Informations officielles
Avis de l’ICEQC et analyses fondées sur des sources concernant les données probantes, les politiques et les instruments réglementaires en matière d’éducation.
12 résultats affichés sur 49
1061 articles publiés
Data and research analysis
The reliability of evidence on data governance in monitoring technology in education is examined together with the limits that apply when findings inform consequential decisions.
Standards interpretation
The evidence for risk and assurance controls for digital inclusion and access is considered with the basis for a reliable conclusion and the limits beyond which it must not extend.
Standards interpretation
Interpretation of evidence across delivery settings for teacher AI capability identifies scope, evidence, decision authority, material exceptions and continuing review.
Data and research analysis
Evidence relevant to PISA 2022 is assessed for currency, coverage and comparability, with material uncertainty stated alongside the finding.
Institutional analysis
WCAG 2.2 adds success criteria while retaining its conformance model; a valid claim still requires traceable scope and complete testing.
Quality improvement method
A corrective-action cycle for mathematics and reading performance — diagnosis, responsible ownership, effectiveness measures and closure evidence.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Learner-protection implications of education for peace and human rights — governance authority, material risks, institutional action and transparent follow-up.
Policy and regulatory analysis
The article examines education for peace and human rights, distinguishing binding duties, policy commitments and the controls needed for accountable implementation.
Policy and regulatory analysis
This policy note addresses education for peace and human rights, with legal authority, decision responsibility, learner protection and jurisdictional limits made explicit.
Quality improvement method
Testing whether improvements in governance of generative artificial intelligence are sustained — diagnosis, responsible ownership, effectiveness measures and closure evidence.
Standards interpretation
Review of consistency in the assessment of digital accessibility sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Standards interpretation
This article examines how digital accessibility following publication of WCAG 2.2 is defined, evidenced and reviewed, keeping exceptions and unresolved limitations visible.
