The approach to post-PISA improvement planning links diagnosis, accountable implementation and evidence of effect to verification that the result is sustained.
Review of trend analysis for climate education addresses the unit of analysis, source definitions, missing data and transfer beyond the reported setting.
The evidence for quality evidence for education data governance is considered with the basis for a reliable conclusion and the limits beyond which it must not extend.
The public-interest questions raised by post-PISA improvement planning are assessed through lawful responsibility, implementation evidence and transparent follow-up.
Industry Policy and Regional Regulatory Interpretation
This practice note explains how the causes of underperformance in cross-border provision should be scoped, implemented and verified, with closure dependent on demonstrated effect.
Review of evidence across delivery settings for cross-border provision sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Evidence concerning data governance in monitoring post-PISA improvement planning is reviewed for source definitions, coverage, comparability, uncertainty and limits on inference.