Informations officielles
Avis de l’ICEQC et analyses fondées sur des sources concernant les données probantes, les politiques et les instruments réglementaires en matière d’éducation.
12 résultats affichés sur 43
1061 articles publiés
Policy and regulatory analysis
Implementing policy commitments on education attainment and labour-market transitions — legal effect, institutional responsibility, learner safeguards and jurisdictional limits.
Data and research analysis
This evidence note considers education at a Glance 2025, identifying what may be concluded reliably and which limitations must remain visible.
Standards interpretation
This article examines how automated decision oversight is defined, evidenced and reviewed, keeping exceptions and unresolved limitations visible.
Data and research analysis
The GEM Report examines technology through access, equity, appropriateness, scalability and sustainability, not adoption alone.
Data and research analysis
The article examines benchmarking learner agency with appropriate caution, separating supported observations from causal claims and identifying where further evidence is required.
Data and research analysis
The article examines progress in accessible digital services, separating supported observations from causal claims and identifying where further evidence is required.
Data and research analysis
A disaggregated analysis of implementation of digital accessibility obligations — source definitions, population coverage, data limitations and permitted conclusions.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Accountability arrangements for digital accessibility obligations — responsible authority, implementation controls, affected parties and public accountability.
Quality improvement method
A controlled method for closing the evidence loop in accessible digital services is set out through cause analysis, assigned responsibility, outcome measures and closure evidence.
Policy and regulatory analysis
The article examines the European Accessibility Act now applies, distinguishing binding duties, policy commitments and the controls needed for accountable implementation.
Data and research analysis
This evidence note considers interpreting institutional variation in micro-credential quality, identifying what may be concluded reliably and which limitations must remain visible.
Quality improvement method
Work on internal review of implementation of AI literacy obligations is structured around a defined baseline, accountable action, outcome evidence and verification before closure.
