Analysis of digital transformation separates legal effect from policy context and identifies institutional responsibility, safeguards and public-interest risk.
In examining digital transformation: legal and governance considerations, administrative form may differ between systems, provided the required outcome and accountability are maintained.
In examining digital transformation: legal and governance considerations, its relevance to the arrangements should be assessed against the affected jurisdiction, learner population and form of provision.
In examining digital transformation: legal and governance considerations, for digital transformation, the Transforming Education Summit in September 2022 brings together commitments on inclusive and equitable education, teachers, digital learning, finance and recovery. The action tracks are connected: technology or curriculum measures cannot compensate for insufficient teachers, unsafe provision or exclusion. Commitments should be translated into costed responsibilities, implementation milestones and evidence capable of showing effects on learning and participation.
In the context of digital transformation, a proper review of the arrangements should establish the intended outcome before selecting controls or indicators.
Application to digital transformation
For digital transformation, the required public outcome should be stated in operational terms. A change in delivery mode should not weaken the defined learning outcomes, learner protection, accessibility or reliability of assessment.
Across the defined scope, cross-jurisdiction interpretation should distinguish international commitment, regional instrument, national law, regulatory direction and provider policy. In reviewing digital transformation, each has a different source of authority and may apply to a different object or person.
The principal risks in relation to the arrangements are inaccessible content or interaction, unclear identity and participation records, technology access determining educational access, and supplier dependency without continuity controls. For digital transformation, the risks are interdependent; failure of one control may conceal or disable another.
Relevant evidence for the measure will normally include accessibility and usability testing, learner access and participation information, supplier performance and exit arrangements, assessment validity and integrity reviews, and service availability and incident records. For digital transformation, currency, provenance and representativeness should be established before evidence is used for assurance.
Controls for digital transformation
The method for the policy position is to prepare a jurisdictional register identifying the service, learner location, provider location, responsible authority, applicable instrument and conflict rule.
For digital transformation, records relating to the measure should preserve both the conclusion and its limits. Across the defined scope, this is material where learners, authorities or institutions relied on information that cannot be corrected by replacing the current text alone.
In examining digital transformation: legal and governance considerations, obtain competent interpretation where the legal position is uncertain and do not resolve uncertainty through promotional wording.