Avis de l’ICEQC et analyses fondées sur des sources concernant les données probantes, les politiques et les instruments réglementaires en matière d’éducation.
The evidence for risk and assurance controls for digital inclusion and access is considered with the basis for a reliable conclusion and the limits beyond which it must not extend.
Interpretation of evidence across delivery settings for teacher AI capability identifies scope, evidence, decision authority, material exceptions and continuing review.
Review of consistency in the assessment of digital accessibility sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
This article examines how digital accessibility following publication of WCAG 2.2 is defined, evidenced and reviewed, keeping exceptions and unresolved limitations visible.
Review of digital inclusion and access arrangements sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Review of governance evidence relating to SDG 4 at the midpoint sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Review of transparency requirements associated with SDG 4 at the midpoint sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
This article examines how institutional arrangements for AI-supported assessment is defined, evidenced and reviewed, keeping exceptions and unresolved limitations visible.
This article examines how record integrity in relation to learner data privacy is defined, evidenced and reviewed, keeping exceptions and unresolved limitations visible.
Review of record integrity within academic integrity investigations sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Analysis of interpreting effective implementation of global qualification recognition separates stated requirements, evidence of operation and continuing effectiveness.