Informations officielles
Avis de l’ICEQC et analyses fondées sur des sources concernant les données probantes, les politiques et les instruments réglementaires en matière d’éducation.
12 résultats affichés sur 49
1061 articles publiés
Data and research analysis
The analysis of data quality in reporting implementation of global identifies what the evidence establishes, where comparison is limited and which qualifications must be reported.
Policy and regulatory analysis
The article examines academic integrity, distinguishing binding duties, policy commitments and the controls needed for accountable implementation.
Standards interpretation
This article examines how institutional arrangements for AI-supported assessment is defined, evidenced and reviewed, keeping exceptions and unresolved limitations visible.
Standards interpretation
This article examines how record integrity in relation to learner data privacy is defined, evidenced and reviewed, keeping exceptions and unresolved limitations visible.
Quality improvement method
The article treats risk-based improvement planning for AI-supported assessment as a controlled process requiring clear ownership, outcome evidence and review of residual risk.
Quality improvement method
Work on global qualification recognition in force is structured around a defined baseline, accountable action, outcome evidence and verification before closure.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Regulatory coordination in relation to academic integrity — governance authority, material risks, institutional action and transparent follow-up.
Standards interpretation
The evidence for learner data privacy is considered with the basis for a reliable conclusion and the limits beyond which it must not extend.
Standards interpretation
Review of record integrity within academic integrity investigations sets out the evidence, authority and controls needed to reach and maintain a defensible conclusion.
Quality improvement method
A controlled method for learner data privacy is set out through cause analysis, assigned responsibility, outcome measures and closure evidence.
Quality improvement method
Review of AI-supported assessment distinguishes completed activity from verified improvement and keeps unresolved action open to further examination.
Policy and regulatory analysis
Regulatory coordination in relation to global qualification recognition in force — governance authority, material risks, institutional action and transparent follow-up.
