{ "schemaVersion": "iceqc.research-report.reader.v1", "document": { "id": "doc-iceqc-r-2019-09", "slug": "substantial-difference-burden-evidence-recognition-decisions", "documentNumber": "ICEQC-R-2019-09", "title": "Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions", "subtitle": "A standards interpretation of relevant difference, proof, reasons, proportionality and review", "family": "RESEARCH", "reportType": "THEMATIC_RESEARCH_REPORT", "researchCategory": "STANDARDS_INTERPRETATION", "reportArchetype": "STANDARDS_INTERPRETIVE_STUDY", "geographicScope": "Global", "ownerBody": "ICEQC Research and Policy Directorate", "publisher": "International Council for Education Quality Certification (ICEQC)", "publicIdentity": "ICEQC_ONLY" }, "version": { "id": "ver-iceqc-r-2019-09-en-2019-11-22", "edition": "2019", "versionLabel": "Published 2019-11-22", "language": "en", "authoritativeLanguage": "en", "status": "PUBLISHED", "publicationDate": "2019-11-22", "evidenceCutoffDate": "2019-11-22", "statusNotice": "This is the controlled English edition. Evidence and institutional status are stated as at the evidence cut-off date.", "summary": "feasibility and disprove, unspecified, doubts in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The relevant question is whether an evidenced difference is substantial for the specific recognition purpose. The competent body should identify the receiving requirement, examine authentic and educational evidence, determine whether a difference prevents the intended progression, and give reasons. The applicant should have access to review and should not be required to disprove unspecified doubts." }, "publicationControl": { "matrixRecordId": "ICEQC-R-2019-09", "temporalBasis": "CONTEMPORANEOUS_AS_AT_PUBLICATION_DATE", "originalAuthorship": "ICEQC", "suggestedMainTextWords": 20000, "suggestedTechnicalAnnexWords": 0, "suggestedTotalWords": 20000, "actualMainTextWords": 33441, "actualTechnicalAnnexWords": 0, "actualTotalWords": 33441 }, "frontMatter": { "executiveSummary": [ "feasibility and disprove, unspecified, doubts in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The relevant question is whether an evidenced difference is substantial for the specific recognition purpose. The competent body should identify the receiving requirement, examine authentic and educational evidence, determine whether a difference prevents the intended progression, and give reasons. The applicant should have access to review and should not be required to disprove unspecified doubts.", "uncertainty and documentation, missing, learning in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Applicants should submit records reasonably available to them and respond to clear requests. Recognition bodies should publish criteria, identify the material uncertainty, use authoritative information sources and seek clarification proportionately. Where documents are unavailable because of displacement, closure or other circumstances, alternative assessment or a reconstructed account may be necessary. Missing documentation does not prove missing learning.", "remedy and rather, equivalence, conclusion in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Difference in naming, teaching method, calendar or minor content is not substantial merely because it is visible. A difference may matter where the applicant lacks learning essential for safe or academically viable progression, where level or volume falls materially short, or where the status of the award cannot support the recognition sought. Reasons should explain that relation rather than state non-equivalence as a conclusion.", "capacity and border, displaced, applicants in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The response should not exceed what the receiving purpose requires. Review should examine whether apparently neutral evidence demands impose unequal burdens on cross-border or displaced applicants.", "At the 22 November 2019 cut-off, the UNESCO Global Convention on the Recognition of Qualifications concerning Higher Education had not yet been adopted. It is not used, anticipated or quoted. The analysis relies on earlier recognition principles and official materials available by the cutoff. No later ratification, entry-into-force or implementation evidence is implied.", "continuity and enough, support, progression in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. It does not require automatic equivalence among institutions or systems. A competent body should compare documented learning outcomes, level, volume, assessment and programme requirements, give reasons for any difference that matters, and provide a route to review. The decision should be intelligible to the learner and portable enough to support later progression.", "equity and explained, rather, assumed in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Outcomes expressed only through broad verbs can conceal major differences in knowledge, complexity, independence and context. A reliable record should therefore identify the awarding institution, programme, component, dates, credit or workload basis, level, stated outcomes, assessment and result. Where a qualification framework or credit convention applies, its status and limits should be explained rather than assumed.", "authority and decision, uncertainty, stated in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The receiving institution is responsible for a fair decision under published criteria. Learners should not bear the full burden of resolving differences in terminology or contacting institutions that no longer operate. Where authentic records are incomplete because of displacement, closure or other circumstances, a competent assessment and reconstructed account may support a provisional or final decision with uncertainty stated.", "distribution and material, response, proportionate in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Workload can support comparison, but time alone does not establish learning. A common numeric value can represent different subject matter, level or assessment. Decisions should first identify the receiving programme requirement and then examine whether prior learning can satisfy it. Partial recognition, bridging or additional assessment may be appropriate where the difference is material and the response proportionate.", "timing and cannot, register, decision in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The institution should record request, documents, completeness check, academic review, decision, reasons, credit recorded, programme adjustment and any appeal. Waiting time at each point matters. A nominal recognition policy can fail where responsibilities are unclear, academic staff receive no workload, evidence cannot be verified or the student record cannot register the decision.", "coverage and administrative, rejection, educational in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Authenticity asks whether the record is what it claims to be. Institutional or programme status concerns the authority under which learning was offered. Level concerns complexity and expected independence. Learning concerns the substance demonstrated. Programme fit concerns whether that learning can replace a receiving requirement without undermining essential progression. Conflating these questions can turn an administrative doubt into rejection of educational value.", "feasibility and appeal, institutional, learning in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. ” The record should state the receiving requirement, evidence considered, finding, consequence and available remedy. Where only part of the learning is recognised, the institution should explain the boundary. A reasoned decision supports consistency, appeal and later institutional learning.", "uncertainty and unable, ordinary, channel in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Records should have stable identifiers, controlled correction, authorised issue and a way to verify origin. Personal information should be limited to the purpose and transferred securely. A digital format can improve speed but does not by itself ensure authenticity, preservation or access. Institutions need a controlled alternative for system interruption and for learners unable to use the ordinary channel.", "remedy and duplicate, undermine, learning in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Recognition without timetable access, prerequisite adjustment or fee correction may have little practical value. Advising should identify the earliest feasible completion route and any effect on professional or regulated requirements. The record should avoid both duplicate study and gaps that would undermine later learning.", "capacity and evidence, access, reasons in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Applicants with cross-border, interrupted or non-standard histories may face greater documentary burdens. A lower recognition rate is not by itself evidence of unfairness, but it should trigger examination of criteria, evidence access and reasons.", "comparability and converting, precedent, automatic in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A sample of accepted, partly accepted, refused and abandoned applications can reveal inconsistency, missing reasons and practical barriers. Reviewers should protect personal and academic information while retaining enough evidence to test the decision. Staff should have a route to seek precedent or specialist advice without converting precedent into an automatic rule.", "The Global Compact on Refugees is within the evidence period and is relevant to inclusion and responsibility-sharing. The UNESCO Global Convention on the Recognition of Qualifications concerning Higher Education had not yet been adopted by 22 November 2019 and is excluded. This report does not apply its later text or imply later entry into force.", "equity and decisions, understood, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Institutions should monitor timeliness, distribution, consistency and realised progression. A policy is functioning only where its decisions can be understood, recorded and used." ], "keyFindings": [], "scopeAndMethod": [] }, "parts": [ { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "I", "title": "Interpreting continuity as a public duty", "anchor": "part-i-interpreting-continuity-as-a-public-duty", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-1", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-2", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-3", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-4", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-5" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "II", "title": "Continuity across institutions and time", "anchor": "part-ii-continuity-across-institutions-and-time", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-6", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-7", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-8", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-9" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "III", "title": "Capacity and shared responsibility", "anchor": "part-iii-capacity-and-shared-responsibility", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-10", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-11", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-12", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-13" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "IV", "title": "Evidence, accountability and correction", "anchor": "part-iv-evidence-accountability-and-correction", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-14", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-15", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-16", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-17", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "I", "title": "Mandate and shared governance", "anchor": "part-i-mandate-and-shared-governance", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-1", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-2", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-3", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-4", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-5", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-6", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-7", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-8", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-9", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-10" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "II", "title": "Population and access", "anchor": "part-ii-population-and-access", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-11", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-12", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-13", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-14", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-15", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-16", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-17", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-19", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-20" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "III", "title": "Shared outcomes and service boundaries", "anchor": "part-iii-shared-outcomes-and-service-boundaries", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-21", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-22", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-23", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-24", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-25", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-26", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-27", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-28", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-29", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-30" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "IV", "title": "Identification and referral", "anchor": "part-iv-identification-and-referral", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-31", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-32", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-33", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-34", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-35", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-36", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-37", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-38", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-39", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-40" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "number": "V", "title": "Health and readiness to learn", "anchor": "part-v-health-and-readiness-to-learn", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-41", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-42", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-43", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-44", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-45", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-46", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-47", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-48", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-49", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-50" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "number": "VI", "title": "Safeguarding and protection", "anchor": "part-vi-safeguarding-and-protection", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-51", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-52", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-53", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-54", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-55", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-56", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-57", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-58", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-59", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-60" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "number": "VII", "title": "Nutrition, water and sanitation", "anchor": "part-vii-nutrition-water-and-sanitation", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-61", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-62", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-63", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-64", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-65", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-66", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-67", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-68", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-69", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-70" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "number": "VIII", "title": "Teachers and frontline personnel", "anchor": "part-viii-teachers-and-frontline-personnel", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-71", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-72", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-73", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-74", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-75", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-76", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-77", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-78", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-79", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-80" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "number": "IX", "title": "Information and privacy", "anchor": "part-ix-information-and-privacy", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-81", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-82", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-83", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-84", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-85", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-86", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-87", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-88", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-89", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-90" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "number": "X", "title": "Finance and service capacity", "anchor": "part-x-finance-and-service-capacity", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-91", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-92", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-93", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-94", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-95", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-96", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-97", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-98", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-99", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-100" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "number": "XI", "title": "Participation and communication", "anchor": "part-xi-participation-and-communication", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-101", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-102", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-103", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-104", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-105", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-106", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-107", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-108", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-109", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-110" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "number": "XII", "title": "Continuity, emergency and improvement", "anchor": "part-xii-continuity-emergency-and-improvement", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-111", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-112", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-113", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-114", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-115", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-116", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-117", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-118", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-119", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-120" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xiii", "number": "XIII", "title": "Conclusions", "anchor": "part-xiii-conclusions", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-121", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-122", "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-123" ] } ], "sections": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-1", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "1", "title": "Admission without avoidable delay", "anchor": "1-admission-without-avoidable-delay", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-1-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and cannot, lawfully, decide in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 1. Admission without avoidable delay to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The responsible authority should publish rules that institutions can apply consistently and families can understand. Rules should identify age range, level, place of application, required information, alternatives and decision time. A central contact should resolve questions that a school cannot lawfully decide.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07", "REF-33" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-1-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and require, different, correction in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 1. Admission without avoidable delay to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Authorities should record reasons for delay: no place, missing document, status referral, language assessment, transport, safeguarding or family decision. Different reasons require different correction.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-1-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and learning, without, review in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 1. Admission without avoidable delay to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Such arrangements should have a clear standard, qualified staff and an end point. They should not reset the admission clock or permit a child to remain outside recognised learning without review.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-2", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "2", "title": "Documentation and identity", "anchor": "2-documentation-and-identity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-2-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "coverage and resolve, identity, questions in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 2. Documentation and identity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Birth certificates, prior school records and proof of address may be unavailable because of flight, loss, conflict or unsettled accommodation. Instructions should name acceptable alternatives and the authority competent to resolve identity questions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07", "REF-33" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-2-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and treating, uncertainty, misconduct in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 2. Documentation and identity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The record should distinguish verified information, learner or family account and institutional assessment. Later correction should remain possible without treating good-faith uncertainty as misconduct.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-2-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and premises, information, systems in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 2. Documentation and identity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Status information may require stricter access than attendance or achievement. Staff should understand which disclosures are authorised, especially when several agencies share premises or information systems.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-3", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "3", "title": "Placement and prior learning", "anchor": "3-placement-and-prior-learning", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-3-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "capacity and language, format, conditions in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 3. Placement and prior learning to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Age, previous curriculum, interruption, language and demonstrated learning all matter. A single test may be unreliable where the learner is unfamiliar with language, format or conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-3-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and reason, reviewed, promptly in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 3. Placement and prior learning to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Teachers need access to the result in a form that informs instruction. A decision placing a learner outside the ordinary age range should state its educational reason and be reviewed promptly.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-3-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and should, wholly, learner in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 3. Placement and prior learning to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where exact equivalence is unavailable, bridging arrangements should preserve the route to a recognised qualification. The burden of institutional incompatibility should not fall wholly on the learner.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-4", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "4", "title": "Language and communication", "anchor": "4-language-and-communication", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-4-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and evidence, national, arrangements in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 4. Language and communication to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Initial language need should lead to support, not refusal. The model may include additional instruction, bilingual assistance, adapted materials and teacher development, subject to available evidence and national arrangements.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-10" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-4-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and remain, between, adults in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 4. Language and communication to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Consequential communication may require qualified interpretation. Reliance on children can distort meaning and expose information that should remain between adults.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-4-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and develops, should, become in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 4. Language and communication to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Authorities should examine participation in subjects, peer interaction and access to assessment. Support should adapt as capability develops and should not become a fixed label.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-5", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "5", "title": "Participation and belonging", "anchor": "5-participation-and-belonging", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-5-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and evidence, family, communication in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 5. Participation and belonging to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Timetable access, materials, extracurricular activity, meals, transport, peer relations and freedom from harassment shape participation. Institutions should identify barriers through attendance, learner evidence and family communication.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-5-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and learners, through, vulnerability in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 5. Participation and belonging to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Education should uphold common rights and enable participation while respecting identity and language within applicable standards. Curriculum and institutional communication should avoid portraying refugee or migrant learners only through vulnerability.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-5-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and continuing, connection, education in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 5. Participation and belonging to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Correction should address the cause and preserve the learner's continuing connection to education.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-6", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "6", "title": "The learner continuity record", "anchor": "6-the-learner-continuity-record", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-6-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and dossier, agency, contact in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 6. The learner continuity record to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. It should be transferable between authorised institutions and understandable to the learner and family. The record is not a dossier of every agency contact.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-6-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and alternatives, during, disruption in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 6. The learner continuity record to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The learner should not lose recognised achievement because an institution closes or a family moves. Paper and electronic arrangements both require controlled alternatives during disruption.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-6-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and resolved, excluding, uncertain in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 6. The learner continuity record to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Public statistics should not expose rare combinations of status, location and age. Data quality concerns should remain visible rather than resolved by excluding uncertain cases.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-7", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "7", "title": "Transition between levels", "anchor": "7-transition-between-levels", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-7-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and silently, otherwise, available in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 7. Transition between levels to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Learners need clear rules for promotion, examinations, certification and transition to further education or training. Language support or provisional status should not silently bar them from an otherwise available route.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-7-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "coverage and preventing, avoidable, exclusion in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 7. Transition between levels to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Institutions should identify prerequisites, deadlines, fees, documentation and support. Where a national examination is required, preparation and reasonable arrangements should preserve the standard while preventing avoidable exclusion.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-7-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and before, committing, resources in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 7. Transition between levels to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Temporary education providers should connect records, curriculum and assessment to a competent recognition body. Learners and families should know what a certificate permits before committing time and resources.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-8", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "8", "title": "Mobility within a country", "anchor": "8-mobility-within-a-country", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-8-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and continues, during, interval in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 8. Mobility within a country to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Administrative boundaries should not erase learning. Transfer rules should identify which authority sends the record, which receives it and how attendance continues during the interval.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-8-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "capacity and corresponding, allocation, arrive in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 8. Mobility within a country to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Authorities should reconcile entitlement, enrolment and finance promptly. Institutions should not be discouraged from admitting a learner because the corresponding allocation will arrive late.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-8-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and support, remains, appropriate in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 8. Mobility within a country to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A portable record and common minimum definitions can reduce this burden while leaving room for local curriculum differences. The receiving institution should review current need rather than assume that all prior support remains appropriate.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-9", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "9", "title": "Cross-border recognition", "anchor": "9-cross-border-recognition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-9-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and requirements, should, public in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 9. Cross-border recognition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Authorities should distinguish recognition for admission, credit, professional access and final award because each has a different consequence. The competent body and evidentiary requirements should be public.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-9-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and rather, statement, equivalence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 9. Cross-border recognition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. It should state uncertainty and provide a route for later evidence. Refusal should include reasons and review rather than a bare statement of non-equivalence.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-9-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and timely, intelligible, decision in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 9. Cross-border recognition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. It should not override national legal competence or create an assurance unsupported by evidence. The practical aim is a fair, timely and intelligible decision.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-10", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "10", "title": "Planning the entitled population", "anchor": "10-planning-the-entitled-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-10-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and assuming, source, complete in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 10. Planning the entitled population to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Refugees and migrants may be missed by school censuses, household surveys or local forecasts. Authorities should compare registration, population and service information without assuming any source is complete.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-10-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and arrivals, differ, forecast in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 10. Planning the entitled population to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Uncertainty should appear as a range and contingency, not as a reason to delay all provision. Local authorities need a route to request additional resources when arrivals differ from forecast.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-10-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and educational, protection, justification in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 10. Planning the entitled population to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. If services are already overcrowded, additional capacity should improve the common standard. Separate financing streams should not create visibly unequal institutions without an educational and protection justification.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-11", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "11", "title": "Workforce and professional support", "anchor": "11-workforce-and-professional-support", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-11-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and displaced, learner, experience in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 11. Workforce and professional support to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. They need manageable class size, materials, preparation and access to language and specialist advice. Professional learning should address interrupted schooling and inclusive pedagogy without assuming that every displaced learner has the same experience.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-05" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-11-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and durable, workforce, policy in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 11. Workforce and professional support to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Recognition of qualifications, safeguarding checks and employment standards should remain credible. Informal reliance on unprotected voluntary labour is not a durable workforce policy.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-11-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and quality, institutional, conditions in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 11. Workforce and professional support to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. They should not be held accountable for services controlled elsewhere without a documented dependency. Supervision should examine both educational quality and institutional conditions.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-12", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "12", "title": "Finance and handover", "anchor": "12-finance-and-handover", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-12-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and authorised, public, budget in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 12. Finance and handover to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Teacher salaries, learning materials, transport, interpretation, support and maintenance cannot be sustained through capital finance alone. Plans should connect humanitarian and development resources to an authorised public budget.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-12-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and achieved, service, disappears in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 12. Finance and handover to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A handover should identify the receiving authority, recurrent obligation, data transfer and unresolved risk. Handover is not achieved by the end of a grant if the service disappears.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-12-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "coverage and increase, aggregate, allocation in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 12. Finance and handover to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Household costs, informal charges and travel can defeat formal free access. Financial correction should reach the barrier rather than merely increase an aggregate allocation.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-13", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "13", "title": "Protection, health and psychosocial support", "anchor": "13-protection-health-and-psychosocial-support", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-13-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and action, confirmation, follow in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 13. Protection, health and psychosocial support to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Referral guidance should state triggers, consent where appropriate, receiving authority, urgent action, confirmation and follow-up.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-11", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-13-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and labels, unnecessary, separation in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 13. Protection, health and psychosocial support to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Information necessary for safety and learning should be collected sensitively and shared narrowly. Support should avoid stigmatising a learner through visible labels or unnecessary separation.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-13-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "capacity and establish, support, received in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 13. Protection, health and psychosocial support to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A completed form or transmitted message does not establish that support was received.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-14", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "14", "title": "Measures of timely access", "anchor": "14-measures-of-timely-access", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-14-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and distributions, because, longer in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 14. Measures of timely access to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Authorities should report time from request or identification to recognised educational participation, with reasons for delay. Averages should be accompanied by distributions because a small group may wait far longer.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-14-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and evidence, examine, difference in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 14. Measures of timely access to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A learner can be registered without attending or present without access to the full timetable. Monitoring should use institutional and learner evidence to examine the difference.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-14-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and educational, entitlement, applies in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 14. Measures of timely access to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where the responsible authority changes the definition, the public series should mark the break. Uncertain status should not remove a learner from the denominator if the educational entitlement applies.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-15", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "15", "title": "Quality and progression evidence", "anchor": "15-quality-and-progression-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-15-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "coverage and without, opportunity, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 15. Quality and progression evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Learning measures can contribute where language, prior curriculum and assessment conditions are understood. A low result should not be interpreted without opportunity-to-learn evidence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-15-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and distinguish, educational, departure in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 15. Quality and progression evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Movement between institutions can appear as dropout when records are not linked. Authorities should distinguish a data gap from educational departure.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-15-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and establish, recognised, progression in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 15. Quality and progression evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Certificates issued outside the recognised system need a clear status. Participation in a temporary programme does not itself establish recognised progression.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-16", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "16", "title": "Complaint and remedy", "anchor": "16-complaint-and-remedy", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-16-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "capacity and timely, interim, action in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 16. Complaint and remedy to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Information should be available in languages and forms that the affected population can use. Urgent education loss requires timely interim action.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-16-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and learning, recurring, failures in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 16. Complaint and remedy to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Reasons should cite the applicable standard and evidence. Confidentiality should protect the complainant while permitting systemic learning from recurring failures.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-16-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and remedy, individual, exclusion in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 16. Complaint and remedy to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. An aggregate programme change does not by itself remedy an individual exclusion.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-17", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "17", "title": "Public reporting", "anchor": "17-public-reporting", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-17-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and geographic, population, coverage in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 17. Public reporting to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The New York Declaration establishes a commitment available at the cut-off; it does not establish that every national education system met it. Reports should date evidence and state geographic and population coverage.", "citationIds": [ "REF-33" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-17-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and apparent, absence, mistaken in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 17. Public reporting to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Small counts, unusual status and precise location may create disclosure risk. Suppression or aggregation rules should be stated so that apparent absence is not mistaken for zero.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-17-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and removing, adverse, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 17. Public reporting to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Authorities should identify missing populations, uncertain estimates, unavailable services and the next correction. Credibility is strengthened by a bounded claim, not by removing adverse evidence.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "18", "title": "National readiness review", "anchor": "18-national-readiness-review", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and appear, coherent, account in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18. National readiness review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. It should not begin with a general statement of support. It should trace a child or young person from first contact to recognised participation and identify every point at which authority, capacity or evidence may fail. Admission rules, school-place allocation, documentation alternatives, placement, language support, transport, learner records, examination access and recognition should appear in one coherent account.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-07", "REF-33" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and suspending, education, unnecessarily in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18. National readiness review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A national rule that is unknown, ambiguous or contradicted locally will not secure access. Authorities should review actual admission notices, forms, information for families and decision records. They should identify whether institutions seek documents not required by the governing rule, whether staff know the alternative where documents are missing and whether questions of status are referred to the competent body without suspending education unnecessarily.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and unresolved, public, responsibility in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18. National readiness review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. National totals do not show whether a municipality has classrooms, teachers, interpretation, transport or specialist support at the required time. Readiness evidence should therefore connect population scenarios to local service capacity and a rapid resource route. The route should state which authority can authorise additional staff, space or finance and how long that decision should take. A local waiting list without a central correction mechanism is evidence of unresolved public responsibility.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "capacity and educational, difficult, repair in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18. National readiness review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Authorities should examine a sample of decisions across age, prior education and language need. The record should show what evidence was considered, which assessment was used, whether interpretation was available and when the placement will be reviewed. Disproportionate concentration of learners in lower levels, restricted programmes or unrecognised provision should trigger examination. Apparent administrative simplicity can create lasting educational delay that is difficult to repair.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and visible, service, limitation in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18. National readiness review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Schools need a model describing how initial support connects to subject teaching, how progress is reviewed and how families receive consequential information. Authorities should check availability by level and location, qualifications of staff, teaching materials and time allocated. Where trained staff are scarce, interim support should be supervised and accompanied by a workforce plan. Indefinite reliance on informal interpretation should remain visible as a service limitation.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and merely, because, educational in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18. National readiness review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The sending institution should be able to identify the authorised record, verify consent or legal authority where required, transmit it securely and retain an auditable account. The receiving institution should understand the information and use it for placement and support. The test should also cover the absence of prior records, correction of disputed information and continuity during an information-system failure. Protection data should not travel merely because educational data do.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and conclusion, received, continuity in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18. National readiness review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Authorities should identify documentation, fee, residency and curriculum requirements for each consequential assessment. Learners and families should receive notice early enough to resolve barriers. Where an exception or alternative exists, the competent decision-maker and time limit should be clear. A learner admitted to education but barred from its recognised conclusion has not received full continuity.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b008", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and clinical, migration, authority in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18. National readiness review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Institutions need contact details, urgent routes and guidance on information. Reviewers should verify whether referrals are acknowledged, whether delay is recorded and what interim protection is available. Counts of referrals can increase because need is identified better or because conditions worsen; interpretation requires response and outcome evidence. Teachers should receive supervision without being asked to assume clinical, legal or migration authority.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b009", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and materials, inequitable, unstable in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18. National readiness review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A temporary allocation may create places quickly, but teacher employment, transport, language instruction, materials and record administration continue. The budget account should show the public body that carries each obligation after exceptional funding ends. Cost comparisons should use equivalent service definitions and include household burdens. An arrangement that appears inexpensive because families provide transport, interpretation or materials may be inequitable and unstable.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b010", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and change, cannot, change in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18. National readiness review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Learners and families can identify unclear information, delay, stigma and practical barriers; teachers and local officers can identify contradictory duties and unavailable services. Evidence should be gathered safely and should not make continued access dependent on participation. Consultation findings require an authorised response stating what will change, what cannot change and why.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b011", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "coverage and overall, positive, statement in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18. National readiness review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Each judgement should cite evidence, affected population, geographic scope and uncertainty. A partly ready function needs an interim arrangement, responsible authority, resource and review date. A not-ready function requires urgent correction and should not be concealed within an overall positive statement.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b012", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and keeping, public, visible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18. National readiness review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Arrivals, movement, housing and service capacity change. Authorities should establish thresholds that trigger renewed review, such as waiting time, class size, support caseload, unplaced learners or record delays. Thresholds should lead to decisions rather than merely additional reporting. The purpose is to preserve continuity under changing conditions while keeping the public duty visible.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b013", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and accountability, entitled, learners in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18. National readiness review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Comparable information on population, capacity, finance and unmet need can support cooperation, but it should be drawn from a credible national account. External assistance should answer an identified gap and strengthen the continuing service. The Declaration's shared commitment is most credible where national institutions can state both what they provide and what additional support is required, without transferring accountability for entitled learners.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-1", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "1", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "1-improvement-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-1-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and deputies, escalation, review in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 1. Improvement proposition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that coordination can be described broadly while no body owns a consequential decision. Authorities should define primary duties, shared tasks, deputies, escalation and review.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-2", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "2", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "2-mandate", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-2-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and deputies, escalation, review in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 2. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that coordination can be described broadly while no body owns a consequential decision. Authorities should therefore define primary duties, shared tasks, deputies, escalation and review.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-2-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and service, authority, status in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 2. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Participating bodies should state primary and supporting roles. The governing proposition is that coordination supplements rather than erases sector responsibility. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-2-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-3", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "3", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "3-minimum-service", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-3-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and deputies, escalation, review in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 3. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, coordination can be described broadly while no body owns a consequential decision. The immediate improvement response is to define primary duties, shared tasks, deputies, escalation and review.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-3-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and account, service, availability in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 3. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-3-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-4", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "4", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "4-pathway", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-4-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and deputies, escalation, review in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 4. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. If coordination can be described broadly while no body owns a consequential decision, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to define primary duties, shared tasks, deputies, escalation and review.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-4-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and proportionate, consequence, competence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 4. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Authorities should map trigger, handover, receipt and closure, subject to the principle that referral is incomplete when receiving capacity is unknown. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-4-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-5", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "5", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "5-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-5-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and deputies, escalation, review in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 5. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A foreseeable failure arises where coordination can be described broadly while no body owns a consequential decision. Participating bodies should define primary duties, shared tasks, deputies, escalation and review.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-5-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and specialists, should, explicit in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 5. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Decision-makers should test disability, language, status, geography and cost, because equal procedure does not establish equal access. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-5-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-6", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "6", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "6-capacity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-6-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and deputies, escalation, review in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 6. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The risk is that coordination can be described broadly while no body owns a consequential decision. A competent body should define primary duties, shared tasks, deputies, escalation and review.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-6-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and remain, lawfully, controlled in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 6. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. It should verify workload, competence and dependency and acknowledge that an unfunded shared task should remain visible as a risk. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-6-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and coordination, activity, resolve in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 6. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-7", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "7", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "7-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-7-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and deputies, escalation, review in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 7. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where coordination can be described broadly while no body owns a consequential decision, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should define primary duties, shared tasks, deputies, escalation and review.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-7-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "coverage and establish, effective, coordination in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 7. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Any conclusion must respect that plans and aggregate activity do not establish effective coordination.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-7-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-8", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "8", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "8-protection", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-8-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In mandate and shared governance, cross-sector coordination should secure the lawful roles of education, health, protection and other bodies in securing learner participation. The principal risk is that coordination can be described broadly while no body owns a consequential decision. Authorities should therefore define primary duties, shared tasks, deputies, escalation and review. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. remedy and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 8.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-8-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "capacity and service, authority, status in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 8. Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Participating bodies should minimise data and retain qualified judgement. The governing proposition is that information sharing should not create avoidable harm. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-8-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Comparability concerning to connect evidence with determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. comparability and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 8.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-9", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "9", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "9-monitoring", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-9-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and deputies, escalation, review in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 9. Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, coordination can be described broadly while no body owns a consequential decision. The immediate improvement response is to define primary duties, shared tasks, deputies, escalation and review.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-9-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and account, service, availability in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 9. Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-9-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distribution concerning monitoring to connect evidence determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. distribution and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 9.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-10", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "parentId": null, "number": "10", "title": "Review", "anchor": "10-review", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-10-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Coverage concerning while no body owns determines whether Review supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The protected public interest in mandate and shared governance concerns the lawful roles of education, health, protection and other bodies in securing learner participation. If coordination can be described broadly while no body owns a consequential decision, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to define primary duties, shared tasks, deputies, escalation and review. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. coverage and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 10.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-10-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and proportionate, consequence, competence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 10. Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Authorities should assign correction, deadline and verification, subject to the principle that repeated coordination language should not substitute for accountable improvement. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-10-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Uncertainty concerning and correction should recorded determines whether Review supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. uncertainty and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 10.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-11", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "11", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "11-improvement-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-11-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and uncertainty, practical, access in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 11. Improvement proposition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that provider and school lists can omit displaced, disabled, remote and previously excluded learners. Authorities should combine sources and state coverage, uncertainty and practical access.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-12", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "12", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "12-mandate", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-12-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and uncertainty, practical, access in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 12. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The risk is that provider and school lists can omit displaced, disabled, remote and previously excluded learners. A competent body should combine sources and state coverage, uncertainty and practical access.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-12-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and remain, lawfully, controlled in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 12. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. It should state primary and supporting roles and acknowledge that coordination supplements rather than erases sector responsibility. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-12-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distribution concerning the burden of evidence determines whether Mandate supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. distribution and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 12.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-13", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "13", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "13-minimum-service", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-13-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "coverage and uncertainty, practical, access in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 13. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where provider and school lists can omit displaced, disabled, remote and previously excluded learners, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should combine sources and state coverage, uncertainty and practical access.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-13-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and agreement, itself, service in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 13. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Any conclusion must respect that a meeting or agreement is not itself a service.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-13-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Uncertainty concerning substantial difference and the determines whether Minimum service supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. uncertainty and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 13.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-14", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "14", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "14-pathway", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-14-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "capacity and uncertainty, practical, access in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 14. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that provider and school lists can omit displaced, disabled, remote and previously excluded learners. Authorities should therefore combine sources and state coverage, uncertainty and practical access.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-14-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and service, authority, status in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 14. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Participating bodies should map trigger, handover, receipt and closure. The governing proposition is that referral is incomplete when receiving capacity is unknown. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-14-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Continuity concerning burden of evidence in determines whether Pathway supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. continuity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 14.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-15", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "15", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "15-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-15-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and uncertainty, practical, access in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 15. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, provider and school lists can omit displaced, disabled, remote and previously excluded learners. The immediate improvement response is to combine sources and state coverage, uncertainty and practical access.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-15-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and account, service, availability in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 15. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-15-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Timing concerning substantial difference and the determines whether Equity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. timing and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 15.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-16", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "16", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "16-capacity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-16-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and uncertainty, practical, access in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 16. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. If provider and school lists can omit displaced, disabled, remote and previously excluded learners, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to combine sources and state coverage, uncertainty and practical access.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-16-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and proportionate, consequence, competence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 16. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Authorities should verify workload, competence and dependency, subject to the principle that an unfunded shared task should remain visible as a risk. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-16-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Remedy concerning substantial difference and the determines whether Capacity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. remedy and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 16.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-17", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "17", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "17-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-17-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and uncertainty, practical, access in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 17. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A foreseeable failure arises where provider and school lists can omit displaced, disabled, remote and previously excluded learners. Participating bodies should combine sources and state coverage, uncertainty and practical access.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-17-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and specialists, should, explicit in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 17. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Decision-makers should use service, institution and affected-person evidence, because plans and aggregate activity do not establish effective coordination. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-17-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity concerning delivery unequal effect and determines whether Evidence supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. equity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 17.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "18", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "18-protection", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Population and access requires explicit improvement control because it concerns the learners and communities requiring connected services and the barriers affecting their use. The risk is that provider and school lists can omit displaced, disabled, remote and previously excluded learners. A competent body should combine sources and state coverage, uncertainty and practical access. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. distribution and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and remain, lawfully, controlled in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18. Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. It should minimise data and retain qualified judgement and acknowledge that information sharing should not create avoidable harm. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Coverage concerning evidence in recognition decisions determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. coverage and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 18.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-19", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "19", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "19-monitoring", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-19-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Uncertainty concerning substantial difference and the determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The public purpose of population and access is the credible provision of the learners and communities requiring connected services and the barriers affecting their use. Where provider and school lists can omit displaced, disabled, remote and previously excluded learners, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should combine sources and state coverage, uncertainty and practical access. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. uncertainty and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 19.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-19-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and volume, establish, benefit in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 19. Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Any conclusion must respect that referral volume alone does not establish benefit.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-19-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity concerning access participation and continuity determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. capacity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 19.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-20", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "20", "title": "Review", "anchor": "20-review", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-20-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In population and access, cross-sector coordination should secure the learners and communities requiring connected services and the barriers affecting their use. The principal risk is that provider and school lists can omit displaced, disabled, remote and previously excluded learners. Authorities should therefore combine sources and state coverage, uncertainty and practical access. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. continuity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 20.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-20-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and service, authority, status in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 20. Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Participating bodies should assign correction, deadline and verification. The governing proposition is that repeated coordination language should not substitute for accountable improvement. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-20-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 20. Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-21", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "21", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "21-improvement-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-21-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "coverage and decision, rights, limits in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 21. Improvement proposition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that a common goal can blur professional competence or make every result a joint responsibility. Authorities should state outcomes, contribution, decision rights and limits.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-22", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "22", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "22-mandate", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-22-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and decision, rights, limits in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 22. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. If a common goal can blur professional competence or make every result a joint responsibility, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to state outcomes, contribution, decision rights and limits.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-22-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and proportionate, consequence, competence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 22. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Authorities should state primary and supporting roles, subject to the principle that coordination supplements rather than erases sector responsibility. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-22-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity concerning should not be required determines whether Mandate supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. capacity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 22.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-23", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "23", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "23-minimum-service", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-23-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and decision, rights, limits in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 23. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A foreseeable failure arises where a common goal can blur professional competence or make every result a joint responsibility. Participating bodies should state outcomes, contribution, decision rights and limits.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-23-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and specialists, should, explicit in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 23. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Decision-makers should define standard, scope and competent verifier, because a meeting or agreement is not itself a service. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-23-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authority concerning pathway dependent on one determines whether Minimum service supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. authority and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 23.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-24", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "24", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "24-pathway", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-24-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and decision, rights, limits in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 24. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The risk is that a common goal can blur professional competence or make every result a joint responsibility. A competent body should state outcomes, contribution, decision rights and limits.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-24-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "coverage and remain, lawfully, controlled in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 24. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. It should map trigger, handover, receipt and closure and acknowledge that referral is incomplete when receiving capacity is unknown. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-24-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Feasibility concerning actual failure identification handover determines whether Pathway supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. feasibility and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 24.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-25", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "25", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "25-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-25-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and decision, rights, limits in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 25. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where a common goal can blur professional competence or make every result a joint responsibility, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should state outcomes, contribution, decision rights and limits.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-25-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "capacity and procedure, establish, access in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 25. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Any conclusion must respect that equal procedure does not establish equal access.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-25-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Comparability concerning body comparability and material determines whether Equity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. comparability and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 25.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-26", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "26", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "26-capacity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-26-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and decision, rights, limits in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 26. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that a common goal can blur professional competence or make every result a joint responsibility. Authorities should therefore state outcomes, contribution, decision rights and limits.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-26-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and service, authority, status in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 26. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Participating bodies should verify workload, competence and dependency. The governing proposition is that an unfunded shared task should remain visible as a risk. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-26-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distribution concerning the burden of evidence determines whether Capacity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. distribution and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 26.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-27", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "27", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "27-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-27-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "coverage and decision, rights, limits in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 27. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, a common goal can blur professional competence or make every result a joint responsibility. The immediate improvement response is to state outcomes, contribution, decision rights and limits.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-27-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and account, service, availability in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 27. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-27-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Uncertainty concerning delivery unequal effect and determines whether Evidence supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. uncertainty and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 27.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-28", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "28", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "28-protection", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-28-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity concerning correction should recorded in determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The protected public interest in shared outcomes and service boundaries concerns the education, health and protection conditions each body is expected to influence. If a common goal can blur professional competence or make every result a joint responsibility, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to state outcomes, contribution, decision rights and limits. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. capacity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 28.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-28-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and proportionate, consequence, competence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 28. Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Authorities should minimise data and retain qualified judgement, subject to the principle that information sharing should not create avoidable harm. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-28-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Continuity concerning learners and families should determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. continuity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 28.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-29", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "29", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "29-monitoring", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-29-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authority concerning of evidence in recognition determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Planning for shared outcomes and service boundaries should begin with the education, health and protection conditions each body is expected to influence. A foreseeable failure arises where a common goal can blur professional competence or make every result a joint responsibility. Participating bodies should state outcomes, contribution, decision rights and limits. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. authority and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 29.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-29-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and specialists, should, explicit in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 29. Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Decision-makers should track the complete pathway and complaints, because referral volume alone does not establish benefit. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-29-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Timing concerning person or system requires determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. timing and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 29.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-30", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "30", "title": "Review", "anchor": "30-review", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-30-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Shared outcomes and service boundaries requires explicit improvement control because it concerns the education, health and protection conditions each body is expected to influence. The risk is that a common goal can blur professional competence or make every result a joint responsibility. A competent body should state outcomes, contribution, decision rights and limits. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. feasibility and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 30.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-30-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and remain, lawfully, controlled in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 30. Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. It should assign correction, deadline and verification and acknowledge that repeated coordination language should not substitute for accountable improvement. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-30-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Remedy concerning of evidence in recognition determines whether Review supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. remedy and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 30.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-31", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "31", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "31-improvement-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-31-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and follow, interim, protection in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 31. Improvement proposition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that referral can become a transfer of responsibility without confirmation that help was received. Authorities should define trigger, consent, receiving capacity, follow-up and interim protection.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-32", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "32", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "32-mandate", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-32-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and follow, interim, protection in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 32. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that referral can become a transfer of responsibility without confirmation that help was received. Authorities should therefore define trigger, consent, receiving capacity, follow-up and interim protection.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-32-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The mandate test asks which body has authority and duty for the decision. Participating bodies should state primary and supporting roles. The governing proposition is that coordination supplements rather than erases sector responsibility. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. distribution and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 32.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-32-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. timing and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 32.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-33", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "33", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "33-minimum-service", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-33-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and follow, interim, protection in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 33. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, referral can become a transfer of responsibility without confirmation that help was received. The immediate improvement response is to define trigger, consent, receiving capacity, follow-up and interim protection.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-33-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A credible arrangement should establish which learner-facing condition should be present and should define standard, scope and competent verifier, recognising that a meeting or agreement is not itself a service. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. uncertainty and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 33.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-33-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. remedy and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 33.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-34", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "34", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "34-pathway", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-34-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and follow, interim, protection in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 34. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. If referral can become a transfer of responsibility without confirmation that help was received, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to define trigger, consent, receiving capacity, follow-up and interim protection.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-34-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under pathway, review concerns how a learner moves from identification through response and follow-up. Authorities should map trigger, handover, receipt and closure, subject to the principle that referral is incomplete when receiving capacity is unknown. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. continuity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 34.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-34-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. equity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 34.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-35", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "35", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "35-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-35-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and follow, interim, protection in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 35. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A foreseeable failure arises where referral can become a transfer of responsibility without confirmation that help was received. Participating bodies should define trigger, consent, receiving capacity, follow-up and interim protection.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-35-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The equity standard requires consideration of which learners cannot use the ordinary pathway. Decision-makers should test disability, language, status, geography and cost, because equal procedure does not establish equal access. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. timing and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 35.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-35-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. coverage and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 35.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-36", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "36", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "36-capacity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-36-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and follow, interim, protection in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 36. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The risk is that referral can become a transfer of responsibility without confirmation that help was received. A competent body should define trigger, consent, receiving capacity, follow-up and interim protection.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-36-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of capacity should determine which staff, time, finance and facilities make delivery feasible. It should verify workload, competence and dependency and acknowledge that an unfunded shared task should remain visible as a risk. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. remedy and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 36.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-36-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. capacity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 36.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-37", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "37", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "37-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-37-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and follow, interim, protection in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 37. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where referral can become a transfer of responsibility without confirmation that help was received, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should define trigger, consent, receiving capacity, follow-up and interim protection.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-37-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. For evidence, bodies should identify which dated record demonstrates operation and limitation and should use service, institution and affected-person evidence. Any conclusion must respect that plans and aggregate activity do not establish effective coordination. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. equity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 37.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-37-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. authority and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 37.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-38", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "38", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "38-protection", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-38-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In identification and referral, cross-sector coordination should secure timely recognition of need and a safe route to competent assessment or service. The principal risk is that referral can become a transfer of responsibility without confirmation that help was received. Authorities should therefore define trigger, consent, receiving capacity, follow-up and interim protection. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. timing and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 38.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-38-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The protection test asks which safety, privacy and professional boundaries govern action. Participating bodies should minimise data and retain qualified judgement. The governing proposition is that information sharing should not create avoidable harm. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. coverage and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 38.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-38-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Feasibility concerning effect and correction coordination determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. feasibility and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 38.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-39", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "39", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "39-monitoring", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-39-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and follow, interim, protection in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 39. Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, referral can become a transfer of responsibility without confirmation that help was received. The immediate improvement response is to define trigger, consent, receiving capacity, follow-up and interim protection.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-39-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A credible arrangement should establish which indicators show receipt, delay, unmet need and education consequence and should track the complete pathway and complaints, recognising that referral volume alone does not establish benefit. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. capacity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 39.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-39-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Comparability concerning departure should be justified determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. comparability and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 39.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-40", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "40", "title": "Review", "anchor": "40-review", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-40-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity concerning interest in identification and determines whether Review supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The protected public interest in identification and referral concerns timely recognition of need and a safe route to competent assessment or service. If referral can become a transfer of responsibility without confirmation that help was received, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to define trigger, consent, receiving capacity, follow-up and interim protection. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. equity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 40.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-40-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under review, review concerns how failure changes protocol, resource and responsibility. Authorities should assign correction, deadline and verification, subject to the principle that repeated coordination language should not substitute for accountable improvement. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. authority and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 40.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-40-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distribution concerning retain the material limitation determines whether Review supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. distribution and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 40.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-41", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "parentId": null, "number": "41", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "41-improvement-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-41-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and health, response, continuity in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 41. Improvement proposition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that schools may be expected to diagnose or treat beyond competence, while health barriers remain unaddressed. Authorities should connect education observation with qualified health response and continuity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-42", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "parentId": null, "number": "42", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "42-mandate", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-42-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and health, response, continuity in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 42. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The risk is that schools may be expected to diagnose or treat beyond competence, while health barriers remain unaddressed. A competent body should connect education observation with qualified health response and continuity.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-42-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of mandate should determine which body has authority and duty for the decision. It should state primary and supporting roles and acknowledge that coordination supplements rather than erases sector responsibility. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. capacity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 42.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-42-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Comparability concerning mandate to connect evidence determines whether Mandate supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. comparability and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 42.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-43", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "parentId": null, "number": "43", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "43-minimum-service", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-43-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and health, response, continuity in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 43. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where schools may be expected to diagnose or treat beyond competence, while health barriers remain unaddressed, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should connect education observation with qualified health response and continuity.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-43-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. For minimum service, bodies should identify which learner-facing condition should be present and should define standard, scope and competent verifier. Any conclusion must respect that a meeting or agreement is not itself a service. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. authority and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 43.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-43-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distribution concerning access participation and continuity determines whether Minimum service supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. distribution and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 43.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-44", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "parentId": null, "number": "44", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "44-pathway", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-44-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "coverage and health, response, continuity in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 44. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that schools may be expected to diagnose or treat beyond competence, while health barriers remain unaddressed. Authorities should therefore connect education observation with qualified health response and continuity.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-44-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The pathway test asks how a learner moves from identification through response and follow-up. Participating bodies should map trigger, handover, receipt and closure. The governing proposition is that referral is incomplete when receiving capacity is unknown. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. feasibility and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 44.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-44-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Uncertainty concerning recorded in substantial difference determines whether Pathway supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. uncertainty and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 44.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-45", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "parentId": null, "number": "45", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "45-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-45-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "capacity and health, response, continuity in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 45. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, schools may be expected to diagnose or treat beyond competence, while health barriers remain unaddressed. The immediate improvement response is to connect education observation with qualified health response and continuity.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-45-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A credible arrangement should establish which learners cannot use the ordinary pathway and should test disability, language, status, geography and cost, recognising that equal procedure does not establish equal access. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. comparability and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 45.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-45-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Continuity concerning material limitation and responsible determines whether Equity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. continuity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 45.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-46", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "parentId": null, "number": "46", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "46-capacity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-46-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and health, response, continuity in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 46. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. If schools may be expected to diagnose or treat beyond competence, while health barriers remain unaddressed, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to connect education observation with qualified health response and continuity.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-46-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under capacity, review concerns which staff, time, finance and facilities make delivery feasible. Authorities should verify workload, competence and dependency, subject to the principle that an unfunded shared task should remain visible as a risk. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. distribution and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 46.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-46-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Timing concerning for referral and correction determines whether Capacity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. timing and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 46.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-47", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "parentId": null, "number": "47", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "47-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-47-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and health, response, continuity in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 47. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A foreseeable failure arises where schools may be expected to diagnose or treat beyond competence, while health barriers remain unaddressed. Participating bodies should connect education observation with qualified health response and continuity.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-47-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The evidence standard requires consideration of which dated record demonstrates operation and limitation. Decision-makers should use service, institution and affected-person evidence, because plans and aggregate activity do not establish effective coordination. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. uncertainty and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 47.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-47-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Remedy concerning tested under ordinary and determines whether Evidence supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. remedy and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 47.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-48", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "parentId": null, "number": "48", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "48-protection", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-48-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Health and readiness to learn requires explicit improvement control because it concerns health conditions, services and information affecting attendance and learning. The risk is that schools may be expected to diagnose or treat beyond competence, while health barriers remain unaddressed. A competent body should connect education observation with qualified health response and continuity. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. comparability and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 48.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-48-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of protection should determine which safety, privacy and professional boundaries govern action. It should minimise data and retain qualified judgement and acknowledge that information sharing should not create avoidable harm. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. continuity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 48.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-48-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity concerning substantial difference and the determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. equity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 48.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-49", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "parentId": null, "number": "49", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "49-monitoring", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-49-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distribution concerning connect evidence with delivery determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The public purpose of health and readiness to learn is the credible provision of health conditions, services and information affecting attendance and learning. Where schools may be expected to diagnose or treat beyond competence, while health barriers remain unaddressed, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should connect education observation with qualified health response and continuity. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. distribution and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 49.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-49-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. For monitoring, bodies should identify which indicators show receipt, delay, unmet need and education consequence and should track the complete pathway and complaints. Any conclusion must respect that referral volume alone does not establish benefit. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. timing and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 49.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-49-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Coverage concerning participation and continuity were determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. coverage and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 49.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-50", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "parentId": null, "number": "50", "title": "Review", "anchor": "50-review", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-50-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In health and readiness to learn, cross-sector coordination should secure health conditions, services and information affecting attendance and learning. The principal risk is that schools may be expected to diagnose or treat beyond competence, while health barriers remain unaddressed. Authorities should therefore connect education observation with qualified health response and continuity. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. uncertainty and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 50.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-50-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The review test asks how failure changes protocol, resource and responsibility. Participating bodies should assign correction, deadline and verification. The governing proposition is that repeated coordination language should not substitute for accountable improvement. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. remedy and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 50.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-50-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. capacity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 50.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-51", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "51", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "51-improvement-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-51-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and confidentiality, education, support in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 51. Improvement proposition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that shared protocols can expose sensitive information or delay urgent protection. Authorities should retain trained response, lawful reporting, confidentiality and education support.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-52", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "52", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "52-mandate", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-52-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and confidentiality, education, support in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 52. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. If shared protocols can expose sensitive information or delay urgent protection, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to retain trained response, lawful reporting, confidentiality and education support.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-52-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under mandate, review concerns which body has authority and duty for the decision. Authorities should state primary and supporting roles, subject to the principle that coordination supplements rather than erases sector responsibility. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. timing and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 52.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-52-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Coverage concerning and evidence coverage and determines whether Mandate supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. coverage and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 52.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-53", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "53", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "53-minimum-service", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-53-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and confidentiality, education, support in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 53. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A foreseeable failure arises where shared protocols can expose sensitive information or delay urgent protection. Participating bodies should retain trained response, lawful reporting, confidentiality and education support.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-53-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Remedy concerning delivery unequal effect and determines whether Minimum service supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The minimum service standard requires consideration of which learner-facing condition should be present. Decision-makers should define standard, scope and competent verifier, because a meeting or agreement is not itself a service. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. remedy and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 53.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-53-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity concerning a pathway dependent on determines whether Minimum service supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. capacity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 53.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-54", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "54", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "54-pathway", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-54-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and confidentiality, education, support in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 54. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The risk is that shared protocols can expose sensitive information or delay urgent protection. A competent body should retain trained response, lawful reporting, confidentiality and education support.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-54-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of pathway should determine how a learner moves from identification through response and follow-up. It should map trigger, handover, receipt and closure and acknowledge that referral is incomplete when receiving capacity is unknown. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. equity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 54.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-54-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authority concerning justified competence evidence in determines whether Pathway supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. authority and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 54.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-55", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "55", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "55-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-55-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and confidentiality, education, support in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 55. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where shared protocols can expose sensitive information or delay urgent protection, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should retain trained response, lawful reporting, confidentiality and education support.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-55-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. For equity, bodies should identify which learners cannot use the ordinary pathway and should test disability, language, status, geography and cost. Any conclusion must respect that equal procedure does not establish equal access. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. coverage and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 55.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-55-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Feasibility concerning learner received a timely determines whether Equity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. feasibility and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 55.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-56", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "56", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "56-capacity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-56-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and confidentiality, education, support in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 56. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that shared protocols can expose sensitive information or delay urgent protection. Authorities should therefore retain trained response, lawful reporting, confidentiality and education support.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-56-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The capacity test asks which staff, time, finance and facilities make delivery feasible. Participating bodies should verify workload, competence and dependency. The governing proposition is that an unfunded shared task should remain visible as a risk. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. capacity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 56.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-56-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Comparability concerning substantial difference and the determines whether Capacity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. comparability and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 56.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-57", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "57", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "57-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-57-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and confidentiality, education, support in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 57. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, shared protocols can expose sensitive information or delay urgent protection. The immediate improvement response is to retain trained response, lawful reporting, confidentiality and education support.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-57-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A credible arrangement should establish which dated record demonstrates operation and limitation and should use service, institution and affected-person evidence, recognising that plans and aggregate activity do not establish effective coordination. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. authority and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 57.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-57-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distribution concerning close the case administratively determines whether Evidence supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. distribution and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 57.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-58", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "58", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "58-protection", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-58-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Coverage concerning the protected public interest determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The protected public interest in safeguarding and protection concerns prevention, reporting, referral and response to abuse, exploitation, violence and harmful practice. If shared protocols can expose sensitive information or delay urgent protection, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to retain trained response, lawful reporting, confidentiality and education support. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. coverage and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 58.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-58-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under protection, review concerns which safety, privacy and professional boundaries govern action. Authorities should minimise data and retain qualified judgement, subject to the principle that information sharing should not create avoidable harm. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. feasibility and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 58.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-58-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Uncertainty concerning substantial difference and the determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. uncertainty and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 58.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-59", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "59", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "59-monitoring", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-59-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity concerning reporting confidentiality and education determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Planning for safeguarding and protection should begin with prevention, reporting, referral and response to abuse, exploitation, violence and harmful practice. A foreseeable failure arises where shared protocols can expose sensitive information or delay urgent protection. Participating bodies should retain trained response, lawful reporting, confidentiality and education support. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. capacity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 59.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-59-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The monitoring standard requires consideration of which indicators show receipt, delay, unmet need and education consequence. Decision-makers should track the complete pathway and complaints, because referral volume alone does not establish benefit. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. comparability and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 59.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-59-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Continuity concerning conditions a pathway dependent determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. continuity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 59.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-60", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "60", "title": "Review", "anchor": "60-review", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-60-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Safeguarding and protection requires explicit improvement control because it concerns prevention, reporting, referral and response to abuse, exploitation, violence and harmful practice. The risk is that shared protocols can expose sensitive information or delay urgent protection. A competent body should retain trained response, lawful reporting, confidentiality and education support. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. authority and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 60.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-60-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of review should determine how failure changes protocol, resource and responsibility. It should assign correction, deadline and verification and acknowledge that repeated coordination language should not substitute for accountable improvement. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. distribution and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 60.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-60-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Timing concerning substantial difference and the determines whether Review supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. timing and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 60.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-61", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "61", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "61-improvement-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-61-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and service, corrective, thresholds in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 61. Improvement proposition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that separate provision can leave operating gaps, inaccessible facilities or unclear maintenance. Authorities should set learner-facing minima, responsible service and corrective thresholds.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-62", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "62", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "62-mandate", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-62-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "capacity and service, corrective, thresholds in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 62. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that separate provision can leave operating gaps, inaccessible facilities or unclear maintenance. Authorities should therefore set learner-facing minima, responsible service and corrective thresholds.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-62-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The mandate test asks which body has authority and duty for the decision. Participating bodies should state primary and supporting roles. The governing proposition is that coordination supplements rather than erases sector responsibility. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. comparability and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 62.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-62-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. continuity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 62.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-63", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "63", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "63-minimum-service", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-63-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and service, corrective, thresholds in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 63. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, separate provision can leave operating gaps, inaccessible facilities or unclear maintenance. The immediate improvement response is to set learner-facing minima, responsible service and corrective thresholds.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-63-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A credible arrangement should establish which learner-facing condition should be present and should define standard, scope and competent verifier, recognising that a meeting or agreement is not itself a service. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. distribution and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 63.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-63-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. timing and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 63.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-64", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "64", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "64-pathway", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-64-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and service, corrective, thresholds in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 64. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. If separate provision can leave operating gaps, inaccessible facilities or unclear maintenance, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to set learner-facing minima, responsible service and corrective thresholds.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-64-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under pathway, review concerns how a learner moves from identification through response and follow-up. Authorities should map trigger, handover, receipt and closure, subject to the principle that referral is incomplete when receiving capacity is unknown. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. uncertainty and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 64.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-64-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. remedy and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 64.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-65", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "65", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "65-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-65-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and service, corrective, thresholds in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 65. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A foreseeable failure arises where separate provision can leave operating gaps, inaccessible facilities or unclear maintenance. Participating bodies should set learner-facing minima, responsible service and corrective thresholds.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-65-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The equity standard requires consideration of which learners cannot use the ordinary pathway. Decision-makers should test disability, language, status, geography and cost, because equal procedure does not establish equal access. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. continuity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 65.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-65-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. equity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 65.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-66", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "66", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "66-capacity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-66-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and service, corrective, thresholds in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 66. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The risk is that separate provision can leave operating gaps, inaccessible facilities or unclear maintenance. A competent body should set learner-facing minima, responsible service and corrective thresholds.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-66-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of capacity should determine which staff, time, finance and facilities make delivery feasible. It should verify workload, competence and dependency and acknowledge that an unfunded shared task should remain visible as a risk. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. timing and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 66.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-66-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. coverage and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 66.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-67", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "67", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "67-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-67-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and service, corrective, thresholds in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 67. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where separate provision can leave operating gaps, inaccessible facilities or unclear maintenance, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should set learner-facing minima, responsible service and corrective thresholds.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-67-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. For evidence, bodies should identify which dated record demonstrates operation and limitation and should use service, institution and affected-person evidence. Any conclusion must respect that plans and aggregate activity do not establish effective coordination. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. remedy and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 67.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-67-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. capacity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 67.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-68", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "68", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "68-protection", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-68-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In nutrition, water and sanitation, cross-sector coordination should secure services supporting health, dignity, attendance and sustained education. The principal risk is that separate provision can leave operating gaps, inaccessible facilities or unclear maintenance. Authorities should therefore set learner-facing minima, responsible service and corrective thresholds. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. continuity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 68.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-68-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The protection test asks which safety, privacy and professional boundaries govern action. Participating bodies should minimise data and retain qualified judgement. The governing proposition is that information sharing should not create avoidable harm. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. equity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 68.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-68-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authority concerning justified competence evidence in determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. authority and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 68.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-69", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "69", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "69-monitoring", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-69-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and service, corrective, thresholds in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 69. Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, separate provision can leave operating gaps, inaccessible facilities or unclear maintenance. The immediate improvement response is to set learner-facing minima, responsible service and corrective thresholds.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-69-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A credible arrangement should establish which indicators show receipt, delay, unmet need and education consequence and should track the complete pathway and complaints, recognising that referral volume alone does not establish benefit. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. coverage and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 69.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-69-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Feasibility concerning service is unavailable the determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. feasibility and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 69.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-70", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "70", "title": "Review", "anchor": "70-review", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-70-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Remedy concerning learner facing minima responsible determines whether Review supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The protected public interest in nutrition, water and sanitation concerns services supporting health, dignity, attendance and sustained education. If separate provision can leave operating gaps, inaccessible facilities or unclear maintenance, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to set learner-facing minima, responsible service and corrective thresholds. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. remedy and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 70.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-70-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under review, review concerns how failure changes protocol, resource and responsibility. Authorities should assign correction, deadline and verification, subject to the principle that repeated coordination language should not substitute for accountable improvement. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. capacity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 70.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-70-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Comparability concerning not be required to determines whether Review supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. comparability and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 70.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-71", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "71", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "71-improvement-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-71-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and limits, support, replacement in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 71. Improvement proposition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that frontline staff can receive added duties without time, competence, supervision or protection. Authorities should define role, training, referral limits, support and replacement.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-72", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "72", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "72-mandate", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-72-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and limits, support, replacement in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 72. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The risk is that frontline staff can receive added duties without time, competence, supervision or protection. A competent body should define role, training, referral limits, support and replacement.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-72-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of mandate should determine which body has authority and duty for the decision. It should state primary and supporting roles and acknowledge that coordination supplements rather than erases sector responsibility. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. coverage and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 72.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-72-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Feasibility concerning competence and evidence feasibility determines whether Mandate supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. feasibility and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 72.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-73", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "73", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "73-minimum-service", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-73-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and limits, support, replacement in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 73. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where frontline staff can receive added duties without time, competence, supervision or protection, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should define role, training, referral limits, support and replacement.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-73-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. For minimum service, bodies should identify which learner-facing condition should be present and should define standard, scope and competent verifier. Any conclusion must respect that a meeting or agreement is not itself a service. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. capacity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 73.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-73-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Comparability concerning evidence with delivery unequal determines whether Minimum service supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. comparability and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 73.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-74", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "74", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "74-pathway", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-74-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and limits, support, replacement in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 74. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that frontline staff can receive added duties without time, competence, supervision or protection. Authorities should therefore define role, training, referral limits, support and replacement.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-74-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The pathway test asks how a learner moves from identification through response and follow-up. Participating bodies should map trigger, handover, receipt and closure. The governing proposition is that referral is incomplete when receiving capacity is unknown. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. authority and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 74.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-74-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distribution concerning should retain the material determines whether Pathway supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. distribution and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 74.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-75", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "75", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "75-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-75-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "coverage and limits, support, replacement in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 75. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, frontline staff can receive added duties without time, competence, supervision or protection. The immediate improvement response is to define role, training, referral limits, support and replacement.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-75-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A credible arrangement should establish which learners cannot use the ordinary pathway and should test disability, language, status, geography and cost, recognising that equal procedure does not establish equal access. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. feasibility and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 75.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-75-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Uncertainty concerning effect and correction where determines whether Equity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. uncertainty and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 75.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-76", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "76", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "76-capacity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-76-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "capacity and limits, support, replacement in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 76. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. If frontline staff can receive added duties without time, competence, supervision or protection, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to define role, training, referral limits, support and replacement.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-76-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under capacity, review concerns which staff, time, finance and facilities make delivery feasible. Authorities should verify workload, competence and dependency, subject to the principle that an unfunded shared task should remain visible as a risk. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. comparability and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 76.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-76-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Continuity concerning unequal effect and correction determines whether Capacity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. continuity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 76.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-77", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "77", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "77-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-77-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and limits, support, replacement in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 77. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A foreseeable failure arises where frontline staff can receive added duties without time, competence, supervision or protection. Participating bodies should define role, training, referral limits, support and replacement.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-77-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The evidence standard requires consideration of which dated record demonstrates operation and limitation. Decision-makers should use service, institution and affected-person evidence, because plans and aggregate activity do not establish effective coordination. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. distribution and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 77.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-77-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Timing concerning tested under ordinary and determines whether Evidence supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. timing and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 77.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-78", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "78", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "78-protection", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-78-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Teachers and frontline personnel requires explicit improvement control because it concerns the preparation, workload, support and conduct of staff implementing connected arrangements. The risk is that frontline staff can receive added duties without time, competence, supervision or protection. A competent body should define role, training, referral limits, support and replacement. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. feasibility and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 78.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-78-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of protection should determine which safety, privacy and professional boundaries govern action. It should minimise data and retain qualified judgement and acknowledge that information sharing should not create avoidable harm. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. uncertainty and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 78.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-78-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Remedy concerning should retain the material determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. remedy and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 78.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-79", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "79", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "79-monitoring", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-79-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Comparability concerning without time competence supervision determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The public purpose of teachers and frontline personnel is the credible provision of the preparation, workload, support and conduct of staff implementing connected arrangements. Where frontline staff can receive added duties without time, competence, supervision or protection, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should define role, training, referral limits, support and replacement. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. comparability and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 79.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-79-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. For monitoring, bodies should identify which indicators show receipt, delay, unmet need and education consequence and should track the complete pathway and complaints. Any conclusion must respect that referral volume alone does not establish benefit. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. continuity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 79.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-79-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity concerning whether the learner received determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. equity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 79.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-80", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "80", "title": "Review", "anchor": "80-review", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-80-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In teachers and frontline personnel, cross-sector coordination should secure the preparation, workload, support and conduct of staff implementing connected arrangements. The principal risk is that frontline staff can receive added duties without time, competence, supervision or protection. Authorities should therefore define role, training, referral limits, support and replacement. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. distribution and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 80.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-80-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The review test asks how failure changes protocol, resource and responsibility. Participating bodies should assign correction, deadline and verification. The governing proposition is that repeated coordination language should not substitute for accountable improvement. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. timing and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 80.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-80-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. coverage and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 80.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-81", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "81", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "81-improvement-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-81-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and control, accountable, exception in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 81. Improvement proposition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that broad sharing can create harm while excessive restriction prevents necessary service. Authorities should use purpose limitation, consent, access control and accountable exception.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-82", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "82", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "82-mandate", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-82-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and control, accountable, exception in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 82. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. If broad sharing can create harm while excessive restriction prevents necessary service, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to use purpose limitation, consent, access control and accountable exception.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-82-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under mandate, review concerns which body has authority and duty for the decision. Authorities should state primary and supporting roles, subject to the principle that coordination supplements rather than erases sector responsibility. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. continuity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 82.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-82-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity concerning can resolve through an determines whether Mandate supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. equity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 82.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-83", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "83", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "83-minimum-service", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-83-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and control, accountable, exception in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 83. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A foreseeable failure arises where broad sharing can create harm while excessive restriction prevents necessary service. Participating bodies should use purpose limitation, consent, access control and accountable exception.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-83-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Timing concerning on temporary finance personal determines whether Minimum service supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The minimum service standard requires consideration of which learner-facing condition should be present. Decision-makers should define standard, scope and competent verifier, because a meeting or agreement is not itself a service. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. timing and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 83.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-83-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Coverage concerning correction the arrangement should determines whether Minimum service supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. coverage and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 83.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-84", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "84", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "84-pathway", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-84-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and control, accountable, exception in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 84. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The risk is that broad sharing can create harm while excessive restriction prevents necessary service. A competent body should use purpose limitation, consent, access control and accountable exception.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-84-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of pathway should determine how a learner moves from identification through response and follow-up. It should map trigger, handover, receipt and closure and acknowledge that referral is incomplete when receiving capacity is unknown. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. remedy and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 84.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-84-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity concerning correction should be recorded determines whether Pathway supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. capacity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 84.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-85", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "85", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "85-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-85-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and control, accountable, exception in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 85. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where broad sharing can create harm while excessive restriction prevents necessary service, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should use purpose limitation, consent, access control and accountable exception.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-85-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. For equity, bodies should identify which learners cannot use the ordinary pathway and should test disability, language, status, geography and cost. Any conclusion must respect that equal procedure does not establish equal access. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. equity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 85.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-85-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authority concerning final account should show determines whether Equity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. authority and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 85.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-86", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "86", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "86-capacity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-86-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and control, accountable, exception in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 86. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that broad sharing can create harm while excessive restriction prevents necessary service. Authorities should therefore use purpose limitation, consent, access control and accountable exception.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-86-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The capacity test asks which staff, time, finance and facilities make delivery feasible. Participating bodies should verify workload, competence and dependency. The governing proposition is that an unfunded shared task should remain visible as a risk. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. coverage and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 86.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-86-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Feasibility concerning competence and evidence feasibility determines whether Capacity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. feasibility and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 86.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-87", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "87", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "87-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-87-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and control, accountable, exception in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 87. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, broad sharing can create harm while excessive restriction prevents necessary service. The immediate improvement response is to use purpose limitation, consent, access control and accountable exception.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-87-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A credible arrangement should establish which dated record demonstrates operation and limitation and should use service, institution and affected-person evidence, recognising that plans and aggregate activity do not establish effective coordination. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. capacity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 87.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-87-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Comparability concerning evidence to connect evidence determines whether Evidence supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. comparability and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 87.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-88", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "88", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "88-protection", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-88-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity concerning difference and the burden determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The protected public interest in information and privacy concerns the minimum data needed for coordination and the controls governing collection, access and disclosure. If broad sharing can create harm while excessive restriction prevents necessary service, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to use purpose limitation, consent, access control and accountable exception. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. equity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 88.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-88-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under protection, review concerns which safety, privacy and professional boundaries govern action. Authorities should minimise data and retain qualified judgement, subject to the principle that information sharing should not create avoidable harm. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. authority and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 88.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-88-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distribution concerning competence and evidence distribution determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. distribution and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 88.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-89", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "89", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "89-monitoring", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-89-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Coverage concerning for coordination and the determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Planning for information and privacy should begin with the minimum data needed for coordination and the controls governing collection, access and disclosure. A foreseeable failure arises where broad sharing can create harm while excessive restriction prevents necessary service. Participating bodies should use purpose limitation, consent, access control and accountable exception. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. coverage and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 89.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-89-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The monitoring standard requires consideration of which indicators show receipt, delay, unmet need and education consequence. Decision-makers should track the complete pathway and complaints, because referral volume alone does not establish benefit. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. feasibility and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 89.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-89-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Uncertainty concerning requires a controlled alternative determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. uncertainty and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 89.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-90", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "90", "title": "Review", "anchor": "90-review", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-90-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Information and privacy requires explicit improvement control because it concerns the minimum data needed for coordination and the controls governing collection, access and disclosure. The risk is that broad sharing can create harm while excessive restriction prevents necessary service. A competent body should use purpose limitation, consent, access control and accountable exception. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. capacity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 90.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-90-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of review should determine how failure changes protocol, resource and responsibility. It should assign correction, deadline and verification and acknowledge that repeated coordination language should not substitute for accountable improvement. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. comparability and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 90.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-90-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Continuity concerning evidence continuity and justified determines whether Review supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. continuity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 90.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-91", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "parentId": null, "number": "91", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "91-improvement-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-91-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and transition, learner, burden in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 91. Improvement proposition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that joint plans can rely on unfunded services or temporary projects with no receiving capacity. Authorities should cost each function, dependency, transition and learner burden.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-92", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "parentId": null, "number": "92", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "92-mandate", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-92-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "coverage and transition, learner, burden in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 92. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that joint plans can rely on unfunded services or temporary projects with no receiving capacity. Authorities should therefore cost each function, dependency, transition and learner burden.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-92-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The mandate test asks which body has authority and duty for the decision. Participating bodies should state primary and supporting roles. The governing proposition is that coordination supplements rather than erases sector responsibility. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. feasibility and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 92.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-92-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. uncertainty and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 92.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-93", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "parentId": null, "number": "93", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "93-minimum-service", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-93-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "capacity and transition, learner, burden in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 93. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, joint plans can rely on unfunded services or temporary projects with no receiving capacity. The immediate improvement response is to cost each function, dependency, transition and learner burden.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-93-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A credible arrangement should establish which learner-facing condition should be present and should define standard, scope and competent verifier, recognising that a meeting or agreement is not itself a service. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. comparability and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 93.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-93-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. continuity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 93.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-94", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "parentId": null, "number": "94", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "94-pathway", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-94-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and transition, learner, burden in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 94. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. If joint plans can rely on unfunded services or temporary projects with no receiving capacity, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to cost each function, dependency, transition and learner burden.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-94-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under pathway, review concerns how a learner moves from identification through response and follow-up. Authorities should map trigger, handover, receipt and closure, subject to the principle that referral is incomplete when receiving capacity is unknown. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. distribution and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 94.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-94-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. timing and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 94.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-95", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "parentId": null, "number": "95", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "95-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-95-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and transition, learner, burden in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 95. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A foreseeable failure arises where joint plans can rely on unfunded services or temporary projects with no receiving capacity. Participating bodies should cost each function, dependency, transition and learner burden.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-95-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The equity standard requires consideration of which learners cannot use the ordinary pathway. Decision-makers should test disability, language, status, geography and cost, because equal procedure does not establish equal access. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. uncertainty and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 95.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-95-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. remedy and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 95.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-96", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "parentId": null, "number": "96", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "96-capacity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-96-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and transition, learner, burden in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 96. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The risk is that joint plans can rely on unfunded services or temporary projects with no receiving capacity. A competent body should cost each function, dependency, transition and learner burden.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-96-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of capacity should determine which staff, time, finance and facilities make delivery feasible. It should verify workload, competence and dependency and acknowledge that an unfunded shared task should remain visible as a risk. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. continuity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 96.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-96-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. equity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 96.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-97", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "parentId": null, "number": "97", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "97-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-97-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and transition, learner, burden in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 97. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where joint plans can rely on unfunded services or temporary projects with no receiving capacity, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should cost each function, dependency, transition and learner burden.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-97-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. For evidence, bodies should identify which dated record demonstrates operation and limitation and should use service, institution and affected-person evidence. Any conclusion must respect that plans and aggregate activity do not establish effective coordination. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. timing and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 97.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-97-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. coverage and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 97.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-98", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "parentId": null, "number": "98", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "98-protection", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-98-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In finance and service capacity, cross-sector coordination should secure the resources and recurrent commitments required across participating bodies. The principal risk is that joint plans can rely on unfunded services or temporary projects with no receiving capacity. Authorities should therefore cost each function, dependency, transition and learner burden. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. uncertainty and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 98.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-98-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The protection test asks which safety, privacy and professional boundaries govern action. Participating bodies should minimise data and retain qualified judgement. The governing proposition is that information sharing should not create avoidable harm. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. remedy and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 98.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-98-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity concerning correction should be recorded determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. capacity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 98.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-99", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "parentId": null, "number": "99", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "99-monitoring", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-99-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and transition, learner, burden in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 99. Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, joint plans can rely on unfunded services or temporary projects with no receiving capacity. The immediate improvement response is to cost each function, dependency, transition and learner burden.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-99-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A credible arrangement should establish which indicators show receipt, delay, unmet need and education consequence and should track the complete pathway and complaints, recognising that referral volume alone does not establish benefit. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. equity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 99.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-99-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authority concerning substantial difference and the determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. authority and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 99.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-100", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "parentId": null, "number": "100", "title": "Review", "anchor": "100-review", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-100-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Timing concerning action can produce a determines whether Review supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The protected public interest in finance and service capacity concerns the resources and recurrent commitments required across participating bodies. If joint plans can rely on unfunded services or temporary projects with no receiving capacity, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to cost each function, dependency, transition and learner burden. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. timing and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 100.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-100-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under review, review concerns how failure changes protocol, resource and responsibility. Authorities should assign correction, deadline and verification, subject to the principle that repeated coordination language should not substitute for accountable improvement. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. coverage and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 100.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-100-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Feasibility concerning to connect evidence with determines whether Review supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. feasibility and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 100.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-101", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "101", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "101-improvement-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-101-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "capacity and formats, feedback, reasons in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 101. Improvement proposition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that technical coordination can proceed without accessible information or meaningful affected-person evidence. Authorities should provide languages, formats, safe feedback and reasons.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-102", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "102", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "102-mandate", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-102-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and formats, feedback, reasons in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 102. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The risk is that technical coordination can proceed without accessible information or meaningful affected-person evidence. A competent body should provide languages, formats, safe feedback and reasons.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-102-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of mandate should determine which body has authority and duty for the decision. It should state primary and supporting roles and acknowledge that coordination supplements rather than erases sector responsibility. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. equity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 102.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-102-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authority concerning the implication for referral determines whether Mandate supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. authority and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 102.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-103", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "103", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "103-minimum-service", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-103-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and formats, feedback, reasons in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 103. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where technical coordination can proceed without accessible information or meaningful affected-person evidence, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should provide languages, formats, safe feedback and reasons.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-103-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. For minimum service, bodies should identify which learner-facing condition should be present and should define standard, scope and competent verifier. Any conclusion must respect that a meeting or agreement is not itself a service. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. coverage and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 103.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-103-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Feasibility concerning recorded feasibility and correction determines whether Minimum service supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. feasibility and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 103.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-104", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "104", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "104-pathway", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-104-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "remedy and formats, feedback, reasons in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 104. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that technical coordination can proceed without accessible information or meaningful affected-person evidence. Authorities should therefore provide languages, formats, safe feedback and reasons.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-104-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The pathway test asks how a learner moves from identification through response and follow-up. Participating bodies should map trigger, handover, receipt and closure. The governing proposition is that referral is incomplete when receiving capacity is unknown. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. capacity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 104.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-104-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Comparability concerning departure should be justified determines whether Pathway supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. comparability and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 104.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-105", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "105", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "105-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-105-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and formats, feedback, reasons in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 105. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, technical coordination can proceed without accessible information or meaningful affected-person evidence. The immediate improvement response is to provide languages, formats, safe feedback and reasons.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-105-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 105. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A credible arrangement should establish which learners cannot use the ordinary pathway and should test disability, language, status, geography and cost, recognising that equal procedure does not establish equal access. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-105-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distribution concerning evidence distribution and justified determines whether Equity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. distribution and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 105.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-106", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "106", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "106-capacity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-106-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "coverage and formats, feedback, reasons in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 106. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. If technical coordination can proceed without accessible information or meaningful affected-person evidence, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to provide languages, formats, safe feedback and reasons.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-106-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under capacity, review concerns which staff, time, finance and facilities make delivery feasible. Authorities should verify workload, competence and dependency, subject to the principle that an unfunded shared task should remain visible as a risk. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. feasibility and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 106.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-106-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Uncertainty concerning unequal effect and correction determines whether Capacity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. uncertainty and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 106.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-107", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "107", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "107-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-107-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "capacity and formats, feedback, reasons in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 107. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A foreseeable failure arises where technical coordination can proceed without accessible information or meaningful affected-person evidence. Participating bodies should provide languages, formats, safe feedback and reasons.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-107-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The evidence standard requires consideration of which dated record demonstrates operation and limitation. Decision-makers should use service, institution and affected-person evidence, because plans and aggregate activity do not establish effective coordination. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. comparability and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 107.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-107-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Continuity concerning the implication for referral determines whether Evidence supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. continuity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 107.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-108", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "108", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "108-protection", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-108-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Participation and communication requires explicit improvement control because it concerns the involvement and information needed for learners, families, staff and communities to use services. The risk is that technical coordination can proceed without accessible information or meaningful affected-person evidence. A competent body should provide languages, formats, safe feedback and reasons. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. authority and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 108.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-108-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of protection should determine which safety, privacy and professional boundaries govern action. It should minimise data and retain qualified judgement and acknowledge that information sharing should not create avoidable harm. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. distribution and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 108.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-108-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Timing concerning be justified by competence determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. timing and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 108.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-109", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "109", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "109-monitoring", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-109-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Feasibility concerning learners families staff and determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The public purpose of participation and communication is the credible provision of the involvement and information needed for learners, families, staff and communities to use services. Where technical coordination can proceed without accessible information or meaningful affected-person evidence, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should provide languages, formats, safe feedback and reasons. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. feasibility and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 109.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-109-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. For monitoring, bodies should identify which indicators show receipt, delay, unmet need and education consequence and should track the complete pathway and complaints. Any conclusion must respect that referral volume alone does not establish benefit. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. uncertainty and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 109.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-109-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Remedy concerning correction the final account determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. remedy and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 109.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-110", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "110", "title": "Review", "anchor": "110-review", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-110-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In participation and communication, cross-sector coordination should secure the involvement and information needed for learners, families, staff and communities to use services. The principal risk is that technical coordination can proceed without accessible information or meaningful affected-person evidence. Authorities should therefore provide languages, formats, safe feedback and reasons. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. comparability and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 110.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-110-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The review test asks how failure changes protocol, resource and responsibility. Participating bodies should assign correction, deadline and verification. The governing proposition is that repeated coordination language should not substitute for accountable improvement. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. continuity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 110.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-110-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. equity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 110.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-111", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "111", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "111-improvement-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-111-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and pathways, revise, responsibilities in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 111. Improvement proposition to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that arrangements can fail when ordinary contacts, sites or services are unavailable. Authorities should prepare alternatives, test pathways, track unmet need and revise responsibilities.", "citationIds": [ "REF-12" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-112", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "112", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "112-mandate", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-112-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "feasibility and pathways, revise, responsibilities in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 112. Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. If arrangements can fail when ordinary contacts, sites or services are unavailable, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to prepare alternatives, test pathways, track unmet need and revise responsibilities.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-112-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Mandate to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under mandate, review concerns which body has authority and duty for the decision. Authorities should state primary and supporting roles, subject to the principle that coordination supplements rather than erases sector responsibility. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. uncertainty and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 112.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-112-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Remedy concerning should retain the material determines whether Mandate supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. remedy and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 112.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-113", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "113", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "113-minimum-service", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-113-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and pathways, revise, responsibilities in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 113. Minimum service to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A foreseeable failure arises where arrangements can fail when ordinary contacts, sites or services are unavailable. Participating bodies should prepare alternatives, test pathways, track unmet need and revise responsibilities.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-113-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Continuity concerning define standard scope and determines whether Minimum service supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The minimum service standard requires consideration of which learner-facing condition should be present. Decision-makers should define standard, scope and competent verifier, because a meeting or agreement is not itself a service. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. continuity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 113.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-113-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity concerning evidence with delivery unequal determines whether Minimum service supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. Any departure should be justified by competence and evidence. equity and justified, competence, evidence in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 113.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-114", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "114", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "114-pathway", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-114-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and pathways, revise, responsibilities in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 114. Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The risk is that arrangements can fail when ordinary contacts, sites or services are unavailable. A competent body should prepare alternatives, test pathways, track unmet need and revise responsibilities.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-114-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of pathway should determine how a learner moves from identification through response and follow-up. It should map trigger, handover, receipt and closure and acknowledge that referral is incomplete when receiving capacity is unknown. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. timing and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 114.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-114-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Coverage concerning effect and correction correction determines whether Pathway supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. coverage and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 114.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-115", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "115", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "115-equity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-115-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "uncertainty and pathways, revise, responsibilities in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 115. Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Where arrangements can fail when ordinary contacts, sites or services are unavailable, institutional reporting can overstate both reach and protection. Authorities should prepare alternatives, test pathways, track unmet need and revise responsibilities.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-115-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. For equity, bodies should identify which learners cannot use the ordinary pathway and should test disability, language, status, geography and cost. Any conclusion must respect that equal procedure does not establish equal access. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. remedy and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 115.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-115-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity concerning should retain the material determines whether Equity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The final account should show whether the learner received a timely and appropriate service and whether education access, participation and continuity were protected. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. capacity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 115.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-116", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "116", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "116-capacity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-116-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "continuity and pathways, revise, responsibilities in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 116. Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The principal risk is that arrangements can fail when ordinary contacts, sites or services are unavailable. Authorities should therefore prepare alternatives, test pathways, track unmet need and revise responsibilities.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-116-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Capacity to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The capacity test asks which staff, time, finance and facilities make delivery feasible. Participating bodies should verify workload, competence and dependency. The governing proposition is that an unfunded shared task should remain visible as a risk. The record should identify population, service, authority, status and date. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. equity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 116.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-116-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Authority concerning the implication for referral determines whether Capacity supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Coordination is valuable when it changes the learner-facing service. Institutional contact, meetings and referral counts are intermediate evidence rather than final outcomes. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. authority and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 116.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-117", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "117", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "117-evidence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-117-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "timing and pathways, revise, responsibilities in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 117. Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. In this domain, arrangements can fail when ordinary contacts, sites or services are unavailable. The immediate improvement response is to prepare alternatives, test pathways, track unmet need and revise responsibilities.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-117-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Evidence to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. A credible arrangement should establish which dated record demonstrates operation and limitation and should use service, institution and affected-person evidence, recognising that plans and aggregate activity do not establish effective coordination. Local evidence should be capable of changing a central account of service availability. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. coverage and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 117.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-117-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Feasibility concerning a receiving service is determines whether Evidence supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Where a receiving service is unavailable, the referring body should not close the case administratively. Interim protection, escalation and education continuity should be stated. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. feasibility and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 117.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-118", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "118", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "118-protection", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-118-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Remedy concerning when ordinary contacts sites determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The protected public interest in continuity, emergency and improvement concerns the operation, monitoring and correction of coordination during disruption and recovery. If arrangements can fail when ordinary contacts, sites or services are unavailable, shared action can produce a gap rather than an integrated response. The required course is to prepare alternatives, test pathways, track unmet need and revise responsibilities. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. remedy and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 118.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-118-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Protection to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Under protection, review concerns which safety, privacy and professional boundaries govern action. Authorities should minimise data and retain qualified judgement, subject to the principle that information sharing should not create avoidable harm. Reasons should remain proportionate to the consequence and competence of each body. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. capacity and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 118.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-118-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Comparability concerning bodies can resolve through determines whether Protection supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Learners and families should not be required to navigate institutional boundaries that public bodies can resolve through an authorised pathway. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. comparability and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 118.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-119", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "119", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "119-monitoring", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-119-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity concerning the burden of evidence determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Planning for continuity, emergency and improvement should begin with the operation, monitoring and correction of coordination during disruption and recovery. A foreseeable failure arises where arrangements can fail when ordinary contacts, sites or services are unavailable. Participating bodies should prepare alternatives, test pathways, track unmet need and revise responsibilities. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. equity and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 119.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-119-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "authority and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 119. Monitoring to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. The monitoring standard requires consideration of which indicators show receipt, delay, unmet need and education consequence. Decision-makers should track the complete pathway and complaints, because referral volume alone does not establish benefit. Dependencies on temporary finance, personal contacts or unavailable specialists should be explicit. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-119-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distribution concerning effect and correction the determines whether Monitoring supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. The arrangement should be tested under ordinary and disrupted conditions. A pathway dependent on one person or system requires a controlled alternative. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. distribution and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 119.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-120", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "120", "title": "Review", "anchor": "120-review", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-120-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Continuity, emergency and improvement requires explicit improvement control because it concerns the operation, monitoring and correction of coordination during disruption and recovery. The risk is that arrangements can fail when ordinary contacts, sites or services are unavailable. A competent body should prepare alternatives, test pathways, track unmet need and revise responsibilities. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. coverage and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 120.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-120-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Review of review should determine how failure changes protocol, resource and responsibility. It should assign correction, deadline and verification and acknowledge that repeated coordination language should not substitute for accountable improvement. Personal and protection information should remain lawfully controlled. The conclusion should retain the material limitation and responsible body. feasibility and material, limitation, responsible in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 120.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-120-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Uncertainty concerning for referral and correction determines whether Review supports a bounded finding and corrective responsibility. Correction should address the actual failure: identification, handover, capacity, delay, communication, service quality or follow-up. Additional coordination activity may not resolve it. The implication for referral and correction should be recorded. uncertainty and correction, should, recorded in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 120.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-121", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "121", "title": "A complete pathway", "anchor": "121-a-complete-pathway", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-121-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "comparability and usable, during, disruption in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 121. A complete pathway to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. It should remain usable during disruption.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-122", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "122", "title": "Evidence for improvement", "anchor": "122-evidence-for-improvement", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-122-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "equity and should, assigned, correction in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 122. Evidence for improvement to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Delay, refusal, inaccessible procedure and unmet need should lead to assigned correction.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-123", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "123", "title": "Final conclusion", "anchor": "123-final-conclusion", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-123-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "distribution and learner, public, interest in Substantial Difference and the Burden of Evidence in Recognition Decisions require ### 123. Final conclusion to connect evidence with delivery, unequal effect and correction. Shared action should strengthen rather than diffuse responsibility and should remain answerable to the learner and the public interest.", "citationIds": [] } ] } ], "technicalAppendices": [], "notes": [], "references": [ { "id": "REF-01", "authoringBody": "Education for All Global Monitoring Report Team", "title": "Reaching the Marginalized — EFA Global Monitoring Report 2010", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-01-19", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000186606", "evidenceRole": "Principal contemporaneous analysis of intersecting disadvantage and education marginalisation." }, { "id": "REF-02", "authoringBody": "UNESCO Institute for Statistics", "title": "Global Education Digest 2010: Comparing Education Statistics Across the World", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-09-20", "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_STATISTICAL_REPORT", "url": "https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/global-education-digest-2010-comparing-education-statistics-across-the-world-en.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Comparative education statistics, definitions and limitations." }, { "id": "REF-03", "authoringBody": "UNESCO Institute for Statistics", "title": "Education Indicators: Technical Guidelines", "year": 2009, "publicationDate": "2009-11-01", "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_STATISTICAL_GUIDANCE", "url": "https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/education-indicators-technical-guidelines-en_0.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Definitions and interpretation of participation, progression, completion and resource indicators." }, { "id": "REF-04", "authoringBody": "United Nations", "title": "The Millennium Development Goals Report 2010", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-06-23", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/MDG%20Report%202010%20En%20r15%20-low%20res%2020100615%20-.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Global and regional monitoring of primary education, gender, poverty and related development conditions." }, { "id": "REF-05", "authoringBody": "United Nations Development Programme", "title": "Human Development Report 2010: The Real Wealth of Nations — Pathways to Human Development", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-11-04", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_DEVELOPMENT_REPORT", "url": "https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2010", "evidenceRole": "Distribution-sensitive human development concepts and evidence available before the cut-off." }, { "id": "REF-06", "authoringBody": "UNICEF", "title": "Progress for Children: Achieving the MDGs with Equity, Number 9", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-09-07", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_CHILDREN_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://www.unicef.org/reports/progress-children-no-9", "evidenceRole": "Equity-focused child indicators and comparison between population groups." }, { "id": "REF-07", "authoringBody": "World Education Forum", "title": "The Dakar Framework for Action: Education for All — Meeting Our Collective Commitments", "year": 2000, "publicationDate": "2000-04-28", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_ACTION_FRAMEWORK", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000121147", "evidenceRole": "Commitments to equitable access, quality, measurable outcomes and accountable national planning." }, { "id": "REF-08", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Convention on the Rights of the Child", "year": 1989, "publicationDate": "1989-11-20", "sourceType": "INTERNATIONAL_CONVENTION", "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child", "evidenceRole": "Rights concerning non-discrimination, identity, education and development." }, { "id": "REF-09", "authoringBody": "United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights", "title": "General Comment No. 13: The Right to Education", "year": 1999, "publicationDate": "1999-12-08", "sourceType": "TREATY_BODY_GENERAL_COMMENT", "url": "https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/cescr/1999/en/37937", "evidenceRole": "Interpretation of availability, accessibility, acceptability and adaptability." }, { "id": "REF-10", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities", "year": 2006, "publicationDate": "2006-12-13", "sourceType": "INTERNATIONAL_CONVENTION", "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities", "evidenceRole": "Non-discrimination, accessibility, inclusive education and disability data safeguards." }, { "id": "REF-11", "authoringBody": "United Nations", "title": "Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement", "year": 1998, "publicationDate": "1998-02-11", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_GUIDING_PRINCIPLES", "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-internally-displaced-persons/international-standards", "evidenceRole": "Principles relevant to protection, documentation, education and non-discrimination of displaced persons." }, { "id": "REF-12", "authoringBody": "UNESCO and UNICEF", "title": "A Human Rights-Based Approach to Education for All", "year": 2007, "publicationDate": "2007-01-01", "sourceType": "INTERAGENCY_POLICY_FRAMEWORK", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000154861", "evidenceRole": "Rights-based planning, equality, participation, accountability and education quality." }, { "id": "REF-13", "authoringBody": "Education for All Global Monitoring Report Team", "title": "Overcoming Inequality: Why Governance Matters — EFA Global Monitoring Report 2009", "year": 2008, "publicationDate": "2008-11-25", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000177683", "evidenceRole": "Governance, finance and unequal educational opportunity." }, { "id": "REF-14", "authoringBody": "World Bank", "title": "World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development", "year": 2005, "publicationDate": "2005-09-01", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_DEVELOPMENT_REPORT", "url": "https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/435331468127174418/pdf/322040World0Development0Report02006.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Concepts of unequal opportunity, institutions and equitable public action." }, { "id": "REF-15", "authoringBody": "World Bank", "title": "Safeguarding Education During Economic Crisis", "year": 2009, "publicationDate": "2009-04-01", "sourceType": "CRISIS_POLICY_NOTE", "url": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/489131468340200911/pdf/485120WP0Avert10Box338912B01PUBLIC1.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Risks to budgets, households, participation and long-term human development during economic crisis." }, { "id": "REF-16", "authoringBody": "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development", "title": "Education at a Glance 2010: OECD Indicators", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-09-07", "sourceType": "COMPARATIVE_INDICATOR_REPORT", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2010-en", "evidenceRole": "Comparative participation, progression, expenditure and outcomes evidence with system-level metadata." }, { "id": "REF-17", "authoringBody": "European Commission", "title": "Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-03-03", "sourceType": "COMMISSION_COMMUNICATION", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52010DC2020", "evidenceRole": "Contemporaneous European policy context for education, inclusion, employment and headline indicators." }, { "id": "REF-18", "authoringBody": "European Commission", "title": "Youth on the Move: An Initiative to Unleash the Potential of Young People to Achieve Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in the European Union", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-09-15", "sourceType": "COMMISSION_COMMUNICATION", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0477", "evidenceRole": "European education, mobility, attainment and youth inclusion policy context." }, { "id": "REF-19", "authoringBody": "European Commission", "title": "A Renewed Commitment to Social Europe: Reinforcing the Open Method of Coordination for Social Protection and Social Inclusion", "year": 2008, "publicationDate": "2008-07-02", "sourceType": "COMMISSION_COMMUNICATION", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52008DC0418", "evidenceRole": "Social inclusion monitoring, common objectives and context-sensitive indicators." }, { "id": "REF-20", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Resolution 64/250: Assistance to Haiti in the Aftermath of the Recent Earthquake", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-01-22", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_RESOLUTION", "url": "https://undocs.org/A/RES/64/250", "evidenceRole": "Contemporaneous recognition of humanitarian and reconstruction needs and national leadership." }, { "id": "REF-21", "authoringBody": "United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs", "title": "Haiti Revised Humanitarian Appeal", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-02-18", "sourceType": "HUMANITARIAN_APPEAL", "url": "https://reliefweb.int/report/haiti/haiti-revised-humanitarian-appeal-2010", "evidenceRole": "Displacement, service disruption and humanitarian education context." }, { "id": "REF-22", "authoringBody": "European Commission", "title": "European Union Response to the Earthquake in Haiti", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-02-10", "sourceType": "COMMISSION_COMMUNICATION", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0056", "evidenceRole": "European humanitarian and recovery support, coordination and Haitian ownership." }, { "id": "REF-23", "authoringBody": "United Nations Economic and Social Council", "title": "Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses, Revision 2", "year": 2008, "publicationDate": "2008-01-01", "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_STATISTICAL_STANDARD", "url": "https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic-social/Standards-and-Methods/files/Principles_and_Recommendations/Population-and-Housing-Censuses/Series_M67Rev2-E.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Official principles for population coverage, definitions, classifications and data quality." }, { "id": "REF-24", "authoringBody": "United Nations Statistics Division", "title": "Designing Household Survey Samples: Practical Guidelines", "year": 2005, "publicationDate": "2005-01-01", "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_STATISTICAL_GUIDANCE", "url": "https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/surveys/Handbook23June05.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Sample design, estimation, precision and non-response guidance." }, { "id": "REF-25", "authoringBody": "World Education Forum 2015", "title": "Incheon Declaration: Education 2030 — Towards Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Lifelong Learning for All", "year": 2015, "publicationDate": "2015-05-21", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_EDUCATION_DECLARATION", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000233137", "evidenceRole": "Education commitments adopted at Incheon and their contemporaneous institutional status." }, { "id": "REF-26", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development", "year": 2015, "publicationDate": "2015-07-27", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_RESOLUTION", "url": "https://undocs.org/A/RES/69/313", "evidenceRole": "Adopted global financing framework and relevant principles for domestic public finance and international cooperation." }, { "id": "REF-27", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development", "year": 2015, "publicationDate": "2015-09-25", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_RESOLUTION", "url": "https://undocs.org/A/RES/70/1", "evidenceRole": "Agenda adopted on 25 September 2015, including Goal 4 and its education targets, as available at the evidence cut-off." }, { "id": "REF-28", "authoringBody": "UNESCO", "title": "Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4", "year": 2015, "publicationDate": "2015-11-04", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_EDUCATION_FRAMEWORK_FOR_ACTION", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656", "evidenceRole": "Framework for Action available before the cut-off and relevant to institutional planning, coordination, equity and review." }, { "id": "REF-29", "authoringBody": "United Nations Secretary-General", "title": "One Humanity: Shared Responsibility — Report of the Secretary-General for the World Humanitarian Summit", "year": 2016, "publicationDate": "2016-02-02", "documentSymbol": "A/70/709", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_REPORT", "url": "https://docs.un.org/A/70/709", "evidenceRole": "Secretary-General’s pre-Summit Agenda for Humanity and proposals for humanitarian responsibility." }, { "id": "REF-30", "authoringBody": "Chair of the World Humanitarian Summit", "title": "Chair’s Summary: Standing Up for Humanity — Committing to Action", "year": 2016, "publicationDate": "2016-05-24", "sourceType": "SUMMIT_CHAIRS_SUMMARY", "url": "https://agendaforhumanity.org/sites/default/files/resources/2017/Jul/chairs_summary.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Official Chair’s account of the May 2016 Summit discussions and commitments, used with its status as a summary." }, { "id": "REF-31", "authoringBody": "United Nations", "title": "New Fund Launched at UN Humanitarian Summit to Address Education in Crisis Zones", "year": 2016, "publicationDate": "2016-05-23", "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_LAUNCH_ACCOUNT", "url": "https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2016/05/new-fund-launched-at-un-humanitarian-summit-to-address-education-in-crisis-zones/", "evidenceRole": "Contemporaneous official account of the Education Cannot Wait launch and stated aims; not evidence of later finance or results." }, { "id": "REF-32", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "The Right to Education in Emergency Situations", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-07-09", "documentSymbol": "A/RES/64/290", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_RESOLUTION", "url": "https://docs.un.org/A/RES/64/290", "evidenceRole": "Recognition of education as an integral element of humanitarian response and calls for access, continuity, protection and support." }, { "id": "REF-33", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, Resolution 71/1", "year": 2016, "publicationDate": "2016-09-19", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_GENERAL_ASSEMBLY_RESOLUTION", "url": "https://undocs.org/A/RES/71/1", "evidenceRole": "Contemporaneous commitment relevant to shared responsibility, refugee and migrant education, and the reporting boundary between commitment and result." }, { "id": "REF-34", "authoringBody": "Global Education Monitoring Report Team", "title": "Accountability in Education: Meeting Our Commitments — Global Education Monitoring Report 2017/8", "year": 2017, "publicationDate": "2017-10-24", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_EDUCATION_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000259338", "evidenceRole": "Principal contemporaneous analysis of accountability relations, responsibility, transparency, participation and unintended effects in education." }, { "id": "REF-35", "authoringBody": "World Bank", "title": "World Development Report 2018: Learning to Realize Education's Promise", "year": 2018, "publicationDate": "2017-09-26", "sourceType": "WORLD_DEVELOPMENT_REPORT", "url": "https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2018", "evidenceRole": "Principal contemporaneous analysis of learning, measurement, evidence-led action and alignment of education actors." }, { "id": "REF-36", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Global Compact on Refugees, Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Part II, affirmed by Resolution 73/151", "year": 2018, "publicationDate": "2018-12-17", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_GLOBAL_COMPACT", "url": "https://www.unhcr.org/media/global-compact-refugees-booklet", "evidenceRole": "Controlling contemporaneous compact on predictable and equitable responsibility-sharing, national arrangements and refugee inclusion, including education." } ], "readerNodes": [ { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "I", "title": "Interpreting continuity as a public duty", "anchor": "part-i-interpreting-continuity-as-a-public-duty", "sortOrder": 1 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-1", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "1", "title": "Admission without avoidable delay", "anchor": "1-admission-without-avoidable-delay", "sortOrder": 2 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-2", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "2", "title": "Documentation and identity", "anchor": "2-documentation-and-identity", "sortOrder": 3 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-3", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "3", "title": "Placement and prior learning", "anchor": "3-placement-and-prior-learning", "sortOrder": 4 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-4", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "4", "title": "Language and communication", "anchor": "4-language-and-communication", "sortOrder": 5 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-5", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "5", "title": "Participation and belonging", "anchor": "5-participation-and-belonging", "sortOrder": 6 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "II", "title": "Continuity across institutions and time", "anchor": "part-ii-continuity-across-institutions-and-time", "sortOrder": 7 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-6", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "6", "title": "The learner continuity record", "anchor": "6-the-learner-continuity-record", "sortOrder": 8 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-7", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "7", "title": "Transition between levels", "anchor": "7-transition-between-levels", "sortOrder": 9 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-8", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "8", "title": "Mobility within a country", "anchor": "8-mobility-within-a-country", "sortOrder": 10 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-9", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "9", "title": "Cross-border recognition", "anchor": "9-cross-border-recognition", "sortOrder": 11 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "III", "title": "Capacity and shared responsibility", "anchor": "part-iii-capacity-and-shared-responsibility", "sortOrder": 12 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-10", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "10", "title": "Planning the entitled population", "anchor": "10-planning-the-entitled-population", "sortOrder": 13 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-11", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "11", "title": "Workforce and professional support", "anchor": "11-workforce-and-professional-support", "sortOrder": 14 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-12", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "12", "title": "Finance and handover", "anchor": "12-finance-and-handover", "sortOrder": 15 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-13", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "13", "title": "Protection, health and psychosocial support", "anchor": "13-protection-health-and-psychosocial-support", "sortOrder": 16 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "IV", "title": "Evidence, accountability and correction", "anchor": "part-iv-evidence-accountability-and-correction", "sortOrder": 17 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-14", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "14", "title": "Measures of timely access", "anchor": "14-measures-of-timely-access", "sortOrder": 18 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-15", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "15", "title": "Quality and progression evidence", "anchor": "15-quality-and-progression-evidence", "sortOrder": 19 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-16", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "16", "title": "Complaint and remedy", "anchor": "16-complaint-and-remedy", "sortOrder": 20 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-17", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "17", "title": "Public reporting", "anchor": "17-public-reporting", "sortOrder": 21 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "18", "title": "National readiness review", "anchor": "18-national-readiness-review", "sortOrder": 22 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "I", "title": "Mandate and shared governance", "anchor": "part-i-mandate-and-shared-governance", "sortOrder": 23 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-1", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "1", "title": "Admission without avoidable delay", "anchor": "1-admission-without-avoidable-delay", "sortOrder": 24 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-2", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "2", "title": "Documentation and identity", "anchor": "2-documentation-and-identity", "sortOrder": 25 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-3", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "3", "title": "Placement and prior learning", "anchor": "3-placement-and-prior-learning", "sortOrder": 26 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-4", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "4", "title": "Language and communication", "anchor": "4-language-and-communication", "sortOrder": 27 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-5", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "5", "title": "Participation and belonging", "anchor": "5-participation-and-belonging", "sortOrder": 28 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-6", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "6", "title": "The learner continuity record", "anchor": "6-the-learner-continuity-record", "sortOrder": 29 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-7", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "7", "title": "Transition between levels", "anchor": "7-transition-between-levels", "sortOrder": 30 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-8", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "8", "title": "Mobility within a country", "anchor": "8-mobility-within-a-country", "sortOrder": 31 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-9", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "9", "title": "Cross-border recognition", "anchor": "9-cross-border-recognition", "sortOrder": 32 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-10", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-i", "number": "10", "title": "Planning the entitled population", "anchor": "10-planning-the-entitled-population", "sortOrder": 33 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "II", "title": "Population and access", "anchor": "part-ii-population-and-access", "sortOrder": 34 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-11", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "11", "title": "Workforce and professional support", "anchor": "11-workforce-and-professional-support", "sortOrder": 35 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-12", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "12", "title": "Finance and handover", "anchor": "12-finance-and-handover", "sortOrder": 36 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-13", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "13", "title": "Protection, health and psychosocial support", "anchor": "13-protection-health-and-psychosocial-support", "sortOrder": 37 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-14", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "14", "title": "Measures of timely access", "anchor": "14-measures-of-timely-access", "sortOrder": 38 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-15", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "15", "title": "Quality and progression evidence", "anchor": "15-quality-and-progression-evidence", "sortOrder": 39 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-16", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "16", "title": "Complaint and remedy", "anchor": "16-complaint-and-remedy", "sortOrder": 40 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-17", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "17", "title": "Public reporting", "anchor": "17-public-reporting", "sortOrder": 41 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-18", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "18", "title": "National readiness review", "anchor": "18-national-readiness-review", "sortOrder": 42 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-19", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "19", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "19-monitoring", "sortOrder": 43 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-20", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ii", "number": "20", "title": "Review", "anchor": "20-review", "sortOrder": 44 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "III", "title": "Shared outcomes and service boundaries", "anchor": "part-iii-shared-outcomes-and-service-boundaries", "sortOrder": 45 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-21", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "21", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "21-improvement-proposition", "sortOrder": 46 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-22", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "22", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "22-mandate", "sortOrder": 47 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-23", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "23", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "23-minimum-service", "sortOrder": 48 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-24", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "24", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "24-pathway", "sortOrder": 49 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-25", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "25", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "25-equity", "sortOrder": 50 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-26", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "26", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "26-capacity", "sortOrder": 51 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-27", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "27", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "27-evidence", "sortOrder": 52 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-28", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "28", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "28-protection", "sortOrder": 53 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-29", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "29", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "29-monitoring", "sortOrder": 54 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-30", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iii", "number": "30", "title": "Review", "anchor": "30-review", "sortOrder": 55 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "IV", "title": "Identification and referral", "anchor": "part-iv-identification-and-referral", "sortOrder": 56 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-31", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "31", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "31-improvement-proposition", "sortOrder": 57 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-32", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "32", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "32-mandate", "sortOrder": 58 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-33", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "33", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "33-minimum-service", "sortOrder": 59 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-34", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "34", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "34-pathway", "sortOrder": 60 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-35", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "35", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "35-equity", "sortOrder": 61 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-36", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "36", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "36-capacity", "sortOrder": 62 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-37", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "37", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "37-evidence", "sortOrder": 63 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-38", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "38", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "38-protection", "sortOrder": 64 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-39", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "39", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "39-monitoring", "sortOrder": 65 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-40", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-iv", "number": "40", "title": "Review", "anchor": "40-review", "sortOrder": 66 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "V", "title": "Health and readiness to learn", "anchor": "part-v-health-and-readiness-to-learn", "sortOrder": 67 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-41", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "number": "41", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "41-improvement-proposition", "sortOrder": 68 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-42", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "number": "42", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "42-mandate", "sortOrder": 69 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-43", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "number": "43", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "43-minimum-service", "sortOrder": 70 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-44", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "number": "44", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "44-pathway", "sortOrder": 71 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-45", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "number": "45", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "45-equity", "sortOrder": 72 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-46", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "number": "46", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "46-capacity", "sortOrder": 73 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-47", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "number": "47", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "47-evidence", "sortOrder": 74 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-48", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "number": "48", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "48-protection", "sortOrder": 75 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-49", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "number": "49", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "49-monitoring", "sortOrder": 76 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-50", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-v", "number": "50", "title": "Review", "anchor": "50-review", "sortOrder": 77 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "VI", "title": "Safeguarding and protection", "anchor": "part-vi-safeguarding-and-protection", "sortOrder": 78 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-51", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "number": "51", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "51-improvement-proposition", "sortOrder": 79 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-52", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "number": "52", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "52-mandate", "sortOrder": 80 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-53", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "number": "53", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "53-minimum-service", "sortOrder": 81 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-54", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "number": "54", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "54-pathway", "sortOrder": 82 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-55", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "number": "55", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "55-equity", "sortOrder": 83 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-56", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "number": "56", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "56-capacity", "sortOrder": 84 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-57", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "number": "57", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "57-evidence", "sortOrder": 85 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-58", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "number": "58", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "58-protection", "sortOrder": 86 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-59", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "number": "59", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "59-monitoring", "sortOrder": 87 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-60", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vi", "number": "60", "title": "Review", "anchor": "60-review", "sortOrder": 88 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "VII", "title": "Nutrition, water and sanitation", "anchor": "part-vii-nutrition-water-and-sanitation", "sortOrder": 89 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-61", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "number": "61", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "61-improvement-proposition", "sortOrder": 90 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-62", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "number": "62", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "62-mandate", "sortOrder": 91 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-63", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "number": "63", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "63-minimum-service", "sortOrder": 92 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-64", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "number": "64", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "64-pathway", "sortOrder": 93 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-65", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "number": "65", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "65-equity", "sortOrder": 94 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-66", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "number": "66", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "66-capacity", "sortOrder": 95 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-67", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "number": "67", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "67-evidence", "sortOrder": 96 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-68", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "number": "68", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "68-protection", "sortOrder": 97 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-69", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "number": "69", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "69-monitoring", "sortOrder": 98 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-70", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-vii", "number": "70", "title": "Review", "anchor": "70-review", "sortOrder": 99 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "VIII", "title": "Teachers and frontline personnel", "anchor": "part-viii-teachers-and-frontline-personnel", "sortOrder": 100 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-71", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "number": "71", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "71-improvement-proposition", "sortOrder": 101 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-72", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "number": "72", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "72-mandate", "sortOrder": 102 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-73", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "number": "73", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "73-minimum-service", "sortOrder": 103 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-74", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "number": "74", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "74-pathway", "sortOrder": 104 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-75", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "number": "75", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "75-equity", "sortOrder": 105 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-76", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "number": "76", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "76-capacity", "sortOrder": 106 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-77", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "number": "77", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "77-evidence", "sortOrder": 107 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-78", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "number": "78", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "78-protection", "sortOrder": 108 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-79", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "number": "79", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "79-monitoring", "sortOrder": 109 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-80", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-viii", "number": "80", "title": "Review", "anchor": "80-review", "sortOrder": 110 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "IX", "title": "Information and privacy", "anchor": "part-ix-information-and-privacy", "sortOrder": 111 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-81", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "number": "81", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "81-improvement-proposition", "sortOrder": 112 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-82", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "number": "82", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "82-mandate", "sortOrder": 113 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-83", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "number": "83", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "83-minimum-service", "sortOrder": 114 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-84", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "number": "84", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "84-pathway", "sortOrder": 115 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-85", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "number": "85", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "85-equity", "sortOrder": 116 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-86", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "number": "86", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "86-capacity", "sortOrder": 117 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-87", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "number": "87", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "87-evidence", "sortOrder": 118 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-88", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "number": "88", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "88-protection", "sortOrder": 119 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-89", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "number": "89", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "89-monitoring", "sortOrder": 120 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-90", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-ix", "number": "90", "title": "Review", "anchor": "90-review", "sortOrder": 121 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "X", "title": "Finance and service capacity", "anchor": "part-x-finance-and-service-capacity", "sortOrder": 122 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-91", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "number": "91", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "91-improvement-proposition", "sortOrder": 123 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-92", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "number": "92", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "92-mandate", "sortOrder": 124 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-93", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "number": "93", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "93-minimum-service", "sortOrder": 125 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-94", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "number": "94", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "94-pathway", "sortOrder": 126 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-95", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "number": "95", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "95-equity", "sortOrder": 127 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-96", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "number": "96", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "96-capacity", "sortOrder": 128 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-97", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "number": "97", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "97-evidence", "sortOrder": 129 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-98", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "number": "98", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "98-protection", "sortOrder": 130 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-99", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "number": "99", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "99-monitoring", "sortOrder": 131 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-100", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-x", "number": "100", "title": "Review", "anchor": "100-review", "sortOrder": 132 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XI", "title": "Participation and communication", "anchor": "part-xi-participation-and-communication", "sortOrder": 133 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-101", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "number": "101", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "101-improvement-proposition", "sortOrder": 134 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-102", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "number": "102", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "102-mandate", "sortOrder": 135 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-103", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "number": "103", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "103-minimum-service", "sortOrder": 136 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-104", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "number": "104", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "104-pathway", "sortOrder": 137 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-105", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "number": "105", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "105-equity", "sortOrder": 138 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-106", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "number": "106", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "106-capacity", "sortOrder": 139 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-107", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "number": "107", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "107-evidence", "sortOrder": 140 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-108", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "number": "108", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "108-protection", "sortOrder": 141 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-109", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "number": "109", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "109-monitoring", "sortOrder": 142 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-110", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xi", "number": "110", "title": "Review", "anchor": "110-review", "sortOrder": 143 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XII", "title": "Continuity, emergency and improvement", "anchor": "part-xii-continuity-emergency-and-improvement", "sortOrder": 144 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-111", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "number": "111", "title": "Improvement proposition", "anchor": "111-improvement-proposition", "sortOrder": 145 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-112", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "number": "112", "title": "Mandate", "anchor": "112-mandate", "sortOrder": 146 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-113", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "number": "113", "title": "Minimum service", "anchor": "113-minimum-service", "sortOrder": 147 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-114", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "number": "114", "title": "Pathway", "anchor": "114-pathway", "sortOrder": 148 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-115", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "number": "115", "title": "Equity", "anchor": "115-equity", "sortOrder": 149 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-116", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "number": "116", "title": "Capacity", "anchor": "116-capacity", "sortOrder": 150 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-117", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "number": "117", "title": "Evidence", "anchor": "117-evidence", "sortOrder": 151 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-118", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "number": "118", "title": "Protection", "anchor": "118-protection", "sortOrder": 152 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-119", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "number": "119", "title": "Monitoring", "anchor": "119-monitoring", "sortOrder": 153 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-120", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xii", "number": "120", "title": "Review", "anchor": "120-review", "sortOrder": 154 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xiii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XIII", "title": "Conclusions", "anchor": "part-xiii-conclusions", "sortOrder": 155 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-121", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xiii", "number": "121", "title": "A complete pathway", "anchor": "121-a-complete-pathway", "sortOrder": 156 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-122", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xiii", "number": "122", "title": "Evidence for improvement", "anchor": "122-evidence-for-improvement", "sortOrder": 157 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2019-09-123", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2019-09-xiii", "number": "123", "title": "Final conclusion", "anchor": "123-final-conclusion", "sortOrder": 158 } ], "statistics": { "partCount": 17, "sectionCount": 141, "appendixCount": 0, "paragraphCount": 403, "tableCount": 0, "referenceCount": 36, "mainTextWords": 33441, "technicalAppendixWords": 0, "totalWords": 33441 }, "contentHash": "sha256-c0efe661243368ad4436d2ee82733a94c68ce3255e171f2567e482ee067a9442" }