Policy and regulatory analysis
Cross-border delivery: public-interest considerations
The analysis of cross-border delivery keeps international policy context distinct from applicable law and from choices made by individual institutions.
Información oficial
Avisos de ICEQC y análisis basados en fuentes sobre evidencias educativas, políticas e instrumentos normativos.
Se muestran 12 de 17 resultados
1061 artículos publicados
Policy and regulatory analysis
The analysis of cross-border delivery keeps international policy context distinct from applicable law and from choices made by individual institutions.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Review of education continuity during the Ebola emergency identifies the responsible authority, affected parties, implementation controls and evidence required for oversight.
Policy and regulatory analysis
The analysis of education continuity during the Ebola emergency keeps international policy context distinct from applicable law and from choices made by individual institutions.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Regulatory coordination in relation to education continuity during the Ebola emergency — responsible authority, implementation controls, affected parties and public accountability.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Review of learner wellbeing identifies the responsible authority, affected parties, implementation controls and evidence required for oversight.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Safeguards relevant to education continuity during the Ebola emergency — policy status, lawful responsibility, implementation evidence and learner protection.
Policy and regulatory analysis
The article examines public-interest oversight of online assessment, distinguishing binding duties, policy commitments and the controls needed for accountable implementation.
Policy and regulatory analysis
This article considers regulatory priorities for the post-2015 education goal, including the allocation of authority, treatment of exceptions and safeguards for affected learners.
Policy and regulatory analysis
The public-interest questions raised by the Muscat Agreement are assessed through lawful responsibility, implementation evidence and transparent follow-up.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Provider responsibilities in relation to the post-2015 education goal — policy status, lawful responsibility, implementation evidence and learner protection.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Policy expectations for transparent implementation of mobile learning — responsible authority, implementation controls, affected parties and public accountability.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Review of safeguards relevant to education finance identifies the responsible authority, affected parties, implementation controls and evidence required for oversight.