Informations officielles
Avis de l’ICEQC et analyses fondées sur des sources concernant les données probantes, les politiques et les instruments réglementaires en matière d’éducation.
12 résultats affichés sur 17
1061 articles publiés
Standards interpretation
Review of evidence sufficiency in relation to education data governance sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Standards interpretation
The evidence for leadership for learning is considered with the basis for a reliable conclusion and the limits beyond which it must not extend.
Standards interpretation
Controls for teacher workforce planning and retention are examined from initial evidence through exceptions, decision authority and continuing assurance.
Standards interpretation
This interpretation addresses evidence for leadership for learning: applicability, materiality, decision records and corrective-action verification.
Standards interpretation
Analysis of institutional controls under risk-based artificial intelligence regulation separates stated requirements, evidence of operation and continuing effectiveness.
Standards interpretation
Review of record integrity in relation to AI competency frameworks sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Standards interpretation
This article examines how AI competency frameworks for students and teachers is defined, evidenced and reviewed, keeping exceptions and unresolved limitations visible.
Standards interpretation
Interpretation of implementation of higher education fundamental values identifies scope, evidence, decision authority, material exceptions and continuing review.
Standards interpretation
Interpretation of cyber resilience identifies scope, evidence, decision authority, material exceptions and continuing review.
Standards interpretation
The evidence for quality evidence for education data governance is considered with the basis for a reliable conclusion and the limits beyond which it must not extend.
Standards interpretation
The evidence for SDG 4 progress is considered with the basis for a reliable conclusion and the limits beyond which it must not extend.
Standards interpretation
Review of evidence across delivery settings for cross-border provision sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
