{ "schemaVersion": "iceqc.research-report.reader.v1", "document": { "id": "doc-iceqc-r-2012-02", "slug": "participation-transition-indicators-education-work-pathways", "documentNumber": "ICEQC-R-2012-02", "title": "From Participation to Transition: Indicators for Education-to-Work Pathways", "subtitle": "A global comparative indicator study of completion, labour-market entry, pathway quality and unequal opportunity", "family": "RESEARCH", "reportType": "THEMATIC_RESEARCH_REPORT", "researchCategory": "DATA_AND_INDICATOR_RESEARCH", "reportArchetype": "COMPARATIVE_INDICATOR_STUDY", "geographicScope": "Global", "ownerBody": "ICEQC Research and Policy Directorate", "publisher": "International Council for Education Quality Certification (ICEQC)", "publicIdentity": "ICEQC_ONLY" }, "version": { "id": "ver-iceqc-r-2012-02-en-2012-02-07", "edition": "2012", "versionLabel": "Published 2012-02-07", "language": "en", "authoritativeLanguage": "en", "status": "PUBLISHED", "publicationDate": "2012-02-07", "evidenceCutoffDate": "2012-02-07", "statusNotice": "This is the controlled English edition. Evidence and institutional status are stated as at the evidence cut-off date.", "summary": "Education-to-work transition is not one event. Young people may combine study and work, search for employment, enter temporary work, return to education, change field or remain outside both recognised learning and employment for different reasons. Indicators should therefore describe states, movements, duration and quality. A participation rate or first job measure alone cannot establish whether a pathway is equitable, educationally credible or sustainable." }, "publicationControl": { "matrixRecordId": "ICEQC-R-2012-02", "temporalBasis": "CONTEMPORANEOUS_AS_AT_PUBLICATION_DATE", "originalAuthorship": "ICEQC", "suggestedMainTextWords": 27000, "suggestedTechnicalAnnexWords": 0, "suggestedTotalWords": 27000, "actualMainTextWords": 31889, "actualTechnicalAnnexWords": 0, "actualTotalWords": 31889 }, "frontMatter": { "executiveSummary": [ "Education-to-work transition is not one event. Young people may combine study and work, search for employment, enter temporary work, return to education, change field or remain outside both recognised learning and employment for different reasons. Indicators should therefore describe states, movements, duration and quality. A participation rate or first job measure alone cannot establish whether a pathway is equitable, educationally credible or sustainable.", "The study begins with education participation and completion, then examines elapsed time, labour-force status, work quality, relevance, workplace learning, guidance, inequality, mobility, institutions and evidence sources. Education and labour classifications serve different purposes and should be connected carefully. Programme level does not prove labour value; employment does not prove use of learning; unemployment is not the same as being outside education and work; and a current state is not a transition history.", "Indicators require explicit populations. Age bands, graduating cohorts and education leavers answer different questions. Cross-sectional data offer broad current coverage but limited sequence. Tracer and longitudinal evidence offer timing and movement but face attrition. Administrative records describe participants and awards while omitting people who never entered. A balanced evidence system uses each source within its scope and keeps missingness visible.", "Equity analysis should extend beyond one gap. Gender, household resources, disability, residence, field of study, migration and economic conditions intersect. Unpaid work experience or distant training can be formally available yet inaccessible. First employment may be brief, informal, low-paid or unrelated to study. Indicators should show quality and distribution, not merely the presence of work.", "Policy use should remain restrained. Associations between education and employment do not by themselves establish programme effect. Prior advantage, selection, local demand, economic cycle and field matter. Descriptive indicators can locate barriers and monitor change; stronger causal conclusions require suitable comparison and follow-up. The public account should identify the authority responsible for curriculum, guidance, recognition, placement or employment conditions.", "The evidence and institutional status in this report are fixed at 7 February 2012. The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development had not yet occurred. This report uses the pre-existing international sustainable-development education context and makes no claim concerning later conference outcomes." ], "keyFindings": [ "Current education or labour status should not be described as a complete transition history.", "Participation, completion, award receipt and progression are separate education events.", "First work, sustained work and decent work require different measures.", "Education and employment can overlap and should be cross-classified before summary.", "Young people outside education and employment form a heterogeneous population.", "Duration distributions are more informative than one average waiting time.", "Work quality, hours, protection and earnings belong beside employment status.", "Field and qualification matching require more than occupational titles.", "Workplace learning should be identified through curriculum, supervision, assessment and recognition.", "Disaggregation should include people who never entered the observed pathway.", "Longitudinal evidence should report attrition and mobility.", "Qualifications frameworks aid transparency but do not prove quality or outcome.", "Economic and cohort context should accompany transition results.", "Targets require distributional and quality safeguards.", "The public account should link evidence to authority and review." ], "scopeAndMethod": [ "The report concerns secondary, vocational, post-secondary and higher-education pathways into work and possible return to learning. It is a comparative indicator study, not a ranking of programmes or countries and not an employment guarantee.", "The framework tests population, state, transition, duration, quality, distribution and policy use. It distinguishes administrative, household, labour-force and longitudinal evidence. Classifications, numerators, denominators, reference periods, exclusions and uncertainty should remain attached to every material result.", "Sources comprise official international education, labour, youth, rights and European policy materials available by the cut-off.", "All evidence and institutional status are stated as at 7 February 2012." ] }, "parts": [ { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-i", "number": "I", "title": "Purpose, population and pathway", "anchor": "part-i-purpose-population-and-pathway", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-1", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-2", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-3" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ii", "number": "II", "title": "Education participation", "anchor": "part-ii-education-participation", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-4", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-5", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-6" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iii", "number": "III", "title": "Completion and credentials", "anchor": "part-iii-completion-and-credentials", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-7", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-8", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-9" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iv", "number": "IV", "title": "Transition timing", "anchor": "part-iv-transition-timing", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-10", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-11", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-12" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-v", "number": "V", "title": "Labour-force status", "anchor": "part-v-labour-force-status", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-13", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-14", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-15" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vi", "number": "VI", "title": "Employment quality", "anchor": "part-vi-employment-quality", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-16", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-17", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-18" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vii", "number": "VII", "title": "Match, use and relevance", "anchor": "part-vii-match-use-and-relevance", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-19", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-20", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-21" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-viii", "number": "VIII", "title": "Work-based learning", "anchor": "part-viii-work-based-learning", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-22", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-23", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-24" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ix", "number": "IX", "title": "Guidance, search and placement", "anchor": "part-ix-guidance-search-and-placement", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-25", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-26", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-27" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-x", "number": "X", "title": "Equity and distribution", "anchor": "part-x-equity-and-distribution", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-28", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-29", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-30" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xi", "number": "XI", "title": "Place, mobility and migration", "anchor": "part-xi-place-mobility-and-migration", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-31", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-32", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-33" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xii", "number": "XII", "title": "Institutions, qualifications and recognition", "anchor": "part-xii-institutions-qualifications-and-recognition", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-34", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-35", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-36" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiii", "number": "XIII", "title": "Data sources and comparability", "anchor": "part-xiii-data-sources-and-comparability", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-37", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-38", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-39" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiv", "number": "XIV", "title": "Interpretation and causal limits", "anchor": "part-xiv-interpretation-and-causal-limits", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-40", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-41", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-42" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xv", "number": "XV", "title": "Policy use and public accountability", "anchor": "part-xv-policy-use-and-public-accountability", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-43", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-44", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-45" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvi", "number": "XVI", "title": "Applied cohort studies", "anchor": "part-xvi-applied-cohort-studies", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-46", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-47", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-48" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvii", "number": "XVII", "title": "Applied exclusion and equity studies", "anchor": "part-xvii-applied-exclusion-and-equity-studies", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-49", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-50", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-51" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xviii", "number": "XVIII", "title": "Applied programme and labour studies", "anchor": "part-xviii-applied-programme-and-labour-studies", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-52", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-53", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-54" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xix", "number": "XIX", "title": "Applied system and reporting studies", "anchor": "part-xix-applied-system-and-reporting-studies", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-55", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-56", "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-57" ] } ], "sections": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-1", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-i", "parentId": null, "number": "1", "title": "The pathway concept", "anchor": "1-the-pathway-concept", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-1-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The measurement object is sequences through education, training, job search, work and possible return to learning. The indicator should be selected only after the population, observation period and intended decision are stated. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-1-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main error is that a single destination measure hides reversals, delay and multiple routes. Numerator, denominator, age, reference date and duration should be kept together. Counts establish scale; rates permit comparison; distributions reveal who waits longest or receives the weakest outcome. A measure should not combine enrolled students, recent leavers and older workers without explaining the different exposure periods. Where status can overlap, such as study and employment, the classification should preserve both conditions before deriving a summary group.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-1-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The construction rule is to define states and transitions before selecting indicators. Published metadata should include classification, source, collection method, exclusions and revision. ISCED can support programme-level comparison but does not establish equivalence, quality or labour-market value. Labour-force definitions support coherent status measures but should not be reworded casually. Where national categories are mapped to a common scheme, the mapping and residual category should remain available. Precision should not exceed source quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-1-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distributional review must include young people with interrupted or non-linear histories. These populations may have different access to programmes, guidance, transport, work networks and accommodation. Disaggregation should describe opportunity and outcome without treating identity as a causal mechanism. Intersections matter: gender, household resources, disability, residence and migration can combine. Where sample sizes are small, broader categories, pooled compatible periods or qualitative service evidence may be appropriate, provided limitations are stated.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-1-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within the pathway concept, authority determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Education authorities can address curriculum, guidance, programme access, quality and recognition; labour institutions can address placement, protection and labour information; employers influence workplace learning and recruitment. Coordination is necessary, but a joint initiative should not obscure accountability. Each measure should state expected reach, resource, implementation evidence and review date. Policy use should link the finding to a competent body and a defined condition that can change. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with authority.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-1-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within the pathway concept, population coverage determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Employment outcomes are material, yet programmes also support further learning, citizenship, personal development and adaptability. Short-term placement in any job should not become the sole judgement of programme value. Conversely, educational quality claims should not ignore repeated evidence that learners cannot progress or use recognised capabilities. A balanced account places labour outcomes beside curriculum, assessment, learner experience and progression rights. Quality should remain educational as well as economic. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with population coverage.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-2", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-i", "parentId": null, "number": "2", "title": "Age and cohort boundaries", "anchor": "2-age-and-cohort-boundaries", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-2-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Age and cohort boundaries concerns the population whose transition is observed over a stated life stage. A national rate is useful context but cannot describe the sequence, duration and quality of every transition. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-2-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation is constrained because fixed youth bands combine people facing very different educational expectations. Analysts should distinguish programme entry, regular participation, completion, credential receipt, job search, first work and sustained work. These events can occur at different dates and in different orders. A cross-sectional observation should not be described as a completed transition. If retrospective reporting is used, recall period and event definition matter. A duration median should be accompanied by the distribution and treatment of people who have not yet reached the destination.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-2-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible approach will report exact ages and education status alongside summary bands. The analyst should retain original categories before combining them, because later policy questions may require distinctions hidden by an early aggregation. Sensitivity to plausible definitions should be tested. If the conclusion depends upon an age band, duration threshold or classification choice, that dependence is part of the finding. Revisions should preserve earlier values and distinguish changed evidence from real change.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-2-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for late entrants, over-age students and early leavers. Unknown education or work status should not be assigned to the majority group. Proxy reports, inaccessible households and institutional non-reporting can produce patterned missingness. The report should identify where this occurs and which body can improve coverage. Confidentiality and disclosure protection are necessary, but they should lead to controlled analysis rather than a claim that no disparity exists.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-2-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within age and cohort boundaries, eligibility determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. These actions require different certainty. Credible evidence of severe exclusion can justify immediate protection before exact prevalence is known, while durable funding formulas should be reviewed as estimates improve. Targets need safeguards against selection of people nearest the threshold. A proportionate response may involve further diagnosis, removal of an access barrier, redistribution of places, improved guidance, workplace standards, recognition reform or evaluation of a programme. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with eligibility.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-2-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within age and cohort boundaries, practical access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Outcomes should be observed at more than one interval where feasible. Immediate status may reflect seasonal demand or continued study; later status may show retention, advancement or return to education. Attrition between observations must be reported and adjusted only through stated methods. The people lost to follow-up can differ systematically. A favourable result among respondents should not be presented as the cohort result without analysis. Timing matters. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with practical access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-3", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-i", "parentId": null, "number": "3", "title": "Observation period and reference date", "anchor": "3-observation-period-and-reference-date", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-3-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For observation period and reference date, the substantive question is whether evidence describes a current state, recent event or accumulated history. The measure should preserve the difference between a current state and movement between states. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-3-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A foreseeable misreading arises where cross-sectional snapshots can make short and long transitions look alike. The evidence should show both the level and the underlying population. Similar percentages can represent different numbers and different uncertainty. A ratio may improve because the reference group deteriorates. A mean can rise while the lower part of the distribution stagnates. Adequacy and equality should therefore be considered together, using a secured educational or work-quality minimum where one is defined.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-3-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authorities should attach duration and sequence to status measures. This requires cooperation between education, labour and statistical bodies without blurring their responsibilities. Shared identifiers or linked records can improve sequence evidence where lawful, accurate and proportionate. Linkage error, non-match and privacy risk should be assessed. When linkage is unavailable, compatible aggregates and carefully designed follow-up can still improve understanding. The absence of linkage should not invite unsupported individual inference.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-3-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For young people moving repeatedly between learning and work, a successful average may conceal delayed or insecure transition. Monitoring should show entry, completion, time, work quality and return to learning where the source permits. A learner's route should not be judged solely by first destination. Some pathways require longer preparation or serve different educational purposes. The relevant question is whether choices are real, support is accessible and the resulting status offers recognised progression and decent conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-3-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within observation period and reference date, educational purpose determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. An employment gap associated with education does not by itself prove the effect of the programme. Economic structure, prior advantage, field, location and selection also matter. Evaluation requires a credible comparison and adequate follow-up. Descriptive evidence remains valuable for locating disparity and monitoring reach when causal claims are restrained. Public reporting should distinguish observation, interpretation and policy consideration. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with educational purpose.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-3-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within observation period and reference date, curriculum coherence determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Movement between academic, vocational and workplace learning requires transparent entry, credit and recognition. Qualifications frameworks can assist communication of levels and outcomes while leaving quality and equivalence to separate evidence. Guidance should explain options and consequences without steering disadvantaged learners automatically toward narrower routes. Learner participation strengthens interpretation of why routes are or are not usable. Institutions should preserve pathways rather than impose a single sequence. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with curriculum coherence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-4", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "4", "title": "Upper-secondary participation", "anchor": "4-upper-secondary-participation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-4-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A pathway account begins with enrolment and attendance in programmes beyond basic education. It should avoid assuming that education exit and stable work form one immediate, irreversible movement. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-4-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement becomes unsafe when administrative enrolment can include absent learners and omit non-formal study. The source should be tested for coverage of institutions, households and mobile populations. Education records describe participants better than non-participants; labour surveys cover residents subject to their frame and response; tracer studies reveal sequence but may lose people who move or fare poorly. Agreement strengthens a conclusion only after definitions and dates are aligned. Disagreement should remain visible and inform further enquiry.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-4-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The operational standard is to combine level classification, age, attendance and programme orientation. Indicators should be reproducible from stated components and reviewable by the bodies expected to act. A measure collected only for international reporting may arrive too late or at too broad a level for local improvement. A local measure can guide service if its limited scope is explicit. National aggregation should not conceal non-reporting areas or providers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-4-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The equity test concerns rural youth and learners facing fees or distance. Fees, transport, unpaid placements, care responsibilities, inaccessible assessment and documentary requirements can shape both participation and observed outcomes. A formally open route may be unusable. Policy evidence should therefore examine offer, take-up, completion and subsequent status. It should identify people who never entered the measured pathway, not only compare those who completed it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-4-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within upper-secondary participation, assessment validity determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Review should examine whether intended participants entered, completed, moved onward and obtained a usable educational or work outcome. It should identify adverse effects, including displacement of other learners or workers and incentives to narrow the denominator. Unresolved cases require an owner. The final account should state remaining uncertainty and next evidence. Completion of a policy cycle means more than movement in a headline indicator. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with assessment validity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-4-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within upper-secondary participation, source reliability determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Cross-country ranks are rarely the most informative output because economic demand, education structure and observation differ. Patterns, distributions and changes within stable definitions can support stronger judgement. A country can improve while remaining unequal; another can show weak short-term employment during downturn despite credible education. The report should name these conditions rather than reward or blame a system through one number. The public conclusion should be bounded by coverage and comparability. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with source reliability.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-5", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "5", "title": "Technical and vocational participation", "anchor": "5-technical-and-vocational-participation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-5-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public interest in technical and vocational participation is entry to programmes intended to combine occupational and general capabilities. Evidence should connect education participation to later status without reducing education to short-term employment alone. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-5-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main error is that programme labels do not establish quality, level or labour-market relevance. Numerator, denominator, age, reference date and duration should be kept together. Counts establish scale; rates permit comparison; distributions reveal who waits longest or receives the weakest outcome. A measure should not combine enrolled students, recent leavers and older workers without explaining the different exposure periods. Where status can overlap, such as study and employment, the classification should preserve both conditions before deriving a summary group.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-5-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The construction rule is to classify purpose, content, workplace component and progression rights. Published metadata should include classification, source, collection method, exclusions and revision. ISCED can support programme-level comparison but does not establish equivalence, quality or labour-market value. Labour-force definitions support coherent status measures but should not be reworded casually. Where national categories are mapped to a common scheme, the mapping and residual category should remain available. Precision should not exceed source quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-5-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distributional review must include girls in male-dominated fields and learners with disabilities. These populations may have different access to programmes, guidance, transport, work networks and accommodation. Disaggregation should describe opportunity and outcome without treating identity as a causal mechanism. Intersections matter: gender, household resources, disability, residence and migration can combine. Where sample sizes are small, broader categories, pooled compatible periods or qualitative service evidence may be appropriate, provided limitations are stated.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-5-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within technical and vocational participation, reference period determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Education authorities can address curriculum, guidance, programme access, quality and recognition; labour institutions can address placement, protection and labour information; employers influence workplace learning and recruitment. Coordination is necessary, but a joint initiative should not obscure accountability. Each measure should state expected reach, resource, implementation evidence and review date. Policy use should link the finding to a competent body and a defined condition that can change. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with reference period.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-5-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within technical and vocational participation, geographic distribution determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Employment outcomes are material, yet programmes also support further learning, citizenship, personal development and adaptability. Short-term placement in any job should not become the sole judgement of programme value. Conversely, educational quality claims should not ignore repeated evidence that learners cannot progress or use recognised capabilities. A balanced account places labour outcomes beside curriculum, assessment, learner experience and progression rights. Quality should remain educational as well as economic. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with geographic distribution.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-6", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "6", "title": "Tertiary and post-secondary participation", "anchor": "6-tertiary-and-post-secondary-participation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-6-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The measurement object is entry to advanced academic, professional or shorter-cycle provision. The indicator should be selected only after the population, observation period and intended decision are stated. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-6-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation is constrained because expansion can coexist with unequal access and low completion. Analysts should distinguish programme entry, regular participation, completion, credential receipt, job search, first work and sustained work. These events can occur at different dates and in different orders. A cross-sectional observation should not be described as a completed transition. If retrospective reporting is used, recall period and event definition matter. A duration median should be accompanied by the distribution and treatment of people who have not yet reached the destination.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-6-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible approach will report entrants by route, field, institution and prior background. The analyst should retain original categories before combining them, because later policy questions may require distinctions hidden by an early aggregation. Sensitivity to plausible definitions should be tested. If the conclusion depends upon an age band, duration threshold or classification choice, that dependence is part of the finding. Revisions should preserve earlier values and distinguish changed evidence from real change.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-6-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for first-generation students and learners unable to relocate. Unknown education or work status should not be assigned to the majority group. Proxy reports, inaccessible households and institutional non-reporting can produce patterned missingness. The report should identify where this occurs and which body can improve coverage. Confidentiality and disclosure protection are necessary, but they should lead to controlled analysis rather than a claim that no disparity exists.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-6-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within tertiary and post-secondary participation, household burden determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. These actions require different certainty. Credible evidence of severe exclusion can justify immediate protection before exact prevalence is known, while durable funding formulas should be reviewed as estimates improve. Targets need safeguards against selection of people nearest the threshold. A proportionate response may involve further diagnosis, removal of an access barrier, redistribution of places, improved guidance, workplace standards, recognition reform or evaluation of a programme. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with household burden.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-6-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within tertiary and post-secondary participation, disability access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Outcomes should be observed at more than one interval where feasible. Immediate status may reflect seasonal demand or continued study; later status may show retention, advancement or return to education. Attrition between observations must be reported and adjusted only through stated methods. The people lost to follow-up can differ systematically. A favourable result among respondents should not be presented as the cohort result without analysis. Timing matters. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with disability access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-7", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "7", "title": "Secondary completion", "anchor": "7-secondary-completion", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-7-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Secondary completion concerns completion of the final grade or recognised programme requirement. A national rate is useful context but cannot describe the sequence, duration and quality of every transition. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-7-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A foreseeable misreading arises where sitting an examination, passing and completing are distinct events. The evidence should show both the level and the underlying population. Similar percentages can represent different numbers and different uncertainty. A ratio may improve because the reference group deteriorates. A mean can rise while the lower part of the distribution stagnates. Adequacy and equality should therefore be considered together, using a secured educational or work-quality minimum where one is defined.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-7-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authorities should report each outcome with population and age. This requires cooperation between education, labour and statistical bodies without blurring their responsibilities. Shared identifiers or linked records can improve sequence evidence where lawful, accurate and proportionate. Linkage error, non-match and privacy risk should be assessed. When linkage is unavailable, compatible aggregates and carefully designed follow-up can still improve understanding. The absence of linkage should not invite unsupported individual inference.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-7-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For late completers and candidates unable to access examinations, a successful average may conceal delayed or insecure transition. Monitoring should show entry, completion, time, work quality and return to learning where the source permits. A learner's route should not be judged solely by first destination. Some pathways require longer preparation or serve different educational purposes. The relevant question is whether choices are real, support is accessible and the resulting status offers recognised progression and decent conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-7-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within secondary completion, language access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. An employment gap associated with education does not by itself prove the effect of the programme. Economic structure, prior advantage, field, location and selection also matter. Evaluation requires a credible comparison and adequate follow-up. Descriptive evidence remains valuable for locating disparity and monitoring reach when causal claims are restrained. Public reporting should distinguish observation, interpretation and policy consideration. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with language access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-7-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within secondary completion, professional capacity determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Movement between academic, vocational and workplace learning requires transparent entry, credit and recognition. Qualifications frameworks can assist communication of levels and outcomes while leaving quality and equivalence to separate evidence. Guidance should explain options and consequences without steering disadvantaged learners automatically toward narrower routes. Learner participation strengthens interpretation of why routes are or are not usable. Institutions should preserve pathways rather than impose a single sequence. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with professional capacity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-8", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "8", "title": "Vocational qualification completion", "anchor": "8-vocational-qualification-completion", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-8-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For vocational qualification completion, the substantive question is achievement of recognised occupational and general learning outcomes. The measure should preserve the difference between a current state and movement between states. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-8-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement becomes unsafe when attendance certificates can be mistaken for qualifications. The source should be tested for coverage of institutions, households and mobile populations. Education records describe participants better than non-participants; labour surveys cover residents subject to their frame and response; tracer studies reveal sequence but may lose people who move or fare poorly. Agreement strengthens a conclusion only after definitions and dates are aligned. Disagreement should remain visible and inform further enquiry.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-8-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The operational standard is to state awarding authority, level, assessment and progression value. Indicators should be reproducible from stated components and reviewable by the bodies expected to act. A measure collected only for international reporting may arrive too late or at too broad a level for local improvement. A local measure can guide service if its limited scope is explicit. National aggregation should not conceal non-reporting areas or providers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-8-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The equity test concerns learners in temporary or employer-based provision. Fees, transport, unpaid placements, care responsibilities, inaccessible assessment and documentary requirements can shape both participation and observed outcomes. A formally open route may be unusable. Policy evidence should therefore examine offer, take-up, completion and subsequent status. It should identify people who never entered the measured pathway, not only compare those who completed it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-8-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within vocational qualification completion, workplace supervision determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Review should examine whether intended participants entered, completed, moved onward and obtained a usable educational or work outcome. It should identify adverse effects, including displacement of other learners or workers and incentives to narrow the denominator. Unresolved cases require an owner. The final account should state remaining uncertainty and next evidence. Completion of a policy cycle means more than movement in a headline indicator. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with workplace supervision.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-8-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within vocational qualification completion, qualification status determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Cross-country ranks are rarely the most informative output because economic demand, education structure and observation differ. Patterns, distributions and changes within stable definitions can support stronger judgement. A country can improve while remaining unequal; another can show weak short-term employment during downturn despite credible education. The report should name these conditions rather than reward or blame a system through one number. The public conclusion should be bounded by coverage and comparability. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with qualification status.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-9", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "9", "title": "Higher-education completion", "anchor": "9-higher-education-completion", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-9-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A pathway account begins with awards completed relative to entrants or population under coherent definitions. It should avoid assuming that education exit and stable work form one immediate, irreversible movement. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-9-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main error is that graduation rates can mix cohorts, durations and transfer patterns. Numerator, denominator, age, reference date and duration should be kept together. Counts establish scale; rates permit comparison; distributions reveal who waits longest or receives the weakest outcome. A measure should not combine enrolled students, recent leavers and older workers without explaining the different exposure periods. Where status can overlap, such as study and employment, the classification should preserve both conditions before deriving a summary group.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-9-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The construction rule is to use true-cohort evidence where possible and state reconstructed assumptions. Published metadata should include classification, source, collection method, exclusions and revision. ISCED can support programme-level comparison but does not establish equivalence, quality or labour-market value. Labour-force definitions support coherent status measures but should not be reworded casually. Where national categories are mapped to a common scheme, the mapping and residual category should remain available. Precision should not exceed source quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-9-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distributional review must include part-time, mobile and returning students. These populations may have different access to programmes, guidance, transport, work networks and accommodation. Disaggregation should describe opportunity and outcome without treating identity as a causal mechanism. Intersections matter: gender, household resources, disability, residence and migration can combine. Where sample sizes are small, broader categories, pooled compatible periods or qualitative service evidence may be appropriate, provided limitations are stated.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-9-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within higher-education completion, credit value determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Education authorities can address curriculum, guidance, programme access, quality and recognition; labour institutions can address placement, protection and labour information; employers influence workplace learning and recruitment. Coordination is necessary, but a joint initiative should not obscure accountability. Each measure should state expected reach, resource, implementation evidence and review date. Policy use should link the finding to a competent body and a defined condition that can change. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with credit value.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-9-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within higher-education completion, recognition consistency determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Employment outcomes are material, yet programmes also support further learning, citizenship, personal development and adaptability. Short-term placement in any job should not become the sole judgement of programme value. Conversely, educational quality claims should not ignore repeated evidence that learners cannot progress or use recognised capabilities. A balanced account places labour outcomes beside curriculum, assessment, learner experience and progression rights. Quality should remain educational as well as economic. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with recognition consistency.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-10", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "10", "title": "Time from education exit to first work", "anchor": "10-time-from-education-exit-to-first-work", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-10-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public interest in time from education exit to first work is elapsed time between defined education departure and first recorded employment. Evidence should connect education participation to later status without reducing education to short-term employment alone. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-10-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation is constrained because first work may be brief, informal or unrelated to study. Analysts should distinguish programme entry, regular participation, completion, credential receipt, job search, first work and sustained work. These events can occur at different dates and in different orders. A cross-sectional observation should not be described as a completed transition. If retrospective reporting is used, recall period and event definition matter. A duration median should be accompanied by the distribution and treatment of people who have not yet reached the destination.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-10-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible approach will report duration distribution and work characteristics. The analyst should retain original categories before combining them, because later policy questions may require distinctions hidden by an early aggregation. Sensitivity to plausible definitions should be tested. If the conclusion depends upon an age band, duration threshold or classification choice, that dependence is part of the finding. Revisions should preserve earlier values and distinguish changed evidence from real change.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-10-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for young people without family networks or transport. Unknown education or work status should not be assigned to the majority group. Proxy reports, inaccessible households and institutional non-reporting can produce patterned missingness. The report should identify where this occurs and which body can improve coverage. Confidentiality and disclosure protection are necessary, but they should lead to controlled analysis rather than a claim that no disparity exists.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-10-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within time from education exit to first work, data comparability determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. These actions require different certainty. Credible evidence of severe exclusion can justify immediate protection before exact prevalence is known, while durable funding formulas should be reviewed as estimates improve. Targets need safeguards against selection of people nearest the threshold. A proportionate response may involve further diagnosis, removal of an access barrier, redistribution of places, improved guidance, workplace standards, recognition reform or evaluation of a programme. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with data comparability.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-10-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within time from education exit to first work, uncertainty determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Outcomes should be observed at more than one interval where feasible. Immediate status may reflect seasonal demand or continued study; later status may show retention, advancement or return to education. Attrition between observations must be reported and adjusted only through stated methods. The people lost to follow-up can differ systematically. A favourable result among respondents should not be presented as the cohort result without analysis. Timing matters. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with uncertainty.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-11", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "11", "title": "Time to stable or sustained employment", "anchor": "11-time-to-stable-or-sustained-employment", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-11-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The measurement object is duration until work persists for a declared period. The indicator should be selected only after the population, observation period and intended decision are stated. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-11-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A foreseeable misreading arises where stability can reflect constrained mobility as well as a good match. The evidence should show both the level and the underlying population. Similar percentages can represent different numbers and different uncertainty. A ratio may improve because the reference group deteriorates. A mean can rise while the lower part of the distribution stagnates. Adequacy and equality should therefore be considered together, using a secured educational or work-quality minimum where one is defined.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-11-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authorities should join duration, contract, hours, earnings and choice. This requires cooperation between education, labour and statistical bodies without blurring their responsibilities. Shared identifiers or linked records can improve sequence evidence where lawful, accurate and proportionate. Linkage error, non-match and privacy risk should be assessed. When linkage is unavailable, compatible aggregates and carefully designed follow-up can still improve understanding. The absence of linkage should not invite unsupported individual inference.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-11-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For young workers in seasonal and casual labour, a successful average may conceal delayed or insecure transition. Monitoring should show entry, completion, time, work quality and return to learning where the source permits. A learner's route should not be judged solely by first destination. Some pathways require longer preparation or serve different educational purposes. The relevant question is whether choices are real, support is accessible and the resulting status offers recognised progression and decent conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-11-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within time to stable or sustained employment, implementation reach determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. An employment gap associated with education does not by itself prove the effect of the programme. Economic structure, prior advantage, field, location and selection also matter. Evaluation requires a credible comparison and adequate follow-up. Descriptive evidence remains valuable for locating disparity and monitoring reach when causal claims are restrained. Public reporting should distinguish observation, interpretation and policy consideration. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with implementation reach.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-11-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within time to stable or sustained employment, transition timing determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Movement between academic, vocational and workplace learning requires transparent entry, credit and recognition. Qualifications frameworks can assist communication of levels and outcomes while leaving quality and equivalence to separate evidence. Guidance should explain options and consequences without steering disadvantaged learners automatically toward narrower routes. Learner participation strengthens interpretation of why routes are or are not usable. Institutions should preserve pathways rather than impose a single sequence. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with transition timing.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-12", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "12", "title": "Return to education after work", "anchor": "12-return-to-education-after-work", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-12-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Return to education after work concerns movement back into formal or recognised learning. A national rate is useful context but cannot describe the sequence, duration and quality of every transition. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-12-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement becomes unsafe when one-way pathway models treat return as failure or ignore it. The source should be tested for coverage of institutions, households and mobile populations. Education records describe participants better than non-participants; labour surveys cover residents subject to their frame and response; tracer studies reveal sequence but may lose people who move or fare poorly. Agreement strengthens a conclusion only after definitions and dates are aligned. Disagreement should remain visible and inform further enquiry.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-12-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The operational standard is to record prior work, programme purpose and credit recognition. Indicators should be reproducible from stated components and reviewable by the bodies expected to act. A measure collected only for international reporting may arrive too late or at too broad a level for local improvement. A local measure can guide service if its limited scope is explicit. National aggregation should not conceal non-reporting areas or providers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-12-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The equity test concerns adults and youth using second-chance routes. Fees, transport, unpaid placements, care responsibilities, inaccessible assessment and documentary requirements can shape both participation and observed outcomes. A formally open route may be unusable. Policy evidence should therefore examine offer, take-up, completion and subsequent status. It should identify people who never entered the measured pathway, not only compare those who completed it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-12-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within return to education after work, employment quality determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Review should examine whether intended participants entered, completed, moved onward and obtained a usable educational or work outcome. It should identify adverse effects, including displacement of other learners or workers and incentives to narrow the denominator. Unresolved cases require an owner. The final account should state remaining uncertainty and next evidence. Completion of a policy cycle means more than movement in a headline indicator. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with employment quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-12-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within return to education after work, learner protection determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Cross-country ranks are rarely the most informative output because economic demand, education structure and observation differ. Patterns, distributions and changes within stable definitions can support stronger judgement. A country can improve while remaining unequal; another can show weak short-term employment during downturn despite credible education. The report should name these conditions rather than reward or blame a system through one number. The public conclusion should be bounded by coverage and comparability. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with learner protection.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-13", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-v", "parentId": null, "number": "13", "title": "Employment, unemployment and inactivity", "anchor": "13-employment-unemployment-and-inactivity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-13-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For employment, unemployment and inactivity, the substantive question is mutually coherent labour-force states under official definitions. The measure should preserve the difference between a current state and movement between states. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-13-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main error is that education participation and job search can overlap. Numerator, denominator, age, reference date and duration should be kept together. Counts establish scale; rates permit comparison; distributions reveal who waits longest or receives the weakest outcome. A measure should not combine enrolled students, recent leavers and older workers without explaining the different exposure periods. Where status can overlap, such as study and employment, the classification should preserve both conditions before deriving a summary group.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-13-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The construction rule is to cross-classify education and labour status. Published metadata should include classification, source, collection method, exclusions and revision. ISCED can support programme-level comparison but does not establish equivalence, quality or labour-market value. Labour-force definitions support coherent status measures but should not be reworded casually. Where national categories are mapped to a common scheme, the mapping and residual category should remain available. Precision should not exceed source quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-13-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distributional review must include students working or seeking work. These populations may have different access to programmes, guidance, transport, work networks and accommodation. Disaggregation should describe opportunity and outcome without treating identity as a causal mechanism. Intersections matter: gender, household resources, disability, residence and migration can combine. Where sample sizes are small, broader categories, pooled compatible periods or qualitative service evidence may be appropriate, provided limitations are stated.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-13-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within employment, unemployment and inactivity, public information determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Education authorities can address curriculum, guidance, programme access, quality and recognition; labour institutions can address placement, protection and labour information; employers influence workplace learning and recruitment. Coordination is necessary, but a joint initiative should not obscure accountability. Each measure should state expected reach, resource, implementation evidence and review date. Policy use should link the finding to a competent body and a defined condition that can change. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with public information.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-13-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within employment, unemployment and inactivity, provider responsibility determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Employment outcomes are material, yet programmes also support further learning, citizenship, personal development and adaptability. Short-term placement in any job should not become the sole judgement of programme value. Conversely, educational quality claims should not ignore repeated evidence that learners cannot progress or use recognised capabilities. A balanced account places labour outcomes beside curriculum, assessment, learner experience and progression rights. Quality should remain educational as well as economic. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with provider responsibility.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-14", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-v", "parentId": null, "number": "14", "title": "Young people neither employed nor in education or training", "anchor": "14-young-people-neither-employed-nor-in-education-or-training", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-14-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A pathway account begins with a residual group outside defined learning and employment during the period. It should avoid assuming that education exit and stable work form one immediate, irreversible movement. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-14-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation is constrained because the category combines active jobseekers, carers, discouraged workers and people unable to work. Analysts should distinguish programme entry, regular participation, completion, credential receipt, job search, first work and sustained work. These events can occur at different dates and in different orders. A cross-sectional observation should not be described as a completed transition. If retrospective reporting is used, recall period and event definition matter. A duration median should be accompanied by the distribution and treatment of people who have not yet reached the destination.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-14-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible approach will disaggregate reason, duration and prior education. The analyst should retain original categories before combining them, because later policy questions may require distinctions hidden by an early aggregation. Sensitivity to plausible definitions should be tested. If the conclusion depends upon an age band, duration threshold or classification choice, that dependence is part of the finding. Revisions should preserve earlier values and distinguish changed evidence from real change.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-14-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for young women with care duties and disabled youth. Unknown education or work status should not be assigned to the majority group. Proxy reports, inaccessible households and institutional non-reporting can produce patterned missingness. The report should identify where this occurs and which body can improve coverage. Confidentiality and disclosure protection are necessary, but they should lead to controlled analysis rather than a claim that no disparity exists.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-14-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within young people neither employed nor in education or training, financial adequacy determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. These actions require different certainty. Credible evidence of severe exclusion can justify immediate protection before exact prevalence is known, while durable funding formulas should be reviewed as estimates improve. Targets need safeguards against selection of people nearest the threshold. A proportionate response may involve further diagnosis, removal of an access barrier, redistribution of places, improved guidance, workplace standards, recognition reform or evaluation of a programme. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with financial adequacy.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-14-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within young people neither employed nor in education or training, monitoring frequency determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Outcomes should be observed at more than one interval where feasible. Immediate status may reflect seasonal demand or continued study; later status may show retention, advancement or return to education. Attrition between observations must be reported and adjusted only through stated methods. The people lost to follow-up can differ systematically. A favourable result among respondents should not be presented as the cohort result without analysis. Timing matters. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with monitoring frequency.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-15", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-v", "parentId": null, "number": "15", "title": "Discouragement and labour-market detachment", "anchor": "15-discouragement-and-labour-market-detachment", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-15-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public interest in discouragement and labour-market detachment is availability for work without active search because opportunities appear absent. Evidence should connect education participation to later status without reducing education to short-term employment alone. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-15-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A foreseeable misreading arises where standard unemployment can omit severe transition difficulty. The evidence should show both the level and the underlying population. Similar percentages can represent different numbers and different uncertainty. A ratio may improve because the reference group deteriorates. A mean can rise while the lower part of the distribution stagnates. Adequacy and equality should therefore be considered together, using a secured educational or work-quality minimum where one is defined.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-15-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authorities should report desire for work, availability, search history and barriers. This requires cooperation between education, labour and statistical bodies without blurring their responsibilities. Shared identifiers or linked records can improve sequence evidence where lawful, accurate and proportionate. Linkage error, non-match and privacy risk should be assessed. When linkage is unavailable, compatible aggregates and carefully designed follow-up can still improve understanding. The absence of linkage should not invite unsupported individual inference.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-15-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For youth in weak local labour markets, a successful average may conceal delayed or insecure transition. Monitoring should show entry, completion, time, work quality and return to learning where the source permits. A learner's route should not be judged solely by first destination. Some pathways require longer preparation or serve different educational purposes. The relevant question is whether choices are real, support is accessible and the resulting status offers recognised progression and decent conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-15-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within discouragement and labour-market detachment, unequal effect determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. An employment gap associated with education does not by itself prove the effect of the programme. Economic structure, prior advantage, field, location and selection also matter. Evaluation requires a credible comparison and adequate follow-up. Descriptive evidence remains valuable for locating disparity and monitoring reach when causal claims are restrained. Public reporting should distinguish observation, interpretation and policy consideration. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with unequal effect.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-15-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within discouragement and labour-market detachment, reversibility determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Movement between academic, vocational and workplace learning requires transparent entry, credit and recognition. Qualifications frameworks can assist communication of levels and outcomes while leaving quality and equivalence to separate evidence. Guidance should explain options and consequences without steering disadvantaged learners automatically toward narrower routes. Learner participation strengthens interpretation of why routes are or are not usable. Institutions should preserve pathways rather than impose a single sequence. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with reversibility.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-16", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "16", "title": "Hours and underemployment", "anchor": "16-hours-and-underemployment", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-16-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The measurement object is whether employed people receive sufficient and chosen working time. The indicator should be selected only after the population, observation period and intended decision are stated. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-16-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement becomes unsafe when any employment can be read as successful transition despite inadequate hours. The source should be tested for coverage of institutions, households and mobile populations. Education records describe participants better than non-participants; labour surveys cover residents subject to their frame and response; tracer studies reveal sequence but may lose people who move or fare poorly. Agreement strengthens a conclusion only after definitions and dates are aligned. Disagreement should remain visible and inform further enquiry.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-16-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The operational standard is to report actual and desired hours with education status. Indicators should be reproducible from stated components and reviewable by the bodies expected to act. A measure collected only for international reporting may arrive too late or at too broad a level for local improvement. A local measure can guide service if its limited scope is explicit. National aggregation should not conceal non-reporting areas or providers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-16-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The equity test concerns young people in irregular part-time work. Fees, transport, unpaid placements, care responsibilities, inaccessible assessment and documentary requirements can shape both participation and observed outcomes. A formally open route may be unusable. Policy evidence should therefore examine offer, take-up, completion and subsequent status. It should identify people who never entered the measured pathway, not only compare those who completed it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-16-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within hours and underemployment, continuity determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Review should examine whether intended participants entered, completed, moved onward and obtained a usable educational or work outcome. It should identify adverse effects, including displacement of other learners or workers and incentives to narrow the denominator. Unresolved cases require an owner. The final account should state remaining uncertainty and next evidence. Completion of a policy cycle means more than movement in a headline indicator. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with continuity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-16-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within hours and underemployment, complaint access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Cross-country ranks are rarely the most informative output because economic demand, education structure and observation differ. Patterns, distributions and changes within stable definitions can support stronger judgement. A country can improve while remaining unequal; another can show weak short-term employment during downturn despite credible education. The report should name these conditions rather than reward or blame a system through one number. The public conclusion should be bounded by coverage and comparability. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with complaint access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-17", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "17", "title": "Contract, informality and protection", "anchor": "17-contract-informality-and-protection", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-17-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Contract, informality and protection concerns security and institutional conditions of employment. A national rate is useful context but cannot describe the sequence, duration and quality of every transition. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-17-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main error is that formal and informal categories differ across systems and may not capture vulnerability. Numerator, denominator, age, reference date and duration should be kept together. Counts establish scale; rates permit comparison; distributions reveal who waits longest or receives the weakest outcome. A measure should not combine enrolled students, recent leavers and older workers without explaining the different exposure periods. Where status can overlap, such as study and employment, the classification should preserve both conditions before deriving a summary group.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-17-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The construction rule is to state operational definitions and social-protection coverage. Published metadata should include classification, source, collection method, exclusions and revision. ISCED can support programme-level comparison but does not establish equivalence, quality or labour-market value. Labour-force definitions support coherent status measures but should not be reworded casually. Where national categories are mapped to a common scheme, the mapping and residual category should remain available. Precision should not exceed source quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-17-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distributional review must include migrant youth and workers in family enterprises. These populations may have different access to programmes, guidance, transport, work networks and accommodation. Disaggregation should describe opportunity and outcome without treating identity as a causal mechanism. Intersections matter: gender, household resources, disability, residence and migration can combine. Where sample sizes are small, broader categories, pooled compatible periods or qualitative service evidence may be appropriate, provided limitations are stated.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-17-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within contract, informality and protection, record correction determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Education authorities can address curriculum, guidance, programme access, quality and recognition; labour institutions can address placement, protection and labour information; employers influence workplace learning and recruitment. Coordination is necessary, but a joint initiative should not obscure accountability. Each measure should state expected reach, resource, implementation evidence and review date. Policy use should link the finding to a competent body and a defined condition that can change. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with record correction.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-17-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within contract, informality and protection, institutional dependency determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Employment outcomes are material, yet programmes also support further learning, citizenship, personal development and adaptability. Short-term placement in any job should not become the sole judgement of programme value. Conversely, educational quality claims should not ignore repeated evidence that learners cannot progress or use recognised capabilities. A balanced account places labour outcomes beside curriculum, assessment, learner experience and progression rights. Quality should remain educational as well as economic. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with institutional dependency.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-18", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "18", "title": "Earnings and material return", "anchor": "18-earnings-and-material-return", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-18-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For earnings and material return, the substantive question is remuneration associated with work and education under comparable conditions. The measure should preserve the difference between a current state and movement between states. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-18-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation is constrained because nominal earnings and averages conceal price, hours and distribution. Analysts should distinguish programme entry, regular participation, completion, credential receipt, job search, first work and sustained work. These events can occur at different dates and in different orders. A cross-sectional observation should not be described as a completed transition. If retrospective reporting is used, recall period and event definition matter. A duration median should be accompanied by the distribution and treatment of people who have not yet reached the destination.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-18-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible approach will use hourly or period-adjusted measures and show dispersion. The analyst should retain original categories before combining them, because later policy questions may require distinctions hidden by an early aggregation. Sensitivity to plausible definitions should be tested. If the conclusion depends upon an age band, duration threshold or classification choice, that dependence is part of the finding. Revisions should preserve earlier values and distinguish changed evidence from real change.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-18-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for low-paid entrants and unpaid contributing family workers. Unknown education or work status should not be assigned to the majority group. Proxy reports, inaccessible households and institutional non-reporting can produce patterned missingness. The report should identify where this occurs and which body can improve coverage. Confidentiality and disclosure protection are necessary, but they should lead to controlled analysis rather than a claim that no disparity exists.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-18-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within earnings and material return, local verification determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. These actions require different certainty. Credible evidence of severe exclusion can justify immediate protection before exact prevalence is known, while durable funding formulas should be reviewed as estimates improve. Targets need safeguards against selection of people nearest the threshold. A proportionate response may involve further diagnosis, removal of an access barrier, redistribution of places, improved guidance, workplace standards, recognition reform or evaluation of a programme. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with local verification.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-18-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within earnings and material return, progression determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Outcomes should be observed at more than one interval where feasible. Immediate status may reflect seasonal demand or continued study; later status may show retention, advancement or return to education. Attrition between observations must be reported and adjusted only through stated methods. The people lost to follow-up can differ systematically. A favourable result among respondents should not be presented as the cohort result without analysis. Timing matters. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with progression.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-19", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "19", "title": "Field-of-study and occupation relationship", "anchor": "19-field-of-study-and-occupation-relationship", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-19-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A pathway account begins with the substantive connection between learning and work performed. It should avoid assuming that education exit and stable work form one immediate, irreversible movement. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-19-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A foreseeable misreading arises where occupational title alone cannot establish skill use or mismatch. The evidence should show both the level and the underlying population. Similar percentages can represent different numbers and different uncertainty. A ratio may improve because the reference group deteriorates. A mean can rise while the lower part of the distribution stagnates. Adequacy and equality should therefore be considered together, using a secured educational or work-quality minimum where one is defined.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-19-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authorities should combine field, occupation, tasks and worker judgement. This requires cooperation between education, labour and statistical bodies without blurring their responsibilities. Shared identifiers or linked records can improve sequence evidence where lawful, accurate and proportionate. Linkage error, non-match and privacy risk should be assessed. When linkage is unavailable, compatible aggregates and carefully designed follow-up can still improve understanding. The absence of linkage should not invite unsupported individual inference.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-19-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For graduates in broad or interdisciplinary programmes, a successful average may conceal delayed or insecure transition. Monitoring should show entry, completion, time, work quality and return to learning where the source permits. A learner's route should not be judged solely by first destination. Some pathways require longer preparation or serve different educational purposes. The relevant question is whether choices are real, support is accessible and the resulting status offers recognised progression and decent conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-19-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within field-of-study and occupation relationship, completion determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. An employment gap associated with education does not by itself prove the effect of the programme. Economic structure, prior advantage, field, location and selection also matter. Evaluation requires a credible comparison and adequate follow-up. Descriptive evidence remains valuable for locating disparity and monitoring reach when causal claims are restrained. Public reporting should distinguish observation, interpretation and policy consideration. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with completion.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-19-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within field-of-study and occupation relationship, later destination determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Movement between academic, vocational and workplace learning requires transparent entry, credit and recognition. Qualifications frameworks can assist communication of levels and outcomes while leaving quality and equivalence to separate evidence. Guidance should explain options and consequences without steering disadvantaged learners automatically toward narrower routes. Learner participation strengthens interpretation of why routes are or are not usable. Institutions should preserve pathways rather than impose a single sequence. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with later destination.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-20", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "20", "title": "Qualification level and job requirements", "anchor": "20-qualification-level-and-job-requirements", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-20-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public interest in qualification level and job requirements is whether formal attainment is above, near or below stated work requirements. Evidence should connect education participation to later status without reducing education to short-term employment alone. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-20-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement becomes unsafe when classification differences and credential inflation complicate comparison. The source should be tested for coverage of institutions, households and mobile populations. Education records describe participants better than non-participants; labour surveys cover residents subject to their frame and response; tracer studies reveal sequence but may lose people who move or fare poorly. Agreement strengthens a conclusion only after definitions and dates are aligned. Disagreement should remain visible and inform further enquiry.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-20-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The operational standard is to use more than one matching method and report sensitivity. Indicators should be reproducible from stated components and reviewable by the bodies expected to act. A measure collected only for international reporting may arrive too late or at too broad a level for local improvement. A local measure can guide service if its limited scope is explicit. National aggregation should not conceal non-reporting areas or providers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-20-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The equity test concerns workers whose skills were acquired outside formal education. Fees, transport, unpaid placements, care responsibilities, inaccessible assessment and documentary requirements can shape both participation and observed outcomes. A formally open route may be unusable. Policy evidence should therefore examine offer, take-up, completion and subsequent status. It should identify people who never entered the measured pathway, not only compare those who completed it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-20-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within qualification level and job requirements, policy attribution determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Review should examine whether intended participants entered, completed, moved onward and obtained a usable educational or work outcome. It should identify adverse effects, including displacement of other learners or workers and incentives to narrow the denominator. Unresolved cases require an owner. The final account should state remaining uncertainty and next evidence. Completion of a policy cycle means more than movement in a headline indicator. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with policy attribution.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-20-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within qualification level and job requirements, review responsibility determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Cross-country ranks are rarely the most informative output because economic demand, education structure and observation differ. Patterns, distributions and changes within stable definitions can support stronger judgement. A country can improve while remaining unequal; another can show weak short-term employment during downturn despite credible education. The report should name these conditions rather than reward or blame a system through one number. The public conclusion should be bounded by coverage and comparability. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with review responsibility.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-21", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "21", "title": "Skills use and continued learning at work", "anchor": "21-skills-use-and-continued-learning-at-work", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-21-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The measurement object is application and development of capabilities after entry. The indicator should be selected only after the population, observation period and intended decision are stated. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-21-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main error is that employment status does not reveal whether learning is used or extended. Numerator, denominator, age, reference date and duration should be kept together. Counts establish scale; rates permit comparison; distributions reveal who waits longest or receives the weakest outcome. A measure should not combine enrolled students, recent leavers and older workers without explaining the different exposure periods. Where status can overlap, such as study and employment, the classification should preserve both conditions before deriving a summary group.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-21-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The construction rule is to observe tasks, training, supervision and progression opportunity. Published metadata should include classification, source, collection method, exclusions and revision. ISCED can support programme-level comparison but does not establish equivalence, quality or labour-market value. Labour-force definitions support coherent status measures but should not be reworded casually. Where national categories are mapped to a common scheme, the mapping and residual category should remain available. Precision should not exceed source quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-21-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distributional review must include young workers in low-discretion jobs. These populations may have different access to programmes, guidance, transport, work networks and accommodation. Disaggregation should describe opportunity and outcome without treating identity as a causal mechanism. Intersections matter: gender, household resources, disability, residence and migration can combine. Where sample sizes are small, broader categories, pooled compatible periods or qualitative service evidence may be appropriate, provided limitations are stated.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-21-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within skills use and continued learning at work, authority determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Education authorities can address curriculum, guidance, programme access, quality and recognition; labour institutions can address placement, protection and labour information; employers influence workplace learning and recruitment. Coordination is necessary, but a joint initiative should not obscure accountability. Each measure should state expected reach, resource, implementation evidence and review date. Policy use should link the finding to a competent body and a defined condition that can change. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with authority.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-21-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within skills use and continued learning at work, population coverage determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Employment outcomes are material, yet programmes also support further learning, citizenship, personal development and adaptability. Short-term placement in any job should not become the sole judgement of programme value. Conversely, educational quality claims should not ignore repeated evidence that learners cannot progress or use recognised capabilities. A balanced account places labour outcomes beside curriculum, assessment, learner experience and progression rights. Quality should remain educational as well as economic. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with population coverage.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-22", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "22", "title": "Apprenticeship entry and completion", "anchor": "22-apprenticeship-entry-and-completion", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-22-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Apprenticeship entry and completion concerns participation in structured learning combining work and off-job education. A national rate is useful context but cannot describe the sequence, duration and quality of every transition. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-22-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation is constrained because informal work experience can be labelled apprenticeship without training or protection. Analysts should distinguish programme entry, regular participation, completion, credential receipt, job search, first work and sustained work. These events can occur at different dates and in different orders. A cross-sectional observation should not be described as a completed transition. If retrospective reporting is used, recall period and event definition matter. A duration median should be accompanied by the distribution and treatment of people who have not yet reached the destination.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-22-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible approach will state contract, curriculum, supervision, assessment and award. The analyst should retain original categories before combining them, because later policy questions may require distinctions hidden by an early aggregation. Sensitivity to plausible definitions should be tested. If the conclusion depends upon an age band, duration threshold or classification choice, that dependence is part of the finding. Revisions should preserve earlier values and distinguish changed evidence from real change.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-22-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for young workers in small enterprises. Unknown education or work status should not be assigned to the majority group. Proxy reports, inaccessible households and institutional non-reporting can produce patterned missingness. The report should identify where this occurs and which body can improve coverage. Confidentiality and disclosure protection are necessary, but they should lead to controlled analysis rather than a claim that no disparity exists.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-22-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within apprenticeship entry and completion, eligibility determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. These actions require different certainty. Credible evidence of severe exclusion can justify immediate protection before exact prevalence is known, while durable funding formulas should be reviewed as estimates improve. Targets need safeguards against selection of people nearest the threshold. A proportionate response may involve further diagnosis, removal of an access barrier, redistribution of places, improved guidance, workplace standards, recognition reform or evaluation of a programme. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with eligibility.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-22-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within apprenticeship entry and completion, practical access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Outcomes should be observed at more than one interval where feasible. Immediate status may reflect seasonal demand or continued study; later status may show retention, advancement or return to education. Attrition between observations must be reported and adjusted only through stated methods. The people lost to follow-up can differ systematically. A favourable result among respondents should not be presented as the cohort result without analysis. Timing matters. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with practical access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-23", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "23", "title": "Internships and temporary work experience", "anchor": "23-internships-and-temporary-work-experience", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-23-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For internships and temporary work experience, the substantive question is short workplace exposure intended to support learning and transition. The measure should preserve the difference between a current state and movement between states. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-23-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A foreseeable misreading arises where unpaid or repetitive work can offer little learning and displace paid entry jobs. The evidence should show both the level and the underlying population. Similar percentages can represent different numbers and different uncertainty. A ratio may improve because the reference group deteriorates. A mean can rise while the lower part of the distribution stagnates. Adequacy and equality should therefore be considered together, using a secured educational or work-quality minimum where one is defined.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-23-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authorities should report learning objectives, duration, supervision and subsequent status. This requires cooperation between education, labour and statistical bodies without blurring their responsibilities. Shared identifiers or linked records can improve sequence evidence where lawful, accurate and proportionate. Linkage error, non-match and privacy risk should be assessed. When linkage is unavailable, compatible aggregates and carefully designed follow-up can still improve understanding. The absence of linkage should not invite unsupported individual inference.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-23-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For young people unable to afford unpaid participation, a successful average may conceal delayed or insecure transition. Monitoring should show entry, completion, time, work quality and return to learning where the source permits. A learner's route should not be judged solely by first destination. Some pathways require longer preparation or serve different educational purposes. The relevant question is whether choices are real, support is accessible and the resulting status offers recognised progression and decent conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-23-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within internships and temporary work experience, educational purpose determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. An employment gap associated with education does not by itself prove the effect of the programme. Economic structure, prior advantage, field, location and selection also matter. Evaluation requires a credible comparison and adequate follow-up. Descriptive evidence remains valuable for locating disparity and monitoring reach when causal claims are restrained. Public reporting should distinguish observation, interpretation and policy consideration. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with educational purpose.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-23-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within internships and temporary work experience, curriculum coherence determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Movement between academic, vocational and workplace learning requires transparent entry, credit and recognition. Qualifications frameworks can assist communication of levels and outcomes while leaving quality and equivalence to separate evidence. Guidance should explain options and consequences without steering disadvantaged learners automatically toward narrower routes. Learner participation strengthens interpretation of why routes are or are not usable. Institutions should preserve pathways rather than impose a single sequence. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with curriculum coherence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-24", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "24", "title": "Employer-provided training", "anchor": "24-employer-provided-training", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-24-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A pathway account begins with organised learning after employment entry. It should avoid assuming that education exit and stable work form one immediate, irreversible movement. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-24-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement becomes unsafe when access can concentrate among already qualified workers. The source should be tested for coverage of institutions, households and mobile populations. Education records describe participants better than non-participants; labour surveys cover residents subject to their frame and response; tracer studies reveal sequence but may lose people who move or fare poorly. Agreement strengthens a conclusion only after definitions and dates are aligned. Disagreement should remain visible and inform further enquiry.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-24-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The operational standard is to report participation, hours, purpose and employer size. Indicators should be reproducible from stated components and reviewable by the bodies expected to act. A measure collected only for international reporting may arrive too late or at too broad a level for local improvement. A local measure can guide service if its limited scope is explicit. National aggregation should not conceal non-reporting areas or providers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-24-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The equity test concerns low-qualified, temporary and part-time workers. Fees, transport, unpaid placements, care responsibilities, inaccessible assessment and documentary requirements can shape both participation and observed outcomes. A formally open route may be unusable. Policy evidence should therefore examine offer, take-up, completion and subsequent status. It should identify people who never entered the measured pathway, not only compare those who completed it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-24-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within employer-provided training, assessment validity determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Review should examine whether intended participants entered, completed, moved onward and obtained a usable educational or work outcome. It should identify adverse effects, including displacement of other learners or workers and incentives to narrow the denominator. Unresolved cases require an owner. The final account should state remaining uncertainty and next evidence. Completion of a policy cycle means more than movement in a headline indicator. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with assessment validity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-24-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within employer-provided training, source reliability determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Cross-country ranks are rarely the most informative output because economic demand, education structure and observation differ. Patterns, distributions and changes within stable definitions can support stronger judgement. A country can improve while remaining unequal; another can show weak short-term employment during downturn despite credible education. The report should name these conditions rather than reward or blame a system through one number. The public conclusion should be bounded by coverage and comparability. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with source reliability.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-25", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "25", "title": "Career information and guidance", "anchor": "25-career-information-and-guidance", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-25-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public interest in career information and guidance is access to reliable information and supported educational or occupational choice. Evidence should connect education participation to later status without reducing education to short-term employment alone. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-25-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main error is that service availability does not establish impartial or usable guidance. Numerator, denominator, age, reference date and duration should be kept together. Counts establish scale; rates permit comparison; distributions reveal who waits longest or receives the weakest outcome. A measure should not combine enrolled students, recent leavers and older workers without explaining the different exposure periods. Where status can overlap, such as study and employment, the classification should preserve both conditions before deriving a summary group.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-25-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The construction rule is to measure reach, timing, content and learner experience. Published metadata should include classification, source, collection method, exclusions and revision. ISCED can support programme-level comparison but does not establish equivalence, quality or labour-market value. Labour-force definitions support coherent status measures but should not be reworded casually. Where national categories are mapped to a common scheme, the mapping and residual category should remain available. Precision should not exceed source quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-25-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distributional review must include rural students and first-generation applicants. These populations may have different access to programmes, guidance, transport, work networks and accommodation. Disaggregation should describe opportunity and outcome without treating identity as a causal mechanism. Intersections matter: gender, household resources, disability, residence and migration can combine. Where sample sizes are small, broader categories, pooled compatible periods or qualitative service evidence may be appropriate, provided limitations are stated.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-25-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within career information and guidance, reference period determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Education authorities can address curriculum, guidance, programme access, quality and recognition; labour institutions can address placement, protection and labour information; employers influence workplace learning and recruitment. Coordination is necessary, but a joint initiative should not obscure accountability. Each measure should state expected reach, resource, implementation evidence and review date. Policy use should link the finding to a competent body and a defined condition that can change. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with reference period.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-25-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within career information and guidance, geographic distribution determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Employment outcomes are material, yet programmes also support further learning, citizenship, personal development and adaptability. Short-term placement in any job should not become the sole judgement of programme value. Conversely, educational quality claims should not ignore repeated evidence that learners cannot progress or use recognised capabilities. A balanced account places labour outcomes beside curriculum, assessment, learner experience and progression rights. Quality should remain educational as well as economic. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with geographic distribution.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-26", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "26", "title": "Job-search duration and method", "anchor": "26-job-search-duration-and-method", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-26-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The measurement object is how young people seek work and which channels connect to opportunities. The indicator should be selected only after the population, observation period and intended decision are stated. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-26-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation is constrained because formal vacancy systems represent only part of recruitment. Analysts should distinguish programme entry, regular participation, completion, credential receipt, job search, first work and sustained work. These events can occur at different dates and in different orders. A cross-sectional observation should not be described as a completed transition. If retrospective reporting is used, recall period and event definition matter. A duration median should be accompanied by the distribution and treatment of people who have not yet reached the destination.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-26-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible approach will record search method, cost, duration and outcome. The analyst should retain original categories before combining them, because later policy questions may require distinctions hidden by an early aggregation. Sensitivity to plausible definitions should be tested. If the conclusion depends upon an age band, duration threshold or classification choice, that dependence is part of the finding. Revisions should preserve earlier values and distinguish changed evidence from real change.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-26-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for youth lacking personal contacts. Unknown education or work status should not be assigned to the majority group. Proxy reports, inaccessible households and institutional non-reporting can produce patterned missingness. The report should identify where this occurs and which body can improve coverage. Confidentiality and disclosure protection are necessary, but they should lead to controlled analysis rather than a claim that no disparity exists.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-26-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within job-search duration and method, household burden determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. These actions require different certainty. Credible evidence of severe exclusion can justify immediate protection before exact prevalence is known, while durable funding formulas should be reviewed as estimates improve. Targets need safeguards against selection of people nearest the threshold. A proportionate response may involve further diagnosis, removal of an access barrier, redistribution of places, improved guidance, workplace standards, recognition reform or evaluation of a programme. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with household burden.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-26-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within job-search duration and method, disability access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Outcomes should be observed at more than one interval where feasible. Immediate status may reflect seasonal demand or continued study; later status may show retention, advancement or return to education. Attrition between observations must be reported and adjusted only through stated methods. The people lost to follow-up can differ systematically. A favourable result among respondents should not be presented as the cohort result without analysis. Timing matters. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with disability access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-27", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "27", "title": "Public employment and placement services", "anchor": "27-public-employment-and-placement-services", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-27-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Public employment and placement services concerns institutional support linking education, jobseekers and employers. A national rate is useful context but cannot describe the sequence, duration and quality of every transition. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-27-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A foreseeable misreading arises where registration counts can substitute for successful and suitable placement. The evidence should show both the level and the underlying population. Similar percentages can represent different numbers and different uncertainty. A ratio may improve because the reference group deteriorates. A mean can rise while the lower part of the distribution stagnates. Adequacy and equality should therefore be considered together, using a secured educational or work-quality minimum where one is defined.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-27-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authorities should trace referral, take-up, job quality and retention. This requires cooperation between education, labour and statistical bodies without blurring their responsibilities. Shared identifiers or linked records can improve sequence evidence where lawful, accurate and proportionate. Linkage error, non-match and privacy risk should be assessed. When linkage is unavailable, compatible aggregates and carefully designed follow-up can still improve understanding. The absence of linkage should not invite unsupported individual inference.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-27-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For long-term unemployed and disadvantaged youth, a successful average may conceal delayed or insecure transition. Monitoring should show entry, completion, time, work quality and return to learning where the source permits. A learner's route should not be judged solely by first destination. Some pathways require longer preparation or serve different educational purposes. The relevant question is whether choices are real, support is accessible and the resulting status offers recognised progression and decent conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-27-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within public employment and placement services, language access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. An employment gap associated with education does not by itself prove the effect of the programme. Economic structure, prior advantage, field, location and selection also matter. Evaluation requires a credible comparison and adequate follow-up. Descriptive evidence remains valuable for locating disparity and monitoring reach when causal claims are restrained. Public reporting should distinguish observation, interpretation and policy consideration. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with language access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-27-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within public employment and placement services, professional capacity determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Movement between academic, vocational and workplace learning requires transparent entry, credit and recognition. Qualifications frameworks can assist communication of levels and outcomes while leaving quality and equivalence to separate evidence. Guidance should explain options and consequences without steering disadvantaged learners automatically toward narrower routes. Learner participation strengthens interpretation of why routes are or are not usable. Institutions should preserve pathways rather than impose a single sequence. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with professional capacity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-28", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-x", "parentId": null, "number": "28", "title": "Gendered pathways", "anchor": "28-gendered-pathways", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-28-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For gendered pathways, the substantive question is differences in field, completion, labour status, pay and care responsibility. The measure should preserve the difference between a current state and movement between states. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-28-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement becomes unsafe when one parity measure can hide occupational segregation and unequal unpaid work. The source should be tested for coverage of institutions, households and mobile populations. Education records describe participants better than non-participants; labour surveys cover residents subject to their frame and response; tracer studies reveal sequence but may lose people who move or fare poorly. Agreement strengthens a conclusion only after definitions and dates are aligned. Disagreement should remain visible and inform further enquiry.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-28-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The operational standard is to report levels, gaps and intersecting conditions. Indicators should be reproducible from stated components and reviewable by the bodies expected to act. A measure collected only for international reporting may arrive too late or at too broad a level for local improvement. A local measure can guide service if its limited scope is explicit. National aggregation should not conceal non-reporting areas or providers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-28-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The equity test concerns young women and men in constrained local markets. Fees, transport, unpaid placements, care responsibilities, inaccessible assessment and documentary requirements can shape both participation and observed outcomes. A formally open route may be unusable. Policy evidence should therefore examine offer, take-up, completion and subsequent status. It should identify people who never entered the measured pathway, not only compare those who completed it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-28-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within gendered pathways, workplace supervision determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Review should examine whether intended participants entered, completed, moved onward and obtained a usable educational or work outcome. It should identify adverse effects, including displacement of other learners or workers and incentives to narrow the denominator. Unresolved cases require an owner. The final account should state remaining uncertainty and next evidence. Completion of a policy cycle means more than movement in a headline indicator. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with workplace supervision.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-28-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within gendered pathways, qualification status determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Cross-country ranks are rarely the most informative output because economic demand, education structure and observation differ. Patterns, distributions and changes within stable definitions can support stronger judgement. A country can improve while remaining unequal; another can show weak short-term employment during downturn despite credible education. The report should name these conditions rather than reward or blame a system through one number. The public conclusion should be bounded by coverage and comparability. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with qualification status.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-29", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-x", "parentId": null, "number": "29", "title": "Household resources and social origin", "anchor": "29-household-resources-and-social-origin", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-29-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A pathway account begins with how economic and educational background shape participation and transition. It should avoid assuming that education exit and stable work form one immediate, irreversible movement. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-29-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main error is that asset groups and parental education are imperfect and context-specific. Numerator, denominator, age, reference date and duration should be kept together. Counts establish scale; rates permit comparison; distributions reveal who waits longest or receives the weakest outcome. A measure should not combine enrolled students, recent leavers and older workers without explaining the different exposure periods. Where status can overlap, such as study and employment, the classification should preserve both conditions before deriving a summary group.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-29-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The construction rule is to state construction and show gradients rather than one poor/non-poor split. Published metadata should include classification, source, collection method, exclusions and revision. ISCED can support programme-level comparison but does not establish equivalence, quality or labour-market value. Labour-force definitions support coherent status measures but should not be reworded casually. Where national categories are mapped to a common scheme, the mapping and residual category should remain available. Precision should not exceed source quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-29-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distributional review must include first-generation learners and poor households. These populations may have different access to programmes, guidance, transport, work networks and accommodation. Disaggregation should describe opportunity and outcome without treating identity as a causal mechanism. Intersections matter: gender, household resources, disability, residence and migration can combine. Where sample sizes are small, broader categories, pooled compatible periods or qualitative service evidence may be appropriate, provided limitations are stated.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-29-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within household resources and social origin, credit value determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Education authorities can address curriculum, guidance, programme access, quality and recognition; labour institutions can address placement, protection and labour information; employers influence workplace learning and recruitment. Coordination is necessary, but a joint initiative should not obscure accountability. Each measure should state expected reach, resource, implementation evidence and review date. Policy use should link the finding to a competent body and a defined condition that can change. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with credit value.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-29-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within household resources and social origin, recognition consistency determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Employment outcomes are material, yet programmes also support further learning, citizenship, personal development and adaptability. Short-term placement in any job should not become the sole judgement of programme value. Conversely, educational quality claims should not ignore repeated evidence that learners cannot progress or use recognised capabilities. A balanced account places labour outcomes beside curriculum, assessment, learner experience and progression rights. Quality should remain educational as well as economic. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with recognition consistency.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-30", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-x", "parentId": null, "number": "30", "title": "Disability and accessible transition", "anchor": "30-disability-and-accessible-transition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-30-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public interest in disability and accessible transition is participation in education, training, guidance and work with necessary accommodation. Evidence should connect education participation to later status without reducing education to short-term employment alone. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-30-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation is constrained because people with disabilities can disappear from both education and labour surveys. Analysts should distinguish programme entry, regular participation, completion, credential receipt, job search, first work and sustained work. These events can occur at different dates and in different orders. A cross-sectional observation should not be described as a completed transition. If retrospective reporting is used, recall period and event definition matter. A duration median should be accompanied by the distribution and treatment of people who have not yet reached the destination.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-30-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible approach will use accessible collection and functional, environmental and support information. The analyst should retain original categories before combining them, because later policy questions may require distinctions hidden by an early aggregation. Sensitivity to plausible definitions should be tested. If the conclusion depends upon an age band, duration threshold or classification choice, that dependence is part of the finding. Revisions should preserve earlier values and distinguish changed evidence from real change.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-30-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for youth requiring reasonable accommodation. Unknown education or work status should not be assigned to the majority group. Proxy reports, inaccessible households and institutional non-reporting can produce patterned missingness. The report should identify where this occurs and which body can improve coverage. Confidentiality and disclosure protection are necessary, but they should lead to controlled analysis rather than a claim that no disparity exists.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-30-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within disability and accessible transition, data comparability determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. These actions require different certainty. Credible evidence of severe exclusion can justify immediate protection before exact prevalence is known, while durable funding formulas should be reviewed as estimates improve. Targets need safeguards against selection of people nearest the threshold. A proportionate response may involve further diagnosis, removal of an access barrier, redistribution of places, improved guidance, workplace standards, recognition reform or evaluation of a programme. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with data comparability.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-30-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within disability and accessible transition, uncertainty determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Outcomes should be observed at more than one interval where feasible. Immediate status may reflect seasonal demand or continued study; later status may show retention, advancement or return to education. Attrition between observations must be reported and adjusted only through stated methods. The people lost to follow-up can differ systematically. A favourable result among respondents should not be presented as the cohort result without analysis. Timing matters. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with uncertainty.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-31", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "31", "title": "Rural and urban opportunity", "anchor": "31-rural-and-urban-opportunity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-31-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The measurement object is pathways shaped by service location, transport and local labour demand. The indicator should be selected only after the population, observation period and intended decision are stated. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-31-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A foreseeable misreading arises where national rural categories conceal remoteness and peri-urban disadvantage. The evidence should show both the level and the underlying population. Similar percentages can represent different numbers and different uncertainty. A ratio may improve because the reference group deteriorates. A mean can rise while the lower part of the distribution stagnates. Adequacy and equality should therefore be considered together, using a secured educational or work-quality minimum where one is defined.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-31-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authorities should join residence with travel time, programme and vacancy evidence. This requires cooperation between education, labour and statistical bodies without blurring their responsibilities. Shared identifiers or linked records can improve sequence evidence where lawful, accurate and proportionate. Linkage error, non-match and privacy risk should be assessed. When linkage is unavailable, compatible aggregates and carefully designed follow-up can still improve understanding. The absence of linkage should not invite unsupported individual inference.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-31-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For remote communities and informal settlements, a successful average may conceal delayed or insecure transition. Monitoring should show entry, completion, time, work quality and return to learning where the source permits. A learner's route should not be judged solely by first destination. Some pathways require longer preparation or serve different educational purposes. The relevant question is whether choices are real, support is accessible and the resulting status offers recognised progression and decent conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-31-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within rural and urban opportunity, implementation reach determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. An employment gap associated with education does not by itself prove the effect of the programme. Economic structure, prior advantage, field, location and selection also matter. Evaluation requires a credible comparison and adequate follow-up. Descriptive evidence remains valuable for locating disparity and monitoring reach when causal claims are restrained. Public reporting should distinguish observation, interpretation and policy consideration. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with implementation reach.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-31-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within rural and urban opportunity, transition timing determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Movement between academic, vocational and workplace learning requires transparent entry, credit and recognition. Qualifications frameworks can assist communication of levels and outcomes while leaving quality and equivalence to separate evidence. Guidance should explain options and consequences without steering disadvantaged learners automatically toward narrower routes. Learner participation strengthens interpretation of why routes are or are not usable. Institutions should preserve pathways rather than impose a single sequence. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with transition timing.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-32", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "32", "title": "Internal and international mobility", "anchor": "32-internal-and-international-mobility", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-32-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Internal and international mobility concerns movement for study or work and the recognition of learning across locations. A national rate is useful context but cannot describe the sequence, duration and quality of every transition. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-32-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement becomes unsafe when destination outcomes can omit costs, unsuccessful movers and those left behind. The source should be tested for coverage of institutions, households and mobile populations. Education records describe participants better than non-participants; labour surveys cover residents subject to their frame and response; tracer studies reveal sequence but may lose people who move or fare poorly. Agreement strengthens a conclusion only after definitions and dates are aligned. Disagreement should remain visible and inform further enquiry.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-32-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The operational standard is to record origin, destination, purpose, duration and recognition. Indicators should be reproducible from stated components and reviewable by the bodies expected to act. A measure collected only for international reporting may arrive too late or at too broad a level for local improvement. A local measure can guide service if its limited scope is explicit. National aggregation should not conceal non-reporting areas or providers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-32-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The equity test concerns migrants and mobile students. Fees, transport, unpaid placements, care responsibilities, inaccessible assessment and documentary requirements can shape both participation and observed outcomes. A formally open route may be unusable. Policy evidence should therefore examine offer, take-up, completion and subsequent status. It should identify people who never entered the measured pathway, not only compare those who completed it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-32-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within internal and international mobility, employment quality determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Review should examine whether intended participants entered, completed, moved onward and obtained a usable educational or work outcome. It should identify adverse effects, including displacement of other learners or workers and incentives to narrow the denominator. Unresolved cases require an owner. The final account should state remaining uncertainty and next evidence. Completion of a policy cycle means more than movement in a headline indicator. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with employment quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-32-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within internal and international mobility, learner protection determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Cross-country ranks are rarely the most informative output because economic demand, education structure and observation differ. Patterns, distributions and changes within stable definitions can support stronger judgement. A country can improve while remaining unequal; another can show weak short-term employment during downturn despite credible education. The report should name these conditions rather than reward or blame a system through one number. The public conclusion should be bounded by coverage and comparability. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with learner protection.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-33", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "33", "title": "Conflict, displacement and fragile institutions", "anchor": "33-conflict-displacement-and-fragile-institutions", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-33-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For conflict, displacement and fragile institutions, the substantive question is pathways interrupted by insecurity, documentation loss and weak public services. The measure should preserve the difference between a current state and movement between states. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-33-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main error is that ordinary comparison can blame learners for institutional disruption. Numerator, denominator, age, reference date and duration should be kept together. Counts establish scale; rates permit comparison; distributions reveal who waits longest or receives the weakest outcome. A measure should not combine enrolled students, recent leavers and older workers without explaining the different exposure periods. Where status can overlap, such as study and employment, the classification should preserve both conditions before deriving a summary group.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-33-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The construction rule is to date exposure, service loss and current access. Published metadata should include classification, source, collection method, exclusions and revision. ISCED can support programme-level comparison but does not establish equivalence, quality or labour-market value. Labour-force definitions support coherent status measures but should not be reworded casually. Where national categories are mapped to a common scheme, the mapping and residual category should remain available. Precision should not exceed source quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-33-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distributional review must include refugees, displaced persons and host communities. These populations may have different access to programmes, guidance, transport, work networks and accommodation. Disaggregation should describe opportunity and outcome without treating identity as a causal mechanism. Intersections matter: gender, household resources, disability, residence and migration can combine. Where sample sizes are small, broader categories, pooled compatible periods or qualitative service evidence may be appropriate, provided limitations are stated.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-33-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within conflict, displacement and fragile institutions, public information determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Education authorities can address curriculum, guidance, programme access, quality and recognition; labour institutions can address placement, protection and labour information; employers influence workplace learning and recruitment. Coordination is necessary, but a joint initiative should not obscure accountability. Each measure should state expected reach, resource, implementation evidence and review date. Policy use should link the finding to a competent body and a defined condition that can change. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with public information.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-33-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within conflict, displacement and fragile institutions, provider responsibility determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Employment outcomes are material, yet programmes also support further learning, citizenship, personal development and adaptability. Short-term placement in any job should not become the sole judgement of programme value. Conversely, educational quality claims should not ignore repeated evidence that learners cannot progress or use recognised capabilities. A balanced account places labour outcomes beside curriculum, assessment, learner experience and progression rights. Quality should remain educational as well as economic. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with provider responsibility.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-34", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "34", "title": "Qualifications frameworks and indicator use", "anchor": "34-qualifications-frameworks-and-indicator-use", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-34-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A pathway account begins with classification of levels and learning outcomes for transparency. It should avoid assuming that education exit and stable work form one immediate, irreversible movement. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-34-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation is constrained because framework placement does not prove programme quality or labour-market value. Analysts should distinguish programme entry, regular participation, completion, credential receipt, job search, first work and sustained work. These events can occur at different dates and in different orders. A cross-sectional observation should not be described as a completed transition. If retrospective reporting is used, recall period and event definition matter. A duration median should be accompanied by the distribution and treatment of people who have not yet reached the destination.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-34-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible approach will separate level description, quality assurance, recognition and outcome evidence. The analyst should retain original categories before combining them, because later policy questions may require distinctions hidden by an early aggregation. Sensitivity to plausible definitions should be tested. If the conclusion depends upon an age band, duration threshold or classification choice, that dependence is part of the finding. Revisions should preserve earlier values and distinguish changed evidence from real change.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-34-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for holders of new or unfamiliar qualifications. Unknown education or work status should not be assigned to the majority group. Proxy reports, inaccessible households and institutional non-reporting can produce patterned missingness. The report should identify where this occurs and which body can improve coverage. Confidentiality and disclosure protection are necessary, but they should lead to controlled analysis rather than a claim that no disparity exists.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-34-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within qualifications frameworks and indicator use, financial adequacy determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. These actions require different certainty. Credible evidence of severe exclusion can justify immediate protection before exact prevalence is known, while durable funding formulas should be reviewed as estimates improve. Targets need safeguards against selection of people nearest the threshold. A proportionate response may involve further diagnosis, removal of an access barrier, redistribution of places, improved guidance, workplace standards, recognition reform or evaluation of a programme. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with financial adequacy.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-34-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within qualifications frameworks and indicator use, monitoring frequency determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Outcomes should be observed at more than one interval where feasible. Immediate status may reflect seasonal demand or continued study; later status may show retention, advancement or return to education. Attrition between observations must be reported and adjusted only through stated methods. The people lost to follow-up can differ systematically. A favourable result among respondents should not be presented as the cohort result without analysis. Timing matters. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with monitoring frequency.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-35", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "35", "title": "Recognition of prior and non-formal learning", "anchor": "35-recognition-of-prior-and-non-formal-learning", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-35-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public interest in recognition of prior and non-formal learning is formal acknowledgement of capabilities acquired outside ordinary programmes. Evidence should connect education participation to later status without reducing education to short-term employment alone. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-35-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A foreseeable misreading arises where recognition counts can hide narrow scope or inaccessible procedure. The evidence should show both the level and the underlying population. Similar percentages can represent different numbers and different uncertainty. A ratio may improve because the reference group deteriorates. A mean can rise while the lower part of the distribution stagnates. Adequacy and equality should therefore be considered together, using a secured educational or work-quality minimum where one is defined.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-35-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authorities should report applications, evidence, decisions, credit and continuation. This requires cooperation between education, labour and statistical bodies without blurring their responsibilities. Shared identifiers or linked records can improve sequence evidence where lawful, accurate and proportionate. Linkage error, non-match and privacy risk should be assessed. When linkage is unavailable, compatible aggregates and carefully designed follow-up can still improve understanding. The absence of linkage should not invite unsupported individual inference.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-35-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For workers returning to learning, a successful average may conceal delayed or insecure transition. Monitoring should show entry, completion, time, work quality and return to learning where the source permits. A learner's route should not be judged solely by first destination. Some pathways require longer preparation or serve different educational purposes. The relevant question is whether choices are real, support is accessible and the resulting status offers recognised progression and decent conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-35-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within recognition of prior and non-formal learning, unequal effect determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. An employment gap associated with education does not by itself prove the effect of the programme. Economic structure, prior advantage, field, location and selection also matter. Evaluation requires a credible comparison and adequate follow-up. Descriptive evidence remains valuable for locating disparity and monitoring reach when causal claims are restrained. Public reporting should distinguish observation, interpretation and policy consideration. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with unequal effect.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-35-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within recognition of prior and non-formal learning, reversibility determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Movement between academic, vocational and workplace learning requires transparent entry, credit and recognition. Qualifications frameworks can assist communication of levels and outcomes while leaving quality and equivalence to separate evidence. Guidance should explain options and consequences without steering disadvantaged learners automatically toward narrower routes. Learner participation strengthens interpretation of why routes are or are not usable. Institutions should preserve pathways rather than impose a single sequence. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with reversibility.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-36", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "36", "title": "Quality assurance and public confidence", "anchor": "36-quality-assurance-and-public-confidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-36-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The measurement object is whether programmes and awards meet stated educational purposes. The indicator should be selected only after the population, observation period and intended decision are stated. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-36-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement becomes unsafe when employment rates can be used as the sole quality judgement. The source should be tested for coverage of institutions, households and mobile populations. Education records describe participants better than non-participants; labour surveys cover residents subject to their frame and response; tracer studies reveal sequence but may lose people who move or fare poorly. Agreement strengthens a conclusion only after definitions and dates are aligned. Disagreement should remain visible and inform further enquiry.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-36-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The operational standard is to combine educational standards, learner outcomes and contextual labour evidence. Indicators should be reproducible from stated components and reviewable by the bodies expected to act. A measure collected only for international reporting may arrive too late or at too broad a level for local improvement. A local measure can guide service if its limited scope is explicit. National aggregation should not conceal non-reporting areas or providers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-36-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The equity test concerns programmes serving weak regional economies. Fees, transport, unpaid placements, care responsibilities, inaccessible assessment and documentary requirements can shape both participation and observed outcomes. A formally open route may be unusable. Policy evidence should therefore examine offer, take-up, completion and subsequent status. It should identify people who never entered the measured pathway, not only compare those who completed it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-36-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within quality assurance and public confidence, continuity determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Review should examine whether intended participants entered, completed, moved onward and obtained a usable educational or work outcome. It should identify adverse effects, including displacement of other learners or workers and incentives to narrow the denominator. Unresolved cases require an owner. The final account should state remaining uncertainty and next evidence. Completion of a policy cycle means more than movement in a headline indicator. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with continuity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-36-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within quality assurance and public confidence, complaint access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Cross-country ranks are rarely the most informative output because economic demand, education structure and observation differ. Patterns, distributions and changes within stable definitions can support stronger judgement. A country can improve while remaining unequal; another can show weak short-term employment during downturn despite credible education. The report should name these conditions rather than reward or blame a system through one number. The public conclusion should be bounded by coverage and comparability. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with complaint access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-37", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "37", "title": "Education administrative data", "anchor": "37-education-administrative-data", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-37-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Education administrative data concerns regular records of programmes, learners, completion and awards. A national rate is useful context but cannot describe the sequence, duration and quality of every transition. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-37-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main error is that systems omit non-participants and can differ in programme classification. Numerator, denominator, age, reference date and duration should be kept together. Counts establish scale; rates permit comparison; distributions reveal who waits longest or receives the weakest outcome. A measure should not combine enrolled students, recent leavers and older workers without explaining the different exposure periods. Where status can overlap, such as study and employment, the classification should preserve both conditions before deriving a summary group.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-37-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The construction rule is to state coverage, revision and non-reporting institutions. Published metadata should include classification, source, collection method, exclusions and revision. ISCED can support programme-level comparison but does not establish equivalence, quality or labour-market value. Labour-force definitions support coherent status measures but should not be reworded casually. Where national categories are mapped to a common scheme, the mapping and residual category should remain available. Precision should not exceed source quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-37-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distributional review must include private, non-formal and work-based providers. These populations may have different access to programmes, guidance, transport, work networks and accommodation. Disaggregation should describe opportunity and outcome without treating identity as a causal mechanism. Intersections matter: gender, household resources, disability, residence and migration can combine. Where sample sizes are small, broader categories, pooled compatible periods or qualitative service evidence may be appropriate, provided limitations are stated.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-37-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within education administrative data, record correction determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Education authorities can address curriculum, guidance, programme access, quality and recognition; labour institutions can address placement, protection and labour information; employers influence workplace learning and recruitment. Coordination is necessary, but a joint initiative should not obscure accountability. Each measure should state expected reach, resource, implementation evidence and review date. Policy use should link the finding to a competent body and a defined condition that can change. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with record correction.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-37-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within education administrative data, institutional dependency determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Employment outcomes are material, yet programmes also support further learning, citizenship, personal development and adaptability. Short-term placement in any job should not become the sole judgement of programme value. Conversely, educational quality claims should not ignore repeated evidence that learners cannot progress or use recognised capabilities. A balanced account places labour outcomes beside curriculum, assessment, learner experience and progression rights. Quality should remain educational as well as economic. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with institutional dependency.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-38", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "38", "title": "Labour-force and household surveys", "anchor": "38-labour-force-and-household-surveys", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-38-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For labour-force and household surveys, the substantive question is population-based education and work status. The measure should preserve the difference between a current state and movement between states. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-38-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation is constrained because sample size, proxy response and field access constrain youth subgroup estimates. Analysts should distinguish programme entry, regular participation, completion, credential receipt, job search, first work and sustained work. These events can occur at different dates and in different orders. A cross-sectional observation should not be described as a completed transition. If retrospective reporting is used, recall period and event definition matter. A duration median should be accompanied by the distribution and treatment of people who have not yet reached the destination.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-38-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible approach will report weights, uncertainty, non-response and question wording. The analyst should retain original categories before combining them, because later policy questions may require distinctions hidden by an early aggregation. Sensitivity to plausible definitions should be tested. If the conclusion depends upon an age band, duration threshold or classification choice, that dependence is part of the finding. Revisions should preserve earlier values and distinguish changed evidence from real change.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-38-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for small groups and mobile households. Unknown education or work status should not be assigned to the majority group. Proxy reports, inaccessible households and institutional non-reporting can produce patterned missingness. The report should identify where this occurs and which body can improve coverage. Confidentiality and disclosure protection are necessary, but they should lead to controlled analysis rather than a claim that no disparity exists.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-38-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within labour-force and household surveys, local verification determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. These actions require different certainty. Credible evidence of severe exclusion can justify immediate protection before exact prevalence is known, while durable funding formulas should be reviewed as estimates improve. Targets need safeguards against selection of people nearest the threshold. A proportionate response may involve further diagnosis, removal of an access barrier, redistribution of places, improved guidance, workplace standards, recognition reform or evaluation of a programme. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with local verification.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-38-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within labour-force and household surveys, progression determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Outcomes should be observed at more than one interval where feasible. Immediate status may reflect seasonal demand or continued study; later status may show retention, advancement or return to education. Attrition between observations must be reported and adjusted only through stated methods. The people lost to follow-up can differ systematically. A favourable result among respondents should not be presented as the cohort result without analysis. Timing matters. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with progression.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-39", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "39", "title": "Longitudinal and tracer evidence", "anchor": "39-longitudinal-and-tracer-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-39-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A pathway account begins with individual sequences from education through later states. It should avoid assuming that education exit and stable work form one immediate, irreversible movement. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-39-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A foreseeable misreading arises where attrition can selectively remove the least successful and most mobile. The evidence should show both the level and the underlying population. Similar percentages can represent different numbers and different uncertainty. A ratio may improve because the reference group deteriorates. A mean can rise while the lower part of the distribution stagnates. Adequacy and equality should therefore be considered together, using a secured educational or work-quality minimum where one is defined.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-39-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authorities should publish starting cohort, follow-up, weights and loss analysis. This requires cooperation between education, labour and statistical bodies without blurring their responsibilities. Shared identifiers or linked records can improve sequence evidence where lawful, accurate and proportionate. Linkage error, non-match and privacy risk should be assessed. When linkage is unavailable, compatible aggregates and carefully designed follow-up can still improve understanding. The absence of linkage should not invite unsupported individual inference.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-39-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For migrants and people outside stable addresses, a successful average may conceal delayed or insecure transition. Monitoring should show entry, completion, time, work quality and return to learning where the source permits. A learner's route should not be judged solely by first destination. Some pathways require longer preparation or serve different educational purposes. The relevant question is whether choices are real, support is accessible and the resulting status offers recognised progression and decent conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-39-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within longitudinal and tracer evidence, completion determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. An employment gap associated with education does not by itself prove the effect of the programme. Economic structure, prior advantage, field, location and selection also matter. Evaluation requires a credible comparison and adequate follow-up. Descriptive evidence remains valuable for locating disparity and monitoring reach when causal claims are restrained. Public reporting should distinguish observation, interpretation and policy consideration. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with completion.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-39-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within longitudinal and tracer evidence, later destination determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Movement between academic, vocational and workplace learning requires transparent entry, credit and recognition. Qualifications frameworks can assist communication of levels and outcomes while leaving quality and equivalence to separate evidence. Guidance should explain options and consequences without steering disadvantaged learners automatically toward narrower routes. Learner participation strengthens interpretation of why routes are or are not usable. Institutions should preserve pathways rather than impose a single sequence. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with later destination.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-40", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "40", "title": "Comparing outcomes across countries", "anchor": "40-comparing-outcomes-across-countries", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-40-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public interest in comparing outcomes across countries is bounded comparison using harmonised education and labour concepts. Evidence should connect education participation to later status without reducing education to short-term employment alone. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-40-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement becomes unsafe when programme structure, economy and business cycle differ. The source should be tested for coverage of institutions, households and mobile populations. Education records describe participants better than non-participants; labour surveys cover residents subject to their frame and response; tracer studies reveal sequence but may lose people who move or fare poorly. Agreement strengthens a conclusion only after definitions and dates are aligned. Disagreement should remain visible and inform further enquiry.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-40-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The operational standard is to test metadata before comparing levels or ranks. Indicators should be reproducible from stated components and reviewable by the bodies expected to act. A measure collected only for international reporting may arrive too late or at too broad a level for local improvement. A local measure can guide service if its limited scope is explicit. National aggregation should not conceal non-reporting areas or providers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-40-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The equity test concerns small or rapidly changing systems. Fees, transport, unpaid placements, care responsibilities, inaccessible assessment and documentary requirements can shape both participation and observed outcomes. A formally open route may be unusable. Policy evidence should therefore examine offer, take-up, completion and subsequent status. It should identify people who never entered the measured pathway, not only compare those who completed it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-40-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within comparing outcomes across countries, policy attribution determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Review should examine whether intended participants entered, completed, moved onward and obtained a usable educational or work outcome. It should identify adverse effects, including displacement of other learners or workers and incentives to narrow the denominator. Unresolved cases require an owner. The final account should state remaining uncertainty and next evidence. Completion of a policy cycle means more than movement in a headline indicator. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with policy attribution.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-40-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within comparing outcomes across countries, review responsibility determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Cross-country ranks are rarely the most informative output because economic demand, education structure and observation differ. Patterns, distributions and changes within stable definitions can support stronger judgement. A country can improve while remaining unequal; another can show weak short-term employment during downturn despite credible education. The report should name these conditions rather than reward or blame a system through one number. The public conclusion should be bounded by coverage and comparability. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with review responsibility.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-41", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "41", "title": "Education effects and selection", "anchor": "41-education-effects-and-selection", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-41-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The measurement object is the relationship between attainment and later work outcomes. The indicator should be selected only after the population, observation period and intended decision are stated. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-41-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main error is that observed differences reflect prior advantage, field, place and labour demand as well as education. Numerator, denominator, age, reference date and duration should be kept together. Counts establish scale; rates permit comparison; distributions reveal who waits longest or receives the weakest outcome. A measure should not combine enrolled students, recent leavers and older workers without explaining the different exposure periods. Where status can overlap, such as study and employment, the classification should preserve both conditions before deriving a summary group.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-41-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The construction rule is to distinguish description from causal evaluation. Published metadata should include classification, source, collection method, exclusions and revision. ISCED can support programme-level comparison but does not establish equivalence, quality or labour-market value. Labour-force definitions support coherent status measures but should not be reworded casually. Where national categories are mapped to a common scheme, the mapping and residual category should remain available. Precision should not exceed source quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-41-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distributional review must include groups selected into different pathways. These populations may have different access to programmes, guidance, transport, work networks and accommodation. Disaggregation should describe opportunity and outcome without treating identity as a causal mechanism. Intersections matter: gender, household resources, disability, residence and migration can combine. Where sample sizes are small, broader categories, pooled compatible periods or qualitative service evidence may be appropriate, provided limitations are stated.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-41-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within education effects and selection, authority determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Education authorities can address curriculum, guidance, programme access, quality and recognition; labour institutions can address placement, protection and labour information; employers influence workplace learning and recruitment. Coordination is necessary, but a joint initiative should not obscure accountability. Each measure should state expected reach, resource, implementation evidence and review date. Policy use should link the finding to a competent body and a defined condition that can change. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with authority.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-41-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within education effects and selection, population coverage determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Employment outcomes are material, yet programmes also support further learning, citizenship, personal development and adaptability. Short-term placement in any job should not become the sole judgement of programme value. Conversely, educational quality claims should not ignore repeated evidence that learners cannot progress or use recognised capabilities. A balanced account places labour outcomes beside curriculum, assessment, learner experience and progression rights. Quality should remain educational as well as economic. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with population coverage.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-42", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "42", "title": "Economic cycle and cohort conditions", "anchor": "42-economic-cycle-and-cohort-conditions", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-42-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Economic cycle and cohort conditions concerns transition outcomes under changing demand and public finance. A national rate is useful context but cannot describe the sequence, duration and quality of every transition. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-42-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation is constrained because one graduating cohort can face conditions unlike the preceding or following cohort. Analysts should distinguish programme entry, regular participation, completion, credential receipt, job search, first work and sustained work. These events can occur at different dates and in different orders. A cross-sectional observation should not be described as a completed transition. If retrospective reporting is used, recall period and event definition matter. A duration median should be accompanied by the distribution and treatment of people who have not yet reached the destination.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-42-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible approach will attach macroeconomic and local context to the observation. The analyst should retain original categories before combining them, because later policy questions may require distinctions hidden by an early aggregation. Sensitivity to plausible definitions should be tested. If the conclusion depends upon an age band, duration threshold or classification choice, that dependence is part of the finding. Revisions should preserve earlier values and distinguish changed evidence from real change.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-42-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for youth entering work during downturn. Unknown education or work status should not be assigned to the majority group. Proxy reports, inaccessible households and institutional non-reporting can produce patterned missingness. The report should identify where this occurs and which body can improve coverage. Confidentiality and disclosure protection are necessary, but they should lead to controlled analysis rather than a claim that no disparity exists.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-42-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within economic cycle and cohort conditions, eligibility determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. These actions require different certainty. Credible evidence of severe exclusion can justify immediate protection before exact prevalence is known, while durable funding formulas should be reviewed as estimates improve. Targets need safeguards against selection of people nearest the threshold. A proportionate response may involve further diagnosis, removal of an access barrier, redistribution of places, improved guidance, workplace standards, recognition reform or evaluation of a programme. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with eligibility.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-42-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within economic cycle and cohort conditions, practical access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Outcomes should be observed at more than one interval where feasible. Immediate status may reflect seasonal demand or continued study; later status may show retention, advancement or return to education. Attrition between observations must be reported and adjusted only through stated methods. The people lost to follow-up can differ systematically. A favourable result among respondents should not be presented as the cohort result without analysis. Timing matters. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with practical access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-43", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "43", "title": "Balanced pathway indicators", "anchor": "43-balanced-pathway-indicators", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-43-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For balanced pathway indicators, the substantive question is a concise set spanning education, transition, work quality and distribution. The measure should preserve the difference between a current state and movement between states. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-43-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A foreseeable misreading arises where one headline rate can redirect behaviour and conceal trade-offs. The evidence should show both the level and the underlying population. Similar percentages can represent different numbers and different uncertainty. A ratio may improve because the reference group deteriorates. A mean can rise while the lower part of the distribution stagnates. Adequacy and equality should therefore be considered together, using a secured educational or work-quality minimum where one is defined.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-43-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authorities should publish a dashboard in prose with clear hierarchy and no composite ranking. This requires cooperation between education, labour and statistical bodies without blurring their responsibilities. Shared identifiers or linked records can improve sequence evidence where lawful, accurate and proportionate. Linkage error, non-match and privacy risk should be assessed. When linkage is unavailable, compatible aggregates and carefully designed follow-up can still improve understanding. The absence of linkage should not invite unsupported individual inference.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-43-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For decision-makers allocating education and employment support, a successful average may conceal delayed or insecure transition. Monitoring should show entry, completion, time, work quality and return to learning where the source permits. A learner's route should not be judged solely by first destination. Some pathways require longer preparation or serve different educational purposes. The relevant question is whether choices are real, support is accessible and the resulting status offers recognised progression and decent conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-43-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within balanced pathway indicators, educational purpose determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. An employment gap associated with education does not by itself prove the effect of the programme. Economic structure, prior advantage, field, location and selection also matter. Evaluation requires a credible comparison and adequate follow-up. Descriptive evidence remains valuable for locating disparity and monitoring reach when causal claims are restrained. Public reporting should distinguish observation, interpretation and policy consideration. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with educational purpose.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-43-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within balanced pathway indicators, curriculum coherence determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Movement between academic, vocational and workplace learning requires transparent entry, credit and recognition. Qualifications frameworks can assist communication of levels and outcomes while leaving quality and equivalence to separate evidence. Guidance should explain options and consequences without steering disadvantaged learners automatically toward narrower routes. Learner participation strengthens interpretation of why routes are or are not usable. Institutions should preserve pathways rather than impose a single sequence. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with curriculum coherence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-44", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "44", "title": "Targets and safeguards", "anchor": "44-targets-and-safeguards", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-44-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A pathway account begins with measurable improvement without exclusion or lowered standards. It should avoid assuming that education exit and stable work form one immediate, irreversible movement. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-44-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement becomes unsafe when providers may concentrate on people nearest a target. The source should be tested for coverage of institutions, households and mobile populations. Education records describe participants better than non-participants; labour surveys cover residents subject to their frame and response; tracer studies reveal sequence but may lose people who move or fare poorly. Agreement strengthens a conclusion only after definitions and dates are aligned. Disagreement should remain visible and inform further enquiry.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-44-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The operational standard is to protect minimum entitlement and report the least-served position. Indicators should be reproducible from stated components and reviewable by the bodies expected to act. A measure collected only for international reporting may arrive too late or at too broad a level for local improvement. A local measure can guide service if its limited scope is explicit. National aggregation should not conceal non-reporting areas or providers.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-44-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The equity test concerns young people facing multiple barriers. Fees, transport, unpaid placements, care responsibilities, inaccessible assessment and documentary requirements can shape both participation and observed outcomes. A formally open route may be unusable. Policy evidence should therefore examine offer, take-up, completion and subsequent status. It should identify people who never entered the measured pathway, not only compare those who completed it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-44-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within targets and safeguards, assessment validity determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Review should examine whether intended participants entered, completed, moved onward and obtained a usable educational or work outcome. It should identify adverse effects, including displacement of other learners or workers and incentives to narrow the denominator. Unresolved cases require an owner. The final account should state remaining uncertainty and next evidence. Completion of a policy cycle means more than movement in a headline indicator. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with assessment validity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-44-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within targets and safeguards, source reliability determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Cross-country ranks are rarely the most informative output because economic demand, education structure and observation differ. Patterns, distributions and changes within stable definitions can support stronger judgement. A country can improve while remaining unequal; another can show weak short-term employment during downturn despite credible education. The report should name these conditions rather than reward or blame a system through one number. The public conclusion should be bounded by coverage and comparability. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with source reliability.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-45", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "45", "title": "The public transition account", "anchor": "45-the-public-transition-account", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-45-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public interest in the public transition account is an annual explanation of level, distribution, uncertainty, response and review. Evidence should connect education participation to later status without reducing education to short-term employment alone. Evidence should preserve educational meaning and later work conditions rather than force every person into one linear route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-45-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main error is that statistics can be detached from authority and practical remedy. Numerator, denominator, age, reference date and duration should be kept together. Counts establish scale; rates permit comparison; distributions reveal who waits longest or receives the weakest outcome. A measure should not combine enrolled students, recent leavers and older workers without explaining the different exposure periods. Where status can overlap, such as study and employment, the classification should preserve both conditions before deriving a summary group.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-45-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The construction rule is to name responsible bodies and next evidence. Published metadata should include classification, source, collection method, exclusions and revision. ISCED can support programme-level comparison but does not establish equivalence, quality or labour-market value. Labour-force definitions support coherent status measures but should not be reworded casually. Where national categories are mapped to a common scheme, the mapping and residual category should remain available. Precision should not exceed source quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-22" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-45-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distributional review must include learners and workers whose routes remain unresolved. These populations may have different access to programmes, guidance, transport, work networks and accommodation. Disaggregation should describe opportunity and outcome without treating identity as a causal mechanism. Intersections matter: gender, household resources, disability, residence and migration can combine. Where sample sizes are small, broader categories, pooled compatible periods or qualitative service evidence may be appropriate, provided limitations are stated.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-45-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within the public transition account, reference period determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Education authorities can address curriculum, guidance, programme access, quality and recognition; labour institutions can address placement, protection and labour information; employers influence workplace learning and recruitment. Coordination is necessary, but a joint initiative should not obscure accountability. Each measure should state expected reach, resource, implementation evidence and review date. Policy use should link the finding to a competent body and a defined condition that can change. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with reference period.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-45-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within the public transition account, geographic distribution determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Employment outcomes are material, yet programmes also support further learning, citizenship, personal development and adaptability. Short-term placement in any job should not become the sole judgement of programme value. Conversely, educational quality claims should not ignore repeated evidence that learners cannot progress or use recognised capabilities. A balanced account places labour outcomes beside curriculum, assessment, learner experience and progression rights. Quality should remain educational as well as economic. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with geographic distribution.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-46", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "46", "title": "Secondary leavers over eighteen months", "anchor": "46-secondary-leavers-over-eighteen-months", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-46-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The study population is a defined cohort completing or leaving upper secondary education. It should be enumerated at the starting event before later status is known. This protects the denominator from being limited to people who can be contacted or who enter a recorded destination. Entry criteria, dates, age and programme classification should be retained. People transferring, emigrating, returning to study or declining follow-up remain part of the cohort, with status recorded as known or unknown. If a comparison group is used, its eligibility and observation period should be aligned rather than selected after outcomes appear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-46-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The essential observations are study, job search, first work, return to learning and status at several intervals. Each is a separate variable with its own date and definition. First work should not be substituted for sustained work, and current study should not erase earlier job search. Multiple status should be permitted where a person combines learning and employment. Sequence can be represented through events and spells, while a concise public account may report selected transitions. The underlying chronology should remain available for analysis so that temporary states, reversals and delayed entry are not forced into one destination category.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-46-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological limitations are loss to follow-up, temporary work and different local demand. They should be anticipated in sampling, collection and interpretation. Baseline variables can support analysis of later non-response, although weighting cannot remove all bias. Economic and institutional context should accompany cohort outcomes. A difference between programmes may reflect selection, field, region or employer demand. Descriptive results should therefore be presented as pathway evidence, while programme-effect claims require a suitable design and testing of alternative explanations.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-46-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within secondary leavers over eighteen months, household burden determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Single-axis results may conceal intersections, yet small cells can become unstable or disclose identity. The report should state suppression and grouping decisions. Unknown category values should not be assigned to the majority. Participation in the study itself should be accessible in relevant languages and formats. Proxy response may be necessary but should be identified because knowledge of job search, work quality or accommodation may be limited. Distributional analysis should consider gender, household resources, disability, residence, migration and prior attainment where lawful and sufficiently reliable. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with household burden.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-46-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within secondary leavers over eighteen months, disability access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. For employment they include hours, desired hours, contract, earnings, protection, safety, task content, training and retention. For education they include programme purpose, teaching, assessment, recognised award and progression rights. Not every source can collect every dimension. A short instrument should prioritise the decision and avoid claiming broad quality from a minimal item. Subjective assessment can add information about choice or task use, but it should not replace observable conditions or be interpreted outside its wording and context. Quality indicators belong beside status. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with disability access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09", "REF-10" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-46-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within secondary leavers over eighteen months, language access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. A long search period may call for better information, transport, placement or stronger demand; non-completion may concern programme access, teaching, assessment or household cost. The indicator does not choose among these explanations. Follow-up should combine the observed pattern with institutional and participant evidence. The selected response should state intended population, resources and review. Targets should guard against selection of people most likely to succeed and should report people who never entered the supported route. Policy use requires an authority and a plausible lever. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with language access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-46-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within secondary leavers over eighteen months, professional capacity determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Revisions to education classification, labour questions or population estimates should be marked. A result should not be ranked across countries until metadata, economic conditions and coverage have been tested. The conclusion should state what the evidence demonstrates and what remains interpretive. Completion of the reporting cycle occurs when findings enter a decision, later evidence tests reach and quality, and unresolved barriers remain assigned rather than disappearing from the next headline. Public reporting should preserve population, period, counts, rates, distribution, uncertainty and remaining unknowns. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with professional capacity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-47", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "47", "title": "Vocational completers and workplace learning", "anchor": "47-vocational-completers-and-workplace-learning", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-47-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The study population is completers from specified occupational programmes. It should be enumerated at the starting event before later status is known. This protects the denominator from being limited to people who can be contacted or who enter a recorded destination. Entry criteria, dates, age and programme classification should be retained. People transferring, emigrating, returning to study or declining follow-up remain part of the cohort, with status recorded as known or unknown. If a comparison group is used, its eligibility and observation period should be aligned rather than selected after outcomes appear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-47-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The essential observations are award, apprenticeship history, field, job tasks, contract, training and retention. Each is a separate variable with its own date and definition. First work should not be substituted for sustained work, and current study should not erase earlier job search. Multiple status should be permitted where a person combines learning and employment. Sequence can be represented through events and spells, while a concise public account may report selected transitions. The underlying chronology should remain available for analysis so that temporary states, reversals and delayed entry are not forced into one destination category.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-47-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological limitations are provider selection, employer participation and informal work. They should be anticipated in sampling, collection and interpretation. Baseline variables can support analysis of later non-response, although weighting cannot remove all bias. Economic and institutional context should accompany cohort outcomes. A difference between programmes may reflect selection, field, region or employer demand. Descriptive results should therefore be presented as pathway evidence, while programme-effect claims require a suitable design and testing of alternative explanations.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-47-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within vocational completers and workplace learning, workplace supervision determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Single-axis results may conceal intersections, yet small cells can become unstable or disclose identity. The report should state suppression and grouping decisions. Unknown category values should not be assigned to the majority. Participation in the study itself should be accessible in relevant languages and formats. Proxy response may be necessary but should be identified because knowledge of job search, work quality or accommodation may be limited. Distributional analysis should consider gender, household resources, disability, residence, migration and prior attainment where lawful and sufficiently reliable. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with workplace supervision.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09", "REF-10" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-47-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within vocational completers and workplace learning, qualification status determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. For employment they include hours, desired hours, contract, earnings, protection, safety, task content, training and retention. For education they include programme purpose, teaching, assessment, recognised award and progression rights. Not every source can collect every dimension. A short instrument should prioritise the decision and avoid claiming broad quality from a minimal item. Subjective assessment can add information about choice or task use, but it should not replace observable conditions or be interpreted outside its wording and context. Quality indicators belong beside status. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with qualification status.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-47-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within vocational completers and workplace learning, credit value determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. A long search period may call for better information, transport, placement or stronger demand; non-completion may concern programme access, teaching, assessment or household cost. The indicator does not choose among these explanations. Follow-up should combine the observed pattern with institutional and participant evidence. The selected response should state intended population, resources and review. Targets should guard against selection of people most likely to succeed and should report people who never entered the supported route. Policy use requires an authority and a plausible lever. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with credit value.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-47-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within vocational completers and workplace learning, recognition consistency determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Revisions to education classification, labour questions or population estimates should be marked. A result should not be ranked across countries until metadata, economic conditions and coverage have been tested. The conclusion should state what the evidence demonstrates and what remains interpretive. Completion of the reporting cycle occurs when findings enter a decision, later evidence tests reach and quality, and unresolved barriers remain assigned rather than disappearing from the next headline. Public reporting should preserve population, period, counts, rates, distribution, uncertainty and remaining unknowns. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with recognition consistency.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-48", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "48", "title": "Higher-education graduates by field and route", "anchor": "48-higher-education-graduates-by-field-and-route", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-48-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The study population is graduates from academic, professional and shorter-cycle programmes. It should be enumerated at the starting event before later status is known. This protects the denominator from being limited to people who can be contacted or who enter a recorded destination. Entry criteria, dates, age and programme classification should be retained. People transferring, emigrating, returning to study or declining follow-up remain part of the cohort, with status recorded as known or unknown. If a comparison group is used, its eligibility and observation period should be aligned rather than selected after outcomes appear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-48-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The essential observations are prior route, field, award, search, destination, pay and further study. Each is a separate variable with its own date and definition. First work should not be substituted for sustained work, and current study should not erase earlier job search. Multiple status should be permitted where a person combines learning and employment. Sequence can be represented through events and spells, while a concise public account may report selected transitions. The underlying chronology should remain available for analysis so that temporary states, reversals and delayed entry are not forced into one destination category.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-48-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological limitations are programme duration, mobility and postgraduate continuation. They should be anticipated in sampling, collection and interpretation. Baseline variables can support analysis of later non-response, although weighting cannot remove all bias. Economic and institutional context should accompany cohort outcomes. A difference between programmes may reflect selection, field, region or employer demand. Descriptive results should therefore be presented as pathway evidence, while programme-effect claims require a suitable design and testing of alternative explanations.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09", "REF-10" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-48-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within higher-education graduates by field and route, data comparability determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Single-axis results may conceal intersections, yet small cells can become unstable or disclose identity. The report should state suppression and grouping decisions. Unknown category values should not be assigned to the majority. Participation in the study itself should be accessible in relevant languages and formats. Proxy response may be necessary but should be identified because knowledge of job search, work quality or accommodation may be limited. Distributional analysis should consider gender, household resources, disability, residence, migration and prior attainment where lawful and sufficiently reliable. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with data comparability.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-48-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within higher-education graduates by field and route, uncertainty determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. For employment they include hours, desired hours, contract, earnings, protection, safety, task content, training and retention. For education they include programme purpose, teaching, assessment, recognised award and progression rights. Not every source can collect every dimension. A short instrument should prioritise the decision and avoid claiming broad quality from a minimal item. Subjective assessment can add information about choice or task use, but it should not replace observable conditions or be interpreted outside its wording and context. Quality indicators belong beside status. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with uncertainty.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-48-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within higher-education graduates by field and route, implementation reach determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. A long search period may call for better information, transport, placement or stronger demand; non-completion may concern programme access, teaching, assessment or household cost. The indicator does not choose among these explanations. Follow-up should combine the observed pattern with institutional and participant evidence. The selected response should state intended population, resources and review. Targets should guard against selection of people most likely to succeed and should report people who never entered the supported route. Policy use requires an authority and a plausible lever. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with implementation reach.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-48-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within higher-education graduates by field and route, transition timing determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Revisions to education classification, labour questions or population estimates should be marked. A result should not be ranked across countries until metadata, economic conditions and coverage have been tested. The conclusion should state what the evidence demonstrates and what remains interpretive. Completion of the reporting cycle occurs when findings enter a decision, later evidence tests reach and quality, and unresolved barriers remain assigned rather than disappearing from the next headline. Public reporting should preserve population, period, counts, rates, distribution, uncertainty and remaining unknowns. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with transition timing.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-49", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "49", "title": "Young people outside education and employment", "anchor": "49-young-people-outside-education-and-employment", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-49-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The study population is young people in neither defined education or training nor employment. It should be enumerated at the starting event before later status is known. This protects the denominator from being limited to people who can be contacted or who enter a recorded destination. Entry criteria, dates, age and programme classification should be retained. People transferring, emigrating, returning to study or declining follow-up remain part of the cohort, with status recorded as known or unknown. If a comparison group is used, its eligibility and observation period should be aligned rather than selected after outcomes appear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-49-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The essential observations are job search, availability, care, health, discouragement, prior education and duration. Each is a separate variable with its own date and definition. First work should not be substituted for sustained work, and current study should not erase earlier job search. Multiple status should be permitted where a person combines learning and employment. Sequence can be represented through events and spells, while a concise public account may report selected transitions. The underlying chronology should remain available for analysis so that temporary states, reversals and delayed entry are not forced into one destination category.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09", "REF-10" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-49-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological limitations are heterogeneous reasons and unobserved informal learning. They should be anticipated in sampling, collection and interpretation. Baseline variables can support analysis of later non-response, although weighting cannot remove all bias. Economic and institutional context should accompany cohort outcomes. A difference between programmes may reflect selection, field, region or employer demand. Descriptive results should therefore be presented as pathway evidence, while programme-effect claims require a suitable design and testing of alternative explanations.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-49-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within young people outside education and employment, employment quality determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Single-axis results may conceal intersections, yet small cells can become unstable or disclose identity. The report should state suppression and grouping decisions. Unknown category values should not be assigned to the majority. Participation in the study itself should be accessible in relevant languages and formats. Proxy response may be necessary but should be identified because knowledge of job search, work quality or accommodation may be limited. Distributional analysis should consider gender, household resources, disability, residence, migration and prior attainment where lawful and sufficiently reliable. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with employment quality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-49-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within young people outside education and employment, learner protection determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. For employment they include hours, desired hours, contract, earnings, protection, safety, task content, training and retention. For education they include programme purpose, teaching, assessment, recognised award and progression rights. Not every source can collect every dimension. A short instrument should prioritise the decision and avoid claiming broad quality from a minimal item. Subjective assessment can add information about choice or task use, but it should not replace observable conditions or be interpreted outside its wording and context. Quality indicators belong beside status. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with learner protection.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-49-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within young people outside education and employment, public information determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. A long search period may call for better information, transport, placement or stronger demand; non-completion may concern programme access, teaching, assessment or household cost. The indicator does not choose among these explanations. Follow-up should combine the observed pattern with institutional and participant evidence. The selected response should state intended population, resources and review. Targets should guard against selection of people most likely to succeed and should report people who never entered the supported route. Policy use requires an authority and a plausible lever. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with public information.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-49-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within young people outside education and employment, provider responsibility determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Revisions to education classification, labour questions or population estimates should be marked. A result should not be ranked across countries until metadata, economic conditions and coverage have been tested. The conclusion should state what the evidence demonstrates and what remains interpretive. Completion of the reporting cycle occurs when findings enter a decision, later evidence tests reach and quality, and unresolved barriers remain assigned rather than disappearing from the next headline. Public reporting should preserve population, period, counts, rates, distribution, uncertainty and remaining unknowns. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with provider responsibility.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-23" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-50", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "50", "title": "Accessible transition for young people with disabilities", "anchor": "50-accessible-transition-for-young-people-with-disabilities", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-50-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The study population is young people with functional difficulties moving from education to training or work. It should be enumerated at the starting event before later status is known. This protects the denominator from being limited to people who can be contacted or who enter a recorded destination. Entry criteria, dates, age and programme classification should be retained. People transferring, emigrating, returning to study or declining follow-up remain part of the cohort, with status recorded as known or unknown. If a comparison group is used, its eligibility and observation period should be aligned rather than selected after outcomes appear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09", "REF-10" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-50-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The essential observations are accommodation, guidance, programme access, completion, search and work conditions. Each is a separate variable with its own date and definition. First work should not be substituted for sustained work, and current study should not erase earlier job search. Multiple status should be permitted where a person combines learning and employment. Sequence can be represented through events and spells, while a concise public account may report selected transitions. The underlying chronology should remain available for analysis so that temporary states, reversals and delayed entry are not forced into one destination category.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-50-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological limitations are survey accessibility, small samples and institutional exclusion. They should be anticipated in sampling, collection and interpretation. Baseline variables can support analysis of later non-response, although weighting cannot remove all bias. Economic and institutional context should accompany cohort outcomes. A difference between programmes may reflect selection, field, region or employer demand. Descriptive results should therefore be presented as pathway evidence, while programme-effect claims require a suitable design and testing of alternative explanations.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-50-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within accessible transition for young people with disabilities, financial adequacy determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Single-axis results may conceal intersections, yet small cells can become unstable or disclose identity. The report should state suppression and grouping decisions. Unknown category values should not be assigned to the majority. Participation in the study itself should be accessible in relevant languages and formats. Proxy response may be necessary but should be identified because knowledge of job search, work quality or accommodation may be limited. Distributional analysis should consider gender, household resources, disability, residence, migration and prior attainment where lawful and sufficiently reliable. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with financial adequacy.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-50-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within accessible transition for young people with disabilities, monitoring frequency determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. For employment they include hours, desired hours, contract, earnings, protection, safety, task content, training and retention. For education they include programme purpose, teaching, assessment, recognised award and progression rights. Not every source can collect every dimension. A short instrument should prioritise the decision and avoid claiming broad quality from a minimal item. Subjective assessment can add information about choice or task use, but it should not replace observable conditions or be interpreted outside its wording and context. Quality indicators belong beside status. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with monitoring frequency.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-50-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within accessible transition for young people with disabilities, unequal effect determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. A long search period may call for better information, transport, placement or stronger demand; non-completion may concern programme access, teaching, assessment or household cost. The indicator does not choose among these explanations. Follow-up should combine the observed pattern with institutional and participant evidence. The selected response should state intended population, resources and review. Targets should guard against selection of people most likely to succeed and should report people who never entered the supported route. Policy use requires an authority and a plausible lever. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with unequal effect.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-23" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-50-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within accessible transition for young people with disabilities, reversibility determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Revisions to education classification, labour questions or population estimates should be marked. A result should not be ranked across countries until metadata, economic conditions and coverage have been tested. The conclusion should state what the evidence demonstrates and what remains interpretive. Completion of the reporting cycle occurs when findings enter a decision, later evidence tests reach and quality, and unresolved barriers remain assigned rather than disappearing from the next headline. Public reporting should preserve population, period, counts, rates, distribution, uncertainty and remaining unknowns. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with reversibility.", "citationIds": [ "REF-22", "REF-25" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-51", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "51", "title": "Rural pathway accessibility", "anchor": "51-rural-pathway-accessibility", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-51-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The study population is young people in remote and sparsely served areas. It should be enumerated at the starting event before later status is known. This protects the denominator from being limited to people who can be contacted or who enter a recorded destination. Entry criteria, dates, age and programme classification should be retained. People transferring, emigrating, returning to study or declining follow-up remain part of the cohort, with status recorded as known or unknown. If a comparison group is used, its eligibility and observation period should be aligned rather than selected after outcomes appear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-51-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The essential observations are travel, programme availability, guidance, mobility cost, local work and return options. Each is a separate variable with its own date and definition. First work should not be substituted for sustained work, and current study should not erase earlier job search. Multiple status should be permitted where a person combines learning and employment. Sequence can be represented through events and spells, while a concise public account may report selected transitions. The underlying chronology should remain available for analysis so that temporary states, reversals and delayed entry are not forced into one destination category.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-51-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological limitations are national residence categories and seasonal opportunity. They should be anticipated in sampling, collection and interpretation. Baseline variables can support analysis of later non-response, although weighting cannot remove all bias. Economic and institutional context should accompany cohort outcomes. A difference between programmes may reflect selection, field, region or employer demand. Descriptive results should therefore be presented as pathway evidence, while programme-effect claims require a suitable design and testing of alternative explanations.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-51-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within rural pathway accessibility, continuity determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Single-axis results may conceal intersections, yet small cells can become unstable or disclose identity. The report should state suppression and grouping decisions. Unknown category values should not be assigned to the majority. Participation in the study itself should be accessible in relevant languages and formats. Proxy response may be necessary but should be identified because knowledge of job search, work quality or accommodation may be limited. Distributional analysis should consider gender, household resources, disability, residence, migration and prior attainment where lawful and sufficiently reliable. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with continuity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-51-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within rural pathway accessibility, complaint access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. For employment they include hours, desired hours, contract, earnings, protection, safety, task content, training and retention. For education they include programme purpose, teaching, assessment, recognised award and progression rights. Not every source can collect every dimension. A short instrument should prioritise the decision and avoid claiming broad quality from a minimal item. Subjective assessment can add information about choice or task use, but it should not replace observable conditions or be interpreted outside its wording and context. Quality indicators belong beside status. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with complaint access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-23" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-51-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within rural pathway accessibility, record correction determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. A long search period may call for better information, transport, placement or stronger demand; non-completion may concern programme access, teaching, assessment or household cost. The indicator does not choose among these explanations. Follow-up should combine the observed pattern with institutional and participant evidence. The selected response should state intended population, resources and review. Targets should guard against selection of people most likely to succeed and should report people who never entered the supported route. Policy use requires an authority and a plausible lever. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with record correction.", "citationIds": [ "REF-22", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-51-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within rural pathway accessibility, institutional dependency determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Revisions to education classification, labour questions or population estimates should be marked. A result should not be ranked across countries until metadata, economic conditions and coverage have been tested. The conclusion should state what the evidence demonstrates and what remains interpretive. Completion of the reporting cycle occurs when findings enter a decision, later evidence tests reach and quality, and unresolved barriers remain assigned rather than disappearing from the next headline. Public reporting should preserve population, period, counts, rates, distribution, uncertainty and remaining unknowns. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with institutional dependency.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-52", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "52", "title": "Structured apprenticeship compared with ordinary youth work", "anchor": "52-structured-apprenticeship-compared-with-ordinary-youth-work", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-52-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The study population is entrants to programmes meeting a stated apprenticeship definition. It should be enumerated at the starting event before later status is known. This protects the denominator from being limited to people who can be contacted or who enter a recorded destination. Entry criteria, dates, age and programme classification should be retained. People transferring, emigrating, returning to study or declining follow-up remain part of the cohort, with status recorded as known or unknown. If a comparison group is used, its eligibility and observation period should be aligned rather than selected after outcomes appear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-52-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The essential observations are curriculum, supervision, off-job study, assessment, pay, protection and award. Each is a separate variable with its own date and definition. First work should not be substituted for sustained work, and current study should not erase earlier job search. Multiple status should be permitted where a person combines learning and employment. Sequence can be represented through events and spells, while a concise public account may report selected transitions. The underlying chronology should remain available for analysis so that temporary states, reversals and delayed entry are not forced into one destination category.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-52-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological limitations are selection into apprenticeship and differing economic sectors. They should be anticipated in sampling, collection and interpretation. Baseline variables can support analysis of later non-response, although weighting cannot remove all bias. Economic and institutional context should accompany cohort outcomes. A difference between programmes may reflect selection, field, region or employer demand. Descriptive results should therefore be presented as pathway evidence, while programme-effect claims require a suitable design and testing of alternative explanations.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-52-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within structured apprenticeship compared with ordinary youth work, local verification determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Single-axis results may conceal intersections, yet small cells can become unstable or disclose identity. The report should state suppression and grouping decisions. Unknown category values should not be assigned to the majority. Participation in the study itself should be accessible in relevant languages and formats. Proxy response may be necessary but should be identified because knowledge of job search, work quality or accommodation may be limited. Distributional analysis should consider gender, household resources, disability, residence, migration and prior attainment where lawful and sufficiently reliable. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with local verification.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-23" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-52-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within structured apprenticeship compared with ordinary youth work, progression determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. For employment they include hours, desired hours, contract, earnings, protection, safety, task content, training and retention. For education they include programme purpose, teaching, assessment, recognised award and progression rights. Not every source can collect every dimension. A short instrument should prioritise the decision and avoid claiming broad quality from a minimal item. Subjective assessment can add information about choice or task use, but it should not replace observable conditions or be interpreted outside its wording and context. Quality indicators belong beside status. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with progression.", "citationIds": [ "REF-22", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-52-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within structured apprenticeship compared with ordinary youth work, completion determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. A long search period may call for better information, transport, placement or stronger demand; non-completion may concern programme access, teaching, assessment or household cost. The indicator does not choose among these explanations. Follow-up should combine the observed pattern with institutional and participant evidence. The selected response should state intended population, resources and review. Targets should guard against selection of people most likely to succeed and should report people who never entered the supported route. Policy use requires an authority and a plausible lever. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with completion.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-52-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within structured apprenticeship compared with ordinary youth work, later destination determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Revisions to education classification, labour questions or population estimates should be marked. A result should not be ranked across countries until metadata, economic conditions and coverage have been tested. The conclusion should state what the evidence demonstrates and what remains interpretive. Completion of the reporting cycle occurs when findings enter a decision, later evidence tests reach and quality, and unresolved barriers remain assigned rather than disappearing from the next headline. Public reporting should preserve population, period, counts, rates, distribution, uncertainty and remaining unknowns. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with later destination.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-53", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "53", "title": "Unpaid work experience and later status", "anchor": "53-unpaid-work-experience-and-later-status", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-53-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The study population is participants and comparable non-participants in short placements. It should be enumerated at the starting event before later status is known. This protects the denominator from being limited to people who can be contacted or who enter a recorded destination. Entry criteria, dates, age and programme classification should be retained. People transferring, emigrating, returning to study or declining follow-up remain part of the cohort, with status recorded as known or unknown. If a comparison group is used, its eligibility and observation period should be aligned rather than selected after outcomes appear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-53-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The essential observations are learning objective, duration, supervision, cost, completion and subsequent work. Each is a separate variable with its own date and definition. First work should not be substituted for sustained work, and current study should not erase earlier job search. Multiple status should be permitted where a person combines learning and employment. Sequence can be represented through events and spells, while a concise public account may report selected transitions. The underlying chronology should remain available for analysis so that temporary states, reversals and delayed entry are not forced into one destination category.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-53-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological limitations are ability to accept unpaid activity and employer selection. They should be anticipated in sampling, collection and interpretation. Baseline variables can support analysis of later non-response, although weighting cannot remove all bias. Economic and institutional context should accompany cohort outcomes. A difference between programmes may reflect selection, field, region or employer demand. Descriptive results should therefore be presented as pathway evidence, while programme-effect claims require a suitable design and testing of alternative explanations.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-23" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-53-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within unpaid work experience and later status, policy attribution determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Single-axis results may conceal intersections, yet small cells can become unstable or disclose identity. The report should state suppression and grouping decisions. Unknown category values should not be assigned to the majority. Participation in the study itself should be accessible in relevant languages and formats. Proxy response may be necessary but should be identified because knowledge of job search, work quality or accommodation may be limited. Distributional analysis should consider gender, household resources, disability, residence, migration and prior attainment where lawful and sufficiently reliable. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with policy attribution.", "citationIds": [ "REF-22", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-53-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within unpaid work experience and later status, review responsibility determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. For employment they include hours, desired hours, contract, earnings, protection, safety, task content, training and retention. For education they include programme purpose, teaching, assessment, recognised award and progression rights. Not every source can collect every dimension. A short instrument should prioritise the decision and avoid claiming broad quality from a minimal item. Subjective assessment can add information about choice or task use, but it should not replace observable conditions or be interpreted outside its wording and context. Quality indicators belong beside status. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with review responsibility.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-53-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within unpaid work experience and later status, authority determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. A long search period may call for better information, transport, placement or stronger demand; non-completion may concern programme access, teaching, assessment or household cost. The indicator does not choose among these explanations. Follow-up should combine the observed pattern with institutional and participant evidence. The selected response should state intended population, resources and review. Targets should guard against selection of people most likely to succeed and should report people who never entered the supported route. Policy use requires an authority and a plausible lever. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with authority.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-53-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within unpaid work experience and later status, population coverage determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Revisions to education classification, labour questions or population estimates should be marked. A result should not be ranked across countries until metadata, economic conditions and coverage have been tested. The conclusion should state what the evidence demonstrates and what remains interpretive. Completion of the reporting cycle occurs when findings enter a decision, later evidence tests reach and quality, and unresolved barriers remain assigned rather than disappearing from the next headline. Public reporting should preserve population, period, counts, rates, distribution, uncertainty and remaining unknowns. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with population coverage.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-07" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-54", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "54", "title": "Transition during economic downturn", "anchor": "54-transition-during-economic-downturn", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-54-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The study population is education leavers entering a weak labour market. It should be enumerated at the starting event before later status is known. This protects the denominator from being limited to people who can be contacted or who enter a recorded destination. Entry criteria, dates, age and programme classification should be retained. People transferring, emigrating, returning to study or declining follow-up remain part of the cohort, with status recorded as known or unknown. If a comparison group is used, its eligibility and observation period should be aligned rather than selected after outcomes appear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-19", "REF-20" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-54-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The essential observations are vacancies, search duration, inactivity, temporary work, return to study and later recovery. Each is a separate variable with its own date and definition. First work should not be substituted for sustained work, and current study should not erase earlier job search. Multiple status should be permitted where a person combines learning and employment. Sequence can be represented through events and spells, while a concise public account may report selected transitions. The underlying chronology should remain available for analysis so that temporary states, reversals and delayed entry are not forced into one destination category.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-23" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-54-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological limitations are cohort conditions, regional demand and policy response. They should be anticipated in sampling, collection and interpretation. Baseline variables can support analysis of later non-response, although weighting cannot remove all bias. Economic and institutional context should accompany cohort outcomes. A difference between programmes may reflect selection, field, region or employer demand. Descriptive results should therefore be presented as pathway evidence, while programme-effect claims require a suitable design and testing of alternative explanations.", "citationIds": [ "REF-22", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-54-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within transition during economic downturn, eligibility determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Single-axis results may conceal intersections, yet small cells can become unstable or disclose identity. The report should state suppression and grouping decisions. Unknown category values should not be assigned to the majority. Participation in the study itself should be accessible in relevant languages and formats. Proxy response may be necessary but should be identified because knowledge of job search, work quality or accommodation may be limited. Distributional analysis should consider gender, household resources, disability, residence, migration and prior attainment where lawful and sufficiently reliable. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with eligibility.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-54-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within transition during economic downturn, practical access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. For employment they include hours, desired hours, contract, earnings, protection, safety, task content, training and retention. For education they include programme purpose, teaching, assessment, recognised award and progression rights. Not every source can collect every dimension. A short instrument should prioritise the decision and avoid claiming broad quality from a minimal item. Subjective assessment can add information about choice or task use, but it should not replace observable conditions or be interpreted outside its wording and context. Quality indicators belong beside status. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with practical access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-54-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within transition during economic downturn, educational purpose determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. A long search period may call for better information, transport, placement or stronger demand; non-completion may concern programme access, teaching, assessment or household cost. The indicator does not choose among these explanations. Follow-up should combine the observed pattern with institutional and participant evidence. The selected response should state intended population, resources and review. Targets should guard against selection of people most likely to succeed and should report people who never entered the supported route. Policy use requires an authority and a plausible lever. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with educational purpose.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-54-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within transition during economic downturn, curriculum coherence determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Revisions to education classification, labour questions or population estimates should be marked. A result should not be ranked across countries until metadata, economic conditions and coverage have been tested. The conclusion should state what the evidence demonstrates and what remains interpretive. Completion of the reporting cycle occurs when findings enter a decision, later evidence tests reach and quality, and unresolved barriers remain assigned rather than disappearing from the next headline. Public reporting should preserve population, period, counts, rates, distribution, uncertainty and remaining unknowns. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with curriculum coherence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-55", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "55", "title": "Cross-border mobility and recognition", "anchor": "55-cross-border-mobility-and-recognition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-55-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The study population is students or workers moving between education and labour jurisdictions. It should be enumerated at the starting event before later status is known. This protects the denominator from being limited to people who can be contacted or who enter a recorded destination. Entry criteria, dates, age and programme classification should be retained. People transferring, emigrating, returning to study or declining follow-up remain part of the cohort, with status recorded as known or unknown. If a comparison group is used, its eligibility and observation period should be aligned rather than selected after outcomes appear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-23" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-55-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The essential observations are origin award, level, field, recognition, additional requirements and destination status. Each is a separate variable with its own date and definition. First work should not be substituted for sustained work, and current study should not erase earlier job search. Multiple status should be permitted where a person combines learning and employment. Sequence can be represented through events and spells, while a concise public account may report selected transitions. The underlying chronology should remain available for analysis so that temporary states, reversals and delayed entry are not forced into one destination category.", "citationIds": [ "REF-22", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-55-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological limitations are unobserved return, language and incompatible classifications. They should be anticipated in sampling, collection and interpretation. Baseline variables can support analysis of later non-response, although weighting cannot remove all bias. Economic and institutional context should accompany cohort outcomes. A difference between programmes may reflect selection, field, region or employer demand. Descriptive results should therefore be presented as pathway evidence, while programme-effect claims require a suitable design and testing of alternative explanations.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-55-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within cross-border mobility and recognition, assessment validity determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Single-axis results may conceal intersections, yet small cells can become unstable or disclose identity. The report should state suppression and grouping decisions. Unknown category values should not be assigned to the majority. Participation in the study itself should be accessible in relevant languages and formats. Proxy response may be necessary but should be identified because knowledge of job search, work quality or accommodation may be limited. Distributional analysis should consider gender, household resources, disability, residence, migration and prior attainment where lawful and sufficiently reliable. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with assessment validity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-55-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within cross-border mobility and recognition, source reliability determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. For employment they include hours, desired hours, contract, earnings, protection, safety, task content, training and retention. For education they include programme purpose, teaching, assessment, recognised award and progression rights. Not every source can collect every dimension. A short instrument should prioritise the decision and avoid claiming broad quality from a minimal item. Subjective assessment can add information about choice or task use, but it should not replace observable conditions or be interpreted outside its wording and context. Quality indicators belong beside status. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with source reliability.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-55-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within cross-border mobility and recognition, reference period determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. A long search period may call for better information, transport, placement or stronger demand; non-completion may concern programme access, teaching, assessment or household cost. The indicator does not choose among these explanations. Follow-up should combine the observed pattern with institutional and participant evidence. The selected response should state intended population, resources and review. Targets should guard against selection of people most likely to succeed and should report people who never entered the supported route. Policy use requires an authority and a plausible lever. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with reference period.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-55-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within cross-border mobility and recognition, geographic distribution determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Revisions to education classification, labour questions or population estimates should be marked. A result should not be ranked across countries until metadata, economic conditions and coverage have been tested. The conclusion should state what the evidence demonstrates and what remains interpretive. Completion of the reporting cycle occurs when findings enter a decision, later evidence tests reach and quality, and unresolved barriers remain assigned rather than disappearing from the next headline. Public reporting should preserve population, period, counts, rates, distribution, uncertainty and remaining unknowns. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with geographic distribution.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09", "REF-10" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-56", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "56", "title": "Tracer-study attrition and correction", "anchor": "56-tracer-study-attrition-and-correction", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-56-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The study population is a starting cohort followed after programme completion. It should be enumerated at the starting event before later status is known. This protects the denominator from being limited to people who can be contacted or who enter a recorded destination. Entry criteria, dates, age and programme classification should be retained. People transferring, emigrating, returning to study or declining follow-up remain part of the cohort, with status recorded as known or unknown. If a comparison group is used, its eligibility and observation period should be aligned rather than selected after outcomes appear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-22", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-56-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The essential observations are contact success, movement, response mode, weights, known baseline and later status. Each is a separate variable with its own date and definition. First work should not be substituted for sustained work, and current study should not erase earlier job search. Multiple status should be permitted where a person combines learning and employment. Sequence can be represented through events and spells, while a concise public account may report selected transitions. The underlying chronology should remain available for analysis so that temporary states, reversals and delayed entry are not forced into one destination category.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-56-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological limitations are selective non-response among mobile or unsuccessful participants. They should be anticipated in sampling, collection and interpretation. Baseline variables can support analysis of later non-response, although weighting cannot remove all bias. Economic and institutional context should accompany cohort outcomes. A difference between programmes may reflect selection, field, region or employer demand. Descriptive results should therefore be presented as pathway evidence, while programme-effect claims require a suitable design and testing of alternative explanations.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-56-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within tracer-study attrition and correction, household burden determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Single-axis results may conceal intersections, yet small cells can become unstable or disclose identity. The report should state suppression and grouping decisions. Unknown category values should not be assigned to the majority. Participation in the study itself should be accessible in relevant languages and formats. Proxy response may be necessary but should be identified because knowledge of job search, work quality or accommodation may be limited. Distributional analysis should consider gender, household resources, disability, residence, migration and prior attainment where lawful and sufficiently reliable. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with household burden.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-56-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within tracer-study attrition and correction, disability access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. For employment they include hours, desired hours, contract, earnings, protection, safety, task content, training and retention. For education they include programme purpose, teaching, assessment, recognised award and progression rights. Not every source can collect every dimension. A short instrument should prioritise the decision and avoid claiming broad quality from a minimal item. Subjective assessment can add information about choice or task use, but it should not replace observable conditions or be interpreted outside its wording and context. Quality indicators belong beside status. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with disability access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-56-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within tracer-study attrition and correction, language access determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. A long search period may call for better information, transport, placement or stronger demand; non-completion may concern programme access, teaching, assessment or household cost. The indicator does not choose among these explanations. Follow-up should combine the observed pattern with institutional and participant evidence. The selected response should state intended population, resources and review. Targets should guard against selection of people most likely to succeed and should report people who never entered the supported route. Policy use requires an authority and a plausible lever. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with language access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09", "REF-10" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-56-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within tracer-study attrition and correction, professional capacity determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Revisions to education classification, labour questions or population estimates should be marked. A result should not be ranked across countries until metadata, economic conditions and coverage have been tested. The conclusion should state what the evidence demonstrates and what remains interpretive. Completion of the reporting cycle occurs when findings enter a decision, later evidence tests reach and quality, and unresolved barriers remain assigned rather than disappearing from the next headline. Public reporting should preserve population, period, counts, rates, distribution, uncertainty and remaining unknowns. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with professional capacity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-57", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "57", "title": "A national pathway account", "anchor": "57-a-national-pathway-account", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-57-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The study population is annual education and labour evidence presented for public judgement. It should be enumerated at the starting event before later status is known. This protects the denominator from being limited to people who can be contacted or who enter a recorded destination. Entry criteria, dates, age and programme classification should be retained. People transferring, emigrating, returning to study or declining follow-up remain part of the cohort, with status recorded as known or unknown. If a comparison group is used, its eligibility and observation period should be aligned rather than selected after outcomes appear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-57-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The essential observations are population, participation, completion, transition duration, work quality, distribution and policy response. Each is a separate variable with its own date and definition. First work should not be substituted for sustained work, and current study should not erase earlier job search. Multiple status should be permitted where a person combines learning and employment. Sequence can be represented through events and spells, while a concise public account may report selected transitions. The underlying chronology should remain available for analysis so that temporary states, reversals and delayed entry are not forced into one destination category.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-57-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological limitations are headline simplification, changing definitions and fragmented authority. They should be anticipated in sampling, collection and interpretation. Baseline variables can support analysis of later non-response, although weighting cannot remove all bias. Economic and institutional context should accompany cohort outcomes. A difference between programmes may reflect selection, field, region or employer demand. Descriptive results should therefore be presented as pathway evidence, while programme-effect claims require a suitable design and testing of alternative explanations.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-57-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within a national pathway account, workplace supervision determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Single-axis results may conceal intersections, yet small cells can become unstable or disclose identity. The report should state suppression and grouping decisions. Unknown category values should not be assigned to the majority. Participation in the study itself should be accessible in relevant languages and formats. Proxy response may be necessary but should be identified because knowledge of job search, work quality or accommodation may be limited. Distributional analysis should consider gender, household resources, disability, residence, migration and prior attainment where lawful and sufficiently reliable. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with workplace supervision.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-57-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within a national pathway account, qualification status determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. For employment they include hours, desired hours, contract, earnings, protection, safety, task content, training and retention. For education they include programme purpose, teaching, assessment, recognised award and progression rights. Not every source can collect every dimension. A short instrument should prioritise the decision and avoid claiming broad quality from a minimal item. Subjective assessment can add information about choice or task use, but it should not replace observable conditions or be interpreted outside its wording and context. Quality indicators belong beside status. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with qualification status.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09", "REF-10" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-57-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within a national pathway account, credit value determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. A long search period may call for better information, transport, placement or stronger demand; non-completion may concern programme access, teaching, assessment or household cost. The indicator does not choose among these explanations. Follow-up should combine the observed pattern with institutional and participant evidence. The selected response should state intended population, resources and review. Targets should guard against selection of people most likely to succeed and should report people who never entered the supported route. Policy use requires an authority and a plausible lever. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with credit value.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-57-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within a national pathway account, recognition consistency determines whether the stated education or transition objective can be judged fairly. Revisions to education classification, labour questions or population estimates should be marked. A result should not be ranked across countries until metadata, economic conditions and coverage have been tested. The conclusion should state what the evidence demonstrates and what remains interpretive. Completion of the reporting cycle occurs when findings enter a decision, later evidence tests reach and quality, and unresolved barriers remain assigned rather than disappearing from the next headline. Public reporting should preserve population, period, counts, rates, distribution, uncertainty and remaining unknowns. The responsible authority should therefore disclose the evidence, limitation and corrective action associated with recognition consistency.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] } ] } ], "technicalAppendices": [], "notes": [], "references": [ { "id": "REF-01", "authoringBody": "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development", "title": "Education at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators", "year": 2011, "publicationDate": "2011-09-13", "sourceType": "COMPARATIVE_INDICATOR_REPORT", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2011-en", "evidenceRole": "Comparative evidence on participation, completion, transitions, education and labour-market outcomes." }, { "id": "REF-02", "authoringBody": "UNESCO Institute for Statistics", "title": "Global Education Digest 2011: Comparing Education Statistics Across the World — Focus on Secondary Education", "year": 2011, "publicationDate": "2011-10-25", "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_STATISTICAL_REPORT", "url": "https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/global-education-digest-2011-comparing-education-statistics-across-the-world-en.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Comparative secondary participation, progression and completion evidence." }, { "id": "REF-03", "authoringBody": "UNESCO Institute for Statistics", "title": "Education Indicators: Technical Guidelines", "year": 2009, "publicationDate": "2009-11-01", "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_STATISTICAL_GUIDANCE", "url": "https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/education-indicators-technical-guidelines-en_0.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Definitions for participation, progression, completion and education resources." }, { "id": "REF-04", "authoringBody": "United Nations", "title": "World Youth Report 2011: Youth Employment — Youth Perspectives on the Pursuit of Decent Work in Changing Times", "year": 2011, "publicationDate": "2011-12-15", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_YOUTH_REPORT", "url": "https://www.un.org/development/desa/youth/world-youth-report/world-youth-report-2011.html", "evidenceRole": "Contemporaneous youth perspectives and policy context concerning employment and transition." }, { "id": "REF-05", "authoringBody": "International Labour Organization", "title": "Global Employment Trends for Youth: 2011 Update", "year": 2011, "publicationDate": "2011-10-19", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_LABOUR_REPORT", "url": "https://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/global-employment-trends/youth/2011/WCMS_165455/lang--en/index.htm", "evidenceRole": "Youth labour-force participation, unemployment and employment context." }, { "id": "REF-06", "authoringBody": "International Labour Organization", "title": "Key Indicators of the Labour Market, Seventh Edition", "year": 2011, "publicationDate": "2011-10-01", "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_LABOUR_INDICATOR_REFERENCE", "url": "https://www.ilo.org/global/statistics-and-databases/research-and-databases/kilm/lang--en/index.htm", "evidenceRole": "Definitions and interpretation of labour-force, employment, unemployment and work-quality indicators." }, { "id": "REF-07", "authoringBody": "United Nations", "title": "The Millennium Development Goals Report 2011", "year": 2011, "publicationDate": "2011-07-07", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/11_MDG%20Report_EN.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Global and regional evidence on education, gender, poverty and employment-related development conditions." }, { "id": "REF-08", "authoringBody": "UNICEF", "title": "The State of the World's Children 2011: Adolescence — An Age of Opportunity", "year": 2011, "publicationDate": "2011-02-25", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_CHILDREN_REPORT", "url": "https://www.unicef.org/reports/state-worlds-children-2011", "evidenceRole": "Adolescent participation, inequality, development and services." }, { "id": "REF-09", "authoringBody": "World Bank", "title": "World Development Report 2007: Development and the Next Generation", "year": 2006, "publicationDate": "2006-09-16", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_DEVELOPMENT_REPORT", "url": "https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5989", "evidenceRole": "Transitions in learning, work, citizenship, family formation and risk among young people." }, { "id": "REF-10", "authoringBody": "World Bank", "title": "World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security, and Development", "year": 2011, "publicationDate": "2011-04-11", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_DEVELOPMENT_REPORT", "url": "https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/4389", "evidenceRole": "Institutional fragility, conflict and constraints on education-to-work pathways." }, { "id": "REF-11", "authoringBody": "World Education Forum", "title": "The Dakar Framework for Action: Education for All — Meeting Our Collective Commitments", "year": 2000, "publicationDate": "2000-04-28", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_ACTION_FRAMEWORK", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000121147", "evidenceRole": "Commitments concerning equitable education access, quality and relevant learning." }, { "id": "REF-12", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Convention on the Rights of the Child", "year": 1989, "publicationDate": "1989-11-20", "sourceType": "INTERNATIONAL_CONVENTION", "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child", "evidenceRole": "Rights concerning education, development, non-discrimination and protection from harmful work." }, { "id": "REF-13", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities", "year": 2006, "publicationDate": "2006-12-13", "sourceType": "INTERNATIONAL_CONVENTION", "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities", "evidenceRole": "Inclusive education, vocational training, work, accessibility and reasonable accommodation." }, { "id": "REF-14", "authoringBody": "UNESCO", "title": "Revised Recommendation concerning Technical and Vocational Education", "year": 2001, "publicationDate": "2001-11-02", "sourceType": "UNESCO_RECOMMENDATION", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000126037", "evidenceRole": "Technical and vocational education aims, access, relevance and lifelong learning." }, { "id": "REF-15", "authoringBody": "UNESCO", "title": "International Standard Classification of Education: ISCED 1997", "year": 1997, "publicationDate": "1997-11-01", "sourceType": "INTERNATIONAL_STATISTICAL_CLASSIFICATION", "url": "https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-1997-en_0.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Programme and level classification for comparative education statistics." }, { "id": "REF-16", "authoringBody": "European Parliament and Council of the European Union", "title": "Recommendation on the Establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning", "year": 2008, "publicationDate": "2008-04-23", "sourceType": "EUROPEAN_UNION_RECOMMENDATION", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008H0506(01)", "evidenceRole": "Qualifications levels, learning outcomes, transparency and mobility." }, { "id": "REF-17", "authoringBody": "European Commission", "title": "Youth on the Move", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-09-15", "sourceType": "COMMISSION_COMMUNICATION", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0477", "evidenceRole": "European policy context for education, mobility, employability and youth transition." }, { "id": "REF-18", "authoringBody": "European Commission", "title": "An Agenda for New Skills and Jobs", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-11-23", "sourceType": "COMMISSION_COMMUNICATION", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0682", "evidenceRole": "European policy context for skills, employment, labour-market transitions and anticipation." }, { "id": "REF-19", "authoringBody": "European Commission", "title": "Youth Opportunities Initiative", "year": 2011, "publicationDate": "2011-12-20", "sourceType": "COMMISSION_COMMUNICATION", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0933", "evidenceRole": "Contemporaneous European measures concerning early leaving, skills, work experience and youth employment." }, { "id": "REF-20", "authoringBody": "European Commission", "title": "Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-03-03", "sourceType": "COMMISSION_COMMUNICATION", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52010DC2020", "evidenceRole": "Headline education and employment policy context." }, { "id": "REF-21", "authoringBody": "Council of the European Union", "title": "Council Conclusions on a Strategic Framework for European Cooperation in Education and Training (ET 2020)", "year": 2009, "publicationDate": "2009-05-28", "sourceType": "COUNCIL_CONCLUSIONS", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52009XG0528(01)", "evidenceRole": "European benchmarks and cooperation concerning lifelong learning, quality, equity and employability." }, { "id": "REF-22", "authoringBody": "Ministers responsible for Higher Education in the European Higher Education Area", "title": "Leuven and Louvain-la-Neuve Communiqué", "year": 2009, "publicationDate": "2009-04-29", "sourceType": "MINISTERIAL_COMMUNIQUE", "url": "https://ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/2009_Leuven_Louvain-la-Neuve/06/1/Leuven_Louvain-la-Neuve_Communique_April_2009_595061.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Higher education access, completion, employability, student-centred learning and mobility." }, { "id": "REF-23", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Policies and Programmes Involving Youth", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-12-21", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_RESOLUTION", "url": "https://undocs.org/A/RES/65/101", "evidenceRole": "United Nations youth policy context including education, employment and participation." }, { "id": "REF-24", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development", "year": 2005, "publicationDate": "2005-12-16", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_RESOLUTION", "url": "https://undocs.org/A/RES/60/215", "evidenceRole": "Education and sustainable-development policy context predating the 2012 United Nations conference." }, { "id": "REF-25", "authoringBody": "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development", "title": "Learning for Jobs", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-09-23", "sourceType": "COMPARATIVE_POLICY_REPORT", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264087460-en", "evidenceRole": "Comparative vocational education, labour-market relevance, workplace learning and guidance." } ], "readerNodes": [ { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-i", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "I", "title": "Purpose, population and pathway", "anchor": "part-i-purpose-population-and-pathway", "sortOrder": 1 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-1", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-i", "number": "1", "title": "The pathway concept", "anchor": "1-the-pathway-concept", "sortOrder": 2 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-2", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-i", "number": "2", "title": "Age and cohort boundaries", "anchor": "2-age-and-cohort-boundaries", "sortOrder": 3 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-3", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-i", "number": "3", "title": "Observation period and reference date", "anchor": "3-observation-period-and-reference-date", "sortOrder": 4 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "II", "title": "Education participation", "anchor": "part-ii-education-participation", "sortOrder": 5 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-4", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ii", "number": "4", "title": "Upper-secondary participation", "anchor": "4-upper-secondary-participation", "sortOrder": 6 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-5", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ii", "number": "5", "title": "Technical and vocational participation", "anchor": "5-technical-and-vocational-participation", "sortOrder": 7 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-6", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ii", "number": "6", "title": "Tertiary and post-secondary participation", "anchor": "6-tertiary-and-post-secondary-participation", "sortOrder": 8 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "III", "title": "Completion and credentials", "anchor": "part-iii-completion-and-credentials", "sortOrder": 9 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-7", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iii", "number": "7", "title": "Secondary completion", "anchor": "7-secondary-completion", "sortOrder": 10 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-8", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iii", "number": "8", "title": "Vocational qualification completion", "anchor": "8-vocational-qualification-completion", "sortOrder": 11 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-9", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iii", "number": "9", "title": "Higher-education completion", "anchor": "9-higher-education-completion", "sortOrder": 12 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iv", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "IV", "title": "Transition timing", "anchor": "part-iv-transition-timing", "sortOrder": 13 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-10", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iv", "number": "10", "title": "Time from education exit to first work", "anchor": "10-time-from-education-exit-to-first-work", "sortOrder": 14 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-11", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iv", "number": "11", "title": "Time to stable or sustained employment", "anchor": "11-time-to-stable-or-sustained-employment", "sortOrder": 15 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-12", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-iv", "number": "12", "title": "Return to education after work", "anchor": "12-return-to-education-after-work", "sortOrder": 16 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-v", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "V", "title": "Labour-force status", "anchor": "part-v-labour-force-status", "sortOrder": 17 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-13", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-v", "number": "13", "title": "Employment, unemployment and inactivity", "anchor": "13-employment-unemployment-and-inactivity", "sortOrder": 18 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-14", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-v", "number": "14", "title": "Young people neither employed nor in education or training", "anchor": "14-young-people-neither-employed-nor-in-education-or-training", "sortOrder": 19 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-15", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-v", "number": "15", "title": "Discouragement and labour-market detachment", "anchor": "15-discouragement-and-labour-market-detachment", "sortOrder": 20 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vi", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "VI", "title": "Employment quality", "anchor": "part-vi-employment-quality", "sortOrder": 21 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-16", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vi", "number": "16", "title": "Hours and underemployment", "anchor": "16-hours-and-underemployment", "sortOrder": 22 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-17", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vi", "number": "17", "title": "Contract, informality and protection", "anchor": "17-contract-informality-and-protection", "sortOrder": 23 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-18", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vi", "number": "18", "title": "Earnings and material return", "anchor": "18-earnings-and-material-return", "sortOrder": 24 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "VII", "title": "Match, use and relevance", "anchor": "part-vii-match-use-and-relevance", "sortOrder": 25 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-19", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vii", "number": "19", "title": "Field-of-study and occupation relationship", "anchor": "19-field-of-study-and-occupation-relationship", "sortOrder": 26 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-20", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vii", "number": "20", "title": "Qualification level and job requirements", "anchor": "20-qualification-level-and-job-requirements", "sortOrder": 27 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-21", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-vii", "number": "21", "title": "Skills use and continued learning at work", "anchor": "21-skills-use-and-continued-learning-at-work", "sortOrder": 28 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-viii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "VIII", "title": "Work-based learning", "anchor": "part-viii-work-based-learning", "sortOrder": 29 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-22", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-viii", "number": "22", "title": "Apprenticeship entry and completion", "anchor": "22-apprenticeship-entry-and-completion", "sortOrder": 30 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-23", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-viii", "number": "23", "title": "Internships and temporary work experience", "anchor": "23-internships-and-temporary-work-experience", "sortOrder": 31 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-24", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-viii", "number": "24", "title": "Employer-provided training", "anchor": "24-employer-provided-training", "sortOrder": 32 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ix", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "IX", "title": "Guidance, search and placement", "anchor": "part-ix-guidance-search-and-placement", "sortOrder": 33 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-25", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ix", "number": "25", "title": "Career information and guidance", "anchor": "25-career-information-and-guidance", "sortOrder": 34 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-26", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ix", "number": "26", "title": "Job-search duration and method", "anchor": "26-job-search-duration-and-method", "sortOrder": 35 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-27", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-ix", "number": "27", "title": "Public employment and placement services", "anchor": "27-public-employment-and-placement-services", "sortOrder": 36 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-x", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "X", "title": "Equity and distribution", "anchor": "part-x-equity-and-distribution", "sortOrder": 37 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-28", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-x", "number": "28", "title": "Gendered pathways", "anchor": "28-gendered-pathways", "sortOrder": 38 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-29", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-x", "number": "29", "title": "Household resources and social origin", "anchor": "29-household-resources-and-social-origin", "sortOrder": 39 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-30", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-x", "number": "30", "title": "Disability and accessible transition", "anchor": "30-disability-and-accessible-transition", "sortOrder": 40 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xi", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XI", "title": "Place, mobility and migration", "anchor": "part-xi-place-mobility-and-migration", "sortOrder": 41 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-31", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xi", "number": "31", "title": "Rural and urban opportunity", "anchor": "31-rural-and-urban-opportunity", "sortOrder": 42 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-32", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xi", "number": "32", "title": "Internal and international mobility", "anchor": "32-internal-and-international-mobility", "sortOrder": 43 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-33", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xi", "number": "33", "title": "Conflict, displacement and fragile institutions", "anchor": "33-conflict-displacement-and-fragile-institutions", "sortOrder": 44 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XII", "title": "Institutions, qualifications and recognition", "anchor": "part-xii-institutions-qualifications-and-recognition", "sortOrder": 45 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-34", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xii", "number": "34", "title": "Qualifications frameworks and indicator use", "anchor": "34-qualifications-frameworks-and-indicator-use", "sortOrder": 46 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-35", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xii", "number": "35", "title": "Recognition of prior and non-formal learning", "anchor": "35-recognition-of-prior-and-non-formal-learning", "sortOrder": 47 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-36", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xii", "number": "36", "title": "Quality assurance and public confidence", "anchor": "36-quality-assurance-and-public-confidence", "sortOrder": 48 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XIII", "title": "Data sources and comparability", "anchor": "part-xiii-data-sources-and-comparability", "sortOrder": 49 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-37", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiii", "number": "37", "title": "Education administrative data", "anchor": "37-education-administrative-data", "sortOrder": 50 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-38", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiii", "number": "38", "title": "Labour-force and household surveys", "anchor": "38-labour-force-and-household-surveys", "sortOrder": 51 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-39", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiii", "number": "39", "title": "Longitudinal and tracer evidence", "anchor": "39-longitudinal-and-tracer-evidence", "sortOrder": 52 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiv", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XIV", "title": "Interpretation and causal limits", "anchor": "part-xiv-interpretation-and-causal-limits", "sortOrder": 53 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-40", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiv", "number": "40", "title": "Comparing outcomes across countries", "anchor": "40-comparing-outcomes-across-countries", "sortOrder": 54 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-41", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiv", "number": "41", "title": "Education effects and selection", "anchor": "41-education-effects-and-selection", "sortOrder": 55 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-42", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xiv", "number": "42", "title": "Economic cycle and cohort conditions", "anchor": "42-economic-cycle-and-cohort-conditions", "sortOrder": 56 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xv", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XV", "title": "Policy use and public accountability", "anchor": "part-xv-policy-use-and-public-accountability", "sortOrder": 57 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-43", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xv", "number": "43", "title": "Balanced pathway indicators", "anchor": "43-balanced-pathway-indicators", "sortOrder": 58 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-44", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xv", "number": "44", "title": "Targets and safeguards", "anchor": "44-targets-and-safeguards", "sortOrder": 59 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-45", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xv", "number": "45", "title": "The public transition account", "anchor": "45-the-public-transition-account", "sortOrder": 60 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvi", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XVI", "title": "Applied cohort studies", "anchor": "part-xvi-applied-cohort-studies", "sortOrder": 61 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-46", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvi", "number": "46", "title": "Secondary leavers over eighteen months", "anchor": "46-secondary-leavers-over-eighteen-months", "sortOrder": 62 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-47", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvi", "number": "47", "title": "Vocational completers and workplace learning", "anchor": "47-vocational-completers-and-workplace-learning", "sortOrder": 63 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-48", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvi", "number": "48", "title": "Higher-education graduates by field and route", "anchor": "48-higher-education-graduates-by-field-and-route", "sortOrder": 64 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XVII", "title": "Applied exclusion and equity studies", "anchor": "part-xvii-applied-exclusion-and-equity-studies", "sortOrder": 65 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-49", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvii", "number": "49", "title": "Young people outside education and employment", "anchor": "49-young-people-outside-education-and-employment", "sortOrder": 66 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-50", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvii", "number": "50", "title": "Accessible transition for young people with disabilities", "anchor": "50-accessible-transition-for-young-people-with-disabilities", "sortOrder": 67 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-51", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xvii", "number": "51", "title": "Rural pathway accessibility", "anchor": "51-rural-pathway-accessibility", "sortOrder": 68 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xviii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XVIII", "title": "Applied programme and labour studies", "anchor": "part-xviii-applied-programme-and-labour-studies", "sortOrder": 69 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-52", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xviii", "number": "52", "title": "Structured apprenticeship compared with ordinary youth work", "anchor": "52-structured-apprenticeship-compared-with-ordinary-youth-work", "sortOrder": 70 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-53", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xviii", "number": "53", "title": "Unpaid work experience and later status", "anchor": "53-unpaid-work-experience-and-later-status", "sortOrder": 71 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-54", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xviii", "number": "54", "title": "Transition during economic downturn", "anchor": "54-transition-during-economic-downturn", "sortOrder": 72 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xix", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XIX", "title": "Applied system and reporting studies", "anchor": "part-xix-applied-system-and-reporting-studies", "sortOrder": 73 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-55", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xix", "number": "55", "title": "Cross-border mobility and recognition", "anchor": "55-cross-border-mobility-and-recognition", "sortOrder": 74 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-56", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xix", "number": "56", "title": "Tracer-study attrition and correction", "anchor": "56-tracer-study-attrition-and-correction", "sortOrder": 75 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2012-02-57", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2012-02-xix", "number": "57", "title": "A national pathway account", "anchor": "57-a-national-pathway-account", "sortOrder": 76 } ], "statistics": { "partCount": 19, "sectionCount": 57, "appendixCount": 0, "paragraphCount": 354, "tableCount": 0, "referenceCount": 25, "mainTextWords": 31889, "technicalAppendixWords": 0, "totalWords": 31889 }, "contentHash": "sha256-c29ff9572474f251437508bbd842c3830a38533d7707727bab7caa4c851182be" }