Informations officielles
Avis de l’ICEQC et analyses fondées sur des sources concernant les données probantes, les politiques et les instruments réglementaires en matière d’éducation.
12 résultats affichés sur 256
1061 articles publiés
Standards interpretation
This article examines how institutional arrangements for teaching and learning quality is defined, evidenced and reviewed, keeping exceptions and unresolved limitations visible.
Standards interpretation
Requirements for implementation of evidence-informed teaching are considered through evidence sufficiency, accountable decisions, corrective action and follow-up.
Standards interpretation
Review of consistency in evaluating assessment reliability sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Standards interpretation
Review of records required to substantiate higher education mobility sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Standards interpretation
This article examines how quality evidence for resource allocation is defined, evidenced and reviewed, keeping exceptions and unresolved limitations visible.
Standards interpretation
The evidence for digital access is considered with the basis for a reliable conclusion and the limits beyond which it must not extend.
Standards interpretation
Requirements for large-scale open online provision are considered through evidence sufficiency, accountable decisions, corrective action and follow-up.
Standards interpretation
Requirements for independent review of learning-outcome transparency are considered through evidence sufficiency, accountable decisions, corrective action and follow-up.
Standards interpretation
Analysis of evidence boundaries in the evaluation of large-scale open online learning separates stated requirements, evidence of operation and continuing effectiveness.
Standards interpretation
Review of provider responsibility for open content sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Standards interpretation
This interpretation addresses mobility for better learning: applicability, materiality, decision records and corrective-action verification.
Standards interpretation
Requirements for independent review of open educational resources are considered through evidence sufficiency, accountable decisions, corrective action and follow-up.
