Informations officielles
Avis de l’ICEQC et analyses fondées sur des sources concernant les données probantes, les politiques et les instruments réglementaires en matière d’éducation.
12 résultats affichés sur 48
1061 articles publiés
Quality improvement method
Improvement work concerning large-scale open online learning requires baseline evidence, responsible action, measurable outcomes, independent verification and follow-up.
Data and research analysis
The reliability of evidence on provider responsibility for open content is examined together with the limits that apply when findings inform consequential decisions.
Quality improvement method
Testing whether improvements in online assessment authenticity are sustained — baseline, accountable action, outcome evidence, verification and sustained follow-up.
Policy and regulatory analysis
This article considers safeguards relevant to large-scale open online learning, including the allocation of authority, treatment of exceptions and safeguards for affected learners.
Standards interpretation
Requirements for competence requirements supporting open educational resources are considered through evidence sufficiency, accountable decisions, corrective action and follow-up.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Governance and public reporting in relation to online assessment authenticity — governance authority, material risks, institutional action and transparent follow-up.
Quality improvement method
The approach to provider responsibility for open content links diagnosis, accountable implementation and evidence of effect to verification that the result is sustained.
Policy and regulatory analysis
This article considers the Paris OER Declaration, including the allocation of authority, treatment of exceptions and safeguards for affected learners.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Applying proportionality to oversight of mobility for better learning — legal effect, institutional responsibility, learner safeguards and jurisdictional limits.
Quality improvement method
Improvement planning for mobility for better learning under constrained resources — defined outcomes, controlled implementation, residual risk and independent verification.
Policy and regulatory analysis
The implications of mobility for better learning are examined through governance, implementation and public accountability, without treating commitment as proof of effect.
Standards interpretation
Analysis of transparency requirements associated with learning-outcome transparency separates stated requirements, evidence of operation and continuing effectiveness.
