Standards interpretation
Open science: implications for research governance, access and integrity
Interpretation of open science identifies scope, evidence, decision authority, material exceptions and continuing review.
Informations officielles
Avis de l’ICEQC et analyses fondées sur des sources concernant les données probantes, les politiques et les instruments réglementaires en matière d’éducation.
11 résultats affichés sur 11
1061 articles publiés
Standards interpretation
Interpretation of open science identifies scope, evidence, decision authority, material exceptions and continuing review.
Standards interpretation
Controls for applying a risk-based standard to pandemic learning recovery are examined from initial evidence through exceptions, decision authority and continuing assurance.
Standards interpretation
Review of competence requirements supporting hybrid learning sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Standards interpretation
This article examines how learning continuity is defined, evidenced and reviewed, keeping exceptions and unresolved limitations visible.
Standards interpretation
Requirements for consistency in the assessment of digital data protection are considered through evidence sufficiency, accountable decisions, corrective action and follow-up.
Standards interpretation
This interpretation addresses transparency requirements associated with academic integrity: applicability, materiality, decision records and corrective-action verification.
Standards interpretation
This interpretation addresses teacher workload controls: applicability, materiality, decision records and corrective-action verification.
Standards interpretation
Controls for evidence boundaries in the evaluation of digital inclusion are examined from initial evidence through exceptions, decision authority and continuing assurance.
Standards interpretation
This interpretation addresses evidence for digital data protection: applicability, materiality, decision records and corrective-action verification.
Standards interpretation
Requirements for hybrid learning are considered through evidence sufficiency, accountable decisions, corrective action and follow-up.
Standards interpretation
The evidence for competence requirements supporting learning continuity is considered with the basis for a reliable conclusion and the limits beyond which it must not extend.