Review of record integrity within academic integrity investigations sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Evidence considered for record integrity within academic integrity investigations
For record integrity within academic integrity investigations, the intended substantive result should remain the starting point for review.
- Provide accessible correction and complaint routes before it is relied on for a decision with material effect.
- Control third-party processing before it informs a consequential decision.
- Verify accuracy where information affects learners.
- Minimise collection.
- Assign accountable data owners before it informs a consequential decision.
Application of the evidence to record integrity within academic integrity investigations
For decisions concerning record integrity within academic integrity investigations, analysis should make its decision rule explicit.
Controls relevant to record integrity within academic integrity investigations
Across the defined scope, the basis for selection, authority for exceptions and timing of reassessment should remain traceable.
The principal risks in relation to the applicable expectation are excessive access to learner information, inaccurate data affecting decisions, uncontrolled supplier access or transfer, and secondary use without adequate authority. Separate treatment would overlook how a failed control may prevent detection or operation of another safeguard.
- Are partner records subject to equivalent controls?
- Is the record attributable?
- Are access rights proportionate?
- Can an amendment be distinguished from the original?
- Can records be retrieved throughout the required period?
Review criteria for record integrity within academic integrity investigations
Relevant evidence for record integrity within academic integrity investigations will normally include retention and secure disposal evidence, a register of information assets and purposes, lawful authority and consent records where relevant, incident response and notification records, and supplier and transfer arrangements.
Authorities and providers reviewing the applicable requirement should proceed in a defined sequence. Review of the applicable expectation should specify mandatory fields, source ownership, access rights, retention and correction procedures. For record integrity within academic integrity investigations, test a sample from creation through use, amendment, reporting and disposal, including records created during disruption or by a delivery partner.
Implications for record integrity within academic integrity investigations
Interpretation of record integrity within academic integrity investigations should produce a test that another competent reviewer can apply to comparable evidence.
For the conclusion, interpretive guidance should not create an obligation that is absent from the governing instrument or applicable law.
For decisions concerning record integrity within academic integrity investigations, records relating to the matter should preserve both the conclusion and its limits.
Assessment of the applicable requirement should reconcile more than one source of evidence and control.