Quality improvement method
Digital access: escalation and management oversight
A controlled method for digital access is set out through cause analysis, assigned responsibility, outcome measures and closure evidence.
Official information
ICEQC notices and source-led analysis of education evidence, policy and regulatory instruments.
Showing 12 of 48 results
1061 published articles
Quality improvement method
A controlled method for digital access is set out through cause analysis, assigned responsibility, outcome measures and closure evidence.
Quality improvement method
This practice note explains how risk-based improvement planning for work-based learning should be scoped, implemented and verified, with closure dependent on demonstrated effect.
Quality improvement method
Improvement work concerning management review of completion data requires baseline evidence, responsible action, measurable outcomes, independent verification and follow-up.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Regional regulatory developments affecting adult learning pathways — policy status, lawful responsibility, implementation evidence and learner protection.
Standards interpretation
Analysis of evidence boundaries in the evaluation of large-scale open online learning separates stated requirements, evidence of operation and continuing effectiveness.
Quality improvement method
The method for quality controls for open educational resources proceeds from diagnosis and ownership to effectiveness testing, residual risk and evidence of sustained effect.
Data and research analysis
Timeliness and completeness of data on online assessment authenticity — data coverage, comparability, uncertainty and safeguards against unsupported inference.
Standards interpretation
Review of provider responsibility for open content sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Data and research analysis
Evidence concerning education participation and transition is reviewed for source definitions, coverage, comparability, uncertainty and limits on inference.
Data and research analysis
Measuring youth skills and employability across education systems — evidence provenance, coverage, comparability, uncertainty and limits on inference.
Standards interpretation
This interpretation addresses mobility for better learning: applicability, materiality, decision records and corrective-action verification.
Standards interpretation
Requirements for independent review of open educational resources are considered through evidence sufficiency, accountable decisions, corrective action and follow-up.