Standards interpretation
Documenting implementation of education data governance
Requirements for implementation of education data governance are considered through evidence sufficiency, accountable decisions, corrective action and follow-up.
Official information
ICEQC notices and source-led analysis of education evidence, policy and regulatory instruments.
Showing 10 of 58 results
1061 published articles
Standards interpretation
Requirements for implementation of education data governance are considered through evidence sufficiency, accountable decisions, corrective action and follow-up.
Standards interpretation
The evidence for applying a risk-based standard to climate education is considered with the basis for a reliable conclusion and the limits beyond which it must not extend.
Standards interpretation
This article examines how education data governance is defined, evidenced and reviewed, keeping exceptions and unresolved limitations visible.
Quality improvement method
The approach to setting effective measures for student wellbeing links diagnosis, accountable implementation and evidence of effect to verification that the result is sustained.
Quality improvement method
The approach to a corrective-action cycle for student wellbeing links diagnosis, accountable implementation and evidence of effect to verification that the result is sustained.
Standards interpretation
Controls for applying a risk-based standard to post-PISA improvement planning are examined from initial evidence through exceptions, decision authority and continuing assurance.
Standards interpretation
Interpretation of evidence across delivery settings for cyber resilience identifies scope, evidence, decision authority, material exceptions and continuing review.
Data and research analysis
This review considers cross-border provision, with attention to data provenance, population coverage, stable definitions and appropriate limits on inference.
Policy and regulatory analysis
The public-interest questions raised by policy commitments on SDG 4 progress are assessed through lawful responsibility, implementation evidence and transparent follow-up.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Policy implementation risks associated with climate education — legal effect, institutional responsibility, learner safeguards and jurisdictional limits.