01",
      "sourceType": "TECHNICAL_GUIDANCE",
      "url": "https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/guide-to-the-analysis-and-use-of-household-survey-and-census-education-data-en_0.pdf",
      "evidenceRole": "Methods for household-based education indicators, disaggregation, age alignment and interpretation."
    }
  ],
  "readerNodes": [
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-i",
      "nodeType": "PART",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "I",
      "title": "Purpose, baseline and analytical boundaries",
      "anchor": "part-i-purpose-baseline-and-analytical-boundaries",
      "sortOrder": 1
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-1",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-i",
      "number": "1",
      "title": "The decision problem",
      "anchor": "1-the-decision-problem",
      "sortOrder": 2
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-2",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-i",
      "number": "2",
      "title": "A contemporaneous risk frame",
      "anchor": "2-a-contemporaneous-risk-frame",
      "sortOrder": 3
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-3",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-i",
      "number": "3",
      "title": "Rights and minimum protection",
      "anchor": "3-rights-and-minimum-protection",
      "sortOrder": 4
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-4",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-i",
      "number": "4",
      "title": "Unit of analysis and time",
      "anchor": "4-unit-of-analysis-and-time",
      "sortOrder": 5
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-5",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-i",
      "number": "5",
      "title": "Causal discipline",
      "anchor": "5-causal-discipline",
      "sortOrder": 6
    },
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-ii",
      "nodeType": "PART",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "II",
      "title": "Population concepts and indicator construction",
      "anchor": "part-ii-population-concepts-and-indicator-construction",
      "sortOrder": 7
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-6",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-ii",
      "number": "6",
      "title": "Children never enrolled",
      "anchor": "6-children-never-enrolled",
      "sortOrder": 8
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-7",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-ii",
      "number": "7",
      "title": "Dropout and non-completion",
      "anchor": "7-dropout-and-non-completion",
      "sortOrder": 9
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-8",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-ii",
      "number": "8",
      "title": "Attendance and effective participation",
      "anchor": "8-attendance-and-effective-participation",
      "sortOrder": 10
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-9",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-ii",
      "number": "9",
      "title": "Primary-age and adolescent exclusion",
      "anchor": "9-primary-age-and-adolescent-exclusion",
      "sortOrder": 11
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-10",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-ii",
      "number": "10",
      "title": "Denominators and population estimates",
      "anchor": "10-denominators-and-population-estimates",
      "sortOrder": 12
    },
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iii",
      "nodeType": "PART",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "III",
      "title": "Transmission through households and livelihoods",
      "anchor": "part-iii-transmission-through-households-and-livelihoods",
      "sortOrder": 13
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-11",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iii",
      "number": "11",
      "title": "Income and liquidity loss",
      "anchor": "11-income-and-liquidity-loss",
      "sortOrder": 14
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-12",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iii",
      "number": "12",
      "title": "Direct and indirect schooling costs",
      "anchor": "12-direct-and-indirect-schooling-costs",
      "sortOrder": 15
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-13",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iii",
      "number": "13",
      "title": "Child labour and work intensity",
      "anchor": "13-child-labour-and-work-intensity",
      "sortOrder": 16
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-14",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iii",
      "number": "14",
      "title": "Food security and nutrition",
      "anchor": "14-food-security-and-nutrition",
      "sortOrder": 17
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-15",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iii",
      "number": "15",
      "title": "Remittances, migration and family separation",
      "anchor": "15-remittances-migration-and-family-separation",
      "sortOrder": 18
    },
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iv",
      "nodeType": "PART",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "IV",
      "title": "Transmission through public finance and education supply",
      "anchor": "part-iv-transmission-through-public-finance-and-education-supply",
      "sortOrder": 19
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-16",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iv",
      "number": "16",
      "title": "Revenue contraction and budget execution",
      "anchor": "16-revenue-contraction-and-budget-execution",
      "sortOrder": 20
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-17",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iv",
      "number": "17",
      "title": "Teacher employment and deployment",
      "anchor": "17-teacher-employment-and-deployment",
      "sortOrder": 21
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-18",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iv",
      "number": "18",
      "title": "School operating resources",
      "anchor": "18-school-operating-resources",
      "sortOrder": 22
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-19",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iv",
      "number": "19",
      "title": "Infrastructure and distance",
      "anchor": "19-infrastructure-and-distance",
      "sortOrder": 23
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-20",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-iv",
      "number": "20",
      "title": "External finance and aid volatility",
      "anchor": "20-external-finance-and-aid-volatility",
      "sortOrder": 24
    },
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-v",
      "nodeType": "PART",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "V",
      "title": "Distributional risk profiles",
      "anchor": "part-v-distributional-risk-profiles",
      "sortOrder": 25
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-21",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-v",
      "number": "21",
      "title": "Poverty and wealth",
      "anchor": "21-poverty-and-wealth",
      "sortOrder": 26
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-22",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-v",
      "number": "22",
      "title": "Gendered pathways",
      "anchor": "22-gendered-pathways",
      "sortOrder": 27
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-23",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-v",
      "number": "23",
      "title": "Disability",
      "anchor": "23-disability",
      "sortOrder": 28
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-24",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-v",
      "number": "24",
      "title": "Rural, remote and urban-poor locations",
      "anchor": "24-rural-remote-and-urban-poor-locations",
      "sortOrder": 29
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-25",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-v",
      "number": "25",
      "title": "Conflict, displacement and fragile administration",
      "anchor": "25-conflict-displacement-and-fragile-administration",
      "sortOrder": 30
    },
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vi",
      "nodeType": "PART",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "VI",
      "title": "Regional and system differentiation",
      "anchor": "part-vi-regional-and-system-differentiation",
      "sortOrder": 31
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-26",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vi",
      "number": "26",
      "title": "Sub-Saharan Africa",
      "anchor": "26-sub-saharan-africa",
      "sortOrder": 32
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-27",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vi",
      "number": "27",
      "title": "South and West Asia",
      "anchor": "27-south-and-west-asia",
      "sortOrder": 33
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-28",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vi",
      "number": "28",
      "title": "East Asia and the Pacific",
      "anchor": "28-east-asia-and-the-pacific",
      "sortOrder": 34
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-29",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vi",
      "number": "29",
      "title": "Latin America and the Caribbean",
      "anchor": "29-latin-america-and-the-caribbean",
      "sortOrder": 35
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-30",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vi",
      "number": "30",
      "title": "Arab States, Central and Eastern Europe, and Central Asia",
      "anchor": "30-arab-states-central-and-eastern-europe-and-central-asia",
      "sortOrder": 36
    },
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vii",
      "nodeType": "PART",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "VII",
      "title": "Early warning, monitoring and interpretation",
      "anchor": "part-vii-early-warning-monitoring-and-interpretation",
      "sortOrder": 37
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-31",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vii",
      "number": "31",
      "title": "A minimum crisis dashboard",
      "anchor": "31-a-minimum-crisis-dashboard",
      "sortOrder": 38
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-32",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vii",
      "number": "32",
      "title": "Administrative data",
      "anchor": "32-administrative-data",
      "sortOrder": 39
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-33",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vii",
      "number": "33",
      "title": "Household surveys and rapid enquiries",
      "anchor": "33-household-surveys-and-rapid-enquiries",
      "sortOrder": 40
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-34",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vii",
      "number": "34",
      "title": "Comparability and breaks in series",
      "anchor": "34-comparability-and-breaks-in-series",
      "sortOrder": 41
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-35",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-vii",
      "number": "35",
      "title": "Thresholds and escalation",
      "anchor": "35-thresholds-and-escalation",
      "sortOrder": 42
    },
    {
      "id": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-viii",
      "nodeType": "PART",
      "parentId": null,
      "number": "VIII",
      "title": "Protective response and conclusions",
      "anchor": "part-viii-protective-response-and-conclusions",
      "sortOrder": 43
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-36",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-viii",
      "number": "36",
      "title": "Protecting access and reducing household cost",
      "anchor": "36-protecting-access-and-reducing-household-cost",
      "sortOrder": 44
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-37",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-viii",
      "number": "37",
      "title": "Protecting core public provision",
      "anchor": "37-protecting-core-public-provision",
      "sortOrder": 45
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-38",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-viii",
      "number": "38",
      "title": "Re-entry and recovery",
      "anchor": "38-re-entry-and-recovery",
      "sortOrder": 46
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-39",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-viii",
      "number": "39",
      "title": "Responsibilities and public reporting",
      "anchor": "39-responsibilities-and-public-reporting",
      "sortOrder": 47
    },
    {
      "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2009-02-40",
      "nodeType": "SECTION",
      "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2009-02-viii",
      "number": "40",
      "title": "Concluding assessment",
      "anchor": "40-concluding-assessment",
      "sortOrder": 48
    }
  ],
  "statistics": {
    "partCount": 8,
    "sectionCount": 40,
    "appendixCount": 0,
    "paragraphCount": 320,
    "tableCount": 0,
    "referenceCount": 20,
    "mainTextWords": 30059,
    "technicalAppendixWords": 0,
    "totalWords": 30059
  },
  "contentHash": "sha256-d538d8db159728ef9c4c9af5eb7106898d70d7e87ff007ec7acf59cef3d68d8f"
}
