{ "schemaVersion": "iceqc.research-report.reader.v1", "document": { "id": "doc-iceqc-r-2026-03", "slug": "the-final-years-to-2030-national-targets-policy-credibility-and-public-accountability", "documentNumber": "ICEQC-R-2026-03", "title": "The Final Years to 2030: National Targets, Policy Credibility and Public Accountability", "subtitle": "A policy synthesis on national ambition, implementation evidence, financing, distribution and correction", "family": "RESEARCH", "reportType": "THEMATIC_RESEARCH_REPORT", "researchCategory": "INDUSTRY_POLICY_AND_REGIONAL_REGULATORY_ANALYSIS", "reportArchetype": "POLICY_AND_REGULATORY_SYNTHESIS", "geographicScope": "Global", "ownerBody": "ICEQC Research and Policy Directorate", "publisher": "International Council for Education Quality Certification (ICEQC)", "publicIdentity": "ICEQC_ONLY" }, "version": { "id": "ver-iceqc-r-2026-03-en-2026-05-19", "edition": "2026", "versionLabel": "Published 2026-05-19", "language": "en", "authoritativeLanguage": "en", "status": "PUBLISHED", "publicationDate": "2026-05-19", "evidenceCutoffDate": "2026-05-19", "statusNotice": "This is the controlled English edition. Evidence and institutional status are stated as at the evidence cut-off date.", "summary": "The final years to 2030 require national targets that are publicly intelligible, evidentially grounded and connected to authorised action. Ambition remains necessary, but credibility depends on a defined baseline, population, measure, policy instrument, responsible authority, finance and review date." }, "publicationControl": { "matrixRecordId": "ICEQC-R-2026-03", "temporalBasis": "CONTEMPORANEOUS_AS_AT_PUBLICATION_DATE", "originalAuthorship": "ICEQC", "suggestedMainTextWords": 22000, "suggestedTechnicalAnnexWords": 0, "suggestedTotalWords": 22000, "actualMainTextWords": 48747, "actualTechnicalAnnexWords": 0, "actualTotalWords": 48747 }, "frontMatter": { "executiveSummary": [ "The final years to 2030 require national targets that are publicly intelligible, evidentially grounded and connected to authorised action. Ambition remains necessary, but credibility depends on a defined baseline, population, measure, policy instrument, responsible authority, finance and review date.", "A national target should distinguish the desired result from the activity proposed to achieve it. Legislation, plans, budgets, services and learner outcomes occupy different points in the accountability chain. Announcing a programme does not establish reach or effect.", "Public accountability should expose unequal starting points and implementation gaps without encouraging the exclusion of populations that are harder to serve or measure. Course correction should be expected where evidence changes; revision should explain what changed, why and how rights and commitments remain protected.", "Evidence should distinguish policy, activity, learner-facing service, experience and result. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs the issue under review within Executive summary: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Descriptive association should not be presented as causal effect. Material limitations should accompany the finding they qualify, and unresolved barriers should remain assigned to a competent authority." ], "keyFindings": [], "scopeAndMethod": [] }, "parts": [ { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-i", "number": "I", "title": "Target credibility and public responsibility", "anchor": "part-i-target-credibility-and-public-responsibility", "sectionIds": [] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ii", "number": "II", "title": "Purpose and interpretive frame", "anchor": "part-ii-purpose-and-interpretive-frame", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-1", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-2", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-3" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iii", "number": "III", "title": "Population and denominator", "anchor": "part-iii-population-and-denominator", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-4", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-5", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-6" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iv", "number": "IV", "title": "Access and participation", "anchor": "part-iv-access-and-participation", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-7", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-8", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-9" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-v", "number": "V", "title": "Progression and completion", "anchor": "part-v-progression-and-completion", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-10", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-11", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-12" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vi", "number": "VI", "title": "Learning and assessment", "anchor": "part-vi-learning-and-assessment", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-13", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-14", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-15" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vii", "number": "VII", "title": "Gender and household resources", "anchor": "part-vii-gender-and-household-resources", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-16", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-17", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-18" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-viii", "number": "VIII", "title": "Place and service geography", "anchor": "part-viii-place-and-service-geography", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-19", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-20", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-21" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ix", "number": "IX", "title": "Disability, language and identity", "anchor": "part-ix-disability-language-and-identity", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-22", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-23", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-24" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-x", "number": "X", "title": "Conflict, disaster and mobility", "anchor": "part-x-conflict-disaster-and-mobility", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-25", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-26", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-27" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xi", "number": "XI", "title": "School conditions and teachers", "anchor": "part-xi-school-conditions-and-teachers", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-28", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-29", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-30" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xii", "number": "XII", "title": "Finance and distribution", "anchor": "part-xii-finance-and-distribution", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-31", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-32", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-33" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiii", "number": "XIII", "title": "Data sources and measurement error", "anchor": "part-xiii-data-sources-and-measurement-error", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-34", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-35", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-36" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiv", "number": "XIV", "title": "Disaggregation and intersection", "anchor": "part-xiv-disaggregation-and-intersection", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-37", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-38", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-39" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xv", "number": "XV", "title": "Comparison, uncertainty and change", "anchor": "part-xv-comparison-uncertainty-and-change", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-40", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-41", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-42" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvi", "number": "XVI", "title": "Responsible interpretation and action", "anchor": "part-xvi-responsible-interpretation-and-action", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-43", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-44", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-45" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "number": "XVII", "title": "Applied distributional analysis", "anchor": "part-xvii-applied-distributional-analysis", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-46", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-47", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-48", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-49", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-50", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-51", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-52", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-53" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xviii", "number": "XVIII", "title": "Extended disparity interpretation", "anchor": "part-xviii-extended-disparity-interpretation", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-54", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-55", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-56" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xix", "number": "XIX", "title": "Extended analysis of learning disparities", "anchor": "part-xix-extended-analysis-of-learning-disparities", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-57", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-58", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-59", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-60", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-61", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-62" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xx", "number": "XX", "title": "Targeted improvement planning", "anchor": "part-xx-targeted-improvement-planning", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-63", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-64", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-65", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-66", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-67", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-68" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxi", "number": "XXI", "title": "National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda", "anchor": "part-xxi-national-translation-after-adoption-of-the-2030-agenda", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-69", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-70", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-71", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-72", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-73", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-74" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxii", "number": "XXII", "title": "Quality and equity within the contemporaneous indicator framework", "anchor": "part-xxii-quality-and-equity-within-the-contemporaneous-indicator-framework", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-75", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-76", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-77", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-78", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-79", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-80" ] }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxiii", "number": "XXIII", "title": "Allocation of responsibility and remedy", "anchor": "part-xxiii-allocation-of-responsibility-and-remedy", "sectionIds": [ "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-81", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-82", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-83", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-84", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-85", "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-86" ] } ], "sections": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-1", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "1", "title": "What national averages conceal", "anchor": "1-what-national-averages-conceal", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-1-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The indicator question concerns national participation or attainment. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs What national averages conceal within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Its object is not to divide a population into convenient labels, but to show whether educational opportunity is distributed in a manner that a national total cannot reveal. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-1-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The preferred construction is the weighted experience of the population included in the denominator. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs What national averages conceal within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Numerator, denominator, reference date, unit and exclusions should appear together. If a proportion is reported, its underlying population count remains material: identical percentages can describe very different evidentiary strength and numbers of affected learners. Administrative records should be reconciled with population-based evidence where their coverage differs. A discrepancy is not resolved by selecting the more favourable source. It should require examination of definitions, timing, migration, duplication and non-response. The resulting indicator should be reproducible from stated components, while any necessary estimation remains distinguishable from direct observation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-1-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation follows this limitation: distribution within countries, not a league table between them. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs What national averages conceal within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. The comparison should show the level for each group as well as any ratio or gap. A ratio can approach one because the more advantaged group deteriorates; a small absolute gap can coexist with severe deprivation for all groups. Reference points therefore need substantive meaning. Where a minimum entitlement or policy threshold is relevant, the distance of every group from that threshold should be visible. Statistical association can identify where disadvantage is concentrated, but it does not establish why the disparity arose. Explanation requires evidence on institutions, resources, households and prior conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-1-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distributional review must deliberately include remote rural learners, urban informal settlements and displaced populations. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs What national averages conceal within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. These populations may be missing not only from good outcomes but from the denominator itself. Coverage assessment should compare survey frames, census listings, administrative registers and local knowledge without assuming that any one is complete. If direct estimation is impossible, the report should state the evidence gap and use appropriate qualitative or service information rather than assign zero. Confidentiality is essential, especially where identity or status creates risk. Protection, however, should lead to careful access and publication rules; it should not make an affected population analytically disappear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-1-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The decision record should connect the finding to a responsible authority, available intervention and review date. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs What national averages conceal within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. An indicator is useful when it can alter service location, staffing, language support, accessibility, household assistance or another defined condition. It should not be used to rank schools or communities where differences in population and opportunity to learn are uncontrolled. Monitoring after action must preserve the original baseline and follow both reach and outcome. Improvement in an average does not demonstrate that the intended group benefited; participation, intensity and learner experience should be checked. The final public statement should identify remaining uncertainty and the next evidentiary step rather than convert a partial result into assurance.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-2", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "2", "title": "Marginalisation as accumulated disadvantage", "anchor": "2-marginalisation-as-accumulated-disadvantage", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-2-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Marginalisation as accumulated disadvantage should be approached as a defined measurement problem. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Marginalisation as accumulated disadvantage within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. The substantive interest is distance from a socially secured educational minimum, observed for a population and period that are stated before calculation. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-2-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement should use the joint effect of exclusion, weak provision and adverse social conditions. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Marginalisation as accumulated disadvantage within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. This formulation requires the reporting body to preserve the population base and the observation period beside the result. Counts reveal scale; rates permit comparison; neither is sufficient alone. Source coverage must be tested before sources are combined. School returns may describe enrolled learners well while saying little about children outside institutions, whereas household enquiries may reach non-enrolled children but provide limited school detail. Reconciliation should record what each source can and cannot represent. Where estimates are revised, both the reason and effect of revision should remain accessible.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-2-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing caution is that multiple indicators read together over the learner's course. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Marginalisation as accumulated disadvantage within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Disparity measures should not replace the underlying distributions. A difference in means may reflect the lower tail, the upper tail or change across the whole range; these possibilities call for different responses. Percentage-point gaps, ratios and relative risks answer different questions and should not be exchanged without explanation. The comparison should identify the reference category but avoid presenting it as a natural norm. Policy significance depends upon the educational consequence and the number of learners affected, not solely upon statistical separation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-2-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for children facing poverty, gender disadvantage, disability or minority status. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Marginalisation as accumulated disadvantage within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Their circumstances may alter access to enumeration, classification and the service being measured. The review should record non-response, unknown status and excluded locations separately. Combining unknown observations with the majority group biases both estimates and obscures the weakness. Where sample size is limited, several years or compatible areas may sometimes be combined, provided the loss of time or place specificity is stated. Where combination would be misleading, a descriptive case record can establish a service problem without pretending to estimate prevalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-2-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Policy use should begin with a question that the competent body can answer. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Marginalisation as accumulated disadvantage within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. The evidence may justify further enquiry, immediate removal of a barrier, redistribution of resources or evaluation of an existing measure. These are different decisions and require different certainty. Urgent protection need not await a perfect estimate where credible evidence shows serious exclusion, but long-term allocation should be reviewed as coverage improves. Targets should specify the population expected to benefit and guard against gains achieved by concentrating on learners nearest a threshold. Accountability lies in changed opportunity, not in the favourable movement of an indicator alone.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-3", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ii", "parentId": null, "number": "3", "title": "From monitoring commitment to decision", "anchor": "3-from-monitoring-commitment-to-decision", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-3-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For from monitoring commitment to decision, the first requirement is conceptual clarity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs From monitoring commitment to decision within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. The study seeks evidence on evidence capable of changing resource or service decisions; it does not infer a learner's circumstances from a national or regional mean. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-3-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible statistic would be based on a link between observed disparity, responsible body and remedy. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs From monitoring commitment to decision within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. The definition should be fixed for the comparison at hand and deviations recorded. Analysts need to show whether the observation refers to a stock on one date, activity over a period or a flow between states. This distinction is essential for participation and progression. The estimate should retain its unrounded numerator and denominator for checking, although published precision should not exceed data quality. When several sources exist, consistency is evidence to consider, not proof that common error is absent.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-3-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical rule is clear: indicators selected for action rather than visibility. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs From monitoring commitment to decision within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Results should be tested for sensitivity to plausible alternative definitions, particularly where age bands, residence, wealth grouping or programme equivalence are involved. If a conclusion changes under a reasonable specification, that instability is part of the finding. National averages should remain available as context, yet never as a substitute for the distribution. Nor should a group estimate be read as a description of every member. Within-group variation and unmeasured intersecting conditions remain material.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-3-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "An adequate equity account asks whether groups absent from routine plans and budget classifications are represented at each stage: population frame, collection, valid response, classification, analysis and publication. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs From monitoring commitment to decision within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Attrition at any stage can produce an apparently complete indicator from a selective population. Field arrangements need relevant languages, accessible formats and safe participation. Analysts should also examine who answers on behalf of whom, since proxy response may be necessary yet less reliable for attendance, impairment or discrimination. Missingness is itself patterned evidence when it clusters by location or social condition, although its magnitude should not be guessed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-3-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A proportionate response records who acts, the condition to be changed and the evidence that will show whether reach was equitable. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs From monitoring commitment to decision within Part II — Purpose and interpretive frame: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Local interpretation is valuable because national classifications cannot capture every barrier; it should operate within common definitions sufficient for aggregation. Communities should be able to question both the category and the conclusion drawn from it. If a measure creates incentives to exclude difficult cases, narrow the denominator or reclassify non-completion, an independent check is required. The report should recognise such behaviour as a measurement risk without assuming misconduct in every discrepancy.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-4", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "4", "title": "Defining the population entitled to education", "anchor": "4-defining-the-population-entitled-to-education", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-4-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A distribution-sensitive account of resident and temporarily absent learners within the relevant age or programme group begins by naming the decision the evidence may inform. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Defining the population entitled to education within Part III — Population and denominator: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Without that purpose, disaggregation can multiply figures without improving public judgement. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-4-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Operationally, the measure is a denominator consistent with the right, level and reference period under review. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Defining the population entitled to education within Part III — Population and denominator: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Its metadata should travel with every published value. At minimum this includes population, geography, date, collection method, classification and known exclusions. A national estimate assembled from local reports should disclose reporting completeness and treatment of missing institutions. A survey estimate should disclose weights and uncertainty. A census figure should disclose enumeration rules. These are substantive attributes because they determine who can appear in the evidence. A figure detached from them may be arithmetically correct yet unsuitable for an equity judgement.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-4-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Use of the indicator is bounded by the principle that census, survey and administrative estimates reconciled openly. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Defining the population entitled to education within Part III — Population and denominator: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. A responsible commentary distinguishes observation, calculation and interpretation. It states whether a disparity is large in educational terms, whether it is estimated precisely enough for the proposed comparison and whether it persists across sources or periods. It does not assign cause from a cross-sectional difference. Apparent exceptions should be examined rather than removed, because they may reveal classification error, a local policy difference or a population not adequately represented elsewhere.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-4-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For unregistered residents, migrants and displaced children, a single group label may conceal important internal differences. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Defining the population entitled to education within Part III — Population and denominator: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Disaggregation should proceed far enough to reveal a plausible service disparity but stop before estimates become unsafe or persons identifiable. This balance is contextual rather than mechanical. It should involve statistical judgement, legal safeguards and knowledge of the affected community. Suppression rules need explanation, and restricted analysis may be preferable to public release of small cells. The public report can still state that a disparity was examined, whether action is required and which body will monitor it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-4-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Public accountability requires a concise explanation of the result and its boundary. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Defining the population entitled to education within Part III — Population and denominator: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Readers should be able to see who was counted, who was not, what period the figure covers, how large the underlying population is and which comparisons are justified. A policy conclusion should be no broader than that evidence. Subsequent reports should distinguish real change from late reporting, revised population estimates and altered definitions. Where a disparity remains, the responsible body should state whether the obstacle is knowledge, authority, resources or implementation. This makes the indicator a means of scrutiny rather than a decorative measure of concern.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-5", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "5", "title": "Age, grade and programme populations", "anchor": "5-age-grade-and-programme-populations", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-5-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public value of age, grade and programme populations lies in making unequal educational experience observable. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Age, grade and programme populations within Part III — Population and denominator: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Here, the relevant phenomenon is age-specific, grade-specific and programme-specific participation, not the administrative convenience of the available categories. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-5-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The preferred construction is separate denominators for different educational questions. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Age, grade and programme populations within Part III — Population and denominator: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Numerator, denominator, reference date, unit and exclusions should appear together. If a proportion is reported, its underlying population count remains material: identical percentages can describe very different evidentiary strength and numbers of affected learners. Administrative records should be reconciled with population-based evidence where their coverage differs. A discrepancy is not resolved by selecting the more favourable source. It should require examination of definitions, timing, migration, duplication and non-response. The resulting indicator should be reproducible from stated components, while any necessary estimation remains distinguishable from direct observation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-5-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation follows this limitation: exact age, school age and enrolled population never substituted silently. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Age, grade and programme populations within Part III — Population and denominator: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. The comparison should show the level for each group as well as any ratio or gap. A ratio can approach one because the more advantaged group deteriorates; a small absolute gap can coexist with severe deprivation for all groups. Reference points therefore need substantive meaning. Where a minimum entitlement or policy threshold is relevant, the distance of every group from that threshold should be visible. Statistical association can identify where disadvantage is concentrated, but it does not establish why the disparity arose. Explanation requires evidence on institutions, resources, households and prior conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-5-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distributional review must deliberately include over-age entrants and learners repeating grades. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Age, grade and programme populations within Part III — Population and denominator: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. These populations may be missing not only from good outcomes but from the denominator itself. Coverage assessment should compare survey frames, census listings, administrative registers and local knowledge without assuming that any one is complete. If direct estimation is impossible, the report should state the evidence gap and use appropriate qualitative or service information rather than assign zero. Confidentiality is essential, especially where identity or status creates risk. Protection, however, should lead to careful access and publication rules; it should not make an affected population analytically disappear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-6", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iii", "parentId": null, "number": "6", "title": "Population movement and disrupted residence", "anchor": "6-population-movement-and-disrupted-residence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-6-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The indicator question concerns education status amid migration, displacement and return. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Population movement and disrupted residence within Part III — Population and denominator: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Its object is not to divide a population into convenient labels, but to show whether educational opportunity is distributed in a manner that a national total cannot reveal. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-6-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement should use dated location and residence rules with sensitivity to mobility. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Population movement and disrupted residence within Part III — Population and denominator: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. This formulation requires the reporting body to preserve the population base and the observation period beside the result. Counts reveal scale; rates permit comparison; neither is sufficient alone. Source coverage must be tested before sources are combined. School returns may describe enrolled learners well while saying little about children outside institutions, whereas household enquiries may reach non-enrolled children but provide limited school detail. Reconciliation should record what each source can and cannot represent. Where estimates are revised, both the reason and effect of revision should remain accessible.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-6-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing caution is that origin, current location and service responsibility distinguished. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Population movement and disrupted residence within Part III — Population and denominator: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Disparity measures should not replace the underlying distributions. A difference in means may reflect the lower tail, the upper tail or change across the whole range; these possibilities call for different responses. Percentage-point gaps, ratios and relative risks answer different questions and should not be exchanged without explanation. The comparison should identify the reference category but avoid presenting it as a natural norm. Policy significance depends upon the educational consequence and the number of learners affected, not solely upon statistical separation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-6-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for families affected by conflict, disaster and seasonal movement. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Population movement and disrupted residence within Part III — Population and denominator: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Their circumstances may alter access to enumeration, classification and the service being measured. The review should record non-response, unknown status and excluded locations separately. Combining unknown observations with the majority group biases both estimates and obscures the weakness. Where sample size is limited, several years or compatible areas may sometimes be combined, provided the loss of time or place specificity is stated. Where combination would be misleading, a descriptive case record can establish a service problem without pretending to estimate prevalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-7", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "7", "title": "Entry at the official starting age", "anchor": "7-entry-at-the-official-starting-age", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-7-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Entry at the official starting age should be approached as a defined measurement problem. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Entry at the official starting age within Part IV — Access and participation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. The substantive interest is timely admission to the first grade of primary education, observed for a population and period that are stated before calculation. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-7-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible statistic would be based on new entrants of official age relative to the corresponding population. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Entry at the official starting age within Part IV — Access and participation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. The definition should be fixed for the comparison at hand and deviations recorded. Analysts need to show whether the observation refers to a stock on one date, activity over a period or a flow between states. This distinction is essential for participation and progression. The estimate should retain its unrounded numerator and denominator for checking, although published precision should not exceed data quality. When several sources exist, consistency is evidence to consider, not proof that common error is absent.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-7-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical rule is clear: late entry examined alongside non-entry. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Entry at the official starting age within Part IV — Access and participation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Results should be tested for sensitivity to plausible alternative definitions, particularly where age bands, residence, wealth grouping or programme equivalence are involved. If a conclusion changes under a reasonable specification, that instability is part of the finding. National averages should remain available as context, yet never as a substitute for the distribution. Nor should a group estimate be read as a description of every member. Within-group variation and unmeasured intersecting conditions remain material.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-7-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "An adequate equity account asks whether children facing fees, distance, disability or documentation barriers are represented at each stage: population frame, collection, valid response, classification, analysis and publication. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Entry at the official starting age within Part IV — Access and participation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Attrition at any stage can produce an apparently complete indicator from a selective population. Field arrangements need relevant languages, accessible formats and safe participation. Analysts should also examine who answers on behalf of whom, since proxy response may be necessary yet less reliable for attendance, impairment or discrimination. Missingness is itself patterned evidence when it clusters by location or social condition, although its magnitude should not be guessed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-8", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "8", "title": "Attendance beyond enrolment", "anchor": "8-attendance-beyond-enrolment", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-8-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For attendance beyond enrolment, the first requirement is conceptual clarity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Attendance beyond enrolment within Part IV — Access and participation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. The study seeks evidence on actual participation during a stated recent period; it does not infer a learner's circumstances from a national or regional mean. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-8-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Operationally, the measure is presence measured independently of registration status. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Attendance beyond enrolment within Part IV — Access and participation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Its metadata should travel with every published value. At minimum this includes population, geography, date, collection method, classification and known exclusions. A national estimate assembled from local reports should disclose reporting completeness and treatment of missing institutions. A survey estimate should disclose weights and uncertainty. A census figure should disclose enumeration rules. These are substantive attributes because they determine who can appear in the evidence. A figure detached from them may be arithmetically correct yet unsuitable for an equity judgement.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-8-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Use of the indicator is bounded by the principle that frequency, season and reasons for absence retained. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Attendance beyond enrolment within Part IV — Access and participation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. A responsible commentary distinguishes observation, calculation and interpretation. It states whether a disparity is large in educational terms, whether it is estimated precisely enough for the proposed comparison and whether it persists across sources or periods. It does not assign cause from a cross-sectional difference. Apparent exceptions should be examined rather than removed, because they may reveal classification error, a local policy difference or a population not adequately represented elsewhere.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-8-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For working children, carers and learners affected by illness, a single group label may conceal important internal differences. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Attendance beyond enrolment within Part IV — Access and participation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Disaggregation should proceed far enough to reveal a plausible service disparity but stop before estimates become unsafe or persons identifiable. This balance is contextual rather than mechanical. It should involve statistical judgement, legal safeguards and knowledge of the affected community. Suppression rules need explanation, and restricted analysis may be preferable to public release of small cells. The public report can still state that a disparity was examined, whether action is required and which body will monitor it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-9", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iv", "parentId": null, "number": "9", "title": "Out-of-school status", "anchor": "9-out-of-school-status", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-9-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A distribution-sensitive account of children in the relevant age group not participating at the defined level begins by naming the decision the evidence may inform. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Out-of-school status within Part IV — Access and participation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Without that purpose, disaggregation can multiply figures without improving public judgement. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-9-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The preferred construction is a transparent residual from compatible population and participation concepts. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Out-of-school status within Part IV — Access and participation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Numerator, denominator, reference date, unit and exclusions should appear together. If a proportion is reported, its underlying population count remains material: identical percentages can describe very different evidentiary strength and numbers of affected learners. Administrative records should be reconciled with population-based evidence where their coverage differs. A discrepancy is not resolved by selecting the more favourable source. It should require examination of definitions, timing, migration, duplication and non-response. The resulting indicator should be reproducible from stated components, while any necessary estimation remains distinguishable from direct observation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-9-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation follows this limitation: never-enrolled and formerly enrolled children separated. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Out-of-school status within Part IV — Access and participation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. The comparison should show the level for each group as well as any ratio or gap. A ratio can approach one because the more advantaged group deteriorates; a small absolute gap can coexist with severe deprivation for all groups. Reference points therefore need substantive meaning. Where a minimum entitlement or policy threshold is relevant, the distance of every group from that threshold should be visible. Statistical association can identify where disadvantage is concentrated, but it does not establish why the disparity arose. Explanation requires evidence on institutions, resources, households and prior conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-9-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distributional review must deliberately include children invisible to school registers. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Out-of-school status within Part IV — Access and participation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. These populations may be missing not only from good outcomes but from the denominator itself. Coverage assessment should compare survey frames, census listings, administrative registers and local knowledge without assuming that any one is complete. If direct estimation is impossible, the report should state the evidence gap and use appropriate qualitative or service information rather than assign zero. Confidentiality is essential, especially where identity or status creates risk. Protection, however, should lead to careful access and publication rules; it should not make an affected population analytically disappear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-10", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-v", "parentId": null, "number": "10", "title": "Repetition and grade survival", "anchor": "10-repetition-and-grade-survival", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-10-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public value of repetition and grade survival lies in making unequal educational experience observable. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Repetition and grade survival within Part V — Progression and completion: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Here, the relevant phenomenon is movement through grades without avoidable delay or exit, not the administrative convenience of the available categories. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-10-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement should use cohort or reconstructed-cohort evidence with explicit assumptions. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Repetition and grade survival within Part V — Progression and completion: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. This formulation requires the reporting body to preserve the population base and the observation period beside the result. Counts reveal scale; rates permit comparison; neither is sufficient alone. Source coverage must be tested before sources are combined. School returns may describe enrolled learners well while saying little about children outside institutions, whereas household enquiries may reach non-enrolled children but provide limited school detail. Reconciliation should record what each source can and cannot represent. Where estimates are revised, both the reason and effect of revision should remain accessible.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-10-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing caution is that repeaters distinguished from re-entrants and transfers. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Repetition and grade survival within Part V — Progression and completion: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Disparity measures should not replace the underlying distributions. A difference in means may reflect the lower tail, the upper tail or change across the whole range; these possibilities call for different responses. Percentage-point gaps, ratios and relative risks answer different questions and should not be exchanged without explanation. The comparison should identify the reference category but avoid presenting it as a natural norm. Policy significance depends upon the educational consequence and the number of learners affected, not solely upon statistical separation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-10-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for learners in overcrowded or intermittently operating schools. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Repetition and grade survival within Part V — Progression and completion: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Their circumstances may alter access to enumeration, classification and the service being measured. The review should record non-response, unknown status and excluded locations separately. Combining unknown observations with the majority group biases both estimates and obscures the weakness. Where sample size is limited, several years or compatible areas may sometimes be combined, provided the loss of time or place specificity is stated. Where combination would be misleading, a descriptive case record can establish a service problem without pretending to estimate prevalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-11", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-v", "parentId": null, "number": "11", "title": "Transition between education levels", "anchor": "11-transition-between-education-levels", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-11-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The indicator question concerns entry to the next level after completion of the preceding one. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Transition between education levels within Part V — Progression and completion: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Its object is not to divide a population into convenient labels, but to show whether educational opportunity is distributed in a manner that a national total cannot reveal. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-11-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible statistic would be based on matched completion and new-entry populations over coherent periods. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Transition between education levels within Part V — Progression and completion: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. The definition should be fixed for the comparison at hand and deviations recorded. Analysts need to show whether the observation refers to a stock on one date, activity over a period or a flow between states. This distinction is essential for participation and progression. The estimate should retain its unrounded numerator and denominator for checking, although published precision should not exceed data quality. When several sources exist, consistency is evidence to consider, not proof that common error is absent.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-11-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical rule is clear: capacity constraints distinguished from learner attainment. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Transition between education levels within Part V — Progression and completion: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Results should be tested for sensitivity to plausible alternative definitions, particularly where age bands, residence, wealth grouping or programme equivalence are involved. If a conclusion changes under a reasonable specification, that instability is part of the finding. National averages should remain available as context, yet never as a substitute for the distribution. Nor should a group estimate be read as a description of every member. Within-group variation and unmeasured intersecting conditions remain material.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-11-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "An adequate equity account asks whether rural learners and those unable to relocate are represented at each stage: population frame, collection, valid response, classification, analysis and publication. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Transition between education levels within Part V — Progression and completion: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Attrition at any stage can produce an apparently complete indicator from a selective population. Field arrangements need relevant languages, accessible formats and safe participation. Analysts should also examine who answers on behalf of whom, since proxy response may be necessary yet less reliable for attendance, impairment or discrimination. Missingness is itself patterned evidence when it clusters by location or social condition, although its magnitude should not be guessed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-12", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-v", "parentId": null, "number": "12", "title": "Completion and educational entitlement", "anchor": "12-completion-and-educational-entitlement", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-12-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Completion and educational entitlement should be approached as a defined measurement problem. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Completion and educational entitlement within Part V — Progression and completion: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. The substantive interest is finishing the final grade or meeting recognised programme requirements, observed for a population and period that are stated before calculation. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-12-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Operationally, the measure is completion defined separately from sitting or passing an examination. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Completion and educational entitlement within Part V — Progression and completion: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Its metadata should travel with every published value. At minimum this includes population, geography, date, collection method, classification and known exclusions. A national estimate assembled from local reports should disclose reporting completeness and treatment of missing institutions. A survey estimate should disclose weights and uncertainty. A census figure should disclose enumeration rules. These are substantive attributes because they determine who can appear in the evidence. A figure detached from them may be arithmetically correct yet unsuitable for an equity judgement.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-12-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Use of the indicator is bounded by the principle that late completion and alternative pathways reported. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Completion and educational entitlement within Part V — Progression and completion: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. A responsible commentary distinguishes observation, calculation and interpretation. It states whether a disparity is large in educational terms, whether it is estimated precisely enough for the proposed comparison and whether it persists across sources or periods. It does not assign cause from a cross-sectional difference. Apparent exceptions should be examined rather than removed, because they may reveal classification error, a local policy difference or a population not adequately represented elsewhere.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-12-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For over-age learners and people returning after interruption, a single group label may conceal important internal differences. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Completion and educational entitlement within Part V — Progression and completion: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Disaggregation should proceed far enough to reveal a plausible service disparity but stop before estimates become unsafe or persons identifiable. This balance is contextual rather than mechanical. It should involve statistical judgement, legal safeguards and knowledge of the affected community. Suppression rules need explanation, and restricted analysis may be preferable to public release of small cells. The public report can still state that a disparity was examined, whether action is required and which body will monitor it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-13", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "13", "title": "Minimum learning outcomes", "anchor": "13-minimum-learning-outcomes", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-13-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For minimum learning outcomes, the first requirement is conceptual clarity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Minimum learning outcomes within Part VI — Learning and assessment: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. The study seeks evidence on demonstrated knowledge or skill against a declared domain; it does not infer a learner's circumstances from a national or regional mean. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-13-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The preferred construction is assessment evidence whose population and conditions are known. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Minimum learning outcomes within Part VI — Learning and assessment: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Numerator, denominator, reference date, unit and exclusions should appear together. If a proportion is reported, its underlying population count remains material: identical percentages can describe very different evidentiary strength and numbers of affected learners. Administrative records should be reconciled with population-based evidence where their coverage differs. A discrepancy is not resolved by selecting the more favourable source. It should require examination of definitions, timing, migration, duplication and non-response. The resulting indicator should be reproducible from stated components, while any necessary estimation remains distinguishable from direct observation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-13-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation follows this limitation: results interpreted with opportunity to learn and participation. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Minimum learning outcomes within Part VI — Learning and assessment: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. The comparison should show the level for each group as well as any ratio or gap. A ratio can approach one because the more advantaged group deteriorates; a small absolute gap can coexist with severe deprivation for all groups. Reference points therefore need substantive meaning. Where a minimum entitlement or policy threshold is relevant, the distance of every group from that threshold should be visible. Statistical association can identify where disadvantage is concentrated, but it does not establish why the disparity arose. Explanation requires evidence on institutions, resources, households and prior conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-13-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distributional review must deliberately include learners taught in an unfamiliar language. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Minimum learning outcomes within Part VI — Learning and assessment: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. These populations may be missing not only from good outcomes but from the denominator itself. Coverage assessment should compare survey frames, census listings, administrative registers and local knowledge without assuming that any one is complete. If direct estimation is impossible, the report should state the evidence gap and use appropriate qualitative or service information rather than assign zero. Confidentiality is essential, especially where identity or status creates risk. Protection, however, should lead to careful access and publication rules; it should not make an affected population analytically disappear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-14", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "14", "title": "Assessment participation", "anchor": "14-assessment-participation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-14-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A distribution-sensitive account of who was eligible, present, absent and excluded from testing begins by naming the decision the evidence may inform. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Assessment participation within Part VI — Learning and assessment: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Without that purpose, disaggregation can multiply figures without improving public judgement. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-14-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement should use a participation profile accompanying every result distribution. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Assessment participation within Part VI — Learning and assessment: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. This formulation requires the reporting body to preserve the population base and the observation period beside the result. Counts reveal scale; rates permit comparison; neither is sufficient alone. Source coverage must be tested before sources are combined. School returns may describe enrolled learners well while saying little about children outside institutions, whereas household enquiries may reach non-enrolled children but provide limited school detail. Reconciliation should record what each source can and cannot represent. Where estimates are revised, both the reason and effect of revision should remain accessible.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-14-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing caution is that non-participation never treated as low attainment or ignored. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Assessment participation within Part VI — Learning and assessment: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Disparity measures should not replace the underlying distributions. A difference in means may reflect the lower tail, the upper tail or change across the whole range; these possibilities call for different responses. Percentage-point gaps, ratios and relative risks answer different questions and should not be exchanged without explanation. The comparison should identify the reference category but avoid presenting it as a natural norm. Policy significance depends upon the educational consequence and the number of learners affected, not solely upon statistical separation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-14-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for learners with disabilities and remote candidates. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Assessment participation within Part VI — Learning and assessment: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Their circumstances may alter access to enumeration, classification and the service being measured. The review should record non-response, unknown status and excluded locations separately. Combining unknown observations with the majority group biases both estimates and obscures the weakness. Where sample size is limited, several years or compatible areas may sometimes be combined, provided the loss of time or place specificity is stated. Where combination would be misleading, a descriptive case record can establish a service problem without pretending to estimate prevalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-15", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vi", "parentId": null, "number": "15", "title": "Distribution of achievement", "anchor": "15-distribution-of-achievement", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-15-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public value of distribution of achievement lies in making unequal educational experience observable. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Distribution of achievement within Part VI — Learning and assessment: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Here, the relevant phenomenon is variation across the full score or proficiency distribution, not the administrative convenience of the available categories. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-15-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible statistic would be based on percentiles and threshold shares beside a mean. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Distribution of achievement within Part VI — Learning and assessment: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. The definition should be fixed for the comparison at hand and deviations recorded. Analysts need to show whether the observation refers to a stock on one date, activity over a period or a flow between states. This distinction is essential for participation and progression. The estimate should retain its unrounded numerator and denominator for checking, although published precision should not exceed data quality. When several sources exist, consistency is evidence to consider, not proof that common error is absent.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-15-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical rule is clear: uncertainty and scale properties stated. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Distribution of achievement within Part VI — Learning and assessment: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Results should be tested for sensitivity to plausible alternative definitions, particularly where age bands, residence, wealth grouping or programme equivalence are involved. If a conclusion changes under a reasonable specification, that instability is part of the finding. National averages should remain available as context, yet never as a substitute for the distribution. Nor should a group estimate be read as a description of every member. Within-group variation and unmeasured intersecting conditions remain material.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-15-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "An adequate equity account asks whether learners concentrated below a minimum proficiency threshold are represented at each stage: population frame, collection, valid response, classification, analysis and publication. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Distribution of achievement within Part VI — Learning and assessment: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Attrition at any stage can produce an apparently complete indicator from a selective population. Field arrangements need relevant languages, accessible formats and safe participation. Analysts should also examine who answers on behalf of whom, since proxy response may be necessary yet less reliable for attendance, impairment or discrimination. Missingness is itself patterned evidence when it clusters by location or social condition, although its magnitude should not be guessed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-16", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "16", "title": "Gender parity and its limits", "anchor": "16-gender-parity-and-its-limits", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-16-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The indicator question concerns differences between girls and boys in access, progression and learning. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Gender parity and its limits within Part VII — Gender and household resources: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Its object is not to divide a population into convenient labels, but to show whether educational opportunity is distributed in a manner that a national total cannot reveal. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-16-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Operationally, the measure is female-to-male ratios read with levels and absolute gaps. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Gender parity and its limits within Part VII — Gender and household resources: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Its metadata should travel with every published value. At minimum this includes population, geography, date, collection method, classification and known exclusions. A national estimate assembled from local reports should disclose reporting completeness and treatment of missing institutions. A survey estimate should disclose weights and uncertainty. A census figure should disclose enumeration rules. These are substantive attributes because they determine who can appear in the evidence. A figure detached from them may be arithmetically correct yet unsuitable for an equity judgement.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-16-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Use of the indicator is bounded by the principle that parity not confused with adequacy for either group. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Gender parity and its limits within Part VII — Gender and household resources: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. A responsible commentary distinguishes observation, calculation and interpretation. It states whether a disparity is large in educational terms, whether it is estimated precisely enough for the proposed comparison and whether it persists across sources or periods. It does not assign cause from a cross-sectional difference. Apparent exceptions should be examined rather than removed, because they may reveal classification error, a local policy difference or a population not adequately represented elsewhere.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-16-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For girls in poor rural households and boys exposed to hazardous work, a single group label may conceal important internal differences. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Gender parity and its limits within Part VII — Gender and household resources: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Disaggregation should proceed far enough to reveal a plausible service disparity but stop before estimates become unsafe or persons identifiable. This balance is contextual rather than mechanical. It should involve statistical judgement, legal safeguards and knowledge of the affected community. Suppression rules need explanation, and restricted analysis may be preferable to public release of small cells. The public report can still state that a disparity was examined, whether action is required and which body will monitor it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-17", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "17", "title": "Household wealth gradients", "anchor": "17-household-wealth-gradients", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-17-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Household wealth gradients should be approached as a defined measurement problem. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Household wealth gradients within Part VII — Gender and household resources: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. The substantive interest is education outcomes across relative household resource groups, observed for a population and period that are stated before calculation. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-17-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The preferred construction is a documented asset or consumption classification within each setting. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Household wealth gradients within Part VII — Gender and household resources: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Numerator, denominator, reference date, unit and exclusions should appear together. If a proportion is reported, its underlying population count remains material: identical percentages can describe very different evidentiary strength and numbers of affected learners. Administrative records should be reconciled with population-based evidence where their coverage differs. A discrepancy is not resolved by selecting the more favourable source. It should require examination of definitions, timing, migration, duplication and non-response. The resulting indicator should be reproducible from stated components, while any necessary estimation remains distinguishable from direct observation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-17-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation follows this limitation: wealth ranks not assumed equivalent across countries or time. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Household wealth gradients within Part VII — Gender and household resources: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. The comparison should show the level for each group as well as any ratio or gap. A ratio can approach one because the more advantaged group deteriorates; a small absolute gap can coexist with severe deprivation for all groups. Reference points therefore need substantive meaning. Where a minimum entitlement or policy threshold is relevant, the distance of every group from that threshold should be visible. Statistical association can identify where disadvantage is concentrated, but it does not establish why the disparity arose. Explanation requires evidence on institutions, resources, households and prior conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-17-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distributional review must deliberately include children in the poorest quintile and those near classification boundaries. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Household wealth gradients within Part VII — Gender and household resources: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. These populations may be missing not only from good outcomes but from the denominator itself. Coverage assessment should compare survey frames, census listings, administrative registers and local knowledge without assuming that any one is complete. If direct estimation is impossible, the report should state the evidence gap and use appropriate qualitative or service information rather than assign zero. Confidentiality is essential, especially where identity or status creates risk. Protection, however, should lead to careful access and publication rules; it should not make an affected population analytically disappear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-18", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vii", "parentId": null, "number": "18", "title": "Costs borne by households", "anchor": "18-costs-borne-by-households", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-18-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For costs borne by households, the first requirement is conceptual clarity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Costs borne by households within Part VII — Gender and household resources: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. The study seeks evidence on fees, materials, transport, clothing and foregone labour; it does not infer a learner's circumstances from a national or regional mean. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-18-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement should use participation read against direct and indirect education costs. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Costs borne by households within Part VII — Gender and household resources: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. This formulation requires the reporting body to preserve the population base and the observation period beside the result. Counts reveal scale; rates permit comparison; neither is sufficient alone. Source coverage must be tested before sources are combined. School returns may describe enrolled learners well while saying little about children outside institutions, whereas household enquiries may reach non-enrolled children but provide limited school detail. Reconciliation should record what each source can and cannot represent. Where estimates are revised, both the reason and effect of revision should remain accessible.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-18-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing caution is that nominal fee abolition checked against remaining expenditure. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Costs borne by households within Part VII — Gender and household resources: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Disparity measures should not replace the underlying distributions. A difference in means may reflect the lower tail, the upper tail or change across the whole range; these possibilities call for different responses. Percentage-point gaps, ratios and relative risks answer different questions and should not be exchanged without explanation. The comparison should identify the reference category but avoid presenting it as a natural norm. Policy significance depends upon the educational consequence and the number of learners affected, not solely upon statistical separation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-18-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for large families and households hit by economic crisis. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Costs borne by households within Part VII — Gender and household resources: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Their circumstances may alter access to enumeration, classification and the service being measured. The review should record non-response, unknown status and excluded locations separately. Combining unknown observations with the majority group biases both estimates and obscures the weakness. Where sample size is limited, several years or compatible areas may sometimes be combined, provided the loss of time or place specificity is stated. Where combination would be misleading, a descriptive case record can establish a service problem without pretending to estimate prevalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-19", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "19", "title": "Rural and urban residence", "anchor": "19-rural-and-urban-residence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-19-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A distribution-sensitive account of education outcomes by a declared settlement classification begins by naming the decision the evidence may inform. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Rural and urban residence within Part VIII — Place and service geography: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Without that purpose, disaggregation can multiply figures without improving public judgement. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-19-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible statistic would be based on residence linked to service availability and travel conditions. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Rural and urban residence within Part VIII — Place and service geography: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. The definition should be fixed for the comparison at hand and deviations recorded. Analysts need to show whether the observation refers to a stock on one date, activity over a period or a flow between states. This distinction is essential for participation and progression. The estimate should retain its unrounded numerator and denominator for checking, although published precision should not exceed data quality. When several sources exist, consistency is evidence to consider, not proof that common error is absent.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-19-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical rule is clear: national rural definitions preserved and comparison limitations stated. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Rural and urban residence within Part VIII — Place and service geography: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Results should be tested for sensitivity to plausible alternative definitions, particularly where age bands, residence, wealth grouping or programme equivalence are involved. If a conclusion changes under a reasonable specification, that instability is part of the finding. National averages should remain available as context, yet never as a substitute for the distribution. Nor should a group estimate be read as a description of every member. Within-group variation and unmeasured intersecting conditions remain material.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-19-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "An adequate equity account asks whether remote villages, pastoral populations and peri-urban settlements are represented at each stage: population frame, collection, valid response, classification, analysis and publication. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Rural and urban residence within Part VIII — Place and service geography: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Attrition at any stage can produce an apparently complete indicator from a selective population. Field arrangements need relevant languages, accessible formats and safe participation. Analysts should also examine who answers on behalf of whom, since proxy response may be necessary yet less reliable for attendance, impairment or discrimination. Missingness is itself patterned evidence when it clusters by location or social condition, although its magnitude should not be guessed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-20", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "20", "title": "Subnational administrative disparity", "anchor": "20-subnational-administrative-disparity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-20-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public value of subnational administrative disparity lies in making unequal educational experience observable. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Subnational administrative disparity within Part VIII — Place and service geography: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Here, the relevant phenomenon is variation between provinces, districts or comparable areas, not the administrative convenience of the available categories. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-20-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Operationally, the measure is area estimates with population size and precision. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Subnational administrative disparity within Part VIII — Place and service geography: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Its metadata should travel with every published value. At minimum this includes population, geography, date, collection method, classification and known exclusions. A national estimate assembled from local reports should disclose reporting completeness and treatment of missing institutions. A survey estimate should disclose weights and uncertainty. A census figure should disclose enumeration rules. These are substantive attributes because they determine who can appear in the evidence. A figure detached from them may be arithmetically correct yet unsuitable for an equity judgement.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-20-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Use of the indicator is bounded by the principle that administrative rankings not mistaken for causal explanations. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Subnational administrative disparity within Part VIII — Place and service geography: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. A responsible commentary distinguishes observation, calculation and interpretation. It states whether a disparity is large in educational terms, whether it is estimated precisely enough for the proposed comparison and whether it persists across sources or periods. It does not assign cause from a cross-sectional difference. Apparent exceptions should be examined rather than removed, because they may reveal classification error, a local policy difference or a population not adequately represented elsewhere.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-20-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For small districts and areas with incomplete reporting, a single group label may conceal important internal differences. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Subnational administrative disparity within Part VIII — Place and service geography: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Disaggregation should proceed far enough to reveal a plausible service disparity but stop before estimates become unsafe or persons identifiable. This balance is contextual rather than mechanical. It should involve statistical judgement, legal safeguards and knowledge of the affected community. Suppression rules need explanation, and restricted analysis may be preferable to public release of small cells. The public report can still state that a disparity was examined, whether action is required and which body will monitor it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-21", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-viii", "parentId": null, "number": "21", "title": "Distance, isolation and transport", "anchor": "21-distance-isolation-and-transport", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-21-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The indicator question concerns physical accessibility of the nearest appropriate service. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Distance, isolation and transport within Part VIII — Place and service geography: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Its object is not to divide a population into convenient labels, but to show whether educational opportunity is distributed in a manner that a national total cannot reveal. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-21-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The preferred construction is travel time, route safety and seasonal interruption rather than straight-line distance alone. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Distance, isolation and transport within Part VIII — Place and service geography: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Numerator, denominator, reference date, unit and exclusions should appear together. If a proportion is reported, its underlying population count remains material: identical percentages can describe very different evidentiary strength and numbers of affected learners. Administrative records should be reconciled with population-based evidence where their coverage differs. A discrepancy is not resolved by selecting the more favourable source. It should require examination of definitions, timing, migration, duplication and non-response. The resulting indicator should be reproducible from stated components, while any necessary estimation remains distinguishable from direct observation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-21-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation follows this limitation: household reports and facility mapping reconciled. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Distance, isolation and transport within Part VIII — Place and service geography: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. The comparison should show the level for each group as well as any ratio or gap. A ratio can approach one because the more advantaged group deteriorates; a small absolute gap can coexist with severe deprivation for all groups. Reference points therefore need substantive meaning. Where a minimum entitlement or policy threshold is relevant, the distance of every group from that threshold should be visible. Statistical association can identify where disadvantage is concentrated, but it does not establish why the disparity arose. Explanation requires evidence on institutions, resources, households and prior conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-21-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distributional review must deliberately include learners with limited mobility and communities cut off seasonally. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Distance, isolation and transport within Part VIII — Place and service geography: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. These populations may be missing not only from good outcomes but from the denominator itself. Coverage assessment should compare survey frames, census listings, administrative registers and local knowledge without assuming that any one is complete. If direct estimation is impossible, the report should state the evidence gap and use appropriate qualitative or service information rather than assign zero. Confidentiality is essential, especially where identity or status creates risk. Protection, however, should lead to careful access and publication rules; it should not make an affected population analytically disappear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-22", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "22", "title": "Disability-sensitive education data", "anchor": "22-disability-sensitive-education-data", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-22-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Disability-sensitive education data should be approached as a defined measurement problem. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Disability-sensitive education data within Part IX — Disability, language and identity: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. The substantive interest is participation and learning by functional difficulty and support requirement, observed for a population and period that are stated before calculation. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-22-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement should use questions designed for comparable reporting without defining the child by diagnosis alone. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Disability-sensitive education data within Part IX — Disability, language and identity: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. This formulation requires the reporting body to preserve the population base and the observation period beside the result. Counts reveal scale; rates permit comparison; neither is sufficient alone. Source coverage must be tested before sources are combined. School returns may describe enrolled learners well while saying little about children outside institutions, whereas household enquiries may reach non-enrolled children but provide limited school detail. Reconciliation should record what each source can and cannot represent. Where estimates are revised, both the reason and effect of revision should remain accessible.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-22-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing caution is that identification, environment and accommodation kept analytically distinct. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Disability-sensitive education data within Part IX — Disability, language and identity: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Disparity measures should not replace the underlying distributions. A difference in means may reflect the lower tail, the upper tail or change across the whole range; these possibilities call for different responses. Percentage-point gaps, ratios and relative risks answer different questions and should not be exchanged without explanation. The comparison should identify the reference category but avoid presenting it as a natural norm. Policy significance depends upon the educational consequence and the number of learners affected, not solely upon statistical separation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-22-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for learners whose impairments are not recorded by schools. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Disability-sensitive education data within Part IX — Disability, language and identity: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Their circumstances may alter access to enumeration, classification and the service being measured. The review should record non-response, unknown status and excluded locations separately. Combining unknown observations with the majority group biases both estimates and obscures the weakness. Where sample size is limited, several years or compatible areas may sometimes be combined, provided the loss of time or place specificity is stated. Where combination would be misleading, a descriptive case record can establish a service problem without pretending to estimate prevalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-23", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "23", "title": "Language of home and instruction", "anchor": "23-language-of-home-and-instruction", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-23-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For language of home and instruction, the first requirement is conceptual clarity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Language of home and instruction within Part IX — Disability, language and identity: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. The study seeks evidence on alignment between learner language, teaching and assessment; it does not infer a learner's circumstances from a national or regional mean. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-23-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible statistic would be based on language categories reflecting local use and instructional practice. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Language of home and instruction within Part IX — Disability, language and identity: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. The definition should be fixed for the comparison at hand and deviations recorded. Analysts need to show whether the observation refers to a stock on one date, activity over a period or a flow between states. This distinction is essential for participation and progression. The estimate should retain its unrounded numerator and denominator for checking, although published precision should not exceed data quality. When several sources exist, consistency is evidence to consider, not proof that common error is absent.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-23-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical rule is clear: small groups not erased through broad national labels. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Language of home and instruction within Part IX — Disability, language and identity: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Results should be tested for sensitivity to plausible alternative definitions, particularly where age bands, residence, wealth grouping or programme equivalence are involved. If a conclusion changes under a reasonable specification, that instability is part of the finding. National averages should remain available as context, yet never as a substitute for the distribution. Nor should a group estimate be read as a description of every member. Within-group variation and unmeasured intersecting conditions remain material.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-23-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "An adequate equity account asks whether minority-language and multilingual learners are represented at each stage: population frame, collection, valid response, classification, analysis and publication. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Language of home and instruction within Part IX — Disability, language and identity: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Attrition at any stage can produce an apparently complete indicator from a selective population. Field arrangements need relevant languages, accessible formats and safe participation. Analysts should also examine who answers on behalf of whom, since proxy response may be necessary yet less reliable for attendance, impairment or discrimination. Missingness is itself patterned evidence when it clusters by location or social condition, although its magnitude should not be guessed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-24", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ix", "parentId": null, "number": "24", "title": "Ethnicity, indigeneity and protected identity", "anchor": "24-ethnicity-indigeneity-and-protected-identity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-24-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A distribution-sensitive account of disparity associated with historically excluded identity groups begins by naming the decision the evidence may inform. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Ethnicity, indigeneity and protected identity within Part IX — Disability, language and identity: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Without that purpose, disaggregation can multiply figures without improving public judgement. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-24-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Operationally, the measure is lawful, voluntary and contextually meaningful classification. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Ethnicity, indigeneity and protected identity within Part IX — Disability, language and identity: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Its metadata should travel with every published value. At minimum this includes population, geography, date, collection method, classification and known exclusions. A national estimate assembled from local reports should disclose reporting completeness and treatment of missing institutions. A survey estimate should disclose weights and uncertainty. A census figure should disclose enumeration rules. These are substantive attributes because they determine who can appear in the evidence. A figure detached from them may be arithmetically correct yet unsuitable for an equity judgement.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-24-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Use of the indicator is bounded by the principle that self-identification protected and non-response reported. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Ethnicity, indigeneity and protected identity within Part IX — Disability, language and identity: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. A responsible commentary distinguishes observation, calculation and interpretation. It states whether a disparity is large in educational terms, whether it is estimated precisely enough for the proposed comparison and whether it persists across sources or periods. It does not assign cause from a cross-sectional difference. Apparent exceptions should be examined rather than removed, because they may reveal classification error, a local policy difference or a population not adequately represented elsewhere.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-24-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For communities exposed to discrimination or forced assimilation, a single group label may conceal important internal differences. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Ethnicity, indigeneity and protected identity within Part IX — Disability, language and identity: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Disaggregation should proceed far enough to reveal a plausible service disparity but stop before estimates become unsafe or persons identifiable. This balance is contextual rather than mechanical. It should involve statistical judgement, legal safeguards and knowledge of the affected community. Suppression rules need explanation, and restricted analysis may be preferable to public release of small cells. The public report can still state that a disparity was examined, whether action is required and which body will monitor it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-25", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-x", "parentId": null, "number": "25", "title": "Education under conflict and insecurity", "anchor": "25-education-under-conflict-and-insecurity", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-25-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public value of education under conflict and insecurity lies in making unequal educational experience observable. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Education under conflict and insecurity within Part X — Conflict, disaster and mobility: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Here, the relevant phenomenon is access, attendance and learning where violence alters service and movement, not the administrative convenience of the available categories. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-25-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The preferred construction is location- and time-specific observation with explicit coverage gaps. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Education under conflict and insecurity within Part X — Conflict, disaster and mobility: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Numerator, denominator, reference date, unit and exclusions should appear together. If a proportion is reported, its underlying population count remains material: identical percentages can describe very different evidentiary strength and numbers of affected learners. Administrative records should be reconciled with population-based evidence where their coverage differs. A discrepancy is not resolved by selecting the more favourable source. It should require examination of definitions, timing, migration, duplication and non-response. The resulting indicator should be reproducible from stated components, while any necessary estimation remains distinguishable from direct observation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-25-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation follows this limitation: absence caused by insecurity distinguished from ordinary dropout. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Education under conflict and insecurity within Part X — Conflict, disaster and mobility: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. The comparison should show the level for each group as well as any ratio or gap. A ratio can approach one because the more advantaged group deteriorates; a small absolute gap can coexist with severe deprivation for all groups. Reference points therefore need substantive meaning. Where a minimum entitlement or policy threshold is relevant, the distance of every group from that threshold should be visible. Statistical association can identify where disadvantage is concentrated, but it does not establish why the disparity arose. Explanation requires evidence on institutions, resources, households and prior conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-25-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distributional review must deliberately include learners in insecure areas and host communities. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Education under conflict and insecurity within Part X — Conflict, disaster and mobility: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. These populations may be missing not only from good outcomes but from the denominator itself. Coverage assessment should compare survey frames, census listings, administrative registers and local knowledge without assuming that any one is complete. If direct estimation is impossible, the report should state the evidence gap and use appropriate qualitative or service information rather than assign zero. Confidentiality is essential, especially where identity or status creates risk. Protection, however, should lead to careful access and publication rules; it should not make an affected population analytically disappear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-26", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-x", "parentId": null, "number": "26", "title": "Disaster-related interruption", "anchor": "26-disaster-related-interruption", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-26-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The indicator question concerns loss of institutions, records, teaching time and household stability. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Disaster-related interruption within Part X — Conflict, disaster and mobility: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Its object is not to divide a population into convenient labels, but to show whether educational opportunity is distributed in a manner that a national total cannot reveal. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-26-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement should use pre-event baseline, dated service status and affected population. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Disaster-related interruption within Part X — Conflict, disaster and mobility: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. This formulation requires the reporting body to preserve the population base and the observation period beside the result. Counts reveal scale; rates permit comparison; neither is sufficient alone. Source coverage must be tested before sources are combined. School returns may describe enrolled learners well while saying little about children outside institutions, whereas household enquiries may reach non-enrolled children but provide limited school detail. Reconciliation should record what each source can and cannot represent. Where estimates are revised, both the reason and effect of revision should remain accessible.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-26-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing caution is that rapid counts revised without erasing earlier uncertainty. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Disaster-related interruption within Part X — Conflict, disaster and mobility: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Disparity measures should not replace the underlying distributions. A difference in means may reflect the lower tail, the upper tail or change across the whole range; these possibilities call for different responses. Percentage-point gaps, ratios and relative risks answer different questions and should not be exchanged without explanation. The comparison should identify the reference category but avoid presenting it as a natural norm. Policy significance depends upon the educational consequence and the number of learners affected, not solely upon statistical separation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-26-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for children displaced by the Haiti earthquake and other emergencies. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Disaster-related interruption within Part X — Conflict, disaster and mobility: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Their circumstances may alter access to enumeration, classification and the service being measured. The review should record non-response, unknown status and excluded locations separately. Combining unknown observations with the majority group biases both estimates and obscures the weakness. Where sample size is limited, several years or compatible areas may sometimes be combined, provided the loss of time or place specificity is stated. Where combination would be misleading, a descriptive case record can establish a service problem without pretending to estimate prevalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-27", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-x", "parentId": null, "number": "27", "title": "Refugees, displaced persons and migrants", "anchor": "27-refugees-displaced-persons-and-migrants", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-27-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Refugees, displaced persons and migrants should be approached as a defined measurement problem. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Refugees, displaced persons and migrants within Part X — Conflict, disaster and mobility: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. The substantive interest is educational participation across changing legal and residential situations, observed for a population and period that are stated before calculation. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-27-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible statistic would be based on status, origin, current location and service access recorded separately. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Refugees, displaced persons and migrants within Part X — Conflict, disaster and mobility: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. The definition should be fixed for the comparison at hand and deviations recorded. Analysts need to show whether the observation refers to a stock on one date, activity over a period or a flow between states. This distinction is essential for participation and progression. The estimate should retain its unrounded numerator and denominator for checking, although published precision should not exceed data quality. When several sources exist, consistency is evidence to consider, not proof that common error is absent.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-27-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical rule is clear: mobility never converted into duplicate enrolment or unexplained disappearance. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Refugees, displaced persons and migrants within Part X — Conflict, disaster and mobility: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Results should be tested for sensitivity to plausible alternative definitions, particularly where age bands, residence, wealth grouping or programme equivalence are involved. If a conclusion changes under a reasonable specification, that instability is part of the finding. National averages should remain available as context, yet never as a substitute for the distribution. Nor should a group estimate be read as a description of every member. Within-group variation and unmeasured intersecting conditions remain material.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-27-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "An adequate equity account asks whether undocumented migrants, refugees and internally displaced learners are represented at each stage: population frame, collection, valid response, classification, analysis and publication. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Refugees, displaced persons and migrants within Part X — Conflict, disaster and mobility: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Attrition at any stage can produce an apparently complete indicator from a selective population. Field arrangements need relevant languages, accessible formats and safe participation. Analysts should also examine who answers on behalf of whom, since proxy response may be necessary yet less reliable for attendance, impairment or discrimination. Missingness is itself patterned evidence when it clusters by location or social condition, although its magnitude should not be guessed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-28", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "28", "title": "Teacher availability and distribution", "anchor": "28-teacher-availability-and-distribution", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-28-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For teacher availability and distribution, the first requirement is conceptual clarity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Teacher availability and distribution within Part XI — School conditions and teachers: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. The study seeks evidence on access to competent teaching across schools and subjects; it does not infer a learner's circumstances from a national or regional mean. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-28-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Operationally, the measure is teachers present and assigned relative to learner and curriculum need. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Teacher availability and distribution within Part XI — School conditions and teachers: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Its metadata should travel with every published value. At minimum this includes population, geography, date, collection method, classification and known exclusions. A national estimate assembled from local reports should disclose reporting completeness and treatment of missing institutions. A survey estimate should disclose weights and uncertainty. A census figure should disclose enumeration rules. These are substantive attributes because they determine who can appear in the evidence. A figure detached from them may be arithmetically correct yet unsuitable for an equity judgement.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-28-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Use of the indicator is bounded by the principle that payroll totals not substituted for classroom availability. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Teacher availability and distribution within Part XI — School conditions and teachers: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. A responsible commentary distinguishes observation, calculation and interpretation. It states whether a disparity is large in educational terms, whether it is estimated precisely enough for the proposed comparison and whether it persists across sources or periods. It does not assign cause from a cross-sectional difference. Apparent exceptions should be examined rather than removed, because they may reveal classification error, a local policy difference or a population not adequately represented elsewhere.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-28-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For schools serving poor, remote or displaced communities, a single group label may conceal important internal differences. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Teacher availability and distribution within Part XI — School conditions and teachers: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Disaggregation should proceed far enough to reveal a plausible service disparity but stop before estimates become unsafe or persons identifiable. This balance is contextual rather than mechanical. It should involve statistical judgement, legal safeguards and knowledge of the affected community. Suppression rules need explanation, and restricted analysis may be preferable to public release of small cells. The public report can still state that a disparity was examined, whether action is required and which body will monitor it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-29", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "29", "title": "Class size, multi-grade teaching and time", "anchor": "29-class-size-multi-grade-teaching-and-time", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-29-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A distribution-sensitive account of the instructional conditions experienced by learners begins by naming the decision the evidence may inform. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Class size, multi-grade teaching and time within Part XI — School conditions and teachers: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Without that purpose, disaggregation can multiply figures without improving public judgement. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-29-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The preferred construction is class organisation, scheduled time and delivered time considered together. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Class size, multi-grade teaching and time within Part XI — School conditions and teachers: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Numerator, denominator, reference date, unit and exclusions should appear together. If a proportion is reported, its underlying population count remains material: identical percentages can describe very different evidentiary strength and numbers of affected learners. Administrative records should be reconciled with population-based evidence where their coverage differs. A discrepancy is not resolved by selecting the more favourable source. It should require examination of definitions, timing, migration, duplication and non-response. The resulting indicator should be reproducible from stated components, while any necessary estimation remains distinguishable from direct observation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-29-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation follows this limitation: simple pupil-teacher ratios not treated as a complete quality measure. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Class size, multi-grade teaching and time within Part XI — School conditions and teachers: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. The comparison should show the level for each group as well as any ratio or gap. A ratio can approach one because the more advantaged group deteriorates; a small absolute gap can coexist with severe deprivation for all groups. Reference points therefore need substantive meaning. Where a minimum entitlement or policy threshold is relevant, the distance of every group from that threshold should be visible. Statistical association can identify where disadvantage is concentrated, but it does not establish why the disparity arose. Explanation requires evidence on institutions, resources, households and prior conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-29-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distributional review must deliberately include early grades and mixed-age classes. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Class size, multi-grade teaching and time within Part XI — School conditions and teachers: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. These populations may be missing not only from good outcomes but from the denominator itself. Coverage assessment should compare survey frames, census listings, administrative registers and local knowledge without assuming that any one is complete. If direct estimation is impossible, the report should state the evidence gap and use appropriate qualitative or service information rather than assign zero. Confidentiality is essential, especially where identity or status creates risk. Protection, however, should lead to careful access and publication rules; it should not make an affected population analytically disappear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-30", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xi", "parentId": null, "number": "30", "title": "Materials, facilities and basic services", "anchor": "30-materials-facilities-and-basic-services", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-30-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public value of materials, facilities and basic services lies in making unequal educational experience observable. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Materials, facilities and basic services within Part XI — School conditions and teachers: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Here, the relevant phenomenon is usable learning resources and safe, accessible school conditions, not the administrative convenience of the available categories. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-30-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement should use availability joined to condition, accessibility and regular use. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Materials, facilities and basic services within Part XI — School conditions and teachers: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. This formulation requires the reporting body to preserve the population base and the observation period beside the result. Counts reveal scale; rates permit comparison; neither is sufficient alone. Source coverage must be tested before sources are combined. School returns may describe enrolled learners well while saying little about children outside institutions, whereas household enquiries may reach non-enrolled children but provide limited school detail. Reconciliation should record what each source can and cannot represent. Where estimates are revised, both the reason and effect of revision should remain accessible.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-30-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing caution is that delivery counts checked against learner access. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Materials, facilities and basic services within Part XI — School conditions and teachers: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Disparity measures should not replace the underlying distributions. A difference in means may reflect the lower tail, the upper tail or change across the whole range; these possibilities call for different responses. Percentage-point gaps, ratios and relative risks answer different questions and should not be exchanged without explanation. The comparison should identify the reference category but avoid presenting it as a natural norm. Policy significance depends upon the educational consequence and the number of learners affected, not solely upon statistical separation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-30-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for learners in temporary or damaged premises. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Materials, facilities and basic services within Part XI — School conditions and teachers: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Their circumstances may alter access to enumeration, classification and the service being measured. The review should record non-response, unknown status and excluded locations separately. Combining unknown observations with the majority group biases both estimates and obscures the weakness. Where sample size is limited, several years or compatible areas may sometimes be combined, provided the loss of time or place specificity is stated. Where combination would be misleading, a descriptive case record can establish a service problem without pretending to estimate prevalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-31", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "31", "title": "Public spending by level and function", "anchor": "31-public-spending-by-level-and-function", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-31-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The indicator question concerns resources assigned to education purposes across the system. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Public spending by level and function within Part XII — Finance and distribution: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Its object is not to divide a population into convenient labels, but to show whether educational opportunity is distributed in a manner that a national total cannot reveal. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-31-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible statistic would be based on expenditure classified by level, recurrent or capital use and responsible body. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Public spending by level and function within Part XII — Finance and distribution: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. The definition should be fixed for the comparison at hand and deviations recorded. Analysts need to show whether the observation refers to a stock on one date, activity over a period or a flow between states. This distinction is essential for participation and progression. The estimate should retain its unrounded numerator and denominator for checking, although published precision should not exceed data quality. When several sources exist, consistency is evidence to consider, not proof that common error is absent.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-31-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical rule is clear: budgets, commitments and actual expenditure distinguished. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Public spending by level and function within Part XII — Finance and distribution: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Results should be tested for sensitivity to plausible alternative definitions, particularly where age bands, residence, wealth grouping or programme equivalence are involved. If a conclusion changes under a reasonable specification, that instability is part of the finding. National averages should remain available as context, yet never as a substitute for the distribution. Nor should a group estimate be read as a description of every member. Within-group variation and unmeasured intersecting conditions remain material.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-31-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "An adequate equity account asks whether basic education services under fiscal pressure are represented at each stage: population frame, collection, valid response, classification, analysis and publication. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Public spending by level and function within Part XII — Finance and distribution: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Attrition at any stage can produce an apparently complete indicator from a selective population. Field arrangements need relevant languages, accessible formats and safe participation. Analysts should also examine who answers on behalf of whom, since proxy response may be necessary yet less reliable for attendance, impairment or discrimination. Missingness is itself patterned evidence when it clusters by location or social condition, although its magnitude should not be guessed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-32", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "32", "title": "Incidence of education spending", "anchor": "32-incidence-of-education-spending", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-32-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Incidence of education spending should be approached as a defined measurement problem. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Incidence of education spending within Part XII — Finance and distribution: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. The substantive interest is who benefits from publicly financed places and services, observed for a population and period that are stated before calculation. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-32-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Operationally, the measure is unit resources combined with participation across population groups. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Incidence of education spending within Part XII — Finance and distribution: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Its metadata should travel with every published value. At minimum this includes population, geography, date, collection method, classification and known exclusions. A national estimate assembled from local reports should disclose reporting completeness and treatment of missing institutions. A survey estimate should disclose weights and uncertainty. A census figure should disclose enumeration rules. These are substantive attributes because they determine who can appear in the evidence. A figure detached from them may be arithmetically correct yet unsuitable for an equity judgement.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-32-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Use of the indicator is bounded by the principle that benefit estimates not treated as household income. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Incidence of education spending within Part XII — Finance and distribution: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. A responsible commentary distinguishes observation, calculation and interpretation. It states whether a disparity is large in educational terms, whether it is estimated precisely enough for the proposed comparison and whether it persists across sources or periods. It does not assign cause from a cross-sectional difference. Apparent exceptions should be examined rather than removed, because they may reveal classification error, a local policy difference or a population not adequately represented elsewhere.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-32-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For groups excluded before public spending can reach them, a single group label may conceal important internal differences. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Incidence of education spending within Part XII — Finance and distribution: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Disaggregation should proceed far enough to reveal a plausible service disparity but stop before estimates become unsafe or persons identifiable. This balance is contextual rather than mechanical. It should involve statistical judgement, legal safeguards and knowledge of the affected community. Suppression rules need explanation, and restricted analysis may be preferable to public release of small cells. The public report can still state that a disparity was examined, whether action is required and which body will monitor it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-33", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xii", "parentId": null, "number": "33", "title": "Protecting equity during fiscal constraint", "anchor": "33-protecting-equity-during-fiscal-constraint", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-33-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For protecting equity during fiscal constraint, the first requirement is conceptual clarity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Protecting equity during fiscal constraint within Part XII — Finance and distribution: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. The study seeks evidence on whether reductions or delays fall disproportionately on weaker services; it does not infer a learner's circumstances from a national or regional mean. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-33-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The preferred construction is dated finance and service indicators read together. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Protecting equity during fiscal constraint within Part XII — Finance and distribution: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Numerator, denominator, reference date, unit and exclusions should appear together. If a proportion is reported, its underlying population count remains material: identical percentages can describe very different evidentiary strength and numbers of affected learners. Administrative records should be reconciled with population-based evidence where their coverage differs. A discrepancy is not resolved by selecting the more favourable source. It should require examination of definitions, timing, migration, duplication and non-response. The resulting indicator should be reproducible from stated components, while any necessary estimation remains distinguishable from direct observation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-33-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation follows this limitation: national totals tested against subnational allocation and household costs. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Protecting equity during fiscal constraint within Part XII — Finance and distribution: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. The comparison should show the level for each group as well as any ratio or gap. A ratio can approach one because the more advantaged group deteriorates; a small absolute gap can coexist with severe deprivation for all groups. Reference points therefore need substantive meaning. Where a minimum entitlement or policy threshold is relevant, the distance of every group from that threshold should be visible. Statistical association can identify where disadvantage is concentrated, but it does not establish why the disparity arose. Explanation requires evidence on institutions, resources, households and prior conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-33-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distributional review must deliberately include poor households and institutions with little financial reserve. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Protecting equity during fiscal constraint within Part XII — Finance and distribution: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. These populations may be missing not only from good outcomes but from the denominator itself. Coverage assessment should compare survey frames, census listings, administrative registers and local knowledge without assuming that any one is complete. If direct estimation is impossible, the report should state the evidence gap and use appropriate qualitative or service information rather than assign zero. Confidentiality is essential, especially where identity or status creates risk. Protection, however, should lead to careful access and publication rules; it should not make an affected population analytically disappear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-34", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "34", "title": "Administrative records", "anchor": "34-administrative-records", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-34-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A distribution-sensitive account of regular learner, staff, facility and finance information begins by naming the decision the evidence may inform. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Administrative records within Part XIII — Data sources and measurement error: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Without that purpose, disaggregation can multiply figures without improving public judgement. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-34-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement should use clear definitions, reporting coverage and revision history. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Administrative records within Part XIII — Data sources and measurement error: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. This formulation requires the reporting body to preserve the population base and the observation period beside the result. Counts reveal scale; rates permit comparison; neither is sufficient alone. Source coverage must be tested before sources are combined. School returns may describe enrolled learners well while saying little about children outside institutions, whereas household enquiries may reach non-enrolled children but provide limited school detail. Reconciliation should record what each source can and cannot represent. Where estimates are revised, both the reason and effect of revision should remain accessible.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-34-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing caution is that non-reporting institutions kept visible in aggregates. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Administrative records within Part XIII — Data sources and measurement error: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Disparity measures should not replace the underlying distributions. A difference in means may reflect the lower tail, the upper tail or change across the whole range; these possibilities call for different responses. Percentage-point gaps, ratios and relative risks answer different questions and should not be exchanged without explanation. The comparison should identify the reference category but avoid presenting it as a natural norm. Policy significance depends upon the educational consequence and the number of learners affected, not solely upon statistical separation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-34-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for small, private, non-formal and emergency providers. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Administrative records within Part XIII — Data sources and measurement error: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Their circumstances may alter access to enumeration, classification and the service being measured. The review should record non-response, unknown status and excluded locations separately. Combining unknown observations with the majority group biases both estimates and obscures the weakness. Where sample size is limited, several years or compatible areas may sometimes be combined, provided the loss of time or place specificity is stated. Where combination would be misleading, a descriptive case record can establish a service problem without pretending to estimate prevalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-35", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "35", "title": "Household surveys", "anchor": "35-household-surveys", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-35-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public value of household surveys lies in making unequal educational experience observable. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Household surveys within Part XIII — Data sources and measurement error: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Here, the relevant phenomenon is population-based evidence beyond enrolled learners, not the administrative convenience of the available categories. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-35-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible statistic would be based on probability samples, weights and field dates documented. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Household surveys within Part XIII — Data sources and measurement error: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. The definition should be fixed for the comparison at hand and deviations recorded. Analysts need to show whether the observation refers to a stock on one date, activity over a period or a flow between states. This distinction is essential for participation and progression. The estimate should retain its unrounded numerator and denominator for checking, although published precision should not exceed data quality. When several sources exist, consistency is evidence to consider, not proof that common error is absent.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-35-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical rule is clear: sampling and non-response uncertainty carried into group comparisons. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Household surveys within Part XIII — Data sources and measurement error: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Results should be tested for sensitivity to plausible alternative definitions, particularly where age bands, residence, wealth grouping or programme equivalence are involved. If a conclusion changes under a reasonable specification, that instability is part of the finding. National averages should remain available as context, yet never as a substitute for the distribution. Nor should a group estimate be read as a description of every member. Within-group variation and unmeasured intersecting conditions remain material.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-35-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "An adequate equity account asks whether small minorities and mobile households are represented at each stage: population frame, collection, valid response, classification, analysis and publication. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Household surveys within Part XIII — Data sources and measurement error: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Attrition at any stage can produce an apparently complete indicator from a selective population. Field arrangements need relevant languages, accessible formats and safe participation. Analysts should also examine who answers on behalf of whom, since proxy response may be necessary yet less reliable for attendance, impairment or discrimination. Missingness is itself patterned evidence when it clusters by location or social condition, although its magnitude should not be guessed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-36", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiii", "parentId": null, "number": "36", "title": "Censuses and population frames", "anchor": "36-censuses-and-population-frames", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-36-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The indicator question concerns broad population coverage and small-area denominators. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Censuses and population frames within Part XIII — Data sources and measurement error: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Its object is not to divide a population into convenient labels, but to show whether educational opportunity is distributed in a manner that a national total cannot reveal. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-36-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Operationally, the measure is enumeration date, usual residence and institutional coverage stated. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Censuses and population frames within Part XIII — Data sources and measurement error: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Its metadata should travel with every published value. At minimum this includes population, geography, date, collection method, classification and known exclusions. A national estimate assembled from local reports should disclose reporting completeness and treatment of missing institutions. A survey estimate should disclose weights and uncertainty. A census figure should disclose enumeration rules. These are substantive attributes because they determine who can appear in the evidence. A figure detached from them may be arithmetically correct yet unsuitable for an equity judgement.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-36-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Use of the indicator is bounded by the principle that long intervals and under-enumeration acknowledged. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Censuses and population frames within Part XIII — Data sources and measurement error: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. A responsible commentary distinguishes observation, calculation and interpretation. It states whether a disparity is large in educational terms, whether it is estimated precisely enough for the proposed comparison and whether it persists across sources or periods. It does not assign cause from a cross-sectional difference. Apparent exceptions should be examined rather than removed, because they may reveal classification error, a local policy difference or a population not adequately represented elsewhere.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-36-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For homeless, displaced and geographically isolated people, a single group label may conceal important internal differences. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Censuses and population frames within Part XIII — Data sources and measurement error: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Disaggregation should proceed far enough to reveal a plausible service disparity but stop before estimates become unsafe or persons identifiable. This balance is contextual rather than mechanical. It should involve statistical judgement, legal safeguards and knowledge of the affected community. Suppression rules need explanation, and restricted analysis may be preferable to public release of small cells. The public report can still state that a disparity was examined, whether action is required and which body will monitor it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-37", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "37", "title": "Single-axis disaggregation", "anchor": "37-single-axis-disaggregation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-37-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Single-axis disaggregation should be approached as a defined measurement problem. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Single-axis disaggregation within Part XIV — Disaggregation and intersection: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. The substantive interest is separate reporting by sex, wealth, residence or another characteristic, observed for a population and period that are stated before calculation. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-37-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The preferred construction is levels, gaps and denominators shown for each category. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Single-axis disaggregation within Part XIV — Disaggregation and intersection: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Numerator, denominator, reference date, unit and exclusions should appear together. If a proportion is reported, its underlying population count remains material: identical percentages can describe very different evidentiary strength and numbers of affected learners. Administrative records should be reconciled with population-based evidence where their coverage differs. A discrepancy is not resolved by selecting the more favourable source. It should require examination of definitions, timing, migration, duplication and non-response. The resulting indicator should be reproducible from stated components, while any necessary estimation remains distinguishable from direct observation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-37-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation follows this limitation: one axis not presented as a complete account of marginalisation. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Single-axis disaggregation within Part XIV — Disaggregation and intersection: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. The comparison should show the level for each group as well as any ratio or gap. A ratio can approach one because the more advantaged group deteriorates; a small absolute gap can coexist with severe deprivation for all groups. Reference points therefore need substantive meaning. Where a minimum entitlement or policy threshold is relevant, the distance of every group from that threshold should be visible. Statistical association can identify where disadvantage is concentrated, but it does not establish why the disparity arose. Explanation requires evidence on institutions, resources, households and prior conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-37-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distributional review must deliberately include groups whose disadvantage lies on another unmeasured dimension. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Single-axis disaggregation within Part XIV — Disaggregation and intersection: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. These populations may be missing not only from good outcomes but from the denominator itself. Coverage assessment should compare survey frames, census listings, administrative registers and local knowledge without assuming that any one is complete. If direct estimation is impossible, the report should state the evidence gap and use appropriate qualitative or service information rather than assign zero. Confidentiality is essential, especially where identity or status creates risk. Protection, however, should lead to careful access and publication rules; it should not make an affected population analytically disappear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-38", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "38", "title": "Intersecting categories", "anchor": "38-intersecting-categories", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-38-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For intersecting categories, the first requirement is conceptual clarity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Intersecting categories within Part XIV — Disaggregation and intersection: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. The study seeks evidence on joint distributions such as sex by wealth and residence; it does not infer a learner's circumstances from a national or regional mean. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-38-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement should use pre-specified combinations with sufficient observations. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Intersecting categories within Part XIV — Disaggregation and intersection: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. This formulation requires the reporting body to preserve the population base and the observation period beside the result. Counts reveal scale; rates permit comparison; neither is sufficient alone. Source coverage must be tested before sources are combined. School returns may describe enrolled learners well while saying little about children outside institutions, whereas household enquiries may reach non-enrolled children but provide limited school detail. Reconciliation should record what each source can and cannot represent. Where estimates are revised, both the reason and effect of revision should remain accessible.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-38-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing caution is that empty or unstable cells reported honestly. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Intersecting categories within Part XIV — Disaggregation and intersection: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Disparity measures should not replace the underlying distributions. A difference in means may reflect the lower tail, the upper tail or change across the whole range; these possibilities call for different responses. Percentage-point gaps, ratios and relative risks answer different questions and should not be exchanged without explanation. The comparison should identify the reference category but avoid presenting it as a natural norm. Policy significance depends upon the educational consequence and the number of learners affected, not solely upon statistical separation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-38-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for poor rural girls, disabled learners in remote areas and displaced minorities. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Intersecting categories within Part XIV — Disaggregation and intersection: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Their circumstances may alter access to enumeration, classification and the service being measured. The review should record non-response, unknown status and excluded locations separately. Combining unknown observations with the majority group biases both estimates and obscures the weakness. Where sample size is limited, several years or compatible areas may sometimes be combined, provided the loss of time or place specificity is stated. Where combination would be misleading, a descriptive case record can establish a service problem without pretending to estimate prevalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-39", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiv", "parentId": null, "number": "39", "title": "Small numbers, disclosure and reliability", "anchor": "39-small-numbers-disclosure-and-reliability", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-39-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A distribution-sensitive account of useful detail without unreliable estimates or identification begins by naming the decision the evidence may inform. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Small numbers, disclosure and reliability within Part XIV — Disaggregation and intersection: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Without that purpose, disaggregation can multiply figures without improving public judgement. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-21" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-39-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible statistic would be based on suppression, aggregation or qualitative evidence chosen proportionately. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Small numbers, disclosure and reliability within Part XIV — Disaggregation and intersection: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. The definition should be fixed for the comparison at hand and deviations recorded. Analysts need to show whether the observation refers to a stock on one date, activity over a period or a flow between states. This distinction is essential for participation and progression. The estimate should retain its unrounded numerator and denominator for checking, although published precision should not exceed data quality. When several sources exist, consistency is evidence to consider, not proof that common error is absent.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-39-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical rule is clear: confidentiality decisions separated from claims that no disparity exists. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Small numbers, disclosure and reliability within Part XIV — Disaggregation and intersection: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Results should be tested for sensitivity to plausible alternative definitions, particularly where age bands, residence, wealth grouping or programme equivalence are involved. If a conclusion changes under a reasonable specification, that instability is part of the finding. National averages should remain available as context, yet never as a substitute for the distribution. Nor should a group estimate be read as a description of every member. Within-group variation and unmeasured intersecting conditions remain material.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-39-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "An adequate equity account asks whether small communities and learners with rare characteristics are represented at each stage: population frame, collection, valid response, classification, analysis and publication. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Small numbers, disclosure and reliability within Part XIV — Disaggregation and intersection: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Attrition at any stage can produce an apparently complete indicator from a selective population. Field arrangements need relevant languages, accessible formats and safe participation. Analysts should also examine who answers on behalf of whom, since proxy response may be necessary yet less reliable for attendance, impairment or discrimination. Missingness is itself patterned evidence when it clusters by location or social condition, although its magnitude should not be guessed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-40", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "40", "title": "Comparing unlike systems", "anchor": "40-comparing-unlike-systems", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-40-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public value of comparing unlike systems lies in making unequal educational experience observable. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Comparing unlike systems within Part XV — Comparison, uncertainty and change: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Here, the relevant phenomenon is cross-country patterns based on harmonised but bounded concepts, not the administrative convenience of the available categories. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-40-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Operationally, the measure is metadata tests before numerical comparison. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Comparing unlike systems within Part XV — Comparison, uncertainty and change: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Its metadata should travel with every published value. At minimum this includes population, geography, date, collection method, classification and known exclusions. A national estimate assembled from local reports should disclose reporting completeness and treatment of missing institutions. A survey estimate should disclose weights and uncertainty. A census figure should disclose enumeration rules. These are substantive attributes because they determine who can appear in the evidence. A figure detached from them may be arithmetically correct yet unsuitable for an equity judgement.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-40-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Use of the indicator is bounded by the principle that differences in programme structure and classification remain visible. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Comparing unlike systems within Part XV — Comparison, uncertainty and change: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. A responsible commentary distinguishes observation, calculation and interpretation. It states whether a disparity is large in educational terms, whether it is estimated precisely enough for the proposed comparison and whether it persists across sources or periods. It does not assign cause from a cross-sectional difference. Apparent exceptions should be examined rather than removed, because they may reveal classification error, a local policy difference or a population not adequately represented elsewhere.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-40-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For countries with incomplete or rapidly changing systems, a single group label may conceal important internal differences. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Comparing unlike systems within Part XV — Comparison, uncertainty and change: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Disaggregation should proceed far enough to reveal a plausible service disparity but stop before estimates become unsafe or persons identifiable. This balance is contextual rather than mechanical. It should involve statistical judgement, legal safeguards and knowledge of the affected community. Suppression rules need explanation, and restricted analysis may be preferable to public release of small cells. The public report can still state that a disparity was examined, whether action is required and which body will monitor it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-41", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "41", "title": "Sampling error and other uncertainty", "anchor": "41-sampling-error-and-other-uncertainty", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-41-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The indicator question concerns the range of values reasonably compatible with the observations. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Sampling error and other uncertainty within Part XV — Comparison, uncertainty and change: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Its object is not to divide a population into convenient labels, but to show whether educational opportunity is distributed in a manner that a national total cannot reveal. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-07" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-41-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The preferred construction is standard errors, design effects and data-quality qualifications. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Sampling error and other uncertainty within Part XV — Comparison, uncertainty and change: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Numerator, denominator, reference date, unit and exclusions should appear together. If a proportion is reported, its underlying population count remains material: identical percentages can describe very different evidentiary strength and numbers of affected learners. Administrative records should be reconciled with population-based evidence where their coverage differs. A discrepancy is not resolved by selecting the more favourable source. It should require examination of definitions, timing, migration, duplication and non-response. The resulting indicator should be reproducible from stated components, while any necessary estimation remains distinguishable from direct observation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-41-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation follows this limitation: rank differences smaller than uncertainty not interpreted. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Sampling error and other uncertainty within Part XV — Comparison, uncertainty and change: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. The comparison should show the level for each group as well as any ratio or gap. A ratio can approach one because the more advantaged group deteriorates; a small absolute gap can coexist with severe deprivation for all groups. Reference points therefore need substantive meaning. Where a minimum entitlement or policy threshold is relevant, the distance of every group from that threshold should be visible. Statistical association can identify where disadvantage is concentrated, but it does not establish why the disparity arose. Explanation requires evidence on institutions, resources, households and prior conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-41-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distributional review must deliberately include small disaggregated populations. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Sampling error and other uncertainty within Part XV — Comparison, uncertainty and change: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. These populations may be missing not only from good outcomes but from the denominator itself. Coverage assessment should compare survey frames, census listings, administrative registers and local knowledge without assuming that any one is complete. If direct estimation is impossible, the report should state the evidence gap and use appropriate qualitative or service information rather than assign zero. Confidentiality is essential, especially where identity or status creates risk. Protection, however, should lead to careful access and publication rules; it should not make an affected population analytically disappear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-42", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xv", "parentId": null, "number": "42", "title": "Trends and breaks in series", "anchor": "42-trends-and-breaks-in-series", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-42-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Trends and breaks in series should be approached as a defined measurement problem. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Trends and breaks in series within Part XV — Comparison, uncertainty and change: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. The substantive interest is change over time under stable definitions and populations, observed for a population and period that are stated before calculation. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-42-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Measurement should use parallel reporting where methods or boundaries change. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Trends and breaks in series within Part XV — Comparison, uncertainty and change: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. This formulation requires the reporting body to preserve the population base and the observation period beside the result. Counts reveal scale; rates permit comparison; neither is sufficient alone. Source coverage must be tested before sources are combined. School returns may describe enrolled learners well while saying little about children outside institutions, whereas household enquiries may reach non-enrolled children but provide limited school detail. Reconciliation should record what each source can and cannot represent. Where estimates are revised, both the reason and effect of revision should remain accessible.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-42-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing caution is that revisions and discontinuities marked at the point of change. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Trends and breaks in series within Part XV — Comparison, uncertainty and change: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Disparity measures should not replace the underlying distributions. A difference in means may reflect the lower tail, the upper tail or change across the whole range; these possibilities call for different responses. Percentage-point gaps, ratios and relative risks answer different questions and should not be exchanged without explanation. The comparison should identify the reference category but avoid presenting it as a natural norm. Policy significance depends upon the educational consequence and the number of learners affected, not solely upon statistical separation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-42-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Particular scrutiny is required for groups entering the data only after improved coverage. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Trends and breaks in series within Part XV — Comparison, uncertainty and change: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Their circumstances may alter access to enumeration, classification and the service being measured. The review should record non-response, unknown status and excluded locations separately. Combining unknown observations with the majority group biases both estimates and obscures the weakness. Where sample size is limited, several years or compatible areas may sometimes be combined, provided the loss of time or place specificity is stated. Where combination would be misleading, a descriptive case record can establish a service problem without pretending to estimate prevalence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-43", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "43", "title": "Reading disparity without blaming learners", "anchor": "43-reading-disparity-without-blaming-learners", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-43-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For reading disparity without blaming learners, the first requirement is conceptual clarity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Reading disparity without blaming learners within Part XVI — Responsible interpretation and action: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. The study seeks evidence on institutional and social conditions associated with unequal outcomes; it does not infer a learner's circumstances from a national or regional mean. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-43-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A defensible statistic would be based on descriptive findings separated from causal claims. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Reading disparity without blaming learners within Part XVI — Responsible interpretation and action: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. The definition should be fixed for the comparison at hand and deviations recorded. Analysts need to show whether the observation refers to a stock on one date, activity over a period or a flow between states. This distinction is essential for participation and progression. The estimate should retain its unrounded numerator and denominator for checking, although published precision should not exceed data quality. When several sources exist, consistency is evidence to consider, not proof that common error is absent.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-43-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical rule is clear: group identity never treated as a mechanism by itself. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Reading disparity without blaming learners within Part XVI — Responsible interpretation and action: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Results should be tested for sensitivity to plausible alternative definitions, particularly where age bands, residence, wealth grouping or programme equivalence are involved. If a conclusion changes under a reasonable specification, that instability is part of the finding. National averages should remain available as context, yet never as a substitute for the distribution. Nor should a group estimate be read as a description of every member. Within-group variation and unmeasured intersecting conditions remain material.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-43-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "An adequate equity account asks whether communities subject to stigma are represented at each stage: population frame, collection, valid response, classification, analysis and publication. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Reading disparity without blaming learners within Part XVI — Responsible interpretation and action: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Attrition at any stage can produce an apparently complete indicator from a selective population. Field arrangements need relevant languages, accessible formats and safe participation. Analysts should also examine who answers on behalf of whom, since proxy response may be necessary yet less reliable for attendance, impairment or discrimination. Missingness is itself patterned evidence when it clusters by location or social condition, although its magnitude should not be guessed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-44", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "44", "title": "Turning evidence into equitable policy", "anchor": "44-turning-evidence-into-equitable-policy", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-44-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A distribution-sensitive account of a decision rule linking disparity to service, finance or legal responsibility begins by naming the decision the evidence may inform. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Turning evidence into equitable policy within Part XVI — Responsible interpretation and action: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Without that purpose, disaggregation can multiply figures without improving public judgement. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-44-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Operationally, the measure is baseline, intended reach, implementation evidence and review date. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Turning evidence into equitable policy within Part XVI — Responsible interpretation and action: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Its metadata should travel with every published value. At minimum this includes population, geography, date, collection method, classification and known exclusions. A national estimate assembled from local reports should disclose reporting completeness and treatment of missing institutions. A survey estimate should disclose weights and uncertainty. A census figure should disclose enumeration rules. These are substantive attributes because they determine who can appear in the evidence. A figure detached from them may be arithmetically correct yet unsuitable for an equity judgement.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-44-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Use of the indicator is bounded by the principle that targets accompanied by distributional safeguards. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Turning evidence into equitable policy within Part XVI — Responsible interpretation and action: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. A responsible commentary distinguishes observation, calculation and interpretation. It states whether a disparity is large in educational terms, whether it is estimated precisely enough for the proposed comparison and whether it persists across sources or periods. It does not assign cause from a cross-sectional difference. Apparent exceptions should be examined rather than removed, because they may reveal classification error, a local policy difference or a population not adequately represented elsewhere.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-44-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "For learners farthest below a secured minimum, a single group label may conceal important internal differences. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Turning evidence into equitable policy within Part XVI — Responsible interpretation and action: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Disaggregation should proceed far enough to reveal a plausible service disparity but stop before estimates become unsafe or persons identifiable. This balance is contextual rather than mechanical. It should involve statistical judgement, legal safeguards and knowledge of the affected community. Suppression rules need explanation, and restricted analysis may be preferable to public release of small cells. The public report can still state that a disparity was examined, whether action is required and which body will monitor it.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-45", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvi", "parentId": null, "number": "45", "title": "A public account beyond the average", "anchor": "45-a-public-account-beyond-the-average", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-45-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public value of a public account beyond the average lies in making unequal educational experience observable. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs A public account beyond the average within Part XVI — Responsible interpretation and action: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Here, the relevant phenomenon is a concise national statement of level, distribution, missingness and remedy, not the administrative convenience of the available categories. The measure should preserve both the observed level and the distribution relevant to the claim. A national figure remains necessary for scale and direction, yet it cannot answer which learners receive the service, how far groups lie from an acceptable minimum or whether apparent progress reflects changed coverage. The report should state the educational consequence before choosing a gap, ratio, threshold or rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-45-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The preferred construction is national totals presented beside selected group and place indicators. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs A public account beyond the average within Part XVI — Responsible interpretation and action: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Numerator, denominator, reference date, unit and exclusions should appear together. If a proportion is reported, its underlying population count remains material: identical percentages can describe very different evidentiary strength and numbers of affected learners. Administrative records should be reconciled with population-based evidence where their coverage differs. A discrepancy is not resolved by selecting the more favourable source. It should require examination of definitions, timing, migration, duplication and non-response. The resulting indicator should be reproducible from stated components, while any necessary estimation remains distinguishable from direct observation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-45-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Interpretation follows this limitation: progress claims bounded by evidence coverage and unresolved gaps. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs A public account beyond the average within Part XVI — Responsible interpretation and action: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. The comparison should show the level for each group as well as any ratio or gap. A ratio can approach one because the more advantaged group deteriorates; a small absolute gap can coexist with severe deprivation for all groups. Reference points therefore need substantive meaning. Where a minimum entitlement or policy threshold is relevant, the distance of every group from that threshold should be visible. Statistical association can identify where disadvantage is concentrated, but it does not establish why the disparity arose. Explanation requires evidence on institutions, resources, households and prior conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-45-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distributional review must deliberately include every learner otherwise hidden by a successful average. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs A public account beyond the average within Part XVI — Responsible interpretation and action: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. These populations may be missing not only from good outcomes but from the denominator itself. Coverage assessment should compare survey frames, census listings, administrative registers and local knowledge without assuming that any one is complete. If direct estimation is impossible, the report should state the evidence gap and use appropriate qualitative or service information rather than assign zero. Confidentiality is essential, especially where identity or status creates risk. Protection, however, should lead to careful access and publication rules; it should not make an affected population analytically disappear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-46", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "46", "title": "Composite measures and the loss of meaning", "anchor": "46-composite-measures-and-the-loss-of-meaning", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-46-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical purpose is combining several dimensions into a summary measure. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Composite measures and the loss of meaning within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. That purpose should be written before the calculation because method follows the intended inference. The evidence base comprises participation, completion, learning and school conditions, each of which describes a different feature of educational opportunity. A result is useful only if a reader can identify the represented population, the reference period and the educational consequence attached to movement. The national total supplies context, while the distribution tests whether the total is shared. Where the measure condenses several observations, its construction must remain open to reconstruction from the underlying values. Where it separates groups, classifications must be lawful, meaningful and sufficiently stable for the comparison.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-46-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological questions concern weights, normalisation and substitution. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Composite measures and the loss of meaning within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Choices on these matters are not neutral presentation details. They determine how strongly one component, place or population can influence the conclusion. A defensible choice begins with the substantive education question and is then tested against alternative reasonable specifications. If the headline conclusion changes materially, the range of results should be reported. Sensitivity does not make the exercise useless; it prevents a conventional choice from appearing inevitable. Documentation should also state which observations are direct, which are estimated and which are unavailable. Missing values should remain missing unless an explicit estimation method and its effect are shown.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-46-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main interpretive danger is a low value in one dimension being concealed by a high value in another. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Composite measures and the loss of meaning within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Avoiding it requires the underlying counts and distributions to remain visible beside any summary. Analysts should check whether an apparently favourable result arose through changed coverage, population movement, reclassification or concentration on cases nearest a threshold. A disparity can narrow because the better-served group deteriorates, while a composite score can improve although a protected minimum worsens. Direction must therefore be joined to adequacy. Comparison should also examine absolute numbers: a smaller rate in a growing population may still correspond to more learners without the secured opportunity. No result should be described as equitable solely because one relative measure improved.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-46-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Source quality should be considered dimension by dimension. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Composite measures and the loss of meaning within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Administrative returns may provide frequent local detail but exclude non-participants and non-reporting institutions. Surveys can represent households beyond formal education, subject to sample size, field access and response. Censuses can support small-area denominators at longer intervals, while enumeration rules and population movement affect coverage. A record of agreement should follow reconciliation of concepts rather than simple numerical proximity. A record of disagreement should identify plausible sources and the decision consequence. If the available evidence does not support a proposed level of disaggregation, the limitation should appear in the finding rather than in a remote methodological note.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-46-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity review asks who can disappear during construction of the measure. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Composite measures and the loss of meaning within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Learners outside school, people in temporary settlements, small language communities, persons with disabilities and households beyond a survey frame can all be absent before analysis begins. Analysts should compare coverage against independent population and service information and preserve an unknown category where classification is incomplete. Small cells require protection against disclosure and caution about statistical stability. These duties do not justify silence about a serious disparity. The public account may report a broader group, a range, a qualitative service failure or restricted findings, provided that it states what cannot safely be quantified and which body is responsible for better evidence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-46-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy user is policy-makers deciding whether a summary aids or obscures resource allocation. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Composite measures and the loss of meaning within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Evidence should lead to a stated decision class: immediate removal of an access barrier, redistribution of staff or finance, further investigation, amendment of a classification, or evaluation of an existing measure. The certainty required depends upon the consequence. Credible indications of severe exclusion can justify protective action before exact prevalence is known, whereas durable allocation formulas require review as evidence improves. Every response should name the expected population reach and the later observation that will test it. Otherwise a disparity can generate activity without demonstrating that conditions changed for the intended learners.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-46-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Participation by affected communities strengthens both interpretation and legitimacy. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Composite measures and the loss of meaning within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Local knowledge can identify seasonal movement, unsafe routes, hidden household costs, language use and service boundaries that national categories miss. Consultation should not be treated as statistical verification, nor should a survey estimate displace credible evidence of a local barrier. The two forms answer different questions. Authorities should provide accessible explanations of definitions and invite correction where categories misdescribe experience. Feedback needs a recorded route into classification, service design or further enquiry. People should not be asked repeatedly for sensitive information when no competent body can act upon the answer.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-23" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-46-b008", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Final reporting should give a clear institutional judgement. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Composite measures and the loss of meaning within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. It should state what the evidence shows, the strength and limits of that conclusion, the people and places most affected, the action within public authority and the date for review. Changes to definitions, boundaries or population estimates should appear at the point where a series changes. Earlier values should remain available so that revision is not mistaken for real progress. A concise account can carry considerable density when every figure retains its population and consequence. The objective is not maximum numerical output. It is a trustworthy connection between unequal educational experience, public responsibility and corrective action.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-47", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "47", "title": "Decomposing an observed education gap", "anchor": "47-decomposing-an-observed-education-gap", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-47-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical purpose is examining how a national disparity is distributed across places and population groups. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Decomposing an observed education gap within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. That purpose should be written before the calculation because method follows the intended inference. The evidence base comprises within-group and between-group differences, each of which describes a different feature of educational opportunity. A result is useful only if a reader can identify the represented population, the reference period and the educational consequence attached to movement. The national total supplies context, while the distribution tests whether the total is shared. Where the measure condenses several observations, its construction must remain open to reconstruction from the underlying values. Where it separates groups, classifications must be lawful, meaningful and sufficiently stable for the comparison.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-47-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological questions concern population shares, outcome levels and overlapping membership. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Decomposing an observed education gap within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Choices on these matters are not neutral presentation details. They determine how strongly one component, place or population can influence the conclusion. A defensible choice begins with the substantive education question and is then tested against alternative reasonable specifications. If the headline conclusion changes materially, the range of results should be reported. Sensitivity does not make the exercise useless; it prevents a conventional choice from appearing inevitable. Documentation should also state which observations are direct, which are estimated and which are unavailable. Missing values should remain missing unless an explicit estimation method and its effect are shown.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-47-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main interpretive danger is treating a descriptive decomposition as proof of cause. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Decomposing an observed education gap within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Avoiding it requires the underlying counts and distributions to remain visible beside any summary. Analysts should check whether an apparently favourable result arose through changed coverage, population movement, reclassification or concentration on cases nearest a threshold. A disparity can narrow because the better-served group deteriorates, while a composite score can improve although a protected minimum worsens. Direction must therefore be joined to adequacy. Comparison should also examine absolute numbers: a smaller rate in a growing population may still correspond to more learners without the secured opportunity. No result should be described as equitable solely because one relative measure improved.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-47-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy user is authorities locating where further enquiry and action are warranted. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Decomposing an observed education gap within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Evidence should lead to a stated decision class: immediate removal of an access barrier, redistribution of staff or finance, further investigation, amendment of a classification, or evaluation of an existing measure. The certainty required depends upon the consequence. Credible indications of severe exclusion can justify protective action before exact prevalence is known, whereas durable allocation formulas require review as evidence improves. Every response should name the expected population reach and the later observation that will test it. Otherwise a disparity can generate activity without demonstrating that conditions changed for the intended learners.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-23" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-48", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "48", "title": "Setting distribution-sensitive targets", "anchor": "48-setting-distribution-sensitive-targets", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-48-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical purpose is expressing progress as improvement in secured minimums and unjustified gaps. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Setting distribution-sensitive targets within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. That purpose should be written before the calculation because method follows the intended inference. The evidence base comprises the national level, the least-served group and the lower tail of the distribution, each of which describes a different feature of educational opportunity. A result is useful only if a reader can identify the represented population, the reference period and the educational consequence attached to movement. The national total supplies context, while the distribution tests whether the total is shared. Where the measure condenses several observations, its construction must remain open to reconstruction from the underlying values. Where it separates groups, classifications must be lawful, meaningful and sufficiently stable for the comparison.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-48-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological questions concern baseline stability, ambition and safeguards against exclusion. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Setting distribution-sensitive targets within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Choices on these matters are not neutral presentation details. They determine how strongly one component, place or population can influence the conclusion. A defensible choice begins with the substantive education question and is then tested against alternative reasonable specifications. If the headline conclusion changes materially, the range of results should be reported. Sensitivity does not make the exercise useless; it prevents a conventional choice from appearing inevitable. Documentation should also state which observations are direct, which are estimated and which are unavailable. Missing values should remain missing unless an explicit estimation method and its effect are shown.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-48-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main interpretive danger is meeting a mean target while abandoning those farthest behind. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Setting distribution-sensitive targets within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Avoiding it requires the underlying counts and distributions to remain visible beside any summary. Analysts should check whether an apparently favourable result arose through changed coverage, population movement, reclassification or concentration on cases nearest a threshold. A disparity can narrow because the better-served group deteriorates, while a composite score can improve although a protected minimum worsens. Direction must therefore be joined to adequacy. Comparison should also examine absolute numbers: a smaller rate in a growing population may still correspond to more learners without the secured opportunity. No result should be described as equitable solely because one relative measure improved.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-48-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy user is governments linking national commitments to subnational delivery. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Setting distribution-sensitive targets within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Evidence should lead to a stated decision class: immediate removal of an access barrier, redistribution of staff or finance, further investigation, amendment of a classification, or evaluation of an existing measure. The certainty required depends upon the consequence. Credible indications of severe exclusion can justify protective action before exact prevalence is known, whereas durable allocation formulas require review as evidence improves. Every response should name the expected population reach and the later observation that will test it. Otherwise a disparity can generate activity without demonstrating that conditions changed for the intended learners.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-49", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "49", "title": "Linking learners to service geography", "anchor": "49-linking-learners-to-service-geography", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-49-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical purpose is relating participation and learning to the location and capacity of education services. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Linking learners to service geography within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. That purpose should be written before the calculation because method follows the intended inference. The evidence base comprises settlement populations, travel conditions, schools, teachers and programme levels, each of which describes a different feature of educational opportunity. A result is useful only if a reader can identify the represented population, the reference period and the educational consequence attached to movement. The national total supplies context, while the distribution tests whether the total is shared. Where the measure condenses several observations, its construction must remain open to reconstruction from the underlying values. Where it separates groups, classifications must be lawful, meaningful and sufficiently stable for the comparison.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-49-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological questions concern geographical scale, boundary effects and facility catchments. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Linking learners to service geography within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Choices on these matters are not neutral presentation details. They determine how strongly one component, place or population can influence the conclusion. A defensible choice begins with the substantive education question and is then tested against alternative reasonable specifications. If the headline conclusion changes materially, the range of results should be reported. Sensitivity does not make the exercise useless; it prevents a conventional choice from appearing inevitable. Documentation should also state which observations are direct, which are estimated and which are unavailable. Missing values should remain missing unless an explicit estimation method and its effect are shown.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-49-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main interpretive danger is assuming the nearest mapped institution is accessible or appropriate. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Linking learners to service geography within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Avoiding it requires the underlying counts and distributions to remain visible beside any summary. Analysts should check whether an apparently favourable result arose through changed coverage, population movement, reclassification or concentration on cases nearest a threshold. A disparity can narrow because the better-served group deteriorates, while a composite score can improve although a protected minimum worsens. Direction must therefore be joined to adequacy. Comparison should also examine absolute numbers: a smaller rate in a growing population may still correspond to more learners without the secured opportunity. No result should be described as equitable solely because one relative measure improved.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-49-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy user is planners choosing sites, transport support and teacher deployment. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Linking learners to service geography within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Evidence should lead to a stated decision class: immediate removal of an access barrier, redistribution of staff or finance, further investigation, amendment of a classification, or evaluation of an existing measure. The certainty required depends upon the consequence. Credible indications of severe exclusion can justify protective action before exact prevalence is known, whereas durable allocation formulas require review as evidence improves. Every response should name the expected population reach and the later observation that will test it. Otherwise a disparity can generate activity without demonstrating that conditions changed for the intended learners.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-50", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "50", "title": "Reconciling conflicting sources", "anchor": "50-reconciling-conflicting-sources", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-50-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical purpose is interpreting differences between administrative, survey and census estimates. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Reconciling conflicting sources within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. That purpose should be written before the calculation because method follows the intended inference. The evidence base comprises coverage, timing, concepts and reporting incentives, each of which describes a different feature of educational opportunity. A result is useful only if a reader can identify the represented population, the reference period and the educational consequence attached to movement. The national total supplies context, while the distribution tests whether the total is shared. Where the measure condenses several observations, its construction must remain open to reconstruction from the underlying values. Where it separates groups, classifications must be lawful, meaningful and sufficiently stable for the comparison.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-50-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological questions concern a documented comparison of population and variable definitions. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Reconciling conflicting sources within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Choices on these matters are not neutral presentation details. They determine how strongly one component, place or population can influence the conclusion. A defensible choice begins with the substantive education question and is then tested against alternative reasonable specifications. If the headline conclusion changes materially, the range of results should be reported. Sensitivity does not make the exercise useless; it prevents a conventional choice from appearing inevitable. Documentation should also state which observations are direct, which are estimated and which are unavailable. Missing values should remain missing unless an explicit estimation method and its effect are shown.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-50-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main interpretive danger is averaging incompatible estimates into an apparently precise figure. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Reconciling conflicting sources within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Avoiding it requires the underlying counts and distributions to remain visible beside any summary. Analysts should check whether an apparently favourable result arose through changed coverage, population movement, reclassification or concentration on cases nearest a threshold. A disparity can narrow because the better-served group deteriorates, while a composite score can improve although a protected minimum worsens. Direction must therefore be joined to adequacy. Comparison should also examine absolute numbers: a smaller rate in a growing population may still correspond to more learners without the secured opportunity. No result should be described as equitable solely because one relative measure improved.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-23" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-50-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy user is statistical authorities issuing one bounded account with visible uncertainty. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Reconciling conflicting sources within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Evidence should lead to a stated decision class: immediate removal of an access barrier, redistribution of staff or finance, further investigation, amendment of a classification, or evaluation of an existing measure. The certainty required depends upon the consequence. Credible indications of severe exclusion can justify protective action before exact prevalence is known, whereas durable allocation formulas require review as evidence improves. Every response should name the expected population reach and the later observation that will test it. Otherwise a disparity can generate activity without demonstrating that conditions changed for the intended learners.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-04" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-51", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "51", "title": "Monitoring marginalisation during severe disruption", "anchor": "51-monitoring-marginalisation-during-severe-disruption", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-51-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical purpose is maintaining useful distributional evidence when populations and services move rapidly. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Monitoring marginalisation during severe disruption within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. That purpose should be written before the calculation because method follows the intended inference. The evidence base comprises rapid counts, restored administrative returns and household evidence, each of which describes a different feature of educational opportunity. A result is useful only if a reader can identify the represented population, the reference period and the educational consequence attached to movement. The national total supplies context, while the distribution tests whether the total is shared. Where the measure condenses several observations, its construction must remain open to reconstruction from the underlying values. Where it separates groups, classifications must be lawful, meaningful and sufficiently stable for the comparison.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-51-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological questions concern dated estimates, revision practice and minimal essential classifications. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Monitoring marginalisation during severe disruption within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Choices on these matters are not neutral presentation details. They determine how strongly one component, place or population can influence the conclusion. A defensible choice begins with the substantive education question and is then tested against alternative reasonable specifications. If the headline conclusion changes materially, the range of results should be reported. Sensitivity does not make the exercise useless; it prevents a conventional choice from appearing inevitable. Documentation should also state which observations are direct, which are estimated and which are unavailable. Missing values should remain missing unless an explicit estimation method and its effect are shown.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-23" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-51-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main interpretive danger is using an unstable emergency denominator to assert durable improvement. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Monitoring marginalisation during severe disruption within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Avoiding it requires the underlying counts and distributions to remain visible beside any summary. Analysts should check whether an apparently favourable result arose through changed coverage, population movement, reclassification or concentration on cases nearest a threshold. A disparity can narrow because the better-served group deteriorates, while a composite score can improve although a protected minimum worsens. Direction must therefore be joined to adequacy. Comparison should also examine absolute numbers: a smaller rate in a growing population may still correspond to more learners without the secured opportunity. No result should be described as equitable solely because one relative measure improved.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-51-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy user is authorities protecting access while rebuilding regular statistics. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Monitoring marginalisation during severe disruption within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Evidence should lead to a stated decision class: immediate removal of an access barrier, redistribution of staff or finance, further investigation, amendment of a classification, or evaluation of an existing measure. The certainty required depends upon the consequence. Credible indications of severe exclusion can justify protective action before exact prevalence is known, whereas durable allocation formulas require review as evidence improves. Every response should name the expected population reach and the later observation that will test it. Otherwise a disparity can generate activity without demonstrating that conditions changed for the intended learners.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05", "REF-06" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-52", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "52", "title": "Communicating uncertainty without losing urgency", "anchor": "52-communicating-uncertainty-without-losing-urgency", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-52-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical purpose is explaining what is known strongly enough to justify action and what remains unresolved. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Communicating uncertainty without losing urgency within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. That purpose should be written before the calculation because method follows the intended inference. The evidence base comprises point estimates, ranges, quality statements and missing populations, each of which describes a different feature of educational opportunity. A result is useful only if a reader can identify the represented population, the reference period and the educational consequence attached to movement. The national total supplies context, while the distribution tests whether the total is shared. Where the measure condenses several observations, its construction must remain open to reconstruction from the underlying values. Where it separates groups, classifications must be lawful, meaningful and sufficiently stable for the comparison.", "citationIds": [ "REF-21", "REF-23" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-52-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological questions concern plain institutional language joined to exact metadata. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Communicating uncertainty without losing urgency within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Choices on these matters are not neutral presentation details. They determine how strongly one component, place or population can influence the conclusion. A defensible choice begins with the substantive education question and is then tested against alternative reasonable specifications. If the headline conclusion changes materially, the range of results should be reported. Sensitivity does not make the exercise useless; it prevents a conventional choice from appearing inevitable. Documentation should also state which observations are direct, which are estimated and which are unavailable. Missing values should remain missing unless an explicit estimation method and its effect are shown.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-52-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main interpretive danger is presenting caution as a reason for inaction or urgency as a reason for overstatement. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Communicating uncertainty without losing urgency within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Avoiding it requires the underlying counts and distributions to remain visible beside any summary. Analysts should check whether an apparently favourable result arose through changed coverage, population movement, reclassification or concentration on cases nearest a threshold. A disparity can narrow because the better-served group deteriorates, while a composite score can improve although a protected minimum worsens. Direction must therefore be joined to adequacy. Comparison should also examine absolute numbers: a smaller rate in a growing population may still correspond to more learners without the secured opportunity. No result should be described as equitable solely because one relative measure improved.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-52-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy user is the public, affected communities and responsible decision-makers. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Communicating uncertainty without losing urgency within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Evidence should lead to a stated decision class: immediate removal of an access barrier, redistribution of staff or finance, further investigation, amendment of a classification, or evaluation of an existing measure. The certainty required depends upon the consequence. Credible indications of severe exclusion can justify protective action before exact prevalence is known, whereas durable allocation formulas require review as evidence improves. Every response should name the expected population reach and the later observation that will test it. Otherwise a disparity can generate activity without demonstrating that conditions changed for the intended learners.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-53", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "parentId": null, "number": "53", "title": "A national marginalisation profile", "anchor": "53-a-national-marginalisation-profile", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-53-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The analytical purpose is assembling a concise recurring account beyond the national average. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs A national marginalisation profile within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. That purpose should be written before the calculation because method follows the intended inference. The evidence base comprises population, access, progression, learning, conditions, finance and unresolved evidence gaps, each of which describes a different feature of educational opportunity. A result is useful only if a reader can identify the represented population, the reference period and the educational consequence attached to movement. The national total supplies context, while the distribution tests whether the total is shared. Where the measure condenses several observations, its construction must remain open to reconstruction from the underlying values. Where it separates groups, classifications must be lawful, meaningful and sufficiently stable for the comparison.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-53-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal methodological questions concern a stable core with context-specific distributions. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs A national marginalisation profile within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Choices on these matters are not neutral presentation details. They determine how strongly one component, place or population can influence the conclusion. A defensible choice begins with the substantive education question and is then tested against alternative reasonable specifications. If the headline conclusion changes materially, the range of results should be reported. Sensitivity does not make the exercise useless; it prevents a conventional choice from appearing inevitable. Documentation should also state which observations are direct, which are estimated and which are unavailable. Missing values should remain missing unless an explicit estimation method and its effect are shown.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-53-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The main interpretive danger is creating an encyclopaedia of indicators without decision priority. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs A national marginalisation profile within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Avoiding it requires the underlying counts and distributions to remain visible beside any summary. Analysts should check whether an apparently favourable result arose through changed coverage, population movement, reclassification or concentration on cases nearest a threshold. A disparity can narrow because the better-served group deteriorates, while a composite score can improve although a protected minimum worsens. Direction must therefore be joined to adequacy. Comparison should also examine absolute numbers: a smaller rate in a growing population may still correspond to more learners without the secured opportunity. No result should be described as equitable solely because one relative measure improved.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-04" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-53-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The policy user is parliament, ministries, local authorities and communities reviewing educational equity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs A national marginalisation profile within Part XVII — Applied distributional analysis: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Evidence should lead to a stated decision class: immediate removal of an access barrier, redistribution of staff or finance, further investigation, amendment of a classification, or evaluation of an existing measure. The certainty required depends upon the consequence. Credible indications of severe exclusion can justify protective action before exact prevalence is known, whereas durable allocation formulas require review as evidence improves. Every response should name the expected population reach and the later observation that will test it. Otherwise a disparity can generate activity without demonstrating that conditions changed for the intended learners.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-16" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-54", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "54", "title": "Minimum comparison threshold", "anchor": "54-minimum-comparison-threshold", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-54-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A learning-disparity comparison requires a declared construct, represented population, assessment conditions, scale, uncertainty and distribution. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Minimum comparison threshold within Part XVIII — Extended disparity interpretation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. National means should be accompanied by lower-tail, threshold and group evidence. Opportunity to learn, participation and exclusions remain material.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-55", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "55", "title": "Within-system interpretation", "anchor": "55-within-system-interpretation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-55-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Within-system gaps should preserve place, group and institutional context without assigning cause from identity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Within-system interpretation within Part XVIII — Extended disparity interpretation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Counts, levels, absolute gaps and ratios answer different questions. Missing learners and non-participating schools must remain visible.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-06" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-56", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xviii", "parentId": null, "number": "56", "title": "Between-system interpretation", "anchor": "56-between-system-interpretation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-56-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Between-system comparison requires metadata tests for curriculum, age, language, sampling and assessment. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Between-system interpretation within Part XVIII — Extended disparity interpretation: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Rank differences smaller than uncertainty should not support categorical conclusions. Harmonisation does not remove substantive system difference.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-57", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "57", "title": "Assessment participation and the represented learning population", "anchor": "57-assessment-participation-and-the-represented-learning-population", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-57-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A learning distribution is defined partly by who participates in the assessment. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Assessment participation and the represented learning population within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. The target population, eligible population, sampled population and assessed population should be reported separately. Learners can be absent because of illness, displacement, school non-attendance, language barriers, disability, conflict, administrative exclusion or ordinary sampling loss. These routes have different meanings. A result calculated only for participating learners may describe their performance accurately while failing to describe the educational system's full learner population.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-57-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Participation should therefore accompany every reported mean, proficiency share or percentile. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Assessment participation and the represented learning population within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. School exclusion and within-school absence need separate observation where the design permits. If institutions outside the frame differ systematically from included schools, a high learner response rate within sampled schools cannot repair the coverage limitation. Similarly, replacement of inaccessible schools can preserve sample size while changing the population represented. Reports should describe replacement rules and show any material effect on geography or institutional type.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-57-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Non-participation should not be assigned a score. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Assessment participation and the represented learning population within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Coding an absent learner as below threshold invents performance evidence; removing every absence without comment creates a different bias. Sensitivity analysis can examine plausible bounds or compare known characteristics of participants and non-participants. Where a numerical adjustment is not defensible, the limitation remains a substantive finding. The absence of learning evidence for a population requiring education attention should not be interpreted as evidence of no disparity.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-57-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Accommodation and language arrangements affect participation and result validity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Assessment participation and the represented learning population within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. An assessment may permit attendance yet fail to elicit the intended construct if the format, communication or response mode is inaccessible. Exemption practices should be reported by reason and learner group. Where an adapted form changes the construct materially, separate interpretation may be necessary. Where it removes an irrelevant barrier, results may belong in the common distribution. The report should explain that judgement rather than treat all adaptations as either incomparable or automatically identical.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05", "REF-10", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-57-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Public interpretation should connect participation to policy. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Assessment participation and the represented learning population within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. A low response among remote schools may require field and service improvement; absence among out-of-school children may require a population-based study and re-entry action; assessment exclusion may require accessible design. These are not corrections to be made solely through statistical weighting. The responsible education body should identify which population remains unrepresented and when better evidence will be available. A national learning claim should be no broader than that coverage.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-58", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "58", "title": "Scale, threshold and distribution comparability", "anchor": "58-scale-threshold-and-distribution-comparability", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-58-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Comparisons require a clear statement of what the assessment scale represents. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Scale, threshold and distribution comparability within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. A numerical score has meaning through the tasks, response model, scoring rules and population for which interpretation has been supported. Equal numerical differences should not be assumed to represent equal educational differences unless the scale warrants that inference. A threshold adds a substantive judgement about the knowledge or capability learners should demonstrate; it should not be selected merely because it divides the sample conveniently.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-58-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Means provide one description of the centre and can conceal change elsewhere. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Scale, threshold and distribution comparability within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. The same mean can accompany a compressed distribution, a wide lower tail or polarisation. Reports should therefore consider percentiles, threshold shares and dispersion where technically sound. The lower part of the distribution is especially important for minimum learning opportunity, while the upper part may reveal whether expansion has altered advanced performance. These summaries should remain tied to uncertainty and assessment coverage.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-58-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Threshold comparisons need stable standard-setting and clear labels. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Scale, threshold and distribution comparability within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. A change in the percentage above a threshold may reflect learning, scale revision, task composition or population change. If standards are reset, the break should be visible at the year of change and parallel results reported where possible. Descriptions such as basic, adequate or advanced should be treated as definitions under the assessment, not universal attributes of a learner or education system.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-58-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Cross-language and cross-cultural comparability require evidence, not an assumption that translation has preserved difficulty and meaning. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Scale, threshold and distribution comparability within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Task familiarity, curriculum exposure and response conventions can affect results. Review should examine translation, adaptation, differential item behaviour and opportunity to learn, while avoiding the claim that every detected difference invalidates the whole assessment. Some comparisons may remain defensible at a broad domain while narrower subscales do not. The permissible inference should be stated accordingly.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-58-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A rank is usually less informative than the estimated difference, uncertainty and distribution. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Scale, threshold and distribution comparability within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Small rank movement can follow changes in participating systems or sampling variation. Public reporting should avoid categorical language when intervals overlap or scale linkage is weak. The useful question is whether the evidence indicates a material disparity requiring enquiry, what population is affected and which educational condition might be changed. League order does not answer those questions.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-59", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "59", "title": "Opportunity to learn and interpretation of achievement gaps", "anchor": "59-opportunity-to-learn-and-interpretation-of-achievement-gaps", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-59-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Achievement evidence should be interpreted with opportunity to learn. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Opportunity to learn and interpretation of achievement gaps within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. This includes curriculum entitlement, content actually taught, instructional time, teacher availability, language, materials, attendance and access to support. Opportunity does not determine performance completely, and its measurement is imperfect. It nevertheless prevents a learning gap from being attributed solely to learners or households when institutions supplied different educational conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-59-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The official curriculum establishes intended opportunity, not delivered instruction. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Opportunity to learn and interpretation of achievement gaps within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Teacher reports, schedules, classroom observation and learner work can add evidence, each with limitations. Teacher self-report may be influenced by recall or expectations; observation covers a short period; work samples are selective. Agreement across sources strengthens interpretation when dates and populations align. Contradictions can identify local variation or weak measurement and should not be resolved by choosing the account most favourable to the system.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-59-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Instructional time should distinguish scheduled, delivered and attended time. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Opportunity to learn and interpretation of achievement gaps within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Closures, teacher absence, shortened shifts and late entry can reduce delivered or usable time. Total hours also conceal subject allocation and teaching quality. A learner receiving more hours of poorly organised instruction does not necessarily have greater opportunity in the intended domain. Time is therefore one component of the explanatory evidence, not a conversion factor for predicted score.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-59-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Resource indicators should be connected to use. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Opportunity to learn and interpretation of achievement gaps within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Textbooks delivered to a school may not be available in the relevant language, grade or classroom. Teacher qualifications recorded administratively may not match subject assignment. Facilities may exist but be inaccessible or unsafe. These conditions should be examined at the level where the learning evidence was collected. National resource averages can obscure concentration of weak provision among the same learners whose scores form the lower tail.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-59-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Policy conclusions should avoid treating opportunity indicators as excuses for low expectations. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Opportunity to learn and interpretation of achievement gaps within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Their purpose is to identify conditions within public responsibility and to design support. Where learners received less curriculum exposure, a response may include additional teaching, staff deployment, accessible materials or revised pacing. Later assessment should test whether opportunity and learning changed. The original disparity and the remedial conditions should remain visible rather than being erased by a new cohort average.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-60", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "60", "title": "Decomposing disparities within education systems", "anchor": "60-decomposing-disparities-within-education-systems", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-60-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A national disparity can reflect differences between regions, schools, classrooms and learners. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Decomposing disparities within education systems within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Decomposition can describe where variation is concentrated, provided it is not treated as proof of cause. A large between-school component may indicate segregation, resource distribution or residential pattern; it does not identify which mechanism operates. A large within-school component can coexist with institutional inequality and should not be read as evidence that schools are irrelevant.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-09", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-60-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The level of analysis should correspond to the sampling and decision structure. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Decomposing disparities within education systems within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Learners are commonly nested within classes and schools, while policies may operate through districts or providers. Standard errors and models should respect clustering. Small schools and sparsely populated areas may require special treatment, but removal changes the population represented. Reports should state exclusions and avoid presenting a modelled residual as direct observation.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-60-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Group composition affects school comparisons. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Decomposing disparities within education systems within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. A raw school mean combines prior opportunity, intake, mobility, attendance and current teaching. Adjusted measures can answer bounded questions but depend on variables and assumptions. They should not replace the unadjusted learner outcome or become a definitive quality rank. Adjustment for a condition influenced by the school can also remove part of the very effect under review. The purpose and causal assumptions need explanation.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-60-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Geographical decomposition should preserve absolute numbers and service context. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Decomposing disparities within education systems within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. A small district with a severe gap may need urgent support even though it contributes little to national variance. A populous area with a modest gap may represent many learners. Policy priority should consider educational severity, population, rights and feasibility rather than statistical contribution alone. Maps and rankings, where used elsewhere, should not expose small communities or imply a boundary creates the disparity.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-60-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The appropriate outcome is a decision agenda. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Decomposing disparities within education systems within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Between-region evidence may lead to allocation review; between-school evidence may lead to staffing, admissions or support enquiry; within-school evidence may lead to classroom, language or accessibility review. Each hypothesis requires additional evidence. The decomposition locates questions; it does not authorise blame. Follow-up should state the condition examined, action taken and later learning evidence.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-61", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "61", "title": "Bounded conclusions between education systems", "anchor": "61-bounded-conclusions-between-education-systems", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-61-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Between-system comparison serves public learning when it identifies patterns, plausible questions and alternative institutional arrangements. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Bounded conclusions between education systems within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. It becomes misleading when harmonised labels conceal different programme structures, ages, curricula, languages, participation or assessment conditions. Metadata review should precede numerical comparison. Where a material difference cannot be reconciled, the systems may still be described separately without a common rank.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-61-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Country and system averages should not be interpreted as attributes of every school or learner. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Bounded conclusions between education systems within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Within-system distributions can overlap substantially even where means differ. Group composition and population coverage matter. An apparent national advantage may not extend to poor, rural, minority-language or disabled learners. Reports should place distributional evidence beside the system result and avoid using nationality as an explanation.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-61-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Temporal comparison requires stable linkage. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Bounded conclusions between education systems within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Changes in curriculum, assessment mode, participation, sampling frame or system boundaries can create discontinuity. A linked scale can support trend if common items or other methods preserve meaning and security, but linkage error should accompany the estimate. A later higher score should not automatically be described as system improvement where the represented population changed materially.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-61-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Policy borrowing should attend to authority, capacity, sequence and context. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Bounded conclusions between education systems within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. A practice associated with high performance elsewhere may depend upon teacher preparation, finance, curriculum coherence or social conditions absent in the receiving system. The comparison can identify an option, not guarantee its effect. Pilots should state the mechanism and review evidence. Adoption based solely on rank proximity or reputation substitutes imitation for analysis.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-61-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The final international statement should distinguish three levels. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Bounded conclusions between education systems within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Recorded fact describes the observed results under stated methods. Interpretation identifies patterns and limitations. Policy consideration proposes further enquiry or action under national authority. Causal judgement requires additional design. This separation permits strong public concern about a learning disparity without false certainty about its source and protects education systems from both complacency and unsupported prescription.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-62", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xix", "parentId": null, "number": "62", "title": "Uncertainty, materiality and the duty to respond", "anchor": "62-uncertainty-materiality-and-the-duty-to-respond", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-62-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Uncertainty should qualify a disparity claim without neutralising it. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Uncertainty, materiality and the duty to respond within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Sampling error, non-response, scale linkage, classification and model choice each affect the range of defensible conclusions. They should be described separately because they support different remedies. A larger sample may reduce sampling error; it does not correct systematic exclusion or an invalid construct. More decimal places cannot repair weak coverage. The public report should identify which uncertainty could alter the decision and which does not affect the direction of urgent protection.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-62-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Statistical significance should not substitute for educational materiality. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Uncertainty, materiality and the duty to respond within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. A small estimated difference may be precise but have limited practical consequence, while an uncertain large gap affecting a protected minimum may require immediate enquiry. Materiality should consider the knowledge or capability involved, the number of learners, distribution, duration and consequences for later progression. The threshold for action also depends upon reversibility. Additional diagnostic support can be introduced and reviewed more readily than a high-stakes classification of schools or learners.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-62-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A remedy should match the evidence. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Uncertainty, materiality and the duty to respond within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Where participation is selective, improve coverage and examine barriers. Where opportunity to learn differs, address time, teachers, curriculum, language, accessibility or materials. Where scale comparability is weak, improve the assessment before publishing ranks. Where a group disparity persists under several definitions, investigate institutional mechanisms without attributing cause to identity. Every response should name the competent body, intended population, resources and review date.", "citationIds": [] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-62-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Later evidence should be capable of changing the conclusion. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Uncertainty, materiality and the duty to respond within Part XIX — Extended analysis of learning disparities: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Reports should preserve the original estimate, method and limitation, then state why revision occurred. Silent replacement makes apparent improvement impossible to distinguish from correction. A national evidence system demonstrates strength when it can acknowledge uncertainty, improve measurement and amend policy. The final test is whether learners receive better educational opportunity and whether remaining disparities continue to be visible rather than whether one annual figure becomes more favourable.", "citationIds": [] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-63", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "63", "title": "Defining a persistent learning gap", "anchor": "63-defining-a-persistent-learning-gap", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-63-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The improvement question concerns a sustained disparity in a declared learning domain, population and period. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Defining a persistent learning gap within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. It should be stated with the learner population, educational domain, geography and evidence period. A national average is insufficient when the plan addresses a local or group disparity. The baseline should preserve the underlying distribution and absolute numbers. If the assessment population excludes learners most at risk, the gap is not adequately defined. The plan should state which observation is direct, which is estimated and which remains unknown.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-63-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal error is a fluctuating score or one cohort difference being treated as proof of persistence. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Defining a persistent learning gap within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Avoiding it requires evidence on both learning and the opportunity supplied. Achievement differences may be associated with poverty, language, disability or residence, but those characteristics are not instructional mechanisms. Authorities should examine curriculum, teacher availability, time, attendance, materials, assessment access and learner support. Alternative explanations should remain open until evidence discriminates among them. This discipline prevents a targeted plan from attaching deficit to learners instead of changing institutions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-63-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The required evidence includes baseline, assessment coverage, uncertainty, distribution and opportunity to learn. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Defining a persistent learning gap within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Each source should be used within scope. Administrative records can describe staffing and participation while omitting non-enrolled learners. Assessment provides bounded learning evidence subject to coverage and validity. Observation and work samples can explain classroom conditions without estimating national prevalence. Learner and teacher accounts can identify barriers. Agreement adds confidence after dates and definitions align; contradiction should guide further enquiry rather than selective reporting.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-63-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing action is to select a gap that is educationally material and within public influence. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Defining a persistent learning gap within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Implementation should identify who acts, with what authority, resources and deadline. Dependencies should be sequenced. Teacher guidance without planning time, materials without accessible use, or tutoring without safe attendance cannot deliver the expected mechanism. Local adaptation should remain possible within a common substantive condition. Any departure should be recorded with its reason and expected learner consequence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-63-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Distributional review should ask who is eligible, offered support, participates, receives the intended intensity and demonstrates a later response. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Defining a persistent learning gap within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Gender, household resources, disability, language, residence and prior opportunity may intersect. A plan can improve its average by reaching learners closest to a threshold while leaving those farthest behind. Targets should therefore include the least-served position and protection against exclusion. Small groups require confidentiality and careful precision, not disappearance from review.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-63-b006", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Professional capability is central. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Defining a persistent learning gap within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Teachers need subject knowledge, worked examples, diagnostic interpretation and protected time to collaborate. Moderation should examine evidence and reasoning rather than force identical decisions for unlike cases. Staff workload and turnover should be monitored. A plan relying on a few exceptional individuals is not institutionally secure. Leadership should route obstacles to bodies able to change staffing, finance, curriculum or assessment rather than leaving every correction to the classroom.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-63-b007", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public account should distinguish authorisation, delivery, use and learning consequence. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Defining a persistent learning gap within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. It should report limitations, adverse effects and unresolved learners. A favourable later result may reflect population or assessment change and should be tested against the baseline metadata. Where the intervention is ineffective, adaptation or cessation is responsible improvement. Where benefit depends on temporary support, institutionalisation requires recurrent finance and ordinary ownership. Completion is demonstrated by stronger learning opportunity and a functioning correction route, not by the end of a project.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-64", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "64", "title": "From diagnosis to an intervention hypothesis", "anchor": "64-from-diagnosis-to-an-intervention-hypothesis", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-64-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The improvement question concerns an explicit account of the condition expected to change learning. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs From diagnosis to an intervention hypothesis within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. It should be stated with the learner population, educational domain, geography and evidence period. A national average is insufficient when the plan addresses a local or group disparity. The baseline should preserve the underlying distribution and absolute numbers. If the assessment population excludes learners most at risk, the gap is not adequately defined. The plan should state which observation is direct, which is estimated and which remains unknown.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-64-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal error is group identity or low performance being mistaken for a causal explanation. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs From diagnosis to an intervention hypothesis within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Avoiding it requires evidence on both learning and the opportunity supplied. Achievement differences may be associated with poverty, language, disability or residence, but those characteristics are not instructional mechanisms. Authorities should examine curriculum, teacher availability, time, attendance, materials, assessment access and learner support. Alternative explanations should remain open until evidence discriminates among them. This discipline prevents a targeted plan from attaching deficit to learners instead of changing institutions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-64-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The required evidence includes curriculum exposure, teaching practice, language, time, materials and support. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs From diagnosis to an intervention hypothesis within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Each source should be used within scope. Administrative records can describe staffing and participation while omitting non-enrolled learners. Assessment provides bounded learning evidence subject to coverage and validity. Observation and work samples can explain classroom conditions without estimating national prevalence. Learner and teacher accounts can identify barriers. Agreement adds confidence after dates and definitions align; contradiction should guide further enquiry rather than selective reporting.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-64-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing action is to state the mechanism and plausible alternatives before choosing activity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs From diagnosis to an intervention hypothesis within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Implementation should identify who acts, with what authority, resources and deadline. Dependencies should be sequenced. Teacher guidance without planning time, materials without accessible use, or tutoring without safe attendance cannot deliver the expected mechanism. Local adaptation should remain possible within a common substantive condition. Any departure should be recorded with its reason and expected learner consequence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-65", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "65", "title": "Designing the targeted plan", "anchor": "65-designing-the-targeted-plan", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-65-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The improvement question concerns a bounded sequence connecting resources and actions to learner-facing change. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Designing the targeted plan within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. It should be stated with the learner population, educational domain, geography and evidence period. A national average is insufficient when the plan addresses a local or group disparity. The baseline should preserve the underlying distribution and absolute numbers. If the assessment population excludes learners most at risk, the gap is not adequately defined. The plan should state which observation is direct, which is estimated and which remains unknown.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-65-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal error is a list of activities replacing a coherent implementation logic. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Designing the targeted plan within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Avoiding it requires evidence on both learning and the opportunity supplied. Achievement differences may be associated with poverty, language, disability or residence, but those characteristics are not instructional mechanisms. Authorities should examine curriculum, teacher availability, time, attendance, materials, assessment access and learner support. Alternative explanations should remain open until evidence discriminates among them. This discipline prevents a targeted plan from attaching deficit to learners instead of changing institutions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-65-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The required evidence includes responsibility, staff capability, learner support, milestones and correction. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Designing the targeted plan within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Each source should be used within scope. Administrative records can describe staffing and participation while omitting non-enrolled learners. Assessment provides bounded learning evidence subject to coverage and validity. Observation and work samples can explain classroom conditions without estimating national prevalence. Learner and teacher accounts can identify barriers. Agreement adds confidence after dates and definitions align; contradiction should guide further enquiry rather than selective reporting.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-65-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing action is to choose a feasible intensity and protect the common educational entitlement. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Designing the targeted plan within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Implementation should identify who acts, with what authority, resources and deadline. Dependencies should be sequenced. Teacher guidance without planning time, materials without accessible use, or tutoring without safe attendance cannot deliver the expected mechanism. Local adaptation should remain possible within a common substantive condition. Any departure should be recorded with its reason and expected learner consequence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-66", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "66", "title": "Resourcing equitable implementation", "anchor": "66-resourcing-equitable-implementation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-66-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The improvement question concerns the staff, time, materials, accessibility and finance required by the selected mechanism. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Resourcing equitable implementation within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. It should be stated with the learner population, educational domain, geography and evidence period. A national average is insufficient when the plan addresses a local or group disparity. The baseline should preserve the underlying distribution and absolute numbers. If the assessment population excludes learners most at risk, the gap is not adequately defined. The plan should state which observation is direct, which is estimated and which remains unknown.", "citationIds": [ "REF-13", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-66-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal error is weak institutions being expected to implement with the same nominal allocation. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Resourcing equitable implementation within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Avoiding it requires evidence on both learning and the opportunity supplied. Achievement differences may be associated with poverty, language, disability or residence, but those characteristics are not instructional mechanisms. Authorities should examine curriculum, teacher availability, time, attendance, materials, assessment access and learner support. Alternative explanations should remain open until evidence discriminates among them. This discipline prevents a targeted plan from attaching deficit to learners instead of changing institutions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-66-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The required evidence includes recurrent cost, teacher workload, additional need and household burden. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Resourcing equitable implementation within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Each source should be used within scope. Administrative records can describe staffing and participation while omitting non-enrolled learners. Assessment provides bounded learning evidence subject to coverage and validity. Observation and work samples can explain classroom conditions without estimating national prevalence. Learner and teacher accounts can identify barriers. Agreement adds confidence after dates and definitions align; contradiction should guide further enquiry rather than selective reporting.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-66-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing action is to direct greater support where barriers and implementation costs are greater. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Resourcing equitable implementation within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Implementation should identify who acts, with what authority, resources and deadline. Dependencies should be sequenced. Teacher guidance without planning time, materials without accessible use, or tutoring without safe attendance cannot deliver the expected mechanism. Local adaptation should remain possible within a common substantive condition. Any departure should be recorded with its reason and expected learner consequence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-67", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "67", "title": "Monitoring reach, quality and learning response", "anchor": "67-monitoring-reach-quality-and-learning-response", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-67-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The improvement question concerns evidence that the intended learners received the intervention as designed and benefited educationally. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Monitoring reach, quality and learning response within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. It should be stated with the learner population, educational domain, geography and evidence period. A national average is insufficient when the plan addresses a local or group disparity. The baseline should preserve the underlying distribution and absolute numbers. If the assessment population excludes learners most at risk, the gap is not adequately defined. The plan should state which observation is direct, which is estimated and which remains unknown.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-67-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal error is participation counts being treated as learning evidence. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Monitoring reach, quality and learning response within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Avoiding it requires evidence on both learning and the opportunity supplied. Achievement differences may be associated with poverty, language, disability or residence, but those characteristics are not instructional mechanisms. Authorities should examine curriculum, teacher availability, time, attendance, materials, assessment access and learner support. Alternative explanations should remain open until evidence discriminates among them. This discipline prevents a targeted plan from attaching deficit to learners instead of changing institutions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-67-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The required evidence includes eligibility, offer, take-up, dosage, teaching quality, work and assessment. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Monitoring reach, quality and learning response within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. Each source should be used within scope. Administrative records can describe staffing and participation while omitting non-enrolled learners. Assessment provides bounded learning evidence subject to coverage and validity. Observation and work samples can explain classroom conditions without estimating national prevalence. Learner and teacher accounts can identify barriers. Agreement adds confidence after dates and definitions align; contradiction should guide further enquiry rather than selective reporting.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-67-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing action is to combine timely implementation evidence with valid learning review. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Monitoring reach, quality and learning response within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Implementation should identify who acts, with what authority, resources and deadline. Dependencies should be sequenced. Teacher guidance without planning time, materials without accessible use, or tutoring without safe attendance cannot deliver the expected mechanism. Local adaptation should remain possible within a common substantive condition. Any departure should be recorded with its reason and expected learner consequence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-06" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-68", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xx", "parentId": null, "number": "68", "title": "Adaptation, institutionalisation and exit", "anchor": "68-adaptation-institutionalisation-and-exit", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-68-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The improvement question concerns reasoned decisions to continue, change, scale or end the plan. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Adaptation, institutionalisation and exit within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. It should be stated with the learner population, educational domain, geography and evidence period. A national average is insufficient when the plan addresses a local or group disparity. The baseline should preserve the underlying distribution and absolute numbers. If the assessment population excludes learners most at risk, the gap is not adequately defined. The plan should state which observation is direct, which is estimated and which remains unknown.", "citationIds": [ "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-68-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The principal error is temporary measures persisting without benefit or disappearing before durable capability exists. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Adaptation, institutionalisation and exit within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Avoiding it requires evidence on both learning and the opportunity supplied. Achievement differences may be associated with poverty, language, disability or residence, but those characteristics are not instructional mechanisms. Authorities should examine curriculum, teacher availability, time, attendance, materials, assessment access and learner support. Alternative explanations should remain open until evidence discriminates among them. This discipline prevents a targeted plan from attaching deficit to learners instead of changing institutions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-02" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-68-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The required evidence includes thresholds, adverse effects, unresolved cases, recurrent ownership and later evidence. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Adaptation, institutionalisation and exit within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Each source should be used within scope. Administrative records can describe staffing and participation while omitting non-enrolled learners. Assessment provides bounded learning evidence subject to coverage and validity. Observation and work samples can explain classroom conditions without estimating national prevalence. Learner and teacher accounts can identify barriers. Agreement adds confidence after dates and definitions align; contradiction should guide further enquiry rather than selective reporting.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-06" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-68-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The governing action is to retain useful capability while ending ineffective or inequitable arrangements. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Adaptation, institutionalisation and exit within Part XX — Targeted improvement planning: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Implementation should identify who acts, with what authority, resources and deadline. Dependencies should be sequenced. Teacher guidance without planning time, materials without accessible use, or tutoring without safe attendance cannot deliver the expected mechanism. Local adaptation should remain possible within a common substantive condition. Any departure should be recorded with its reason and expected learner consequence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-69", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "69", "title": "Fixing the contemporaneous institutional baseline", "anchor": "69-fixing-the-contemporaneous-institutional-baseline", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-69-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "National planning should begin from the institutional position that existed on 24 June 2017. The Incheon Declaration expressed the education community's commitment to inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning; Addis supplied a financing framework; the 2030 Agenda established Goal 4 and its targets; and the Education 2030 Framework for Action supplied implementation guidance. The Statistical Commission decision provides a contemporaneous measurement starting point while leaving future refinements and later settlements to later records.", "citationIds": [ "REF-25", "REF-26", "REF-27", "REF-28", "REF-29" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-69-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The distinction between adoption and implementation is essential. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Fixing the contemporaneous institutional baseline within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Adoption establishes an agreed direction and permits governments to begin alignment. It does not prove that national law, plans, budgets, information or delivery arrangements already satisfy the commitment. Each country should identify which obligations and targets can be acted upon under existing authority, which require legislative or administrative change, and which depend on clarification through later competent decisions. Unsettled detail should be recorded as such rather than filled by anticipation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07", "REF-12", "REF-27" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-69-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The baseline should preserve existing education commitments and national evidence. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Fixing the contemporaneous institutional baseline within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. The new agenda does not erase the right to education, the unfinished Education for All undertaking, programme structures or established statistical series. National authorities should map the newly adopted targets against those instruments and against the education stages, populations and institutions already in law and plans. This avoids two risks: abandoning useful evidence because terminology changed, and claiming continuity where a new target has broader scope or different educational substance.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-69-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A dated commitment register can support institutional accuracy. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Fixing the contemporaneous institutional baseline within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. For each relevant proposition, it should record the adopting body, date, legal or policy status, national authority, present implementing instrument and unresolved question. This is not an administrative inventory for its own sake. It prevents a proposed measure from being represented as an obligation, a declaration from being treated as proof of delivery, and a later decision from being projected backwards. The register should be revised openly as competent bodies act.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19", "REF-27" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-69-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Public communication should use the same discipline. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Fixing the contemporaneous institutional baseline within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Governments can state that the 2030 Agenda has been adopted and that national alignment is commencing. They should not state that every indicator, national milestone or implementation mechanism has already been internationally settled. A precise account strengthens credibility because it makes clear which choices belong to national democratic and administrative procedure and which follow directly from adopted commitments. It also establishes a reliable point from which later implementation can be judged.", "citationIds": [ "REF-25", "REF-26", "REF-27" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-70", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "70", "title": "Selecting priorities without narrowing the commitment", "anchor": "70-selecting-priorities-without-narrowing-the-commitment", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-70-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The breadth of Goal 4 requires sequencing, not selective abandonment. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Selecting priorities without narrowing the commitment within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. A national plan cannot improve every condition simultaneously, yet it should retain a complete map of early childhood, primary and secondary education, technical and vocational learning, tertiary participation, adult learning, relevant skills, equality, literacy, learning environments, scholarships and teachers as they appear in the adopted targets. A first improvement priority should be chosen because evidence shows a serious and remediable break, not because other elements have ceased to matter.", "citationIds": [ "REF-25", "REF-27" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-70-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Priority selection should apply four tests. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Selecting priorities without narrowing the commitment within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. The entitlement test asks which population and educational condition are at stake. The consequence test asks the scale and severity of the denial. The actionability test asks whether a competent authority has a plausible means of change. The equity test asks whether the measure will reach learners farthest from the secured opportunity. A priority that scores highly on visibility but weakly on consequence or equity should be reconsidered. The reasons for selection should be published beside the evidence and known limitations.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-70-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "National averages should not determine the sequence alone. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Selecting priorities without narrowing the commitment within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. A moderate national gap may conceal acute failure in one district or population; a large aggregate shortfall may require broad system expansion alongside targeted support. Analysis should retain the national level, absolute number affected, subnational and group distributions and the minimum educational floor. It should also distinguish poor data from satisfactory conditions. Where the least-served population is weakly observed, strengthening coverage can itself become an immediate priority while urgent service evidence supports proportionate protection.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-06", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-70-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Dependencies should influence sequence. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Selecting priorities without narrowing the commitment within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. An assessment reform cannot improve learning without curriculum alignment, teacher capability and participation. Expansion of secondary places may depend on primary completion, trained staff and facilities. Adult learning may require flexible provision, recognition and learner support. The plan should make these dependencies visible and decide which must precede or accompany the selected measure. Otherwise a high-level commitment can be converted into an isolated activity unable to change the learner-facing condition.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-16", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-70-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Selection should remain revisable. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Selecting priorities without narrowing the commitment within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. New evidence may show that the diagnosed mechanism was wrong, that another population is more severely affected or that implementation capacity is insufficient. Revision is not a retreat from ambition when reasons and consequences are published. It is a condition of responsible improvement. The complete commitment map should remain in view so that repeated concentration on one readily measured target does not produce silent neglect of lifelong learning, equality, educational quality or populations outside formal schooling.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-25", "REF-27" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-71", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "71", "title": "From global target to national improvement proposition", "anchor": "71-from-global-target-to-national-improvement-proposition", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-71-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A national improvement proposition should translate a broad target into a bounded statement of change. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs From global target to national improvement proposition within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. It should name the population, present educational condition, institutional mechanism, responsible body, resources, time and evidence of success. For example, a commitment to equitable quality education is too broad to guide one implementation decision; a proposition to improve regular attendance for a defined remote population through transport, staffing and calendar changes can be examined and corrected. The narrower proposition remains connected to the universal commitment and should not be mistaken for its completion.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07", "REF-12", "REF-27" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-71-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Diagnosis should precede instrument choice. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs From global target to national improvement proposition within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. A low completion rate may reflect late entry, repetition, household cost, distance, school safety, language, disability exclusion, teacher shortage or unreliable records. These mechanisms require different responses. A government should compare administrative, household, assessment and local service evidence and state where inference remains uncertain. Consultation with teachers, learners and communities can identify mechanisms, but it should not replace representative population evidence when prevalence is claimed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-71-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The intervention hypothesis should explain how the proposed measure changes the barrier. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs From global target to national improvement proposition within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Additional materials will not improve learning if teachers lack time or knowledge to use them; professional guidance will not improve attendance where transport is decisive; a new indicator will not correct exclusion without authority and resources. The plan should identify necessary dependencies and foreseeable adverse effects. It should specify which part of the hypothesis is established by evidence and which remains to be tested during implementation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-12", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-71-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "National adaptation should preserve educational substance. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs From global target to national improvement proposition within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Targets may need national definitions for programme levels, age groups, language and institutional responsibility. Adaptation is legitimate where it makes the commitment operational and comparable over time. It is not legitimate where it narrows the entitled population, lowers expectations for disadvantaged groups or converts learning into attendance alone. The public record should show the relationship between the global target, national definition and selected measure, including any material difference from an existing series.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-10", "REF-25" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-71-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The proposition should end with a decision rule. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs From global target to national improvement proposition within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. Authorities should state what evidence would justify continuation, expansion, adaptation or cessation and when that decision will occur. A pilot that continues because it attracts support rather than because it changes the intended condition is not an improvement method. Conversely, an intervention should not be abandoned merely because early outcomes are uncertain where delivery has not reached intended intensity. Review must distinguish theory failure, implementation failure, measurement weakness and insufficient time.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-11", "REF-23" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-72", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "72", "title": "Aligning authority, finance and professional capability", "anchor": "72-aligning-authority-finance-and-professional-capability", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-72-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Implementation requires a chain of competent authority. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Aligning authority, finance and professional capability within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. National policy may set the priority, but regional administrations, municipalities, schools, training institutions or other bodies may control staffing, facilities and learner support. The plan should allocate each function to the body able to perform it and identify escalation where local authority is insufficient. Coordination should not allow responsibility to become diffuse. One public owner should remain answerable for whether the learner-facing condition changes.", "citationIds": [ "REF-12", "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-72-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Finance should cover the complete intervention rather than visible start-up items. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Aligning authority, finance and professional capability within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. Staff preparation, salaries, accessible materials, transport, maintenance, guidance, assessment, evidence and review may all be necessary. The Addis Ababa Action Agenda places national action within a broader financing context, but an international commitment does not supply a national cost estimate. Authorities should identify recurrent and capital requirements, the source and timing of funds, distribution rules and the conditions for continuity after temporary support.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-26" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-72-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Allocation should respond to unequal cost and starting capacity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Aligning authority, finance and professional capability within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Equal per-learner funding can reproduce inequality where remoteness, disability, language, insecurity or weak infrastructure makes adequate provision more expensive. Formulae should state which need factors are recognised and should be checked against actual receipt. Announced expenditure is not proof of delivery: review should trace authorization, transfer, institutional use and learner consequence. Where households continue to bear material cost, formal fee policy should not be represented as full accessibility.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-72-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teachers and institutional leaders require capability proportionate to the change. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Aligning authority, finance and professional capability within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. A new curriculum, assessment or inclusion expectation needs more than notification. Professional learning should provide subject substance, practical examples, time for collaboration and a route to support. Staffing and turnover should be examined in the locations expected to implement first. A plan dependent on exceptional individuals or uncompensated workload is not institutionally secure and can deepen disparity between strong and weak institutions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-72-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "International cooperation should strengthen ordinary national capacity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Aligning authority, finance and professional capability within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. External support may finance initial expansion, evidence, technical work or regional learning, but roles, conditions and exit should be clear. Parallel activities and reporting arrangements can fragment public authority. Assistance should align with a national improvement proposition, use compatible records and establish how essential functions will enter recurrent provision. Its success should be judged by national capability and equitable learner opportunity, not the duration or visibility of the supporting activity.", "citationIds": [ "REF-22", "REF-26", "REF-27" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-73", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "73", "title": "Monitoring delivery, reach and educational consequence", "anchor": "73-monitoring-delivery-reach-and-educational-consequence", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-73-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Monitoring should follow the causal sequence of the improvement proposition. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Monitoring delivery, reach and educational consequence within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the finding must preserve its denominator, uncertainty and available remedy. Inputs show whether resources and staff were available; delivery evidence shows whether the measure operated; reach shows which eligible learners participated and with what intensity; educational evidence shows whether the intended condition changed. These stages should not be collapsed. A budget can be executed without materials arriving, a programme can operate without reaching disadvantaged learners, and participation can rise without improvement in learning or progression.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-06", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-73-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The baseline should retain numerator, denominator, population, date, geography, definition and exclusions. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Monitoring delivery, reach and educational consequence within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. Where a new target requires a new measure, authorities should preserve the preceding series and identify any break. Apparent improvement caused by revised population estimates, wider institutional reporting or changed assessment participation should be separated from educational change. Comparable trends are valuable, but continuity should not be asserted where concepts differ materially.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-73-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity monitoring should show eligibility, offer, take-up, attendance, completion and outcome for relevant groups and places. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Monitoring delivery, reach and educational consequence within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the equity judgement should identify people absent from the observed or served population. A plan can improve its average by reaching learners already closest to the desired condition. It should therefore report the least-served position and protect against exclusion or deterioration. Disaggregation must remain lawful, meaningful and safe. Small numbers may require controlled access or combined reporting, but the affected population and public responsibility should not disappear.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-73-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Learning evidence requires population coverage and opportunity to learn. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Monitoring delivery, reach and educational consequence within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the decision should remain reasoned, contestable and open to correction. Assessment results should identify the domain, eligible population, participation and exclusions. A favourable mean among tested learners cannot represent those outside school or absent from assessment. Classroom observation, work samples and learner accounts can illuminate mechanism without establishing national prevalence. Agreement across sources strengthens a conclusion only after definitions and dates align; disagreement should guide investigation rather than selective reporting.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-73-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Public reporting should connect the result to a decision. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs Monitoring delivery, reach and educational consequence within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; comparison is warranted only where definitions, coverage and timing have been reconciled. A concise account should state what was implemented, who received it, what changed, what remains uncertain, which adverse effects occurred and whether the measure will continue, adapt, expand or cease. The next review date and responsible authority should be visible. This makes monitoring a means of correction rather than an obligation to produce favourable figures. The adopted agenda gains national credibility when evidence can alter action and expose populations who remain underserved.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-25", "REF-27" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-74", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxi", "parentId": null, "number": "74", "title": "First national decisions after adoption", "anchor": "74-first-national-decisions-after-adoption", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-74-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The immediate national decision is to establish governance for alignment without pretending that implementation detail is complete. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs First national decisions after adoption within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; institutional performance should be judged by learner-facing consequence rather than announced activity. Governments can designate a competent coordinating authority, preserve existing sector responsibilities, assemble a dated commitment register and commission a baseline review. The review should map every adopted education target against national law, plans, budgets and evidence. It should identify urgent gaps and unsettled definitions separately. This creates a disciplined bridge between global adoption and national action.", "citationIds": [ "REF-25", "REF-27" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-74-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A first priority should be small enough for accountable action and important enough to change educational opportunity. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs First national decisions after adoption within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the responsible authority should identify the population, decision owner and review point. It should name the population and condition, state why it takes precedence, and preserve the wider commitment map. Where credible evidence reveals severe exclusion or harm, protective action need not await a perfect estimate. Longer-term allocation, however, should be reviewed as coverage improves. The plan should guard against choosing only learners and institutions most likely to produce rapid favourable results.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-06", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-74-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The first budget decision should identify recurrent implications. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs First national decisions after adoption within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; the public account should distinguish observation from explanation and attributed effect. Temporary finance may permit testing, but teachers, learner support, accessible facilities, maintenance and evidence cannot be sustained by an announcement. The national authority should state the source, timing and distribution of finance and how external cooperation relates to ordinary provision. A financing gap should be described rather than hidden through reduced educational substance or transfer of cost to poor households.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-26" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-74-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The first public report should be candid about chronology. It can state that three major texts relevant to education and financing had been adopted by the cut-off, including the 2030 Agenda on the preceding day. It should also state that later implementation instruments are outside the record. This protects the difference between an adopted commitment, national policy choice and future institutional clarification. Accurate status is a condition of accountable planning, not a reason for delay.", "citationIds": [ "REF-25", "REF-26", "REF-27" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-74-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The first review should test whether institutions learned, not merely whether a plan was issued. For national credibility in the final years to 2030, this proposition directly informs First national decisions after adoption within Part XXI — National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda: whether targets are matched by authority, resources, public evidence and corrective action; implementation should connect educational entitlement to resources, professional action and follow-up. It should examine authority, delivery, reach, professional capability, finance, learner experience and early educational consequence. It should record adverse findings and adapt the measure where the hypothesis or delivery proves weak. The transition from global commitment to national improvement is complete only when ordinary institutions can sustain the changed condition and correct foreseeable departures; the end of a project or reporting period is not evidence of that result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12", "REF-23" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-75", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxii", "parentId": null, "number": "75", "title": "The hierarchy from goal to observation", "anchor": "75-the-hierarchy-from-goal-to-observation", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-75-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The indicator framework should be read through a hierarchy of public meaning. Goal 4 states the overarching commitment; each target identifies an educational change or condition; an indicator selects one observable aspect; a national measure applies definitions, sources and calculations; and a released value describes a population and period. Authority and inference narrow at each stage. A measure can support judgement on part of a target without becoming the target's complete meaning.", "citationIds": [ "REF-27", "REF-28", "REF-29" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-75-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "This distinction is essential for quality and equity because both are multidimensional. A learning indicator can provide important evidence on one domain and population, but cannot establish free access, regular participation, safety, curricular breadth or recognised progression. A parity measure can reveal a relative relationship while concealing low levels for both groups or exclusion from the denominator. Interpretation should therefore state the specific proposition supported and name the remaining parts of the target that require other evidence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-03", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-75-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The Statistical Commission's March 2016 treatment of the proposed framework as a practical starting point supports use and continuing refinement. It does not justify presenting every definition as fixed for all later periods. A responsible national record should retain the indicator version, metadata, source and calculation used at each release. Where subsequent refinement changes the population or concept, the effect should be assessed and the series broken when continuity is not defensible.", "citationIds": [ "REF-16", "REF-23", "REF-29" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-75-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "National measures may add detail relevant to law, programme structure and known barriers, provided their relation to the global concept is documented. The common measure supports international orientation; the national measure supports domestic decision. Neither should be preferred merely because it produces a more favourable result. A correspondence statement should identify population, education level, event, reference period and material divergence so that readers can see whether two values answer the same question.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-19", "REF-28" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-75-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Public reporting should preserve this hierarchy in its language. It should not say that a goal was achieved because one indicator improved, or that an indicator failed because a source is temporarily unavailable. An unavailable measure identifies a statistical gap; an unfavourable value identifies an observed condition; an incomplete target judgement requires a broader evidentiary account. These are different findings with different responsible bodies and remedies.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-17", "REF-29" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-76", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxii", "parentId": null, "number": "76", "title": "Interpreting quality beyond one outcome", "anchor": "76-interpreting-quality-beyond-one-outcome", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-76-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Quality concerns the educational substance and conditions through which learners participate, learn, complete and progress. Its evidence can include curriculum, teachers, instructional time, facilities, safety, accessibility, assessment, learner work and recognised qualifications. No single item establishes the whole. Inputs can be present but unused; learning can be observed among a selected population; completion can carry weak or uncertain educational value. The framework should therefore be interpreted as a related set rather than a search for one quality proxy.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09", "REF-12", "REF-28" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-76-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Learning measures require a specified domain, target population, instrument, language, administration and proficiency threshold. Grade-based results describe learners who reached the grade and participated under stated conditions. Age-based results may represent a broader population while using different educational correspondence. School-based assessment cannot represent children outside provision without an explicit population model. Participation and exclusions should accompany the result so that improved coverage is not mistaken for deteriorating learning or vice versa.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-76-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Relevant and effective learning outcomes should not be narrowed to whatever domain is easiest to compare. National curricula and public purposes remain material. Comparative measures can establish a common bounded domain, while national evidence addresses additional knowledge, capabilities and progression. A report should state which part of curriculum is observed and should not infer general school quality from a limited instrument. Where a target concerns citizenship or sustainable development, policy presence and learner capability should remain separate stages.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-24", "REF-27" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-76-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teachers are both a means-of-implementation concern and a condition of quality across targets. Counts should be interpreted with preparation, assignment, attendance, workload and support. A national ratio can conceal shortage by subject, level or locality. Qualification definitions vary and need national metadata. Reporting should connect teacher evidence to the learners and institutions exposed to the condition rather than assume that a national workforce total describes classroom opportunity uniformly.", "citationIds": [ "REF-04", "REF-18", "REF-28" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-76-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Quality interpretation should lead to action. If low learning coincides with weak participation, response should not concentrate solely on assessed pupils. If teacher shortage is local, a national recruitment measure may be too broad or too slow. If facilities exclude learners with disabilities, an aggregate infrastructure count is insufficient. The public account should connect the observed condition to the competent authority, resource and later review without claiming attribution beyond the evidence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13", "REF-17" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-77", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxii", "parentId": null, "number": "77", "title": "Equity, parity and minimum educational levels", "anchor": "77-equity-parity-and-minimum-educational-levels", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-77-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Equity is substantive fairness in opportunity, support and result. Indicator interpretation should therefore retain levels, absolute numbers, gaps, ratios and distance from an educational minimum. These quantities answer different questions. A parity index can improve because a disadvantaged group advanced, because the reference group deteriorated or because both changed. Only the underlying levels reveal which occurred. A small relative gap can coexist with severe deprivation across all groups.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05", "REF-06", "REF-14" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-77-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Disaggregation should begin from a public question and an entitled population. Sex, household resources, residence, disability, language, migration, displacement and indigenous or other nationally relevant status may reveal different barriers. Categories should be lawful, respectful, stable enough for comparison and safe to publish. More detail is not automatically better: small cells can be unstable or identifying. Restricted analysis, pooled estimates or descriptive service evidence may support action while public reports preserve confidentiality.", "citationIds": [ "REF-07", "REF-10", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-77-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Intersections can reveal exclusion hidden by single categories. The experience of poor rural girls may differ from the national female average, and disability may interact with language or displacement. Cross-classification should be selected for a plausible mechanism and adequate precision rather than produced mechanically. The report should show the population share represented and state where a group estimate is unavailable. An unobserved population should never be coded as equality or merged silently with the majority.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-13", "REF-23" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-77-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The equity test should also consider who enters the outcome population. Assessment and completion measures are conditional on prior access and progression. If disadvantaged learners are more likely to leave before the observed stage, a narrowing outcome gap among those remaining can coexist with wider system exclusion. Reports should relate outcome distributions to entry, attendance, progression and participation in the measurement itself.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-03", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-77-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Targets should protect a minimum condition and prevent deterioration. Concentrating support on learners closest to a threshold can raise a national result while leaving those farthest behind unchanged. A distribution-sensitive milestone should identify the least-served population, expected level and absolute number, and should review reach as well as outcome. Equity becomes accountable when a material gap is connected to an authority and a remedy, not when it is merely displayed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12", "REF-28" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-78", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxii", "parentId": null, "number": "78", "title": "Refugee and migrant inclusion after the New York Declaration", "anchor": "78-refugee-and-migrant-inclusion-after-the-new-york-declaration", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-78-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The New York Declaration is contemporaneous evidence that refugee and migrant children should be included within education policy and evidence. Its adoption does not establish that every learner entered education or that later implementation succeeded. Indicator interpretation should identify whether refugees and migrants are within population denominators, school registers, surveys, assessments and public reporting, and should state relevant status and residence rules.", "citationIds": [ "REF-30" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-78-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Population movement makes denominators time-sensitive. Registration, border, shelter, household and school sources may refer to different populations and dates and may contain duplicate or missing persons. A rapid operational count can guide service allocation when dated and revised; it should not be represented as a final participation rate without a suitable denominator. Country of origin, present residence and service responsibility should remain distinct where each affects interpretation.", "citationIds": [ "REF-11", "REF-20", "REF-23" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-78-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Education participation should be traced through admission, attendance, instructional time, learning, completion and recognised progression. Documentation, language, prior curriculum, disability, household cost and movement can interrupt this course. A place formally available is not evidence of usable access when those conditions are unresolved. National reports should show whether refugee and migrant learners are integrated into public provision, served through temporary arrangements or absent from the recorded system.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09", "REF-12", "REF-30" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-78-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment and qualification evidence need continuity safeguards. Learners may lack prior records, enter at a different grade or study in an unfamiliar language. Diagnostic placement can support continuity but should not become an exclusionary high-stakes barrier. Results should be interpreted with opportunity to learn and participation. Records and certification should support movement and progression while protecting personal information and avoiding disclosure that creates risk.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-78-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Host-community conditions belong in the same account. Rapid enrolment can change class size, teacher workload and materials for existing learners. Additional support directed only to one population may create parallel structures, while equal treatment without language or bridging support may reproduce exclusion. Equity requires differentiated resources to secure a common substantive opportunity, monitored across displaced, migrant and host learners.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-14", "REF-30" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-79", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxii", "parentId": null, "number": "79", "title": "Responsible use before later settlement", "anchor": "79-responsible-use-before-later-settlement", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-79-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "As at the cut-off, indicator use should remain tied to the March 2016 Statistical Commission decision and the official metadata available by that date. Later General Assembly action, later tier classifications, technical revisions, estimates and results cannot be projected backwards. A country may use a contemporaneous candidate or national measure, but should identify its status and avoid implying that future arrangements had already been settled.", "citationIds": [ "REF-29" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-79-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Baseline construction should preserve actual reference periods. A value released in 2016 may describe an earlier school year, survey or assessment. It should not be labelled a 2016 educational condition merely because of release date. Historical reconstruction should use the definitions and sources available for the relevant period, disclose estimation and avoid filling gaps with later results. When a later revision occurs, the original baseline and reason for change should remain accessible.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-16", "REF-23" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-79-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Comparison should be conditional on conceptual correspondence. Similar indicator labels can conceal differences in age, programme, threshold, population coverage or collection. Metadata should travel with the value, and apparent differences should be tested against those features before ranking systems. A global aggregate may be useful for orientation while remaining unable to describe internal distributions or countries with missing evidence.", "citationIds": [ "REF-02", "REF-19", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-79-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Indicators should not create incentives to exclude difficult cases, narrow curriculum or reclassify non-completion. Participation, source coverage and definition stability provide safeguards. Independent statistical authority, release calendars and visible revision strengthen trust. Unexpected improvement is not evidence of manipulation by itself, but it should be confirmed against population, delivery and measurement change before broad policy claims are made.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-17" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-79-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The public statement should conclude with a bounded decision. It should state the observed value, population, distribution, uncertainty, interpretation, responsible authority and next review. If evidence is inadequate, the decision may be stronger collection rather than immediate intervention; if credible evidence shows serious exclusion, proportionate action need not wait for perfect precision. In either case, the indicator serves public judgement rather than becoming a detached mark of compliance.", "citationIds": [ "REF-12", "REF-28", "REF-29" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-80", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxii", "parentId": null, "number": "80", "title": "Minimum interpretive record", "anchor": "80-minimum-interpretive-record", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-80-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The minimum interpretive record should identify the Goal 4 target, the specific proposition measured, the indicator status at 24 June 2017 and the national correspondence. It should state population, numerator, denominator, reference period, geography, source, disaggregation, uncertainty and known exclusions. Where the measure is non-numeric, it should state the institutional condition, evidence and judgement rule.", "citationIds": [ "REF-27", "REF-28", "REF-29" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-80-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Quality claims should identify which educational domain and population are observed and which conditions remain outside the measure. Equity claims should show group levels and absolute numbers beside gaps or ratios and should identify the minimum condition protected. A composite score should not be used where it conceals failure in an essential dimension or permits success among represented learners to compensate for exclusion from the population.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-05", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-80-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The record should distinguish direct observation, calculation, estimate and interpretation. It should identify changes in definition or coverage and preserve revision history. Missing, unknown, not applicable and suppressed are different states. When public disclosure is unsafe, the affected population and institutional action should remain visible even if the detailed value is restricted.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-10", "REF-23" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-80-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "An equity or quality finding should be linked to a competent body, available measure, resource requirement and review date. Statistical offices protect methodological integrity; education authorities act on service and policy; institutions correct delivery within their mandate. Coordination should not diffuse ownership. The report should state whether the next action concerns evidence, authority, finance or implementation because these require different remedies.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19", "REF-28" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-80-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "At 24 June 2017, a credible interpretation treats the indicator framework as a practical measurement starting point subordinate to the full education targets. It uses the New York Declaration within its adopted scope, excludes later settlements and results, protects unrepresented populations, and refuses to infer quality or equity from a single convenient value. This is the minimum standard for evidence that can support comparison without narrowing the universal commitment.", "citationIds": [ "REF-29", "REF-30" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-81", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxiii", "parentId": null, "number": "81", "title": "Government responsibility", "anchor": "81-government-responsibility", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-81-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Government responsibility begins with the legal and financial conditions of the right to education. Public authorities determine compulsory and free provision, curriculum and qualification rules, teacher establishments, resource distribution, data safeguards and complaint mechanisms. Decentralisation may allocate functions, but it does not remove the obligation to ensure that every competent body has authority and resources and that gaps between jurisdictions do not leave learners without remedy.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-09", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-81-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "National authorities should define the substantive minimum while permitting context-sensitive implementation. Availability, accessibility, acceptability and adaptability require provision, non-discrimination, educational quality and responsiveness. A national standard should identify what institutions and learners may expect and how additional support is allocated where disability, language, poverty, remoteness or displacement creates greater cost. Equal nominal rules are not sufficient when they produce unequal use.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13", "REF-27" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-81-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Finance should be transparent from authorization through transfer, receipt and learner-facing use. Governments should publish the basis of allocations, timing and treatment of need. A national budget total cannot show whether understaffed or inaccessible institutions received the resources required. Where responsibility is shared with international partners or private providers, public authority should retain standards, protection and continuity and should disclose conditions that affect the service.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19", "REF-26" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-81-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Government also carries responsibility for information capable of revealing unequal opportunity. Statistical offices and ministries should maintain population, administrative, assessment and finance evidence with professional integrity. Missing groups should remain visible; personal information should be protected; revisions should be public. A lack of data does not extinguish a duty, but it can require a proportionate improvement in evidence alongside immediate protection where credible information shows exclusion.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-23", "REF-24" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-81-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The remedy structure should be navigable. Learners, families, institutions and teachers need to know which body can address admission, staffing, accessibility, discrimination, qualification or finance and within what period. Appeals should not require specialist knowledge unavailable to affected communities. Government review should identify recurrent complaints and correct the system condition rather than resolve identical cases one by one without institutional learning.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05", "REF-12" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-82", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxiii", "parentId": null, "number": "82", "title": "Institutional responsibility", "anchor": "82-institutional-responsibility", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-82-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Education institutions are responsible for implementing law and public standards within their delegated authority. They organize admission, attendance, teaching, assessment, safeguarding, records, support and progression. Institutional plans should identify the eligible population, service conditions and staff roles and should publish information sufficient for learners and families to understand what is offered and how to challenge a failure.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05", "REF-15" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-82-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "An institution should not claim authority it lacks. It cannot confer a qualification without competent recognition, promise a service dependent on unfunded external action or exclude a learner because another public body failed to provide documentation or support. Where a material dependency lies elsewhere, the institution should escalate it and protect continuity as far as lawfully possible. The unresolved condition should remain in the plan and public account.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-82-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Institutional responsibility includes equitable organization. Timetables, grouping, discipline, assessment, language and communication can create barriers even where national rules are formally equal. Leaders should examine participation and outcome distributions and seek learner, teacher and family evidence. Group difference should initiate enquiry into institutional mechanisms, not blame or lower expectations.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-82-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Institutions should support professional judgement and correction. Teachers need curriculum guidance, planning time, materials and routes to obtain specialist help. Performance information should be used to identify conditions and support, not to attach sole responsibility to a classroom for finance, staffing or population differences beyond its control. Leadership should document decisions, adverse effects and requested system action.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-82-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Complaints and review should be safe and practical. Families and learners should be able to raise concerns without retaliation, and staff should be able to report unsafe or unworkable conditions. Confidentiality should be protected. The institution should state outcome, reasons and further appeal and should use recurring evidence to revise ordinary practice.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-10" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-83", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxiii", "parentId": null, "number": "83", "title": "Teacher professional responsibility", "anchor": "83-teacher-professional-responsibility", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-83-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teachers hold professional responsibility for planning and delivering curriculum, assessing learning, maintaining inclusive participation and using evidence within their competence. This responsibility is real but bounded by training, time, class conditions, materials and authority. It should not be used to make teachers individually liable for system shortages, household poverty or infrastructure decisions they cannot change.", "citationIds": [ "REF-15", "REF-18" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-83-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Professional standards should be clear enough for support and fair review. Teachers should know the intended learning, assessment principles, safeguarding duties, confidentiality requirements and route for referral. Observation and learner evidence should address bounded practice and context. One result or visit should not stand for comprehensive competence, and evaluation should distinguish individual practice from shared institutional conditions.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-83-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Assessment responsibility includes accurate, fair and accessible judgement. Teachers should use multiple evidence where appropriate, apply criteria consistently and avoid deficit assumptions based on identity. Learners should receive feedback and a route to challenge factual or procedural error. High-stakes decisions should have moderation and protection against conflict of interest.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-83-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Teachers also have a duty to identify barriers and escalate them. Persistent absence, exclusion, unsafe facilities, disability needs, language barriers or protection concerns may require action beyond the classroom. Teachers should have a documented route to institutional or specialist response and should not be asked to conduct investigations beyond professional competence. A referral does not end educational responsibility; continued participation and follow-up remain material.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-83-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Professional accountability should be accompanied by due procedure and learning. A concern should state the practice, evidence, expected standard, support and review. Serious misconduct may require formal action, but weak results alone do not establish misconduct. Improvement is sustained when teachers can examine evidence collectively, obtain assistance and see system obstacles addressed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-84", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxiii", "parentId": null, "number": "84", "title": "Family and learner participation without transferred liability", "anchor": "84-family-and-learner-participation-without-transferred-liability", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-84-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Families contribute essential knowledge about participation, health, language, prior learning, cost and safety. They support attendance and learning within their circumstances and can question institutional decisions. Their participation improves diagnosis and legitimacy, but it does not replace the State's responsibility to provide accessible and acceptable education. A family cannot be held responsible for distance, unaffordable charges, inaccessible facilities or missing teachers created by public arrangements.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-84-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Communication should state rights, programme expectations, attendance, assessment, support, cost and complaint routes in accessible language and format. Information is not participation when families cannot ask questions or influence a decision. Meetings and consultation should account for work, care, language, disability and travel so that participation is not limited to those with the greatest resources.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-84-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Learners should be heard on teaching, safety, discrimination, workload and support in ways appropriate to age and protection. Participation should be voluntary and should not expose personal circumstances publicly. Learner views are evidence of experience and mechanism; they should not be represented as population prevalence without a suitable design. Institutions should record how the evidence affected the decision.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-15" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-84-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Household contribution to cost requires scrutiny. Voluntary contribution can become an informal condition of admission or participation, excluding poor families. Public reports should distinguish statutory charge, optional contribution and actual household expenditure. Community activity can strengthen provision but should not finance essential functions through unequal ability to pay.", "citationIds": [ "REF-06", "REF-17" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-84-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Where attendance is weak, authorities should examine the barrier before assigning fault. Communication and family support may be appropriate, but punitive action can worsen exclusion when the cause is transport, safety, disability, work, care or school quality. The response should be proportionate, protect the learner and match the demonstrated mechanism.", "citationIds": [ "REF-01", "REF-14" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-85", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxiii", "parentId": null, "number": "85", "title": "Shared action and undivided accountability", "anchor": "85-shared-action-and-undivided-accountability", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-85-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Many education conditions require shared action. Admission may involve civil registration, social services and schools; disability inclusion may involve health and accessibility bodies; refugee education may involve origin, host and international authorities; transition to work may involve education and labour institutions. Coordination should define tasks and information while preserving one accountable owner for the learner-facing result.", "citationIds": [ "REF-20", "REF-30" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-85-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Shared plans should identify dependency, authority, resource, deadline and escalation. A committee or memorandum does not prove delivery. Each body should report the action within its control and the lead body should report whether the combined condition changed. Delays and disagreement should remain visible rather than be described as stakeholder complexity without remedy.", "citationIds": [ "REF-17", "REF-19" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-85-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Information sharing should follow necessity and protection. Coordination does not authorize unrestricted transfer of personal data. Bodies should specify purpose, minimum fields, access, retention and correction. Aggregate evidence may be sufficient for planning, while individual referral requires consent or another lawful basis and safeguards.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-10" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-85-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Power differences matter. Families, learners and teachers may participate in a forum without controlling finance or regulation. Consultation should not allow the best-organized actor to define the public interest or permit government to present consensus where material objections remain. Decisions should state reasons and how affected populations were represented.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-85-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Undivided accountability means that the learner can obtain a decision even when several bodies contribute. The lead authority should not redirect the person indefinitely between offices. Internal allocation can be complex; the public route should be simple. Subsequent review should examine whether coordination reduced delay and changed educational opportunity, not merely whether meetings occurred.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09", "REF-16" ] } ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-86", "partId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxiii", "parentId": null, "number": "86", "title": "Minimum responsibility statement", "anchor": "86-minimum-responsibility-statement", "level": 1, "blocks": [ { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-86-b001", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "A responsibility statement should identify the educational entitlement, eligible population, government authority, institutional duty, teacher professional role, family and learner participation, required resources, evidence and review date. It should distinguish mandatory function, discretionary contribution and action outside each actor's authority.", "citationIds": [ "REF-08", "REF-12" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-86-b002", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "The statement should attach every material finding to the body capable of remedy. Admission, finance, staffing, curriculum, assessment, accessibility, safeguarding and records may require different owners. A general reference to stakeholders is not sufficient. Where authority is missing or contested, government should resolve it and protect learners during the interval.", "citationIds": [ "REF-09", "REF-17" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-86-b003", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Transparency should be proportionate and safe. Performance and complaint information should show the condition and response without exposing personal information or stigmatizing groups. Missing evidence, unresolved cases and adverse findings should remain visible. Corrections should reach the audience that received the original claim.", "citationIds": [ "REF-10", "REF-13" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-86-b004", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "Review should distinguish authorization, delivery, use and educational consequence. A policy can establish authority, a budget can authorize finance and an institution can document activity; none alone proves changed opportunity. The responsible body should state what is known, what remains uncertain and the next evidence needed.", "citationIds": [ "REF-03", "REF-16" ] }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-86-b005", "type": "PARAGRAPH", "text": "At 24 June 2017, the minimum interpretation is clear: governments retain the public duty; institutions organize accountable provision; teachers exercise supported professional responsibility; families and learners participate without assuming public liability; and coordination must end in a named decision and remedy.", "citationIds": [ "REF-05", "REF-12", "REF-27" ] } ] } ], "technicalAppendices": [], "notes": [], "references": [ { "id": "REF-01", "authoringBody": "Education for All Global Monitoring Report Team", "title": "Reaching the Marginalized — EFA Global Monitoring Report 2010", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-01-19", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000186606", "evidenceRole": "Principal contemporaneous analysis of intersecting disadvantage and education marginalisation." }, { "id": "REF-02", "authoringBody": "UNESCO Institute for Statistics", "title": "Global Education Digest 2010: Comparing Education Statistics Across the World", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-09-20", "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_STATISTICAL_REPORT", "url": "https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/global-education-digest-2010-comparing-education-statistics-across-the-world-en.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Comparative education statistics, definitions and limitations." }, { "id": "REF-03", "authoringBody": "UNESCO Institute for Statistics", "title": "Education Indicators: Technical Guidelines", "year": 2009, "publicationDate": "2009-11-01", "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_STATISTICAL_GUIDANCE", "url": "https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/education-indicators-technical-guidelines-en_0.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Definitions and interpretation of participation, progression, completion and resource indicators." }, { "id": "REF-04", "authoringBody": "United Nations", "title": "The Millennium Development Goals Report 2010", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-06-23", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/MDG%20Report%202010%20En%20r15%20-low%20res%2020100615%20-.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Global and regional monitoring of primary education, gender, poverty and related development conditions." }, { "id": "REF-05", "authoringBody": "United Nations Development Programme", "title": "Human Development Report 2010: The Real Wealth of Nations — Pathways to Human Development", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-11-04", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_DEVELOPMENT_REPORT", "url": "https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2010", "evidenceRole": "Distribution-sensitive human development concepts and evidence available before the cut-off." }, { "id": "REF-06", "authoringBody": "UNICEF", "title": "Progress for Children: Achieving the MDGs with Equity, Number 9", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-09-07", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_CHILDREN_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://www.unicef.org/reports/progress-children-no-9", "evidenceRole": "Equity-focused child indicators and comparison between population groups." }, { "id": "REF-07", "authoringBody": "World Education Forum", "title": "The Dakar Framework for Action: Education for All — Meeting Our Collective Commitments", "year": 2000, "publicationDate": "2000-04-28", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_ACTION_FRAMEWORK", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000121147", "evidenceRole": "Commitments to equitable access, quality, measurable outcomes and accountable national planning." }, { "id": "REF-08", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Convention on the Rights of the Child", "year": 1989, "publicationDate": "1989-11-20", "sourceType": "INTERNATIONAL_CONVENTION", "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child", "evidenceRole": "Rights concerning non-discrimination, identity, education and development." }, { "id": "REF-09", "authoringBody": "United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights", "title": "General Comment No. 13: The Right to Education", "year": 1999, "publicationDate": "1999-12-08", "sourceType": "TREATY_BODY_GENERAL_COMMENT", "url": "https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/cescr/1999/en/37937", "evidenceRole": "Interpretation of availability, accessibility, acceptability and adaptability." }, { "id": "REF-10", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities", "year": 2006, "publicationDate": "2006-12-13", "sourceType": "INTERNATIONAL_CONVENTION", "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities", "evidenceRole": "Non-discrimination, accessibility, inclusive education and disability data safeguards." }, { "id": "REF-11", "authoringBody": "United Nations", "title": "Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement", "year": 1998, "publicationDate": "1998-02-11", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_GUIDING_PRINCIPLES", "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-internally-displaced-persons/international-standards", "evidenceRole": "Principles relevant to protection, documentation, education and non-discrimination of displaced persons." }, { "id": "REF-12", "authoringBody": "UNESCO and UNICEF", "title": "A Human Rights-Based Approach to Education for All", "year": 2007, "publicationDate": "2007-01-01", "sourceType": "INTERAGENCY_POLICY_FRAMEWORK", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000154861", "evidenceRole": "Rights-based planning, equality, participation, accountability and education quality." }, { "id": "REF-13", "authoringBody": "Education for All Global Monitoring Report Team", "title": "Overcoming Inequality: Why Governance Matters — EFA Global Monitoring Report 2009", "year": 2008, "publicationDate": "2008-11-25", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_MONITORING_REPORT", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000177683", "evidenceRole": "Governance, finance and unequal educational opportunity." }, { "id": "REF-14", "authoringBody": "World Bank", "title": "World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development", "year": 2005, "publicationDate": "2005-09-01", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_DEVELOPMENT_REPORT", "url": "https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/435331468127174418/pdf/322040World0Development0Report02006.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Concepts of unequal opportunity, institutions and equitable public action." }, { "id": "REF-15", "authoringBody": "World Bank", "title": "Safeguarding Education During Economic Crisis", "year": 2009, "publicationDate": "2009-04-01", "sourceType": "CRISIS_POLICY_NOTE", "url": "https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/489131468340200911/pdf/485120WP0Avert10Box338912B01PUBLIC1.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Risks to budgets, households, participation and long-term human development during economic crisis." }, { "id": "REF-16", "authoringBody": "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development", "title": "Education at a Glance 2010: OECD Indicators", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-09-07", "sourceType": "COMPARATIVE_INDICATOR_REPORT", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2010-en", "evidenceRole": "Comparative participation, progression, expenditure and outcomes evidence with system-level metadata." }, { "id": "REF-17", "authoringBody": "European Commission", "title": "Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-03-03", "sourceType": "COMMISSION_COMMUNICATION", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52010DC2020", "evidenceRole": "Contemporaneous European policy context for education, inclusion, employment and headline indicators." }, { "id": "REF-18", "authoringBody": "European Commission", "title": "Youth on the Move: An Initiative to Unleash the Potential of Young People to Achieve Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in the European Union", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-09-15", "sourceType": "COMMISSION_COMMUNICATION", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0477", "evidenceRole": "European education, mobility, attainment and youth inclusion policy context." }, { "id": "REF-19", "authoringBody": "European Commission", "title": "A Renewed Commitment to Social Europe: Reinforcing the Open Method of Coordination for Social Protection and Social Inclusion", "year": 2008, "publicationDate": "2008-07-02", "sourceType": "COMMISSION_COMMUNICATION", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52008DC0418", "evidenceRole": "Social inclusion monitoring, common objectives and context-sensitive indicators." }, { "id": "REF-20", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Resolution 64/250: Assistance to Haiti in the Aftermath of the Recent Earthquake", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-01-22", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_RESOLUTION", "url": "https://undocs.org/A/RES/64/250", "evidenceRole": "Contemporaneous recognition of humanitarian and reconstruction needs and national leadership." }, { "id": "REF-21", "authoringBody": "United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs", "title": "Haiti Revised Humanitarian Appeal", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-02-18", "sourceType": "HUMANITARIAN_APPEAL", "url": "https://reliefweb.int/report/haiti/haiti-revised-humanitarian-appeal-2010", "evidenceRole": "Displacement, service disruption and humanitarian education context." }, { "id": "REF-22", "authoringBody": "European Commission", "title": "European Union Response to the Earthquake in Haiti", "year": 2010, "publicationDate": "2010-02-10", "sourceType": "COMMISSION_COMMUNICATION", "url": "https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52010DC0056", "evidenceRole": "European humanitarian and recovery support, coordination and Haitian ownership." }, { "id": "REF-23", "authoringBody": "United Nations Economic and Social Council", "title": "Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses, Revision 2", "year": 2008, "publicationDate": "2008-01-01", "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_STATISTICAL_STANDARD", "url": "https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic-social/Standards-and-Methods/files/Principles_and_Recommendations/Population-and-Housing-Censuses/Series_M67Rev2-E.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Official principles for population coverage, definitions, classifications and data quality." }, { "id": "REF-24", "authoringBody": "United Nations Statistics Division", "title": "Designing Household Survey Samples: Practical Guidelines", "year": 2005, "publicationDate": "2005-01-01", "sourceType": "OFFICIAL_STATISTICAL_GUIDANCE", "url": "https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/surveys/Handbook23June05.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Sample design, estimation, precision and non-response guidance." }, { "id": "REF-25", "authoringBody": "World Education Forum 2015", "title": "Incheon Declaration: Education 2030 — Towards Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Lifelong Learning for All", "year": 2015, "publicationDate": "2015-05-21", "sourceType": "GLOBAL_EDUCATION_DECLARATION", "url": "https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000233137", "evidenceRole": "Education commitments adopted at Incheon and their contemporaneous institutional status." }, { "id": "REF-26", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development", "year": 2015, "publicationDate": "2015-07-27", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_RESOLUTION", "url": "https://undocs.org/A/RES/69/313", "evidenceRole": "Adopted global financing framework and relevant principles for domestic public finance and international cooperation." }, { "id": "REF-27", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development", "year": 2015, "publicationDate": "2015-09-25", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_RESOLUTION", "url": "https://undocs.org/A/RES/70/1", "evidenceRole": "Agenda adopted on 25 September 2015, including Goal 4 and its education targets, as available at the evidence cut-off." }, { "id": "REF-28", "authoringBody": "UNESCO and the World Education Forum 2015 co-convening agencies", "title": "Education 2030 Framework for Action", "year": 2015, "publicationDate": "2015-11-04", "sourceType": "INTERNATIONAL_EDUCATION_IMPLEMENTATION_FRAMEWORK", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/education-2030-framework-action-be-formally-adopted-and-launched", "evidenceRole": "Implementation guidance adopted at the 4 November 2015 high-level meeting; used without later indicator arrangements, statistics or results." }, { "id": "REF-29", "authoringBody": "United Nations Statistical Commission", "title": "Report on the Forty-Seventh Session (8–11 March 2016)", "year": 2016, "publicationDate": "2016-03-11", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_STATISTICAL_COMMISSION_REPORT", "url": "https://unstats.un.org/UNSDWebsite/statcom/session_47/documents/2016-34-FinalReport-E.pdf", "evidenceRole": "Contemporaneous Statistical Commission decision treating the proposed global indicator framework as a practical starting point, subject to future refinement." }, { "id": "REF-30", "authoringBody": "United Nations General Assembly", "title": "New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants", "year": 2016, "publicationDate": "2016-09-19", "sourceType": "UNITED_NATIONS_RESOLUTION", "url": "https://undocs.org/A/RES/71/1", "evidenceRole": "Adopted commitment relevant to access to education for refugee and migrant children within the cut-off." } ], "readerNodes": [ { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-i", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "I", "title": "Target credibility and public responsibility", "anchor": "part-i-target-credibility-and-public-responsibility", "sortOrder": 1 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "II", "title": "Purpose and interpretive frame", "anchor": "part-ii-purpose-and-interpretive-frame", "sortOrder": 2 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-1", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ii", "number": "1", "title": "What national averages conceal", "anchor": "1-what-national-averages-conceal", "sortOrder": 3 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-2", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ii", "number": "2", "title": "Marginalisation as accumulated disadvantage", "anchor": "2-marginalisation-as-accumulated-disadvantage", "sortOrder": 4 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-3", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ii", "number": "3", "title": "From monitoring commitment to decision", "anchor": "3-from-monitoring-commitment-to-decision", "sortOrder": 5 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "III", "title": "Population and denominator", "anchor": "part-iii-population-and-denominator", "sortOrder": 6 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-4", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iii", "number": "4", "title": "Defining the population entitled to education", "anchor": "4-defining-the-population-entitled-to-education", "sortOrder": 7 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-5", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iii", "number": "5", "title": "Age, grade and programme populations", "anchor": "5-age-grade-and-programme-populations", "sortOrder": 8 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-6", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iii", "number": "6", "title": "Population movement and disrupted residence", "anchor": "6-population-movement-and-disrupted-residence", "sortOrder": 9 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iv", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "IV", "title": "Access and participation", "anchor": "part-iv-access-and-participation", "sortOrder": 10 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-7", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iv", "number": "7", "title": "Entry at the official starting age", "anchor": "7-entry-at-the-official-starting-age", "sortOrder": 11 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-8", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iv", "number": "8", "title": "Attendance beyond enrolment", "anchor": "8-attendance-beyond-enrolment", "sortOrder": 12 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-9", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-iv", "number": "9", "title": "Out-of-school status", "anchor": "9-out-of-school-status", "sortOrder": 13 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-v", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "V", "title": "Progression and completion", "anchor": "part-v-progression-and-completion", "sortOrder": 14 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-10", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-v", "number": "10", "title": "Repetition and grade survival", "anchor": "10-repetition-and-grade-survival", "sortOrder": 15 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-11", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-v", "number": "11", "title": "Transition between education levels", "anchor": "11-transition-between-education-levels", "sortOrder": 16 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-12", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-v", "number": "12", "title": "Completion and educational entitlement", "anchor": "12-completion-and-educational-entitlement", "sortOrder": 17 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vi", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "VI", "title": "Learning and assessment", "anchor": "part-vi-learning-and-assessment", "sortOrder": 18 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-13", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vi", "number": "13", "title": "Minimum learning outcomes", "anchor": "13-minimum-learning-outcomes", "sortOrder": 19 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-14", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vi", "number": "14", "title": "Assessment participation", "anchor": "14-assessment-participation", "sortOrder": 20 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-15", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vi", "number": "15", "title": "Distribution of achievement", "anchor": "15-distribution-of-achievement", "sortOrder": 21 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "VII", "title": "Gender and household resources", "anchor": "part-vii-gender-and-household-resources", "sortOrder": 22 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-16", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vii", "number": "16", "title": "Gender parity and its limits", "anchor": "16-gender-parity-and-its-limits", "sortOrder": 23 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-17", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vii", "number": "17", "title": "Household wealth gradients", "anchor": "17-household-wealth-gradients", "sortOrder": 24 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-18", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-vii", "number": "18", "title": "Costs borne by households", "anchor": "18-costs-borne-by-households", "sortOrder": 25 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-viii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "VIII", "title": "Place and service geography", "anchor": "part-viii-place-and-service-geography", "sortOrder": 26 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-19", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-viii", "number": "19", "title": "Rural and urban residence", "anchor": "19-rural-and-urban-residence", "sortOrder": 27 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-20", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-viii", "number": "20", "title": "Subnational administrative disparity", "anchor": "20-subnational-administrative-disparity", "sortOrder": 28 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-21", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-viii", "number": "21", "title": "Distance, isolation and transport", "anchor": "21-distance-isolation-and-transport", "sortOrder": 29 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ix", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "IX", "title": "Disability, language and identity", "anchor": "part-ix-disability-language-and-identity", "sortOrder": 30 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-22", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ix", "number": "22", "title": "Disability-sensitive education data", "anchor": "22-disability-sensitive-education-data", "sortOrder": 31 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-23", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ix", "number": "23", "title": "Language of home and instruction", "anchor": "23-language-of-home-and-instruction", "sortOrder": 32 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-24", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-ix", "number": "24", "title": "Ethnicity, indigeneity and protected identity", "anchor": "24-ethnicity-indigeneity-and-protected-identity", "sortOrder": 33 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-x", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "X", "title": "Conflict, disaster and mobility", "anchor": "part-x-conflict-disaster-and-mobility", "sortOrder": 34 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-25", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-x", "number": "25", "title": "Education under conflict and insecurity", "anchor": "25-education-under-conflict-and-insecurity", "sortOrder": 35 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-26", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-x", "number": "26", "title": "Disaster-related interruption", "anchor": "26-disaster-related-interruption", "sortOrder": 36 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-27", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-x", "number": "27", "title": "Refugees, displaced persons and migrants", "anchor": "27-refugees-displaced-persons-and-migrants", "sortOrder": 37 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xi", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XI", "title": "School conditions and teachers", "anchor": "part-xi-school-conditions-and-teachers", "sortOrder": 38 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-28", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xi", "number": "28", "title": "Teacher availability and distribution", "anchor": "28-teacher-availability-and-distribution", "sortOrder": 39 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-29", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xi", "number": "29", "title": "Class size, multi-grade teaching and time", "anchor": "29-class-size-multi-grade-teaching-and-time", "sortOrder": 40 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-30", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xi", "number": "30", "title": "Materials, facilities and basic services", "anchor": "30-materials-facilities-and-basic-services", "sortOrder": 41 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XII", "title": "Finance and distribution", "anchor": "part-xii-finance-and-distribution", "sortOrder": 42 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-31", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xii", "number": "31", "title": "Public spending by level and function", "anchor": "31-public-spending-by-level-and-function", "sortOrder": 43 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-32", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xii", "number": "32", "title": "Incidence of education spending", "anchor": "32-incidence-of-education-spending", "sortOrder": 44 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-33", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xii", "number": "33", "title": "Protecting equity during fiscal constraint", "anchor": "33-protecting-equity-during-fiscal-constraint", "sortOrder": 45 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XIII", "title": "Data sources and measurement error", "anchor": "part-xiii-data-sources-and-measurement-error", "sortOrder": 46 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-34", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiii", "number": "34", "title": "Administrative records", "anchor": "34-administrative-records", "sortOrder": 47 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-35", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiii", "number": "35", "title": "Household surveys", "anchor": "35-household-surveys", "sortOrder": 48 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-36", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiii", "number": "36", "title": "Censuses and population frames", "anchor": "36-censuses-and-population-frames", "sortOrder": 49 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiv", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XIV", "title": "Disaggregation and intersection", "anchor": "part-xiv-disaggregation-and-intersection", "sortOrder": 50 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-37", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiv", "number": "37", "title": "Single-axis disaggregation", "anchor": "37-single-axis-disaggregation", "sortOrder": 51 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-38", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiv", "number": "38", "title": "Intersecting categories", "anchor": "38-intersecting-categories", "sortOrder": 52 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-39", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xiv", "number": "39", "title": "Small numbers, disclosure and reliability", "anchor": "39-small-numbers-disclosure-and-reliability", "sortOrder": 53 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xv", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XV", "title": "Comparison, uncertainty and change", "anchor": "part-xv-comparison-uncertainty-and-change", "sortOrder": 54 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-40", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xv", "number": "40", "title": "Comparing unlike systems", "anchor": "40-comparing-unlike-systems", "sortOrder": 55 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-41", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xv", "number": "41", "title": "Sampling error and other uncertainty", "anchor": "41-sampling-error-and-other-uncertainty", "sortOrder": 56 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-42", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xv", "number": "42", "title": "Trends and breaks in series", "anchor": "42-trends-and-breaks-in-series", "sortOrder": 57 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvi", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XVI", "title": "Responsible interpretation and action", "anchor": "part-xvi-responsible-interpretation-and-action", "sortOrder": 58 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-43", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvi", "number": "43", "title": "Reading disparity without blaming learners", "anchor": "43-reading-disparity-without-blaming-learners", "sortOrder": 59 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-44", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvi", "number": "44", "title": "Turning evidence into equitable policy", "anchor": "44-turning-evidence-into-equitable-policy", "sortOrder": 60 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-45", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvi", "number": "45", "title": "A public account beyond the average", "anchor": "45-a-public-account-beyond-the-average", "sortOrder": 61 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XVII", "title": "Applied distributional analysis", "anchor": "part-xvii-applied-distributional-analysis", "sortOrder": 62 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-46", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "number": "46", "title": "Composite measures and the loss of meaning", "anchor": "46-composite-measures-and-the-loss-of-meaning", "sortOrder": 63 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-47", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "number": "47", "title": "Decomposing an observed education gap", "anchor": "47-decomposing-an-observed-education-gap", "sortOrder": 64 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-48", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "number": "48", "title": "Setting distribution-sensitive targets", "anchor": "48-setting-distribution-sensitive-targets", "sortOrder": 65 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-49", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "number": "49", "title": "Linking learners to service geography", "anchor": "49-linking-learners-to-service-geography", "sortOrder": 66 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-50", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "number": "50", "title": "Reconciling conflicting sources", "anchor": "50-reconciling-conflicting-sources", "sortOrder": 67 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-51", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "number": "51", "title": "Monitoring marginalisation during severe disruption", "anchor": "51-monitoring-marginalisation-during-severe-disruption", "sortOrder": 68 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-52", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "number": "52", "title": "Communicating uncertainty without losing urgency", "anchor": "52-communicating-uncertainty-without-losing-urgency", "sortOrder": 69 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-53", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xvii", "number": "53", "title": "A national marginalisation profile", "anchor": "53-a-national-marginalisation-profile", "sortOrder": 70 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xviii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XVIII", "title": "Extended disparity interpretation", "anchor": "part-xviii-extended-disparity-interpretation", "sortOrder": 71 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-54", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xviii", "number": "54", "title": "Minimum comparison threshold", "anchor": "54-minimum-comparison-threshold", "sortOrder": 72 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-55", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xviii", "number": "55", "title": "Within-system interpretation", "anchor": "55-within-system-interpretation", "sortOrder": 73 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-56", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xviii", "number": "56", "title": "Between-system interpretation", "anchor": "56-between-system-interpretation", "sortOrder": 74 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xix", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XIX", "title": "Extended analysis of learning disparities", "anchor": "part-xix-extended-analysis-of-learning-disparities", "sortOrder": 75 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-57", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xix", "number": "57", "title": "Assessment participation and the represented learning population", "anchor": "57-assessment-participation-and-the-represented-learning-population", "sortOrder": 76 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-58", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xix", "number": "58", "title": "Scale, threshold and distribution comparability", "anchor": "58-scale-threshold-and-distribution-comparability", "sortOrder": 77 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-59", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xix", "number": "59", "title": "Opportunity to learn and interpretation of achievement gaps", "anchor": "59-opportunity-to-learn-and-interpretation-of-achievement-gaps", "sortOrder": 78 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-60", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xix", "number": "60", "title": "Decomposing disparities within education systems", "anchor": "60-decomposing-disparities-within-education-systems", "sortOrder": 79 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-61", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xix", "number": "61", "title": "Bounded conclusions between education systems", "anchor": "61-bounded-conclusions-between-education-systems", "sortOrder": 80 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-62", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xix", "number": "62", "title": "Uncertainty, materiality and the duty to respond", "anchor": "62-uncertainty-materiality-and-the-duty-to-respond", "sortOrder": 81 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xx", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XX", "title": "Targeted improvement planning", "anchor": "part-xx-targeted-improvement-planning", "sortOrder": 82 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-63", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xx", "number": "63", "title": "Defining a persistent learning gap", "anchor": "63-defining-a-persistent-learning-gap", "sortOrder": 83 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-64", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xx", "number": "64", "title": "From diagnosis to an intervention hypothesis", "anchor": "64-from-diagnosis-to-an-intervention-hypothesis", "sortOrder": 84 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-65", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xx", "number": "65", "title": "Designing the targeted plan", "anchor": "65-designing-the-targeted-plan", "sortOrder": 85 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-66", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xx", "number": "66", "title": "Resourcing equitable implementation", "anchor": "66-resourcing-equitable-implementation", "sortOrder": 86 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-67", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xx", "number": "67", "title": "Monitoring reach, quality and learning response", "anchor": "67-monitoring-reach-quality-and-learning-response", "sortOrder": 87 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-68", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xx", "number": "68", "title": "Adaptation, institutionalisation and exit", "anchor": "68-adaptation-institutionalisation-and-exit", "sortOrder": 88 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxi", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XXI", "title": "National translation after adoption of the 2030 Agenda", "anchor": "part-xxi-national-translation-after-adoption-of-the-2030-agenda", "sortOrder": 89 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-69", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxi", "number": "69", "title": "Fixing the contemporaneous institutional baseline", "anchor": "69-fixing-the-contemporaneous-institutional-baseline", "sortOrder": 90 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-70", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxi", "number": "70", "title": "Selecting priorities without narrowing the commitment", "anchor": "70-selecting-priorities-without-narrowing-the-commitment", "sortOrder": 91 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-71", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxi", "number": "71", "title": "From global target to national improvement proposition", "anchor": "71-from-global-target-to-national-improvement-proposition", "sortOrder": 92 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-72", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxi", "number": "72", "title": "Aligning authority, finance and professional capability", "anchor": "72-aligning-authority-finance-and-professional-capability", "sortOrder": 93 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-73", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxi", "number": "73", "title": "Monitoring delivery, reach and educational consequence", "anchor": "73-monitoring-delivery-reach-and-educational-consequence", "sortOrder": 94 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-74", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxi", "number": "74", "title": "First national decisions after adoption", "anchor": "74-first-national-decisions-after-adoption", "sortOrder": 95 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XXII", "title": "Quality and equity within the contemporaneous indicator framework", "anchor": "part-xxii-quality-and-equity-within-the-contemporaneous-indicator-framework", "sortOrder": 96 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-75", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxii", "number": "75", "title": "The hierarchy from goal to observation", "anchor": "75-the-hierarchy-from-goal-to-observation", "sortOrder": 97 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-76", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxii", "number": "76", "title": "Interpreting quality beyond one outcome", "anchor": "76-interpreting-quality-beyond-one-outcome", "sortOrder": 98 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-77", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxii", "number": "77", "title": "Equity, parity and minimum educational levels", "anchor": "77-equity-parity-and-minimum-educational-levels", "sortOrder": 99 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-78", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxii", "number": "78", "title": "Refugee and migrant inclusion after the New York Declaration", "anchor": "78-refugee-and-migrant-inclusion-after-the-new-york-declaration", "sortOrder": 100 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-79", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxii", "number": "79", "title": "Responsible use before later settlement", "anchor": "79-responsible-use-before-later-settlement", "sortOrder": 101 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-80", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxii", "number": "80", "title": "Minimum interpretive record", "anchor": "80-minimum-interpretive-record", "sortOrder": 102 }, { "id": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxiii", "nodeType": "PART", "parentId": null, "number": "XXIII", "title": "Allocation of responsibility and remedy", "anchor": "part-xxiii-allocation-of-responsibility-and-remedy", "sortOrder": 103 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-81", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxiii", "number": "81", "title": "Government responsibility", "anchor": "81-government-responsibility", "sortOrder": 104 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-82", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxiii", "number": "82", "title": "Institutional responsibility", "anchor": "82-institutional-responsibility", "sortOrder": 105 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-83", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxiii", "number": "83", "title": "Teacher professional responsibility", "anchor": "83-teacher-professional-responsibility", "sortOrder": 106 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-84", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxiii", "number": "84", "title": "Family and learner participation without transferred liability", "anchor": "84-family-and-learner-participation-without-transferred-liability", "sortOrder": 107 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-85", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxiii", "number": "85", "title": "Shared action and undivided accountability", "anchor": "85-shared-action-and-undivided-accountability", "sortOrder": 108 }, { "id": "sec-iceqc-r-2026-03-86", "nodeType": "SECTION", "parentId": "part-iceqc-r-2026-03-xxiii", "number": "86", "title": "Minimum responsibility statement", "anchor": "86-minimum-responsibility-statement", "sortOrder": 109 } ], "statistics": { "partCount": 23, "sectionCount": 86, "appendixCount": 0, "paragraphCount": 369, "tableCount": 0, "referenceCount": 30, "mainTextWords": 48747, "technicalAppendixWords": 0, "totalWords": 48747 }, "contentHash": "sha256-3ac97c829dba0d603f0b08eba76fdc0935bd6300f798157d5e845cff73e01fbd" }