Informations officielles
Avis de l’ICEQC et analyses fondées sur des sources concernant les données probantes, les politiques et les instruments réglementaires en matière d’éducation.
10 résultats affichés sur 10
1061 articles publiés
Standards interpretation
Review of record integrity in relation to inclusive competence development sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Standards interpretation
Controls for inclusive competence development are examined from initial evidence through exceptions, decision authority and continuing assurance.
Standards interpretation
Requirements for online assessment privacy are considered through evidence sufficiency, accountable decisions, corrective action and follow-up.
Standards interpretation
Interpretation of independent review of cross-border data transfers identifies scope, evidence, decision authority, material exceptions and continuing review.
Standards interpretation
The evidence for the revised key competences framework is considered with the basis for a reliable conclusion and the limits beyond which it must not extend.
Standards interpretation
Review of evidence sufficiency in relation to inclusive competence development sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Standards interpretation
Requirements for records required to substantiate teacher–learner interaction are considered through evidence sufficiency, accountable decisions, corrective action and follow-up.
Standards interpretation
Interpretation of governance evidence relating to education finance effectiveness identifies scope, evidence, decision authority, material exceptions and continuing review.
Standards interpretation
Analysis of transparency requirements associated with risk-based education management separates stated requirements, evidence of operation and continuing effectiveness.
Standards interpretation
Interpretation of governance evidence relating to institutional responses to the global identifies scope, evidence, decision authority, material exceptions and continuing review.
