Información oficial
Avisos de ICEQC y análisis basados en fuentes sobre evidencias educativas, políticas e instrumentos normativos.
Se muestran 12 de 58 resultados
1061 artículos publicados
Standards interpretation
Analysis of institutional controls under risk-based artificial intelligence regulation separates stated requirements, evidence of operation and continuing effectiveness.
Policy and regulatory analysis
The case for proportionate oversight of risk-based artificial intelligence regulation — policy status, lawful responsibility, implementation evidence and learner protection.
Quality improvement method
The article treats the causes of underperformance in AI competency frameworks as a controlled process requiring clear ownership, outcome evidence and review of residual risk.
Data and research analysis
The article examines AI competency frameworks, separating supported observations from causal claims and identifying where further evidence is required.
Standards interpretation
Review of record integrity in relation to AI competency frameworks sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Data and research analysis
Review of education at a Glance 2024 addresses the unit of analysis, source definitions, missing data and transfer beyond the reported setting.
Standards interpretation
This article examines how AI competency frameworks for students and teachers is defined, evidenced and reviewed, keeping exceptions and unresolved limitations visible.
Data and research analysis
Review of implementation of risk-based artificial intelligence regulation addresses the unit of analysis, source definitions, missing data and transfer beyond the reported setting.
Quality improvement method
Targeted review of institutional controls under risk-based artificial intelligence regulation — diagnosis, responsible ownership, effectiveness measures and closure evidence.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Review of the Artificial Intelligence Act enters into force identifies the responsible authority, affected parties, implementation controls and evidence required for oversight.
Quality improvement method
A controlled method for management review of SDG 4 progress is set out through cause analysis, assigned responsibility, outcome measures and closure evidence.
Data and research analysis
PISA 2022 results depend on population, sampling and trend methods; they do not establish an individual provider’s quality or causation.
