Review of record integrity in relation to inclusive competence development sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Evidence considered for record integrity in relation to inclusive competence development
The 2018 key competences framework provides a policy reference for record integrity in relation to inclusive competence development.
For inclusive competence development, implementation should be organised around a decision that can be tested.
The principal risks in relation to the applicable expectation are collection without a defined educational or legal purpose, uncontrolled supplier access or transfer, excessive access to learner information, and inaccurate data affecting decisions. When examining inclusive competence development, the risks are interdependent; failure of one control may conceal or disable another.
For inclusive competence development, analysis should make its decision rule explicit.
Relevant evidence for the applicable expectation will normally include role-based access and access reviews, data-quality and correction controls, incident response and notification records, a register of information assets and purposes, and lawful authority and consent records where relevant. Across the defined scope, currency, provenance and representativeness should be established before evidence is used for assurance. For inclusive competence development, conflicting records require reconciliation before a complete assurance conclusion is reached.
Application of the evidence to record integrity in relation to inclusive competence development
For the matter, security, privacy and data quality are related but distinct.
Records relating to the applicable expectation should preserve both the conclusion and its limits. For decisions concerning inclusive competence development, a changed evidential position should be applied to the affected scope, including prior decisions that may no longer be reliable.
- Verify accuracy where information affects learners.
- Control third-party processing.
- Provide accessible correction and complaint routes.
- Minimise collection.
- Limit and review access.
Controls relevant to record integrity in relation to inclusive competence development
A competent examination of the matter should specify mandatory fields, source ownership, access rights, retention and correction procedures. In the context of inclusive competence development, test a sample from creation through use, amendment, reporting and disposal, including records created during disruption or by a delivery partner.
Across the defined scope, the final record on the control should identify the applicable expectation, the relevant scope, the evidence examined, the sampling basis, material exceptions and the reason for the conclusion. For decisions concerning inclusive competence development, if an alternative method is accepted, the record should demonstrate that it achieves the same required outcome.
- Is the record attributable?
- Can records be retrieved throughout the required period?
- Are access rights proportionate?
- Can an amendment be distinguished from the original?
- Are partner records subject to equivalent controls?
Review criteria for record integrity in relation to inclusive competence development
In reviewing inclusive competence development, education information should be collected for a defined purpose, protected in proportion to its sensitivity and retained only for an authorised period.
When examining inclusive competence development, progress should not be assessed by the amount of policy or documentation produced.